DA To Review Investigation Of Clairton Police Shooting

The Allegheny County District Attorney says he will investigate whether mistakes were made in the investigation into the shooting of a Clairton police officer.

[Hard to believe]

The claim of the jury is police did not provide adequate evidence.

[Hey]

We're mistakes made?

[Yeah]

I'd feel the same way in the same position as the officer. I hope they investigate again and locate the shooter. God bless you and yours James Kuzak!

[Hey]

Officer Kuzak is a outstanding officer, he deserves all the support. He placed his life on the line for others.

Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends.
John 15:13

[Hotshot]

Hard to believe wrote:

The claim of the jury is police did not provide adequate evidence.

If you read the article, the first thing you should notice, is that there is not the normal typical reporting or description of what actually happen and how and why the officer was shot. This clearly shows that the PD has something to hide. They don't explain if he was in uniform or not, or if he properly identified who he was. It is strange that they have a taped confession and the case was dismissed, unless the person taped was never given his miranda warning or some other gross violation of the shooter's constitutional rights were violated. It is also equally strange that nothing testamony wise, was repoprted in the media, which shows that they are trying very hard to hide something. Normally the issues, like what was claimed and stated during the case on both sides are reported in the paper and media, but they only report what the jury found without explanation why. Something is being hid.

[Stunned]

Hotshot,
I think your brain is the only thing that is being "hid"

[R U KIDDING]

Hotshot wrote:

<quoted text>
If you read the article, the first thing you should notice, is that there is not the normal typical reporting or description of what actually happen and how and why the officer was shot. This clearly shows that the PD has something to hide. They don't explain if he was in uniform or not, or if he properly identified who he was. It is strange that they have a taped confession and the case was dismissed, unless the person taped was never given his miranda warning or some other gross violation of the shooter's constitutional rights were violated. It is also equally strange that nothing testamony wise, was repoprted in the media, which shows that they are trying very hard to hide something. Normally the issues, like what was claimed and stated during the case on both sides are reported in the paper and media, but they only report what the jury found without explanation why. Something is being hid.

Screw the miranda rights BS !! He confessed PERIOD !!