Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 312663 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301118 Jun 18, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
NR? I still mean it in regards to you. Post that one on your mirror, kay? Read it everyday.
And don't forget. As long your Xtianity continues to shine though, I'll continue to think the above.
Katie,YOU are being quoted(links and all). Why are you using your bigotry by bringing up his faith to cover it up?.

OWN what you say for once. What is with you people playing games with your own words?

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#301119 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Not sure why you are being nasty and sarcastic to me Rose. Did I do something to you to warrant this?
Like I said,I am not perfect or sinless. WHY would I be happy that you suffered. Are you "happy" if I suffer for my sins?
NOT nice Rose.
Just reacting to what you said IN about slutty women getting pregnant ..And disagreeing about how much we knew..And talking about moms who give bad examples.

Lost my temper.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#301120 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Uh,sweetie? You PROUDLY refer to yourself as PRO-CHOICE.
Yes I do freak child. So?
Choice to do what?
Damn you're stupid.

TO MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICE. Period. It doesn't MATTER what the choices are, its the fact that I support their right TO MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICE.

What is so confusing about that to you? You're truly stuck on stupid regarding a very simple concept.

“GO BLACKHAWKS!!”

Since: Dec 07

Home of Lord Stanley!

#301122 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text><snipped>I have never heard of anyone calling sex "dirty". Just because it was more respected and sacred back when,and that it was not for single unmarried people,didn't mean that it was "dirty".
I respect the fact that you, and those you personally know, were taught different views regarding sex. However, I was speaking about *my* family and the way *they* were raised to think and feel about sex.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301123 Jun 18, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
IMO "the pill" has given women a false sense of security. Part of the problem is that education about the pill is lacking. Many women still don't know that the pill MUST be taken every day, that it's effectiveness can be compromised by certain drugs like antibiotics, and that it offers no protection against STD's.
While abortion will never completely stop, there is a lot that can be done, especially in the area of education, to lower the abortion rates. Of course far too many women don't bother getting themselves educated and/or making the effort to prevent pregnancy because abortion is so readily available.
I agree!

Abortion is a solid back up plan. ADULT women take birth control and don't know HOW to use it or what interferes with it? That is really dumb. I don't take the pill or use any artificial means and even I know that.

It's irresponsible behavior. Abortion is taught as a womans decision and so....50 million abortions later...it's convenient. I'd hardly call them "oops" pregnancies. Let's face it,if abortion was illegal as of tommorow,I'd bet my life there wouldn't be all the "oopsy" irresponsible acts of abortions. ADULTS can't "get it right" but expect teenagers to? NOT gonna happen.

To shift the subject back to the pill given a woman a false sense of security,..when I was a teenager,I had sex education in my school. We learned it all about b/c. You know what it did for the kids in the class the way it was taught? Sex feels good. People want sex. It's natural. ALL you need to do if you want to have sex is to use b/c. You're parents might not approve so use it anyway. Honestly, I walked out of that class thinking "hmmm....an adult saying this is fun and you could be safe"""" "...

It didn't have the positive influence people thought. Our school still had high rates of teenage pregnancy and throughout the years,many girls who had abortions.

My friend in the class,went out,got on birth control and had sex with MANY guys through out her life.. At the time,It seemed so alluring knowing that she got to have all this sex with these cute guys and she will NEVER EVER EVER get pregnant. Seemed so simple.

She did get pregnant and she has a STD.

Another girl I know has cervical cancer and is dying due to her "fun" days of carefree sex while being "protected".

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#301124 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Oh please! We are discussing ABORTION here not "let's educate each other here as to how to prevent it".
Says who? Funny, in the REAL world, including the world on this forum, the discussion certainly HAS been about education and how to PREVENT abortion you dumbass.
2013 and you think that we NEED to discuss how to prevent pregnancy?
Since unwanted pregnancies still happen, and happen BECAUSE women dont know now the PROPER ways to prevent it, YES you fucking idiot, I DO think we NEED to discuss it.

What does it being 2013 have to do with it?

Do you think babies are born with the knowledge?

Osmosis maybe?

You say this stupid shit all the time Skankdawg.

If people are not educated PROPERLY, what does 2013 have to do with it?

I"ve asked you these questions before and you ignore them as if the issues dont exist.

Ignorant parents who dont know can't teach the children, and idiots like you want to PREVENT proper education in the schools.

Holy CRAP,you people are so pro-contraception (with MULTIPLE options to prevent pregnancy)yet you still can't prevent pregnancy.
Gee,maybe sex leads to pregnancy when your fertile...so if you don't want to get pregnant,don't have sex at that time. Have it every other freakin day if your that horny. I think that you WILL survive @@
Oh stop acting like such a santimonious ass already. Not every woman KNOWS when they're fertile, many dont even know what that means you fool.

Women with irregular periods can't always tell.

Sperm can live up to FOURTEEN DAYS in a woman, so a woman not having sex during their "fertile" time, can STILL get pregnant.

Again, ITS NOT A ONE SIZE FITS ALL ISSUE you STUPID Skanky jackass.
*sigh* I am talking to a lesbian who can't produce a child. Why am I wasting my time?
Really? I "cant"? Says who?

You're fond of making a fool of yourself aren't you?@@
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301125 Jun 18, 2013
Sweet JM wrote:
<quoted text> You didn't know that sex lead to pregnancy? My mom is ALOT older than you and she "knew her body".
Women deserve equal rights. They deserved respect. That whole womens movement was borderline selfish attitude-me me me.
,women who can't concejve or carry or nurse their babies..
Look at the fruits of it...abortion, mom out of the homes with kids in daycares, divorce, STDs
Unfortunatly, the contraception introduction lead to failure more than jhst preventing MULTIPLE unwanted pregnancy.
Look at women today, GROWN women have NO clue
JM? The Equal Rights Amendment never passed. Women still do not have equal rights.

"Conservative women were mobilized in the late 1970s by Phyllis Schlafly (1924–) in an effort to stop ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution. The ERA had seemed a noncontroversial effort to provide legal equality when it easily passed Congress in 1972 and quickly was ratified by 28 of the necessary 38 states. Schlafly denounced it as tilting the playing field against the traditional housewife in a power grab by anti-family feminists on the left. She warned it would mean women would be drafted in the Army on the same basis as men. Through her Eagle Forum she organized state-by-state to block further ratification, and to have states rescind their ratification. Congress extended the time needed, and a movement among feminists tried to boycott tourist cities in states that had not ratified (such as Chicago and New Orleans). It was to no avail. The ERA never became law and Schlafly became a major spokesperson for anti-feminism in the conservative movement.[165]"

Do you still think women deserve equal rights? Because you seem to be mimicking what is quoted above. And she didn't think women needed equal rights.
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301126 Jun 18, 2013

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#301127 Jun 18, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
I did know sex could lead to a baby but my true love said oh nit just once ..And if something happened are getting married when you graduate we can just marry earlier.
That's how much I knew..I was stupid.....are you happy .you had a mire normal life..by the he was was lying .
2 of my friends married 2 of his but alas I was left behind with my huge fountain knowledge..nothing about protection..No BC piles none around..despite what knit thinks.
So there I was a really really bad stupid loose woman. And I went against my religion ..well I learned my lesson!!!
Happy???
Skanky is not very intelligent Rose. She seems to think that women just "know" these things, that nobody has to teach them.@@

Its why she thinks there should be no school education about it, that its TWENTY THIRTEEN so kids just KNOW these things.

Its an old and VERY stupid argument by her.

She's delusional.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301128 Jun 18, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Just reacting to what you said IN about slutty women getting pregnant ..And disagreeing about how much we knew..And talking about moms who give bad examples.
Lost my temper.
You took it personal. You also misunderstood me. I NEVER said that "slutty girls get pregnant".

For what it is worth,you think that I am criticizing "slutty girls with loose morals". I am not. I feel sorry for them. They are looking for love through sex with as many men that will show them love. They are being used and that is sad. They want to be loved at ANY cost. My gf admits to sleeping around looking for love. She suffered in her life. She wanted to be loved. By ANYONE. She never was fullfilled in that way though. YEARS later,she began a relationship with Jesus. She was Jewish by the way.

Because you slept with your bf didn't make you a slut. NOR did the fact that you got pregnant.

*sigh*

I remember back when I was young,my mom used to say to pray for prostitutes,loose women,strippers,because they are selling their bodies because they have no love. They are using their bodies because they have no self-respect.

TODAY,young girls and women whom Katie referred to as "slutty girls with loose morals" are no different. They allow their bodies to be used. THAT is not a happy person. That's sad.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#301129 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Uh,sweetie? You PROUDLY refer to yourself as PRO-CHOICE.
Hellooooo....is ANYONE home?
Choice to do what? ABORTION/GESTATION/ADOPTION. You not choosing abortion for you is irrelevent to the PRO-CHOICE title dear.
I do not support abortion as choice FOR ME AND OTHERS,so I am ANTI-CHOICE. Abortion kills a humans life whether it is mine or a strangers own.
Sorry master manipulator,but sassy aint fooled by your word games. You're ashamed of your stance. Other proaborts admit it as fact. You're a coward.
Ummm Sasylicious,, it really doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to know what she thinks.

She supports CHOICE, which IS what the woman who's pregnant wants to do. If a woman is pregnant and decides to keep the pregnancy, and that is her choice to do so, Foofoo would support her CHOICE. If a woman is pregnant and decides not to keep the pregnancy, and she terminates the pregnancy, foofoo would support her CHOICE to do so. She supports women having the choice in either event.

My God, it's like you're accusing her of standing outside a Lamaze class holding up signs that read - Abort before it's too late!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#301130 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Not sure why you are being nasty and sarcastic to me Rose. Did I do something to you to warrant this?
Perhaps its because you are doing what you always do, you make stupid comments, ignore what's being said to you, put your own spin on things and are generally a Skanky azzhole.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#301131 Jun 18, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmm Let me try this.
I agree. The IRS shouldn't meddle in politics.
The IRS is on the list for being dismantled. What better way to do so than create a scandal and rearrange the executives in charge? Put one in place that favors the Religious Rights "core values" and call it good. Granted, I haven't wanted to discuss this at length because I haven't been able to research it at length and don't wanna -- wow there was a big roll of thunder. Anyway, don't wanna be coming at this without any more information.
In regard to personal privacy and bodily autonomy, I may not like the procedure of abortion, but I like losing these civil rights a lot less.
It used to be republicans and democrats worked together, cooperated, and found balance. What's been chipped away the most is that balance. You talk of sides... Rose, I don't have a side. I believe in civil rights, in equality. I believe in knowing the facts of all sides before spouting off, shooting at the hip so to say. I used to vote either republican or democrat in my state prior to our state gov't changing the rules. That resulted in one unfavorable, inexperienced person voted in as Assessor-Treasurer and created a huge backlash. Last I read, they were changing the revised system, but I still can't vote the way I liked to. Now I have to pick a side.
And there's more thunder... they said thunder storm possibly late afternoon... guess it's here now.
I am glad we are able to discuss this civilly. You remind me of my mom, though. Stubborn as all hell! LOL
Yes I am stubborn..you bet.

Sorry but really the right is NOT making this up. If the right wanted to favor the right via the I R S..it would have done it..But it's only before this LAST election.

I do not want the I R S favoring anyone.

And your right...the 2Sides did used to work together.

The thing is we have much more big government now..and that is not good.

The big rant on Bush was the deficit..it has been hugely multiplied in the last few years.

And the worst is they DPRND so much time getting elected and making the other side look bad ..there is no cooperation at all.

You are afraid of the Religious right.. I am afraid of the socialists.

They are much more dangerous imo..And neither of us like people behind the scenes..But going after these people we don't like should not be the purview of the Fed..unless they break the law.

Now see I was young bug I liked Kennedy..He lowered taxes..both ghosts by in more money and stood up strong against the Commies..No wonder he got killed..congress used to work for us..now it's agsinst each other

When either party has too much power it's not good.

They kicked out Nixon for using His office and the gov for hit lists.

That was a good thing.

We should get rid of any one abusing power.

And yes this really gets to me..

As thinking abortion coukd be outlawed gets to you.
Trust me the latter won't happen..it's too ingrained and political.

So we each from opposite sides see danger ..my fears are already a reality.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#301132 Jun 18, 2013
She's pro-CHOICE in supporting whatever the pregnant woman wants to do..... k? OKAY?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#301133 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet,I am the classified "rigid Catholic" by bigots?
Who says you're a "rigid Catholic"? You're not even a christian. You're a fanatic, but not a chrisitan.
Katie

Maple Valley, WA

#301134 Jun 18, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Katie,YOU are being quoted(links and all). Why are you using your bigotry by bringing up his faith to cover it up?.
OWN what you say for once. What is with you people playing games with your own words?
LOLOLOL

Nobody's playing any games with words.
Your failure to understand and comprehend is yours.
Nobody else's.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#301135 Jun 18, 2013
That includes ALL options... ALL OPTIONS
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#301136 Jun 18, 2013
-Michelle- wrote:
<quoted text>
I respect the fact that you, and those you personally know, were taught different views regarding sex. However, I was speaking about *my* family and the way *they* were raised to think and feel about sex.
I know. Thing is,people on here constantly make remarks about Catholics thinking sex is dirty if not for procreating,or that we are rigid and ONLY have sex for procreation. NONE of which is true. I hear it all the time. I wonder if most of that way of thinking in your family was all a fact or was it a misconception.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#301137 Jun 18, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Says who? Funny, in the REAL world, including the world on this forum, the discussion certainly HAS been about education and how to PREVENT abortion you dumbass.
<quoted text>
Since unwanted pregnancies still happen, and happen BECAUSE women dont know now the PROPER ways to prevent it, YES you fucking idiot, I DO think we NEED to discuss it.
What does it being 2013 have to do with it?
Do you think babies are born with the knowledge?
Osmosis maybe?
You say this stupid shit all the time Skankdawg.
If people are not educated PROPERLY, what does 2013 have to do with it?
I"ve asked you these questions before and you ignore them as if the issues dont exist.
Ignorant parents who dont know can't teach the children, and idiots like you want to PREVENT proper education in the schools.
<quoted text>
Oh stop acting like such a santimonious ass already. Not every woman KNOWS when they're fertile, many dont even know what that means you fool.
Women with irregular periods can't always tell.
Sperm can live up to FOURTEEN DAYS in a woman, so a woman not having sex during their "fertile" time, can STILL get pregnant.
Again, ITS NOT A ONE SIZE FITS ALL ISSUE you STUPID Skanky jackass.
<quoted text>
Really? I "cant"? Says who?
You're fond of making a fool of yourself aren't you?@@
Oh Your back ..thought went nitey nite ..sent a mail

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#301138 Jun 18, 2013
and when I say ALL OPTIONS... I mean keeping it/ aborting it/ adopting it etc.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Seeking Internet Warriors? 20 min heck no 7
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 26 min Paris 13,872
Madam President 41 min doomednewt 174
SEX DOLL CONVERSION Selling Like HotCakes ! 57 min Akmad 11
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 1 hr Paul Yanks 334,237
Giants talk back (Dec '06) 1 hr Paul Yanks 5,675
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 1 hr Paul Yanks 42,105

Jackson-Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages