Another yet another and another of KO...

Another yet another and another of KOWs Bantu pals ...

Posted in the Jacksonville Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#1 Oct 24, 2013
http://www.news4jax.com/news/Sources-Student-...

He be lubbin' dem bloody-handed Bantus, but hatin' on the snarky Zionists.
Toaster

Saint Augustine, FL

#2 Oct 24, 2013
noshellswill wrote:
http://www.news4jax.com/news/S ources-Student-used-cutter-to- kill-teacher/-/475880/22607706 /-/xcx114/-/index.html
He be lubbin' dem bloody-handed Bantus, but hatin' on the snarky Zionists.
If it had been a white kid doing this crime on a black teacher,it would be riot time in Mass. I think it's time for a return to their homeland. Most will never fit in to White society,not just in the US,but in Europe as well. I wonder why you don't see many blacks in Russia. Could it be that Putin would not take their BS.
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#3 Oct 24, 2013
Toaster wrote:
<quoted text>
If it had been a white kid doing this crime on a black teacher,it would be riot time in Mass. I think it's time for a return to their homeland. Most will never fit in to White society,not just in the US,but in Europe as well. I wonder why you don't see many blacks in Russia. Could it be that Putin would not take their BS.
I wonder if sex or drugs had anything to do with the killing..

As far as not seeing many blacks in Russia.. Unlike Russia, the foundations of the US was built by the blood and sweat of black slave labor... They were imported by the masses and considered more valuable the any other asset that the US had..

The fact is the black man made it possible for the US to exist and grow.. So let me enlighten you on something.. This it not the white mans country alone, because he didn't build it on his own..
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#4 Oct 24, 2013
Early white North American colonists (1600-1750) French & English functioned quite well without Bantu slaves and **with** RedMan gifting. But, white Christian woman needed their maids ... feckin-A I heard that line in La ten-years ago.

You're right about perceived slave-value, but wrong about the consequences ... slaves build nothing without
white design & **slave-driving** labor !! They dug feckin-A mud! And whites could have built it all ... as they did in Canada. USA Bantu slaves caused an industrial regression both north & south, the same way narco.MEX wetttbakks regress current farm industrialization. Repeat that truth KOW ... effects of Bantu stupidity rub off on all around them!

USA without any slaves at any time would-have-been a more advanced technical culture and industry. Smarter too, but you know that! Kinda like 20-th Century USA architecture would have been more advanced without the building of Bantu vote-herding-hi-rise quarters in large northern cities.

Got to **store** the Bantu someplace between elections.

Ain't it a bytch. Period.
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>

<clip>

The fact is the black man made it possible for the US to exist and grow.. So let me enlighten you on something.. This it not the white mans country alone, because he didn't build it on his own..
Toaster

Saint Augustine, FL

#5 Oct 24, 2013
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder if sex or drugs had anything to do with the killing..
As far as not seeing many blacks in Russia.. Unlike Russia, the foundations of the US was built by the blood and sweat of black slave labor... They were imported by the masses and considered more valuable the any other asset that the US had..
The fact is the black man made it possible for the US to exist and grow.. So let me enlighten you on something.. This it not the white mans country alone, because he didn't build it on his own..
Sacrifices made by Blacks from the 1600 to mid 1900's are not comprehend able in today's world, but it seems all those sweat and toils were wasted on today's thug culture in the Black community.
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#6 Oct 25, 2013
noshellswill wrote:
Early white North American colonists (1600-1750) French & English functioned quite well without Bantu slaves and **with** RedMan gifting.<quoted text>
Not true..

The British would have won the war if there were no blacks in the USA..

In other words.. If it wasn't for the black man, there would be no USA...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#7 Oct 25, 2013
Toaster wrote:
<quoted text>
Sacrifices made by Blacks from the 1600 to mid 1900's are not comprehend able in today's world, but it seems all those sweat and toils were wasted on today's thug culture in the Black community.
Are you saying there are no thug culture in the white community? If so, you are as clueless as they come..

If it wasn't for the black sacrifices from the 1600 to mid 1900's.. There would be no USA in todays world, and there would be no Israel either ..
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#8 Oct 25, 2013
noshellswill wrote:
USA without any slaves at any time would-have-been a more advanced technical culture and industry. Smarter too, but you know that!
<quoted text>
Thats not true.. Lets take the cotton gin for example...
----------
" Eli Whitney's long-standing claim as sole inventor of the cotton gin has come under fire. Some historians credit a woman who supported Whitney at the time of the invention, or the slave community in general. The gin is also said to be a common device of the period, and Whitney is portrayed as an opportunist who took advantage of the patent system to claim ownership. Eli Whitney just got the credit, it is suggested, because of his skill in manipulating the legal system to get a patent. "

http://invention.smithsonian.org/centerpieces...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#9 Oct 25, 2013
About 20/1 participation by Bantu armed fighters on the Brit side ... as Brits also promised the RedMan suppression of colonialist westward expansion. But Bantu fighters effected nothing-of-value for either side. May I repeat, the Bantu had **no** significant military effect on the American Rev War. Period.

A **No Bantu** faux-history true enough produces a different colonial America ... no issue. No Bantu = little cotton and sugarcane.

So excluding creole fishermen the **sea-islands** stay empty of whites big deal. Piedmont Scot-Irish mechanics and upland pasture rule the isolated malaria ridden lowlands. Major southron ports still are developed in Norfolk, Charleston & Savannah. Cotton never gets to be king. But the anti-tax anti-king Puritan/merchant-based Rev. War still happens and the colonists shoot early, shoot often and win. The French will always backstab the Brits, while Howe & Cornwallis will always lose!

Manufacture all you want fantasy-land Bantu contributions to American well-being. They were a drag to start and a millstone at present. All social cost babymomaville ... while zero input to the design/build/test meme. If all Bantu vanished tomorrow morning at 9:15AM nothing of value would be lost from the American culture.
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true..
The British would have won the war if there were no blacks in the USA..
In other words.. If it wasn't for the black man, there would be no USA...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#10 Oct 26, 2013
noshellswill wrote:
About 20/1 participation by Bantu armed fighters on the Brit side ...
<quoted text>
It wasn't just militarily, idiot.. Blacks also provided much needed labor to free up others to fight..

You can deny it all you want because it is topical of a raciest such as your self... But the fact is the USA would not be here and would not have advanced technically if it wasn't for the blood, sweat and ideas of the black man..

History proves me to be right, and you wrong.. Your long winded rants are baseless, and you know it..
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#11 Oct 26, 2013
Slave Bantus enabled nothing, except drunken South-Caroline kocksmen! Continue deluding yourself KOW ... you are just history ignorant. Northern farmers and mechanics had no-trouble shooting King Georges Brits & Hessians **in-the-back** despite minimal slave labor.

FROM WIKI:
"In 1780 Pennsylvania passed the first state Abolition Act in the United States. It followed Vermont's abolition of slavery in its constitution of 1777."

Small amt. of northern Bantu labor before that: Pa. & NY whites were too smart to dole-away their jobs and world-high (1760) labor pay-rates! Look it up! Get with the program KOW. Stuff a dirty rag in that bleeding-heart and study away your ignorance!

Bantus were, have been and continue to be a social, economic and cultural DRAG** on creative white America. Do you understand the value of woven cloth compared to a bale of raw cotton? Cheap Bantu sweat induced cracker landowers to grow the former and let Brits produce the latter high value item ... Carolina-de-dammmed for its ignorance and loss of value ... for that lost value buys expensive Pa. rifles & French brass 8-pounders if nothing else. Bantu should still be in Africa chipping stone spear-heads.

And Bantu Neolith behavior makes you say silly things only a teen girl would find amusing ...
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't just militarily, idiot.. Blacks also provided much needed labor to free up others to fight..
You can deny it all you want because it is topical of a raciest such as your self... But the fact is the USA would not be here and would not have advanced technically if it wasn't for the blood, sweat and ideas of the black man..
History proves me to be right, and you wrong.. Your long winded rants are baseless, and you know it..
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#12 Oct 26, 2013
noshellswill wrote:
Slave Bantus enabled nothing, except drunken South-Caroline kocksmen! Continue deluding yourself KOW ... you are just history ignorant. Northern farmers and mechanics had no-trouble shooting King Georges Brits & Hessians **in-the-back** despite minimal slave labor.
FROM WIKI:
"In 1780 Pennsylvania passed the first state Abolition Act in the United States. It followed Vermont's abolition of slavery in its constitution of 1777."

<quoted text>
If you are going to use cut and paste, you should always leave a link..

There was over 100 years of slave labor before the abolition of slavery, and the war..

That pretty much kills your argument..
----------

"When the Dutch and Swedish established colonies in the Delaware Valley, they quickly imported African slaves for workers, or transported them from New Netherland; slavery was documented as early as 1639"

http://www.ask.com/wiki/History_of_slavery_in...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#13 Oct 26, 2013
Yawn ... 1630s eh? You forgot to reference RedMen Injuns who took & kept slaves .. especially the good-looking Iroquis and Mohawk babes. Did 'em lots of good eh .... You give a weak-sister argument. Go back far enough and everyone was-a-slave/had-a-slave. So what!

Just this! Bantu slaves didn't have the skills or culture to generate ansatz in a culture busy creating THE industrial revolution. No written language no maths and barter-level finance. Truly Bantu retarded the South! Repeat that KOW:**Bantus retard ay culture they touch!** In a word primitive all-the-way down... not like Greek slaves in Rome or Italian slaves in Syria!

Bantu slaves just held back industrial progress in America .. surely in the southron states. Too stupid and too lax --- you can't create guild or industry with median IQ=80 and a hunter-gatherer jungle mindset. Haven't improved one bit since fool Abe Lincoln let them run free, destroying their own best men while parasiting on the larger white culture.!! Choke on the facts KOW, then read a few books. Get back to me ...
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are going to use cut and paste, you should always leave a link..
There was over 100 years of slave labor before the abolition of slavery, and the war..
That pretty much kills your argument..
----------
"When the Dutch and Swedish established colonies in the Delaware Valley, they quickly imported African slaves for workers, or transported them from New Netherland; slavery was documented as early as 1639"
http://www.ask.com/wiki/History_of_slavery_in...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#14 Oct 27, 2013
noshellswill wrote:
Yawn ... 1630s eh? You forgot to reference RedMen Injuns who took & kept slaves ..
<quoted text>
Not even worth bringing up because it was just a drop in the bucket compared the the white mans use of "black slavery"... The indians would make slaves out of anyone they captured in war.. Slavery was not a racial selective process when it came to the indians.. indians liked white kids too.. Have you ever seen the movie "dance with the wolves"?

You sure are a desperate raciest, school teacher.. Which is why every time that you stand up, I will kick you back down with your own ignorance..
----------
"Many Native American tribes practiced some form of slavery before the European introduction of African slavery into North America; but none exploited slave labor on a large scale.[2]

Native American groups often enslaved war captives whom they primarily used for small-scale labor"

http://www.ask.com/wiki/Slavery_among_Native_...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#15 Oct 27, 2013
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#16 Oct 27, 2013
Again palsy you **fib by omission**. From your likely source article: you forgot to include this bit KOW:

WIKI:
"Among some Pacific Northwest tribes, as many as one-fourth of the population were slaves."

Wonder what those values were among violent warlike Azteks and Incas? You figure 30%?? Anyrate were NA slaves forced into "heavy labor"? View that question from a hunter-gatherer perspective ... in which cultures there was precious-little heavy industrial activity, but lots of root-picking and animal entrapment. Heavy labor? You tell me. Still- those slaves didn't help the RedMan much ...

Now perhaps you are just admitting that whites are nasty b*stards & good organizers. True enough -- nobody butchers like a white-man (see WW1/WW2 etcetc for examples). Took a white-man or MuJad to plan, organize & get any worthwhile activity out of the Neolith Bantu. What do you expect from a stone-age peoples? Still true.

Admit it KOW. Bantu contribution to American well-being was a "drop in the bucket". No Bantu = all's well. Their sweat-work advanced no culture, won no war and preceded no advance. It bought a few trinkets for tideland southron bytches, made Brit weavers wealthy and empoverished piedmont Scots/Irish, and primed 650,000 stupid American whites to kill eachother thanks to Nazi-Abe-Lincolns war.

Nice feckin-A Bantu outcome. Your pals KOW ...
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
Not even worth bringing up because it was just a drop in the bucket compared the the white mans use of "black slavery"... The indians would make slaves out of anyone they captured in war.. Slavery was not a racial selective process when it came to the indians.. indians liked white kids too.. Have you ever seen the movie "dance with the wolves"?
You sure are a desperate raciest, school teacher.. Which is why every time that you stand up, I will kick you back down with your own ignorance..
----------
"Many Native American tribes practiced some form of slavery before the European introduction of African slavery into North America; but none exploited slave labor on a large scale.[2]
Native American groups often enslaved war captives whom they primarily used for small-scale labor"
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Slavery_among_Native_...
noshellswillmoro n

Jacksonville Beach, FL

#17 Oct 27, 2013
Noshells and toaster love bantu phallus. KOW loves zionist phallus.
Toaster

Saint Augustine, FL

#18 Oct 27, 2013
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying there are no thug culture in the white community? If so, you are as clueless as they come..
If it wasn't for the black sacrifices from the 1600 to mid 1900's.. There would be no USA in todays world, and there would be no Israel either ..
No comparison on the % of crimes committed by whites vs blacks.
In Jacksonville 14% of our population is black males. That 14% commits over 70% of the homicides. The article on Black crime was in the FL Times Union a few weeks ago. You can check it out. I think we have paid more than enough for black sacrifices of the past. Currently they contribute very little,except for illegitimate kids and crime.
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#19 Oct 27, 2013
noshellswill wrote:
"Among some Pacific Northwest tribes, as many as one-fourth of the population were slaves."
Wonder what those values were among violent warlike Azteks and Incas? You figure 30%?? Anyrate were NA slaves forced into "heavy labor"? View that question from a hunter-gatherer perspective ... in which cultures there was precious-little heavy industrial activity, but lots of root-picking and animal entrapment. Heavy labor? You tell me. Still- those slaves didn't help the RedMan much ...
Now perhaps you are just admitting that whites are nasty b*stards & good organizers. True enough -- nobody butchers like a white-man (see WW1/WW2 etcetc for examples). Took a white-man or MuJad to plan, organize & get any worthwhile activity out of the Neolith Bantu. What do you expect from a stone-age peoples? Still true.
Admit it KOW. Bantu contribution to American well-being was a "drop in the bucket". No Bantu = all's well. Their sweat-work advanced no culture, won no war and preceded no advance. It bought a few trinkets for tideland southron bytches, made Brit weavers wealthy and empoverished piedmont Scots/Irish, and primed 650,000 stupid American whites to kill eachother thanks to Nazi-Abe-Lincolns war.
Nice feckin-A Bantu outcome. Your pals KOW ...
<quoted text>
You keep forgetting that not all the slaves were black with the indians, and the blacks slaves were sold or traded to the white man..Thats why the indians valued them..

And you mention ww2.. Well guess what.. Blacks were forbidden to fight.. They only cooked and did laundry.. But there was an all black crew on the USS Mason that saved a fleet of ships .. The Manson had white officers but the black crew did all the work and no doubt offered suggestions and Ideas to the officers to get the job done..

Face the facts, school teacher.. If if wasn't for the black man, you would be speaking with a British or German tongue..

If nobody butchers like a whiteman, then why did you start this thread?

Keep trying..

http://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/19/us/black-cr...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#20 Oct 27, 2013
Toaster wrote:
<quoted text>
No comparison on the % of crimes committed by whites vs blacks.
In Jacksonville 14% of our population is black males. That 14% commits over 70% of the homicides. The article on Black crime was in the FL Times Union a few weeks ago. You can check it out. I think we have paid more than enough for black sacrifices of the past. Currently they contribute very little,except for illegitimate kids and crime.
You have no idea on what you are talking about, otherwise you would have posted a link to back it up .. And how does the TU know how many blacks and whites live in Jacksonville when folks are moving in and out on a daily basses?

Show me your facts, or shut the f$$kup...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jacksonville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Donna Maso-Furedi - 18 years of Hell, and Abuse 2 hr Tom Malcry 4
News On Your Side - Ken Amaro Answers Your Mail (Mar '08) 4 hr Don Bergeron 122
Semi trucks on MLK 14 hr HCL31569 1
do you have a forbidden sex story? (Aug '14) Tue Manfromoz13 36
Jacob Currin ANTIFA Jacksonville Leader Sep 17 Boaster 1
Jacob Currin AITIFA Leader Sep 17 Stop Antifa 2
News Local News - People say They Know a Different J... (Aug '07) Sep 16 Chad 19

Jacksonville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jacksonville Mortgages