This is when you sound just like JM. Please, Rose. I've been very clear about wanting women to retain their civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy.<quoted text>
You want abortion legal past 20 weeks ..as the New law wants it legal up to 20+weeks .
This does not mean I "want abortion legal past 20 weeks ..as the New law wants it legal up to 20+weeks ."
Roe v Wade already restricts abortion at 24 weeks. I don't see any reason to close the window on this time frame, not even a smidgeon.
Therefore, to me, this "new law" is as redundant as forcing women to have or view ultrasounds even though this had been previously offered without any law in place.
It's just another way for gov't to intrude into a private, medical moment. You hate "obamacare" so much but see no problem with health care being legislated from the legal bench rather than decided by physicians.
I'm not the one abusing semantics here, Rose. Fetuses are not babies. I have no right to another woman's fetus and neither do you. To sit there and pretend you do is ludicrous imo.Abortion done on purpose violently ends the life in the womb.
Did you look at those videos..th e y are the same age you think it's ok to kill them in the womb ..
You did not have to use the word violent ..for an abortion to be so..
Please semantics ...
And I was trying to make the point that one does nit have to want a theocracy in to be humane and merciful to babies.
And if you do not w I shouldn't to look at c children like the ones in the videos an d see them as,aware ..if they were to be killed.
Then there is nothing more to be said useful on the subject ..
As others have been told, not every pregnancy survives. There's little difference between spontaneous and induced abortion. One was decided by the woman's body, one was decided by the woman's mind. You respond as if this is a bad thing.
Do you get yourself all worked up when someone miscarries? Would you get all worked up about it if you didn't even know about it? And if so, why?