cockfighting

somepeople around here think that cock fighting is legal in kentucky lol, well guess wat, look it up its illegal to be a spectator at these fights its illegal to take a bird and fight it and these are fellony charges in 39 of the 50 states and misdemeanors in the rest, look it up if u dnt believe me, the only reason noone does anything is because of no man power folks, so congrats brain children, lol. in case some of you dont understand, no man power means not enough cops, wish there was.

I don't like it either. I think it is cruel and senseless. I think people could find better things to do and bet on for a past time.

Like betting on what you Christians will have a problem with next? I like that idea, because the answer is everything.
I can't lose....

No matter if you're a christian or not, it's wrong to treat animals that way for profit. By the way, it is illegal to cockfight. People that do these things would use their own children in child fighting as long as there was a profit to be made from it.

lol wrote:

somepeople around here think that cock fighting is legal in kentucky lol, well guess wat, look it up its illegal to be a spectator at these fights its illegal to take a bird and fight it and these are fellony charges in 39 of the 50 states and misdemeanors in the rest, look it up if u dnt believe me, the only reason noone does anything is because of no man power folks, so congrats brain children, lol. in case some of you dont understand, no man power means not enough cops, wish there was.

mr big likes em big like....likes cockfighting......

lol at your life wrote:

Like betting on what you Christians will have a problem with next? I like that idea, because the answer is everything.
I can't lose....

Idk how you get that this is a religious issue. Cockfighting is nasty and stupid. Bunch of grown men playing with a rooster's butt....anyway u look at that, it has homosexual undertones. There's nothing entertaining about watching animals be tortured.

ManKind wrote:

No matter if you're a christian or not, it's wrong to treat animals that way for profit. By the way, it is illegal to cockfight. People that do these things would use their own children in child fighting as long as there was a profit to be made from it.

Thomas Jefferson and Abe Lincoln disagree.

yeahhh wrote:

<quoted text>Idk how you get that this is a religious issue. Cockfighting is nasty and stupid. Bunch of grown men playing with a rooster's butt....anyway u look at that, it has homosexual undertones. There's nothing entertaining about watching animals be tortured.

Breathitt being dry has nothing to do with religion either....

yeahhh wrote:

<quoted text>Idk how you get that this is a religious issue. Cockfighting is nasty and stupid. Bunch of grown men playing with a rooster's butt....anyway u look at that, it has homosexual undertones. There's nothing entertaining about watching animals be tortured.

What if the handler is female?
Do you still have a problem, homophobe?

lol at your life wrote:

<quoted text>
What if the handler is female?
Do you still have a problem, homophobe?

Not a homophobe, captain beastuality. Good enough for She and George-last I checked this is 2011. And it wouldn't matter if it were a man or woman, its disgusting and illegal.

*Abe, sorry

lol at your life wrote:

Like betting on what you Christians will have a problem with next? I like that idea, because the answer is everything.
I can't lose....

look it up if u dont believe me.

lol at your life wrote:

<quoted text>
Thomas Jefferson and Abe Lincoln disagree.

is thomas jefferson around? lol. 200 years ago also lol. is that the best you got? they also had slaves back then lol. so..........

Hmmmmmm
That was retarded.
Wow

lol at your life wrote:

<quoted text>
Thomas Jefferson and Abe Lincoln disagree.

The last time I looked they had cotton stuffed up their asses, because they're dead as hell. If you're going to use people's names in your post, at least pick them that are still living.

ManKind wrote:

<quoted text>The last time I looked they had cotton stuffed up their asses, because they're dead as hell. If you're going to use people's names in your post, at least pick them that are still living.

Why, because you say so? Pffft

lol at your life wrote:

<quoted text>
Why, because you say so? Pffft

Of course I say so. If no one else is going to do it, I will. Besides, you shouldn't speak of the dead that way, because they can't defend themselves. and what does Pffft mean, can't you even spell? Gracious sakes alive, here you use those poor Old presidents in your posts and you can't even spell. What would they think of you? Shame on you!

Thus that which is the most awful of evils, death, is nothing to us, since when we exist there is no death, and when there is death we do not exist.

ManKind wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course I say so. If no one else is going to do it, I will. Besides, you shouldn't speak of the dead that way, because they can't defend themselves. and what does Pffft mean, can't you even spell? Gracious sakes alive, here you use those poor Old presidents in your posts and you can't even spell. What would they think of you? Shame on you!

you tell em

cockfighters need shot