Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311318 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303603 Jul 6, 2013
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
No it's not.
You and "Knit" do not speak for Christ.
The undisguised anger and uncontrolled malevolence that "Knit" hurls at those she disagrees with is nothing compared to the deceptive, sneaky, surreptitious strategy that you tend to employ my darling "Sassafrass."
You love to "snuggle-up-to" those whom you feel might be "receptive" to your point of view. Then slowly, but surely, you start injecting the "poison." Telling those that you're coddling up to that, "what they're saying is just misguided." That those folks whom they've been befriended by are really "Evil," and how they're trying to turn them away from God and towards Satan.
I'm wise to your "game" darling.
I know a "viper" when I "see" one...
The Skankafrass thinks she's fooling people with her phony 'niceness' to those she thinks SHOULD be posting as she WANTS them to post.

The biggest problem I see with them all, is they cant even PRETEND to practice what they preach. They're simply not intelligent enough to do their cause ANYTHING BUT HARM.

Collectively they're a joke.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303604 Jul 6, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> Can you please rewrite this. I can't read it.
Of course you can't, you're not that smart. The rest of us can read it just fine and know exactly what she's saying.

Thanks for spotlighting your stupidity yet AGAIN Skanky LOL!

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#303605 Jul 6, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> Who are these women that you are claiming, are?
You made an out of context statement regarding NFP users actually causing miscarriages. They don't make up the norm. But just the same, a miscarriage is NOT deliberate lala. Perhaps the woman is ill or on meds and simply MUST abstain or doesn't want sex because of it? Are YOU accusing her of her miscarriage if she does get pregnant anyway?
That's ridiculous.
They are real women. Are you under the impression that you are privy to everyone's intimate details concerning their pregnancies? Silly girl.

I am accusing no one of anything, unless, of course, they have a large number of miscarriages, in which case they should probably abstain from sex during the time periods where research indicates they are more prone to miscarriage.

Yes, NFP has a higher likelihood of causing miscarriages for women who are prone to them. That is precisely what the research indicates. I merely reiterated what the study stated. Prove them wrong, if you feel so inclined.
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text>
The RCC catechism explains our reasoning for being against sex while blocking life from happening. MOST of whom are not married which goes against God.
NFP "blocks life" when used as a contraceptive.

Do you have proof that MOST of the couples who use NFP are not married? That seems rather unlikely, especially since it is the ONLY form of contraception the church condones. Even Mr. Mary and his wife use it. I suspect quite a large percentage of Catholics use NFP as contraception in order to stay consistent with church teachings.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#303606 Jul 6, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> I can't read.
No shit?

You've made that patently obvious.

Next...
sassy JM

Jackson, NJ

#303607 Jul 6, 2013
-Michelle- wrote:
<quoted text>
It would've been hypocritical of me to tell my son not to have premarital sex. I abhor hypocrisy. Granted, I don't believe in promiscuity, and I told my son that I would expect better of him than to be promiscuous and that I would prefer that he save sexual activities for committed relationships(if he chooses to have sex at all). I guess I was lucky in that my son really didn't start getting interested in girls and start dating until he was 17 but even then so, he prefers hanging out with his friends to play video games and/or work on cars.
Anyways, I, as well as his father and my SO, began to talk about sex at appropriate levels starting at age 10. The older he got, the more detailed the conversations got. Considering that I lost my virginity at 16, and I promise you that I did not think twice nor was embarrassed about buying condoms and spermicide at that age because my health was way more important than embarrassment, I felt that was a good age to really break things down. One thing we made a point to stress was responsibility and possible consequences to certain actions. He understood that if he felt he was ready to become sexually active then he must protect himself at all times. We've had very frank conversations and he knows that he can come to me, his father or my SO for anything. He's about to turn 19 and he's a bright young lad. He's a very respectful boy and I couldn't ask for a better kid.
So you didn't teach your son about God because you have premarital sex since age 16yrs old? Didn't you promise to when you Baptized him?

Bottom line, you didn't provide condoms in case an unexpected sexual encounter arose.

If you had a daughter, would you put her on bc as a precautionary measure?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303608 Jul 6, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>Did you ever see an exorcism? The devil spouts filth like your doing because the devil is afraid. You are afraid of the truth,foo, very afraid.
Shall we post your filth back to you Kunter? We KNOW your 'devil' speaks through you, you prove it all the time. Seems to me its YOU that's terrified of the truth. Strikes me too, that you wouldn't know the TRUTH if it walked up and slapped you in your ugly puss.

I on the other hand, am perfectly comfortable with what I say to your kind. NOTHING to be afraid of there. The TRUTH is that you spout nastiness and bullshit and that's about it.
sassy JM

Jackson, NJ

#303609 Jul 6, 2013
As I thought, my question went unanswered ;)

Other than Michele.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303610 Jul 6, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>Naw, Christ loves us and you too, by the way.
Nah, your jebus loves you, but Christ thinks you're as big a piece of shit as the rest of us do.

I wouldn't want anything loving me that loves the likes of you.

Perhaps its time ROH starts seeing what you post here Knutter. I mean how many crazy knitting bitches can your parish have after all?
sassy JM

Jackson, NJ

#303611 Jul 6, 2013
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
They are real women. Are you under the impression that you are privy to everyone's intimate details concerning their pregnancies? Silly girl.
I am accusing no one of anything, unless, of course, they have a large number of miscarriages, in which case they should probably abstain from sex during the time periods where research indicates they are more prone to miscarriage.
Yes, NFP has a higher likelihood of causing miscarriages for women who are prone to them. That is precisely what the research indicates. I merely reiterated what the study stated. Prove them wrong, if you feel so inclined.
<quoted text>
NFP "blocks life" when used as a contraceptive.
Do you have proof that MOST of the couples who use NFP are not married? That seems rather unlikely, especially since it is the ONLY form of contraception the church condones. Even Mr. Mary and his wife use it. I suspect quite a large percentage of Catholics use NFP as contraception in order to stay consistent with church teachings.
Lala, NFP doesn't block life. The ONLY way God intended for life to be conceived was via sex. That is why blocking a life WHILE having sex is forbidden.

NOT not having sex.

I have explained this over and over.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#303612 Jul 6, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>You lust abortion?
As much as you lust your pastor.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303613 Jul 6, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
You're taking shots at me because I disagree with you?
More likely its becasue you're a lying hypocrite Skanky.
She thinks that you are Ladi under Roses name. So she is addressing you as Rose and Ladi.
She's a moron. Everyone, INCLUDING YOU knows it.
No reason for you to sandwhich me in your fights.
THen perhaps you should distance yourself FROM that fight and keep your trap shut. Its YOU that's instigating, something you seem to cream your jeans doing on a fairly regular basis.
Me? I will not tolerate such a holocaust supporter as easily.<quoted text>
Nobody here is a "holocaust supporter" you Skanky ass. Stop with the hyperbolic lies already.

Do you ENJOY making yourself look like a fool Skanky? You do it so often after all.
sassy JM

Jackson, NJ

#303614 Jul 6, 2013
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
They are real women. Are you under the impression that you are privy to everyone's intimate details concerning their pregnancies? Silly girl.
I am accusing no one of anything, unless, of course, they have a large number of miscarriages, in which case they should probably abstain from sex during the time periods where research indicates they are more prone to miscarriage.
Yes, NFP has a higher likelihood of causing miscarriages for women who are prone to them. That is precisely what the research indicates. I merely reiterated what the study stated. Prove them wrong, if you feel so inclined.
<quoted text>
NFP "blocks life" when used as a contraceptive.
Do you have proof that MOST of the couples who use NFP are not married? That seems rather unlikely, especially since it is the ONLY form of contraception the church condones. Even Mr. Mary and his wife use it. I suspect quite a large percentage of Catholics use NFP as contraception in order to stay consistent with church teachings.
Btw..I never suggested that "most of the couples using NFP are not married". Why would they be going against God by having unmarried sex and care about using aNFP?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#303615 Jul 6, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously the one that I posted to does in fact "subscribe to my version of God".
Rose doesn't 'subscribe' to a religion.
She follows, as closely as she can, the doctrine of Jesus Christ.

You don't. JMO.
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted textWe ALL will have our bodies die. God is taking our souls in death. He isn't "killing" us.
If you die naturally in your sleep at age 99yrs old then that is natural. If a man shoots you to death, that's unnatural and it's killing.
How perceptive of you. The ability to read the mind of a dead man is phenomenal.

Don't you wish you were 'right'?

Ask Jesus, why don'tcha?????

We'll need the audiotape..........I'm sure you'll provide it.

;)

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303616 Jul 6, 2013
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
Hiya Luv!
How're you feeling Milady?
:)
Like crap. Apparently there's still a stone he missed up there. Cant do much til Monday, so I'm just marking time til then. Advil is my friend LOL
sassy JM

Jackson, NJ

#303617 Jul 6, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
No Skanky, its not. Its nonsense.
<quoted text>
My approval of your kind's behavior is irrelevant yes, but its certainly NOT irrelevant to the message of Christ and Christianity - something none of you exibit in the least.
As has been pointed out to your kind before, NOBODY takes your ilk seriously, when its CLEAR that YOU dont even take your own preaching seriously.
EVERYTHING you post here is the exact opposite of what Christ taught, and is EXACTLY why your kind will ALWAYS be losers, even among others of your kind.
AGAIN...your opinion of me or whether you take me seriously or not, is irrelevent to what Gods word is.

Got it?!?!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303618 Jul 6, 2013
persnickety wrote:
<quoted text>Can you just try to proof read?
Why should she change how she posts to comfort your stupidity? Nobody else has a problem reading her posts.

You like to bitch JUST to bitch.

Grow up Knutbar.
sassy JM

Jackson, NJ

#303619 Jul 6, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Rose doesn't 'subscribe' to a religion.
She follows, as closely as she can, the doctrine of Jesus Christ.
You don't. JMO.
<quoted text> How perceptive of you. The ability to read the mind of a dead man is phenomenal.
Don't you wish you were 'right'?
Ask Jesus, why don'tcha?????
We'll need the audiotape..........I'm sure you'll provide it.
;)
Rose believes in the word of God. That's what I am saying. So yeah, we (as you put it) "subscribe to the same version of God.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303620 Jul 6, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> If you die naturally in your sleep at age 99yrs old then that is natural. If a man shoots you to death, that's unnatural and it's killing.
And according to you, G-d KNEW both were going to happen. If he didn't want it to happen, it wouldn't.

You want it both ways Skanky, but you can't have it both ways. Just another TOUGH SHIT moment in your pathetic existance.
sassy JM

Jackson, NJ

#303621 Jul 6, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text> More likely its becasue you're a lying hypocrite Skanky.
<quoted text> She's a moron. Everyone, INCLUDING YOU knows it.
<quoted text>
THen perhaps you should distance yourself FROM that fight and keep your trap shut. Its YOU that's instigating, something you seem to cream your jeans doing on a fairly regular basis.
<quoted text>
Nobody here is a "holocaust supporter" you Skanky ass. Stop with the hyperbolic lies already.
Do you ENJOY making yourself look like a fool Skanky? You do it so often after all.
Are you still stoned?(pun intended)

Keep them pain killers coming ..

You're in your glory huh?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#303622 Jul 6, 2013
sassy JM wrote:
<quoted text> Lala, NFP doesn't block life. The ONLY way God intended for life to be conceived was via sex. That is why blocking a life WHILE having sex is forbidden.
NOT not having sex.
I have explained this over and over.
And its been explained over and over why you're wrong as usual. Also as typical, you ignore what you dont like. Typical Skank behavior.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 28 min RangerYanksJets66 40,092
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 39 min Patriot AKA Bozo 60,016
News CNN's Reality Check Team vets Trump's claims 58 min Mite Be 19
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 1 hr SweLL GirL 15,366
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 1 hr rainmaker2016 14,577
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 1 hr jimi-yank 329,650
little child little child 3 hr Little Child 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages