Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#653 Sep 26, 2013
Stray- Dog wrote:
<quoted text>
Ole Nuggy is pilled up again. Call the white suit guys.
I think he escaped for awhile from them and is not taking his medications...They will catch up on him soon though...lol

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#654 Sep 27, 2013
Yawn,

The fact of the matter remains that you guys are supporting policies which will lead to the ruination of the world.

For Stray, it's pure ignorance and apathy.
For Green, it's religious doctrine - Jesus WANTS the world to end.

Honestly, you guys talk about mental issues, but religion and conservativism are CLEAR indicators of a sociopathic mind.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#655 Sep 27, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
Yawn,
The fact of the matter remains that you guys are supporting policies which will lead to the ruination of the world.
For Stray, it's pure ignorance and apathy.
For Green, it's religious doctrine - Jesus WANTS the world to end.
Honestly, you guys talk about mental issues, but religion and conservativism are CLEAR indicators of a sociopathic mind.
You escaped again,I see...lol...The men in the white coats are close behind...Look out!!

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#656 Sep 27, 2013
POLYSTRATE TREES DEFY MILLIONS OF YEARS

Evolutionists rely on the idea that the Earth is many millions of years old. They need millions of years in order to support the idea of life evolving. Even though evolution is impossible, they still need this large time span.

The photo is one of many trees that run through several layers of rock that is supposed to take millions of years to form. How does a tree not rot away while waiting to be buried in the millions of years it took to do this? It could be explained away if only a few were found but these Polystrate Tree Fossils are found all over the world. There are also animal fossils that just through several layers of rock strata. Millions of years has been debunked.

https://www.facebook.com/1mill.creationist...

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#657 Sep 27, 2013
Green Hornet 007 wrote:
POLYSTRATE TREES DEFY MILLIONS OF YEARS
Always found in flood plains and river delts. NEVER found anywhere else.

If the Flood were real, we'd find these EVERYWHERE all the time.

Instead, we only find them in places where the rate of deposit for sediment is extremely high.

A tree grows slowly. Heavy rains happen seasonally, the base of the tree ends up being several feet below the top layer of mud.

Nothing surprising other than the fact that you bought this load of crap

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#658 Sep 27, 2013
IN 2011, THE REMAINS OF 80 WHALES WERE FOUND IN THE CHILEAN DESERT....

How would whales have become stranded in the middle of a desert? Researchers were quick to explain that it must have happened over a long period of time. However, a more logical explanation is that these whales swam together and were stranded as the waters subsided after Noah's flood. They are found in sedimentary sandstone in the same layers and some of the whales even overlap. Meaning this did not happen over a long stretch of time. They were buried rapidly and preserved, as the skeletons are complete and fossilized.

https://www.facebook.com/1mill.creationist...

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#659 Sep 27, 2013
Green Hornet 007 wrote:
IN 2011, THE REMAINS OF 80 WHALES WERE FOUND IN THE CHILEAN DESERT....
How would whales have become stranded in the middle of a desert?
You've posted this before, and I've answered it before.

I'm going to summarily answer _ALL_ of your posts.

You keep posting this stuff claiming that this is evidence for the Flood. However, if there were a Flood and this were evidence for it, this wouldn't be an unusual story. We'd find whale bones _EVERYWHERE__ALL THE TIME_.

The fact that this area is now a desert would be MEANINGLESS because we'd be finding whale bones and EVERY COUNTRY, on EVERY MOUNTAIN.

In fact, we'd find ALL FOSSILS of ALL things mixed up and spread out EVERYWHERE.

However, we DON'T find that. We've NEVER found that.

So, where's the evidence? If the Flood happened, where are the T-Rex bones mixed with cow bones? Where is the Stegasaurs (that you claim was living with the Inca, but apparently not with any culture that lived BEFORE the Inca) that's mixed in with a human burial?

What's the goods?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#660 Sep 28, 2013
Designer Trunks: For something that supposedly arose by the blind chance of evolution, intelligent engineers are finding out how specifically complex the elephant's trunk is designed.

So, wanting to come up with a new design of robotic arm that would be safer to operate around people, engineers turned for inspiration to the elephant’s trunk. They were attracted by the fact that its trunk provides the elephant with “an appendage that is flexible, capable of transmitting large forces, precise, delicate and highly compliant.”

http://creation.com/designer-trunks

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#661 Sep 28, 2013
Green Hornet 007 wrote:
Designer Trunks: For something that supposedly arose by the blind chance of evolution
No one anywhere has ever claimed that evolution is based on blind chance and random results.

There's a reason that Darwin called it "Natural _SELECTION_"

You don't know enough about to topic to debate it.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#662 Sep 28, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
No one anywhere has ever claimed that evolution is based on blind chance and random results.
There's a reason that Darwin called it "Natural _SELECTION_"
You don't know enough about to topic to debate it.
We have no acceptable theory of evolution at the present time. There is none; and I cannot accept the theory that I teach to my students each year. Let me explain. I teach the synthetic theory known as the neo-Darwinian one, for one reason only; not because it’s good, we know it is bad, but because there isn’t any other. Whilst waiting to find something better you are taught something which is known to be inexact, which is a first approximation …

–Professor Jerome Lejeune, in a lecture given in Paris
on March 17, 1985, translated by Peter Wilders

What You Will Learn

Textbooks present evolution in two different ways—small, observable changes (natural selection, speciation, adaptation) and large, unobservable changes (molecules-to-man evolution). They show evidence for the former and then conclude that this proves that the latter took place as well.

As our understanding of genetics has improved, it has become increasingly clear that mutations + time + chance do not equal evolution. All observed mutations demonstrate a loss of genetic information from the genetic code, or they are neutral. Evolution claims that the process has no direction or goal. If you look at the complexity of the “first” organism, it must be accepted that a massive amount of information has been produced to explain the variety of life we see today. Mutations cannot generate new genetic information; so they cannot be used to explain how evolution has proceeded from a cell with less information than is present in modern cells.

Despite the claims of evolution, the appearance of new species, antibiotic resistance in bacteria, pesticide resistance, and sickle-cell anemia are not evidence in favor of evolution. They do, however, demonstrate the principle of natural selection acting on existing traits—a concept that creationists and evolutionists agree on. The creationist model of how life spread across the globe after the Flood of Genesis uses many of the same principles of natural selection and adaptive radiation that are used in the evolution model. One of the main differences is that the biblical creation model recognizes that one kind cannot change into another and that the changes are a result of variation within the created kinds—not descent from a single common ancestor. As a result of the Curse, genetic mutations, representing a loss of information, have been accumulating, but these do not cause new kinds to emerge..

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/n...

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#663 Sep 28, 2013
Perhaps the most frequently repeated mistake that evolutionists make in their attacks on creation is to assert that ‘natural selection’ and ‘speciation’ prove evolution and disprove the biblical account of origins. Their bait-and-switch arguments imply that creationists believe in ‘fixity of species.’ The glossary for the PBS Evolution series Online Course for Teachers: Teaching Evolution explicitly makes this empty allegation:

In creationism, species are described as ‘fixed’ in the sense that they are believed not to change their form, or appearance, through time.

But no reputable creationist denies speciation—in fact, it is an important part of creationist biology. In the previous chapter, I showed that the real issue is whether evolution can explain the increase of genetic information content—enough changes to turn microbes into men, not simple change through time. Before laying to rest the evolutionists’ pointless arguments on this issue, it might be helpful to review the creationist model in detail.
Biblical ‘kinds’ are not modern species

Creationists, starting from the Bible, believe that God created different kinds of organisms, which reproduced ‘after their kinds’(Gen. 1:11, 12, 21, 24, 25). Thus the biblical kinds would have originally been distinct biological species, i.e., a population of organisms that can interbreed to produce fertile offspring but that cannot so breed with a different biological species.

But creationists point out that the biblical ‘kind’ is larger than one of today’s ‘species.’ Each of the original kinds was created with a vast amount of information. God made sure that the original creatures had enough variety in their genetic information so that their descendants could adapt to a wide variety of environments.

Based on the biblical criterion for kinds, creationists have made several deductions about the modern descendants of the original creations. They deduce, for example, that as long as two modern creatures can hybridize with true fertilization, the two creatures are descended from the same kind.3 Also, if two creatures can hybridize with the same third creature, they are all members of the same kind.4 The hybridization criterion is a valid operational definition, which could in principle enable researchers to list all the kinds. The implication is one-way—hybridization is evidence that two creatures are the same kind, but it does not necessarily follow that if hybridization cannot occur then they are not members of the same kind (failure to hybridize could be due to degenerative mutations). After all, there are couples who can’t have children, and we don’t classify them as a different species, let alone a different kind.

The boundaries of the ‘kind’ do not always correspond to any given man-made classification such as ‘species,’ genus, family, etc. But this is not the fault of the biblical term ‘kind’; it is actually due to inconsistencies in the man-made classification system. That is, several organisms classified as different ‘species,’ and even different genera or higher groupings, can produce fertile offspring. This means that they are really the same species that has several varieties, hence a polytypic (many type) species. A good example is Kekaimalu the wholphin, a fertile hybrid between a male false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) and a female bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), i.e., between two different so-called genera.5 There are more examples in reference 3.

http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-2-chap...

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#664 Sep 29, 2013
Green Hornet 007 wrote:
<quoted text>
We have no acceptable theory of evolution at the present time.
Utterly false.

–Professor Jerome Lejeune, in a lecture given in Paris
on March 17, 1985,
A lecture from 30 years ago? LOL.
That's like saying: "There's no such thing as online shopping".- Bill Gates Feb 3, 1972

Green, you can't win this debate for this simple reason: You're wrong.

This isn't a subjective issue like "should taxes be higher or lower". This is about facts.

Evolution is a fact. It is the best understood, most thoroughly researched, piece of science in the history of the world.

We know more about evolution than we know about gravity.

You can't overturn the entire scientific community just because you want Jews to have magic powers.

Doesn't work that way.

If Jews had magic powers, they wouldn't be getting their ass kicked all the damn time.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#665 Sep 29, 2013
Green Hornet 007 wrote:
Perhaps the most frequently repeated mistake that evolutionists make in their attacks on creation is to assert that ‘natural selection’ and ‘speciation’ prove evolution and disprove the biblical account of origins.
We don't need to "disprove" the Bible.

The Bible is false on it's face. Science can just ignore it the way it ignores Harry Potter.

It is YOUR responsibility to find OVERWHELMING evidence that everything science has ever produced (computers, cars, plastic, electricity, etc.) has been entirely fake and that Jews can fly and shoot laser beams from their hands.

Until you come up with evidence, you're just telling bedtime stories.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#666 Sep 29, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Utterly false.
<quoted text>
A lecture from 30 years ago? LOL.
That's like saying: "There's no such thing as online shopping".- Bill Gates Feb 3, 1972
Green, you can't win this debate for this simple reason: You're wrong.
This isn't a subjective issue like "should taxes be higher or lower". This is about facts.
Evolution is a fact. It is the best understood, most thoroughly researched, piece of science in the history of the world.
We know more about evolution than we know about gravity.
You can't overturn the entire scientific community just because you want Jews to have magic powers.
Doesn't work that way.
If Jews had magic powers, they wouldn't be getting their ass kicked all the damn time.
Evolution is not a fact..Evolution is technically not even a theory.It is a hypothesis.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#668 Sep 29, 2013
If you want to build a house, you erect all the materials on a very solid foundation. If you do not do so, the ground beneath may eventually sink different amounts in different places, and the house will crack and may eventually collapse. All of our continents have been placed on a very solid foundation: granite. There is no rock more solid and enduring than granite.

Granite, when melted by men, never hardens again into granite, but only into rhyolite! It is impossible for anyone, using any kind of technique, to make granite out of melted-down granite! This is because granite was originally made in solid form (Dr. Robert Gentry has shown that the crust of the Earth was created anywhere from seconds to minutes-instantaneous creation). It cannot be produced from melted materials, and all attempts to do so fail.

Granite also never contains fossils. This is very important, for it could not be one of the original rocks of the earth if it contained fossils.Even evolutionary geologists are puzzled over the fact that granite and certain other rocks cannot be formed today.

https://www.facebook.com/1mill.creationist...

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#669 Sep 29, 2013
Green Hornet 007 wrote:
<quoted text>
Evolution is not a fact..Evolution is technically not even a theory.It is a hypothesis.
You clearly don't understand any of the words you are using.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#670 Sep 29, 2013
Green Hornet 007 wrote:
If you want to build a house, you erect all the materials on a very solid foundation. If you do not do so, the ground beneath may eventually sink different amounts in different places, and the house will crack and may eventually collapse. All of our continents have been placed on a very solid foundation: granite. There is no rock more solid and enduring than granite.
And that's why we never have earthquakes or volcanoes.

Oh, wait. Reality trumps Jew fantasy yet again

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#671 Sep 29, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
You clearly don't understand any of the words you are using.
I guess the man I quoted in post #667 does not either..

Dr. Menton received his Ph.D. in Biology from Brown University. He has been involved in biomedical research and education for over 30 years.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#672 Sep 29, 2013
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
And that's why we never have earthquakes or volcanoes.
Oh, wait. Reality trumps Jew fantasy yet again
Apples and oranges.You are getting desperate.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#673 Sep 29, 2013
Dr Russell Humphreys Refutes Critics of his Work on Helium in Zircons: My part of the RATE initiative, in collaboration with fellow RATE researchers Steve Austin, John Baumgardner, and Andrew Snelling, was to explain the remarkable retention of helium observed in radioactive crystals in granitic rocks. I showed that the retention is evidence that the usual radioactivity-based billion-year ages for such rocks are grossly wrong, and that the rocks are only 6000 (± 2000) years old. Even before I finished the project, critics began sniping at it. The critics are usually atheists or professing Christians with various old-earth views. They are very disturbed about the project’s strong support of the young biblical age of the earth...

http://creation.com/helium-evidence-for-a-you...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jamestown Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in... (Oct '10) 28 min miss tuffet 149,809
TN Should state mandate immunizations? New require... (May '11) 1 hr Black Ops 9,446
NRA's New TV Ad 1 hr dollop 1
Bernie Sanders for 2016? 1 hr Mechanic_45 7
Orange Milkweed 4 hr Fishscribe 1
A fishing class at YAI ? 7 hr Betch ya 16
New Building by Sonic 12 hr Carol 13
•••
•••

Jamestown Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Jamestown People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Jamestown News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Jamestown
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••