Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 336827 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326701 Sep 26, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
Primitive superstitions are just so CUTE!
BTW--many cities do offer clean needle programs, because they cut down on disease transmission. These are secular programs, so they care about the person, not the sin. That must horrify you.
<quoted text>
So,you believe that we should offer kids in schools clean needles? After all,Heroin is a HUGE concern here(especially where I am from).

Of course I care about those who make bad choices. Drugs are destructive. They kill. They hurt families. They destroy our youth. There seems to be an underlying issue here concerning this epidemic more than just a typical kid being tempted to try "drugs,alcohol or cigarettes". These kids seem to be masking deep pain. It is MORE about saying "no". It takes,IMO,more digging into the core of these kids and their feelings of being not loved or lost.
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326702 Sep 26, 2014
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Restating your position isn't a REASON for your position. It's become clear that you cannot explain why you hold it.
I don't believe in killing others lives. God forbids deliberately killing another. God gives life,he takes life,not me or you. How hard is that to comprehend that you feel I must "explain" it into depth?

Are you slow or just being obtuse?
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326703 Sep 26, 2014
Pearl Jam wrote:
<quoted text>That's why she's a troll. She hasn't put a whole lot of thought into the issue. Her morals and values are molded by the Catholic Church. She hasn't a mind of her own.
Yes,my morals and values are INDEED molded by God. I have a mind of my own though. I have a free will to CHOOSE to follow my God,or not.

I have put much thought and study into it. I CHOOSE to follow my creator. It is the best decision in the world. I don't EVER regret it either :)
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326704 Sep 26, 2014
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
To know her is to love her?JM only dances on the line of "brainwashed". There's a small caring kernel wrapped up deep inside of her. Maybe.
Brainwashed? LOL by who? Ya know Aged/Junket, something happened to you growing up with people(your parents,family?) who held the RC religion behind them. I feel that you have taken your anger,frustrations and sadness out of God and his church because of it. Understandable and quite common actually. Perhaps you were brainwashed and now think that anyone else who knows our religion,is as well.

I am sorry to inform you that I did not grow up like you. I don't have hangups. I don't have deep resentments that stem from my past. I know people who had issues with their families(being hypocrites,half-assed Catholics/Jews/etc..)and now resent EVERYTHING related about them and whatever connection to them. Like I said,this seems to be quite common. I am truly sorry for whatever left you confused,resentful and left feeling,well....empty.

I truly mean this from the bottom of my heart and yet,I know you will throw it back in my face somehow. It is a HUGE core issue with those who have experienced similiar pain as you AND there connection to supporting abortion. Seems like if THEY(you) feel insignificant,then certainly a "fetus" who is only in their developing stages of their life,must be. Or better yet,HAVE to.

This will most likely go over most of your heads. Please slowly reread what I said. MANY who have come to terms with their abortions OR have changed away from their abortion stance of being Pro-choice,have agreed.
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326705 Sep 26, 2014
Kathwynn wrote:
No, if you are expecting skanky to suddenly be forthcoming. Have any kind of rational answer about her position.. Not going to happen..
Though speaking about her new pope.. So how is that working for you, skanky..Emphasizing feeding the poor, telling catholic business people to quit being greedy, and love one another. That includes people that you do not like, skanky.
Yep, you have a pope that really does understand socialism as well.
BUWHAHAHAHAHAHA The irony of that is just to much. Everything that you are not. The best part you have to listen to the man and do as he says.. LMFAO. The comedy of that alone is gold.
My position is VERY clear. I am against killing anothers life as choice. Don't understand why you people can't comprehend.

""'"" "How is that working for you(my new Pope)"""" """"" ""

It is working out great. He's great. He represents Christ as head of his church. He says what the Popes have always said. I am not sure why suddenly he became so popular with non-Catholics. I mean,this is GREAT news that so many like him. I do as well :)
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326706 Sep 26, 2014
Pearl Jam wrote:
<quoted text>When there are only two choices, birth or abortion, society doesn't get to decide that the only option for her is birth given the fact she has the ability to make her own decision. Your post makes no sense.
A woman doesn't have two choices Pearl. Why must you people be so dishonest? ONLY during a certain amount of time does she have a choice whether to kill her developing child or not. So,yeah,society DOES get to decide for her that after that limitation,she MUST give birth. She has NO decision.

As I have pointed out a thousand and one times, MOST of you who call yourselves "pro-choice" are actually anti-choice to kill. You and I are much more alike on this issue than you'd like to admit.
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326707 Sep 26, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
Nope; I consider my home and privacy to be inviolable. If you come in without permission, you're leaving immediately.
<quoted text>
That person may "leave immediately" but will still be alive.

Abortion is killing a womans developing child. Sex leads to pregnancy. As long as the woman has a uterus,and the man deposits his sperm,then it is invited. NOBODY injected a human into the womans uterus. She participated in the procreation of her child/offspring,as did the male who fathered the child.

You say the silliest things sometimes when you get desperate, Peter.
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326708 Sep 26, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
Give me a fu**ing fetus and a fu**ing blender and I'll show you the "full implications".
Pregnancy is an accidental or possible result of sex; it would be a direct result if every sex act created a pregnancy. No woman is obligated to gestate, and terminating a fetus is a part of, not the focus, of the abortion process.
<quoted text>
Oh Peter,you try so desperately to use your shock tactics. Nobody is impressed with them. Sorry.

But no,pregnancy is not "accidental". It is in fact,natural. Life process? It is no mistake buddy boy. Stop being so degrading and anti-woman when you accuse women of creating and carrying "mistakes".

A woman may not want to mother her child. That happens. She should give her child up for adoption. Killing anothers life that exists,is wrong. Inside the womb or outside the womb. Susan Smiths of the world or the women who hold their child hostage in the womb,are all alike. They kill their unwanted existing child.

Don't want a child,don't conceive one. Killing your child because YOU don't want them will never be justified. EVER.
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326709 Sep 26, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
Uhhh...it's pregnant women who are aborting because they don't think it's wonderful. Women are perfectly capable of not wanting pregnancy and not wanting kids.
<quoted text>
You are very ignorant. FYI,most young girls will abort because they feel alone,abandoned, confused about their future,the timing of this childs existence in their life, and scared. It is their CIRCUMSTANCES surrounding their pregnancy,not their feelings about their existing child growing in their womb. Educate yourself old timer.
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326710 Sep 26, 2014
Pearl Jam wrote:
<quoted text>Well you're just being ridiculous. I've been pregnant, had a healthy pregnancy too but I never thought it was wonderful, a blessing or a gift from God. Pro abort is not even a word. So tell these women that can't get pregnant to head down to the nearest abortion provider and offer to adopt. SMH
""""" """"" """"" ""I've been pregnant, had a healthy pregnancy too but I never thought it was wonderful, a blessing or a gift from God"""" """"" """"" """"" """"" """"" "

and HERE it is folks!!!!!!!!!!

A proabort who can't even see that her own WANTED child was a blessing,wonderful or a gift.

How sad for the generations of proabort women.

:(
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326711 Sep 26, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
Understand decency? There's nothing decent about women being denied abortion just because you have a Pollyanna fetish.
<quoted text>
Do you let your proabort friends(the majority I might add) know that they are not decent because they agree with the law that denies women elective abortions after their time frame? Do they have "Pollyanna fetishes" too? Or are you to cowardly to tell them so?
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326712 Sep 26, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
A "pro abort" would not have children who weren't wanted, so those children wouldn't be a burden. It's the women who have kids they don't want who consider them burdens.
<quoted text>
So ALL the women who kill their newborns or older children were prolife? Was Susan Smith prolife?

Think HARD about this Peter. They are prodeath...whether before or after birth. They simply CAN'T be prolife therefore.

Your post^^^is a lie.

pro-death.pro-abortion.killing .get it?????
Sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#326713 Sep 26, 2014
Kathwynn wrote:
<quoted text>
Sassyjm and I go a lonngg way back on this forum.. So my laughing in her face is something that is just her and I understanding that nothing between us has changed.. Sooner or later she will laugh in mine.. and on it goes.
As for abortion.. Against nature.. Really? what do you call a miscarriage.. An oppps by nature? And there is no such thing and unborn any thing.. Are you going to contend your are pre-dead..
I don't "laugh" at you Kathyboy. I feel sorry for you. I pray for you.

Oh wait,that is not true. I have laughed at your sentence structure. I mean,can one blame me? A grown man fubbing up every post? You can't even form a coherent sentence.

A miscarriage is natural. Elective abortions are not. It is deliberate killing of another human. Grandma dies at age 100 yrs old of natural causes. Intruder shoots her in the head during a robbery attempt. Not natural.

smh

FTR,being born is a process of life. So,yeah,one can be pre-born. It is the time before birth.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#326715 Sep 26, 2014
Sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>
Selfish people cause many to starve,not God. Stop blaming God for the actions or lack of actions of others. People needlessly suffer.
Euthansia is your answer to ending the worlds sufferings? You're a proabort. Why am I not surprised?
*sigh*
I never said God caused starvation, I said God could end it if he/she so chooses to. No euthanasia is not the answer, I answered a question and answered it honestly, and with what seemed logical to me. It would just as difficult for me to watch a child die of starvation as it would to end it's suffering. Are you saying it would be easy for you to watch a child die slowly? Don't put words in my mouth because I can do the same to you and make you appear to be just as despicable a human being as you think I am.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#326716 Sep 26, 2014
Sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes,my morals and values are INDEED molded by God. I have a mind of my own though. I have a free will to CHOOSE to follow my God,or not.
I have put much thought and study into it. I CHOOSE to follow my creator. It is the best decision in the world. I don't EVER regret it either :)
So you follow God and spew hatred and intolerance. How is what you do any different than denying someone food until they are starved? Let's see if you can grasp that logic.
Life is Love

Allentown, PA

#326717 Sep 26, 2014
Pearl Jam wrote:
<quoted text>Are you an Obi Wan or a Princess Leah? For something to be unnatural it has to be the opposite in nature. There is nothing in nature that says women should want to be mothers. If that were a fact, then natural abortifacients would be unnatural but yet the earth provides them.
What is natural is debatable, but that's it. Heterosexual sex is natural for me, whereas sex with another woman would be unnatural for me. But if sex with another man is natural to a man then sex with a woman for that man is unnatural. Reproduction is not the only purpose of sex and nature does not say it is because there are many species of animals that have same sex mating and bonding and sex for pleasure and not procreation.
Your words betray your ignorance and immaturity. It also revels a basic selfishness. One cannot decide something is in line with the energy of the earth because it suits their personal objectives. You speak of what you like, what I like, all irrelevant. The law of nature is what's at work. By taking actions designed to interfere with the earth energy you are in conflict with nature.

You insults and word games are no more illuminating than Peters. I can provide you with helpful information on living in the earths energy, if you are interested. Educating yourself to the reality of nature and your part of the energy orb would be calming to your senses.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326718 Sep 27, 2014
Great...now prove ANY of this crap.

I'm hardly confused; I know the FACTS and you're mired in your delusions. There is no such thing as "unnatural energy"...all energy comes from nature. And since energy cannot be created or destroyed, there is no "new energy" during a pregnancy. Nature is not sentient and cannot decide anything. Humans are not captive to the hims of "nature".

BTW--I'm an atheist because I've studied most of the planets religions, including animus/naturist/shamanistic ones. It's not giving up; it's realization that superstitious pablum is based on nothing but wish-fulfillment and fear.
Life is Love wrote:
<quoted text>
I am so sorry you have much difficulty the nature of life and the You are not alone many people are confused and resort to various religions or just give up and call themselves atheists.
You don't understand your condition because you believe it to be normal. This is why psychotics do not know they are psychotic. You are in unnatural energy and as such do not see the reality of your situation.
However, to the point at hand, abortion is unnatural as it is a new life force on the earth. Nature decides if the life force goes on or is re-absorbed. To destroy the new life is against the laws of nature and the energy of the earth. I can refer you to some references to broaden and expand your understanding of these things,if you are interested.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326719 Sep 27, 2014
Rehab is a nice idea, but worthless until/unless the person WANTS to quit using. All the therapy/intervention/detox in the world is meaningless if it's forced on them. So yes, definitelyu, if we can't get them off the drugs, we can at least help them avoid HIV, hepatitis, and other communicable illnesses.
Sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>
So,you believe that we should offer kids in schools clean needles? After all,Heroin is a HUGE concern here(especially where I am from).
Of course I care about those who make bad choices. Drugs are destructive. They kill. They hurt families. They destroy our youth. There seems to be an underlying issue here concerning this epidemic more than just a typical kid being tempted to try "drugs,alcohol or cigarettes". These kids seem to be masking deep pain. It is MORE about saying "no". It takes,IMO,more digging into the core of these kids and their feelings of being not loved or lost.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326720 Sep 27, 2014
If they pose a risk to my health or life, I have every right to terminate them.

Abortion is terminating the woman's pregnancy; the fetus is just a byproduct of that process. Pregnancy CAN result from sex, but it's hardly a certainty. And you have no clue what "invited" means whatsoever.

I'm not desperate at all; I'm not the one trying to interfere with other peoples' lives. That's your sick, PLM-zombie goal.

Shhh.... Do you hear that? It's the sound of a thousand Hoovers liberating a thousand women from unwanted pregnancies! And all your whining hasn't prevented ONE of them.
Sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>
That person may "leave immediately" but will still be alive.
Abortion is killing a womans developing child. Sex leads to pregnancy. As long as the woman has a uterus,and the man deposits his sperm,then it is invited. NOBODY injected a human into the womans uterus. She participated in the procreation of her child/offspring,as did the male who fathered the child.
You say the silliest things sometimes when you get desperate, Peter.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326721 Sep 27, 2014
Oh, sassy, who gives a royal fu** what impresses you? Still believing in the deadbeat jewish zombie and his psychotic daddy?

Things are either deliberate or accidental, regardless of how "natural" they are. Is skin cancer deliberate because you go out in the sunlight?

" women who hold their child hostage in the womb" would be women who DON'T abort, idiot.
Sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Peter,you try so desperately to use your shock tactics. Nobody is impressed with them. Sorry.
But no,pregnancy is not "accidental". It is in fact,natural. Life process? It is no mistake buddy boy. Stop being so degrading and anti-woman when you accuse women of creating and carrying "mistakes".
A woman may not want to mother her child. That happens. She should give her child up for adoption. Killing anothers life that exists,is wrong. Inside the womb or outside the womb. Susan Smiths of the world or the women who hold their child hostage in the womb,are all alike. They kill their unwanted existing child.
Don't want a child,don't conceive one. Killing your child because YOU don't want them will never be justified. EVER.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 4 min YANKEES 4 LIFE 344,031
BOLT-ON REVEALED as FALSE NEWS MAVEN ! 1 hr The Bronx CheerLe... 1
Fox is going down (Dec '09) 1 hr The Bronx CheerLe... 7,325
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 1 hr jimi-yank 47,193
OBAMA is the BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Nov '10) 1 hr Guinness Drunkard 20,369
jets talk back (Dec '07) 1 hr jimi-yank 16,004
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... (Nov '16) 1 hr Guinness Drunkard 7,243

Jackson-Heights Jobs

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages