Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 325986 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#305941 Jul 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if you don't use the word 'morals', you aren't teaching your daughter self respect when you say it is okay to sleep around. Why would you encourage your child to invest intimacies of heart, mind and body to someone who doesn't know her or care to?
And who here has told their child such, that "it's okay to sleep around"? Do YOU know, Witless? Or, are you assuming this?

It's quite a stretch to assume that from the many here who have taught their children comprehensive sex ed, which INCLUDES the fact that abstinence is the only way to guarantee no pregnancy and stds, AND how to protect oneself IF they do have sex anyway.

But, you and SS are arrogant asses anyway, so I shouldn't be surprised.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305942 Jul 27, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> All i hear from you people is that BC is acceptable if a young girl is having sex or might give in one time...yet...not one of you put your girls on BC or handed condoms to your young kids(as young as 14 yrs old when kids are experimenting).
Except for Playa whoproudly bought her 23 yr old sons playboy. After all she said..."guys are gonna f*ck girls".
They were 13.

And neither one ever got anybody pregnant.

Score 2 for mom.

:)

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305943 Jul 27, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text>Only the totally ignorant ones won't.
Guaranteed!
You people are frighteningly ignorant. Nothing worse than someone who chooses to remain clueless and in the dark.
Next......
Your posts are guaranteed to lower the IQ of anyone who believes a word out of your keyboard, honey....you got that part right.

Vehemently disagreeing with your harangues and pontifications, does not equate to 'ignorance'.

But your stance on 'just say nooooooooo' sex education, certainly does. You're counting on it.

Next....

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305944 Jul 27, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do posters who come here think you are a guy ???
Unless you've been backlighting me all this time ..or maybe I missed something. Lol
I have no idea why the poster who keeps referring to me as 'sir' is doing so...they likely think to provoke me into a response.

What's 'backlighting'?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305945 Jul 27, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> My late husband was neglected in many different ways.
Having spent his married life in proximity to the deep freeze of your nether regions, I'm rather certain he didn't mind, when you moved him to the shed out back.

Stop flagellating yourself over it...it's too late for you to make amends at this point.

Next....
Read

United States

#305946 Jul 27, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Fire coming from premature, miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies, to smite the eyes of their feckless and undoubtedly sex-crazed mothers, eh?
Peter was an avowed misogynist, who drank to excess. No wonder he had such fantasies.
You, I don't know - but you sound like Sassy, who would cheerfully criminalize abortion, and would then relish the agony of women who were driven to dirty kitchen tables in back alleys.
How very Christian.
Next...
You may be nearly as old as Peter but you did not know him.
She WOULD cheerfully criminalize abortion but only to insure that no human life is allowed to be legally electively terminated. She would not relish the agony of any woman. That is your fantasy.
Driven? No one is ever forced to have get an abortion whether they are legal or not. Remember, sir ?
You on the other hand I have no doubt would root enthusiastically for a woman who foolishly CHOOSES to obtain an illegal "back alley" abortion, to suffer. Just so you could point to the pro life and say " I told you so".
You are one sick old fool mister.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#305947 Jul 27, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
And who here has told their child such, that "it's okay to sleep around"? Do YOU know, Witless? Or, are you assuming this?
It's quite a stretch to assume that from the many here who have taught their children comprehensive sex ed, which INCLUDES the fact that abstinence is the only way to guarantee no pregnancy and stds, AND how to protect oneself IF they do have sex anyway.
But, you and SS are arrogant asses anyway, so I shouldn't be surprised.
There are plenty of people on here who have said that kids are going to have sex anyway which is why they have need for abortion and contraceptive services. Any mother who approves of giving contraception to children is at the very least, looking the other way while their daughters sleep around and at the most touting the feminist theology of women entitled to sexual freedom.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#305948 Jul 27, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>They were 13.
And neither one ever got anybody pregnant.
Score 2 for mom.
:)
How do you know?
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#305951 Jul 27, 2013
Katie Still Not Reading wrote:
<quoted text>
Heh, no I didn't miss anything. Unlike you I read.
You asked why it is that.someone trying to bring someone over to their way of thinking should not focus on someone already "dug in". I explained why and it applies to both sides.
READ.
I didn't ask anything. Therefore your explanation was unnecessary.

I quoted the author's attempt at educating others on the fine arts of manipulation. She wrote that article almost a full year prior to writing the other regarding "the abortion industry's attempts to manipulate."

When you consistently need every little thing explained to you, all you do is continue to show *your* inability to read.
sassy JM

Cresskill, NJ

#305952 Jul 27, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>They were 13.
And neither one ever got anybody pregnant.
Score 2 for mom.
:)
Rose?^^^^is this pervert a good mother too?

This woman is an abuser. Giving 13yr olds por. YUK!
Read

United States

#305953 Jul 27, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I have no idea why the poster who keeps referring to me as 'sir' is doing so...they likely think to provoke me into a response.
Oh I'm sure you know why. What goes around comes around, eh fella ?
But keep using that as an excuse not to respond to posts you aren't able to refute. That's even more pathetic.
Katie Still Not Reading

United States

#305954 Jul 27, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't ask anything. Therefore your explanation was unnecessary.
I quoted the author's attempt at educating others on the fine arts of manipulation. She wrote that article almost a full year prior to writing the other regarding "the abortion industry's attempts to manipulate."
When you consistently need every little thing explained to you, all you do is continue to show *your* inability to read.
You didn't ask anything ?

Post 305618:
"Heh. Why do you think that is?"

How can you possibly say anyone else needs everything explained to them, when you even need what YOU say YOURSELF explained to you ???

READ !

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305955 Jul 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know?
Wouldn't you know, if your kid was, or got someone, pregnant?

I'm a mom, I pay attention, and my kids have no problem talking to me.

I know.

:)

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#305956 Jul 27, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
She did no such thing, you lying piece of sh*t.
You can question the validity of what she posts without resorting to the name calling. Lose the anger. You are one 60,000+, 24/7 posting angry, scary wacko.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#305957 Jul 27, 2013
Read wrote:
<quoted text>
She WOULD cheerfully criminalize abortion
I know. So would you. Criminalizing abortion, removes all the other regulations and restrictions on its practice too...Gosnells will be EVERYWHERE.

And then, when the number of women showing up in emergency rooms, quadruples, because the regulations are no longer in place, you SCPL will begin to protest the women being treated, and pacing the parking lots of ER's nationwide with signs saying "Feminist Murderers Deserve to Die."

And when that doesn't work to get laws criminalizing the TREATMENT of women who've undergone abortion and have complications, you folks will start blowing up Emergency Rooms, and shooting ER docs at church.

Next...

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#305958 Jul 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know?
She doesn't. They were probably boning anything that breathed and only by the grace of God and sheer luck didn't impregnate anyone. And she considers that to be a notch in her parenting belt. She's senile.
Better to pay her no mind.
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#305959 Jul 27, 2013
Katie Still Not Reading wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't ask anything ?
Post 305618:
"Heh. Why do you think that is?"
How can you possibly say anyone else needs everything explained to them, when you even need what YOU say YOURSELF explained to you ???
READ !
Are you ignoring the quotation marks on purpose? Did you not see where the author used that very question in her examples of manipulating those on the fence to vote GOP?

See? Keep showing everyone how it's your inability to read that keeps holding you back.

<smh>

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#305960 Jul 27, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I have no idea why the poster who keeps referring to me as 'sir' is doing so...they likely think to provoke me into a response.
What's 'backlighting'?
Lol sorry meant Gas lighting. You know old Ingrid Bergman movie .

Evidently Madam doesn't like it as one word lol

I think that's the second person call I by your son or sir lol
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#305961 Jul 27, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Wouldn't you know, if your kid was, or got someone, pregnant?
I'm a mom, I pay attention, and my kids have no problem talking to me.
I know.
:)
You seem really confident that your children would tell you all of their mistakes and wrongdoings. I don't know if they would want to share everything for which they may be embarrassed about or have shame or painful feelings. But I'm sure you never miss a thing.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#305962 Jul 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
There are plenty of people on here who have said that kids are going to have sex anyway which is why they have need for abortion and contraceptive services. Any mother who approves of giving contraception to children is at the very least, looking the other way while their daughters sleep around and at the most touting the feminist theology of women entitled to sexual freedom.
No, it is not the same thing as saying "it's okay to sleep around" at all. As I said, it's just arrogant on your part to try to tie the two together.

Women ARE entitled to sexual freedom, same as men. There is no "theology" to that. What have women to do with it, anyway, Witless? Were we NOT talking about teenagers of both genders?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Giants talk back (Dec '06) 5 min jimi-yank 7,396
jets talk back (Dec '07) 30 min jimi-yank 15,474
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 33 min jimi-yank 343,000
What's your favorite cat feed? 36 min Trying to be myself 5
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... (Nov '16) 46 min NEMO 6,141
News On MLK Day, New York's Political Heavyweights V... 2 hr ThomasA 2
California leads nation in poverty 3 hr Jesse 2

Jackson-Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages