Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 341396 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

STO

Vallejo, CA

#292460 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> You are not God..so stop judging people who do wrong..unless you are without sin like Michele said.
You asked if I believed a convicted murderer should be in prison, and I said yes. Then you called me a hypocrite for believing we should have a justice system. I asked you, "Did Jesus tell us not to have a justice system?" and this is your reply.

I notice there is no answer in your reply.
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Ohhhh but as long as we aren't talking about abortion then judging is okay right?
I answered your question numerous times. If we put women in prison for 25 yrs to life for deliberately killing her newborn or 5yr old then yes, a woman who pays to have her unborn child killed should have the same sentence.
Now...ask me again @@
Btw..since abortion is legal now..we can't go into her recordsnto see if she had a previous abortion.It would have to be once the law is passed. That's how our law works correct?
"we can't go into her recordsnto see if she had a previous abortion."

I asked you if you would want the law to be retroactive. Yes or no? I'm not asking you how the law works. I'm asking you to tell me how YOU would want it to work, if you had your way.

Annnnnnd, you know what I asked and dodged yet another straight forward, very clear question.

Would you WANT to open up the records of every woman in America to see if she has ever had an abortion, so you can have the justice system charge her with murder?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292461 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
They HAVE been debunked you moron. NOBODY is being forced to have a legal abortion in a reputable facility. A simple "NO" brings EVERYTHING to a screeching halt.
If they change their mind, they have to speak up, nobody is mindreading them.
<quoted text>
Well, you're certainly epitome of NOBODY Skanky, but you dont speak for anyone but your own nobody self.
No, they haven't been debunked. These women whk went in for abortion tell their own stories about crying and changing their minds about the abortion and have been ignored. The Dr kills anyway. Even former abortion Drs and staff have admitted this.

YOU don't want to hear the truth. THOSE women are not part of your agenda like Gosnells are.

Phony.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292462 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> A woman who conceives a child is the biological mother.
If she gives birth and raises the child, she is mothering her child. If she gives the child up for adoption, then another is mothering her child. If she conceives and miscarries..then she still is a mother but never had a chance to mother her child.
You are confusing being a mother and mothering.
Having a deceased child doesn't undo your motherhood. It just means you are not presently not mothering your child .
I'm not confusing anything. Again, you dodge a clear question.

I'll try again...

Would you tell a woman who has never had children, but has had a miscarriage (or more), and who tells you she has not been able to have children and will keep trying, that indeed she IS a mother of dead children?

Would you tell her that?

Would you speak your disagreement to her face? Would you?

Yes or no?
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#292463 Apr 15, 2013
sASs talks a big talk on the Internet but I doubt she'd puke her hateful garbage to someones face.
Katie

Kent, WA

#292464 Apr 15, 2013
Chickster wrote:
Effew antichoicers! You'll ALWAYS loose lolol!!
You are not Chicky. Go away. Fraud.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292465 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Bet our abortion rates wouldnt be in the millions annually if a woman faced prison. She SUDDENLY would have to learn to prevent pregnancy . I bet she'd learn fast.
Now...well...she can act irresponsibly ...because she can alway have a killing back up plan.
"Bet our abortion rates wouldnt be in the millions annually if a woman faced prison."

Eh, a lot of them would probably be dead. Which, of course, is perfectly acceptable to you. Prison or death is your solution.

Hey, but that aside, do you believe a pregnant woman should have the legal right to refuse prenatal care? To refuse taking prenatal vitamins? To refuse the monthly or weekly check ups? You know, all the stuff pregnant women who want to gestate do in order to have a healthy pregnancy?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292466 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I get it now....FORCE. woman to gestate an unwanted" "ZEF" if its after your deadline. NO choices for her and you support that.
You people are proabortion when you say so but anti -choice after that.
Hypocrites.
Sit down. You're a joke.
You support exceptions for life threat, so that makes you a "proabort", by your own defintion.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292467 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
You asked if I believed a convicted murderer should be in prison, and I said yes. Then you called me a hypocrite for believing we should have a justice system. I asked you, "Did Jesus tell us not to have a justice system?" and this is your reply.
I notice there is no answer in your reply.
<quoted text>
"we can't go into her recordsnto see if she had a previous abortion."
I asked you if you would want the law to be retroactive. Yes or no? I'm not asking you how the law works. I'm asking you to tell me how YOU would want it to work, if you had your way.
Annnnnnd, you know what I asked and dodged yet another straight forward, very clear question.
Would you WANT to open up the records of every woman in America to see if she has ever had an abortion, so you can have the justice system charge her with murder?
Excuse me but this questioning came about when you, michele and other proaborts claim that prolifers shouldn't call out women who abort or women/men who support this evil. You call us self-righteous Xtians. Michele even got a "amen sister" from you for telling someone that Jesus said let those without sin cast the first stone. NO judging. Remember?

But it's okay for YOU to judge another apparently. Sending another sinner to prison as punishment. Youre without sin that you can cast a stone?

Hypocrite. We are only allowed./justified to judge people as long as we arent involving killing/abortion? Your mother paid someone to kill Gods creation but thats okay. Another killing is bad bad bad in your eyes and belongs in prison. HOW CONVENIENT.

Again your askinv the same question? Really?...... again for the tenth time...NO I DONT THINK A WOMANS OLD RECORDS SHOULD BE OPENED UP..WHY?...BECAUSE ABORTION NOW IS LEGAL...BUT I THINK THE LAW SHOULD CHANGE AND THEN WHOMEVER KILLS/ABORTS SHOULD GO TO JAIL.

Shall I repeat it?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292468 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not confusing anything. Again, you dodge a clear question.
I'll try again...
Would you tell a woman who has never had children, but has had a miscarriage (or more), and who tells you she has not been able to have children and will keep trying, that indeed she IS a mother of dead children?
Would you tell her that?
Would you speak your disagreement to her face? Would you?
Yes or no?
Why would I? You make no sense. Fact is she CONCEIVED her child. She WAS the biological mother of that deceased child.

If she is grying to have another child to "mother" then thats her right. I would hope she could. Why would i remind her of her deceased child if she eagerly wants to mother a new child?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292469 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
You support exceptions for life threat, so that makes you a "proabort", by your own defintion.
Oh I do?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292470 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
What other medical conditions or medical treatments do you want to send people to jail for Skanky? Aids perhaps?
You are one of the stupidest and nastiest bitches I've ever had the misfortune to have met, even on a forum.
You stupid shit, abortion wasn't hindered at all, even when it WAS illegal, it simply went underground with women dying.
You're fine with women dying tho.
I almost forgot you'd rather your child die than have a life saving abortion. I suppose you'd go see her on visitors day in the prison you'd put her in for making that decision.
You're as dumb as it gets Skanky.
BTW, where's hubby? Out schtupping a REAL woman for a change? You do always seem to be more bitter when you're posting late at night, alone, as usual.......
Shoulda read ahead :)
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292471 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
"Bet our abortion rates wouldnt be in the millions annually if a woman faced prison."
Eh, a lot of them would probably be dead. Which, of course, is perfectly acceptable to you. Prison or death is your solution.
Hey, but that aside, do you believe a pregnant woman should have the legal right to refuse prenatal care? To refuse taking prenatal vitamins? To refuse the monthly or weekly check ups? You know, all the stuff pregnant women who want to gestate do in order to have a healthy pregnancy?
Prison is your solution. Its acceptable to you. You just said it.

Me? Yes...a woman or man who kills or pays to have someone killed ESPECIALLY a premeditated killing should be punished.

Once upon a time(days of my own two grandmas) they didnt have prenatal care. They knew they were pregnant and took extra care of themselves. Prenatal care is not mandatory for childbirth. Since the beginning of time women birthed children alone with no Dr giving crappy prescribed vitamins. I didnt take them. I got whole food real vitamnins andtook ggod care of myself.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292472 Apr 15, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Only if she WANTS to be. If she doesn't want pregnancy or children, she doesn't have to continue the pregnancy.
Are you on auto-reply? Repeating the same crap over and over swithout even readjng what your replying to?

I said; A WOMAN WHO CONCEIVES IS THE BIOLOGICAL MOTHER.

What does not wanting to be pregnant have to do with that fact?

""Not if she doesn't want to be"""" ""

What?

@@
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292473 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Excuse me but this questioning came about when you, michele and other proaborts claim that prolifers shouldn't call out women who abort or women/men who support this evil. You call us self-righteous Xtians. Michele even got a "amen sister" from you for telling someone that Jesus said let those without sin cast the first stone. NO judging. Remember?
But it's okay for YOU to judge another apparently. Sending another sinner to prison as punishment. Youre without sin that you can cast a stone?
Hypocrite. We are only allowed./justified to judge people as long as we arent involving killing/abortion? Your mother paid someone to kill Gods creation but thats okay. Another killing is bad bad bad in your eyes and belongs in prison. HOW CONVENIENT.
Again your askinv the same question? Really?...... again for the tenth time...NO I DONT THINK A WOMANS OLD RECORDS SHOULD BE OPENED UP..WHY?...BECAUSE ABORTION NOW IS LEGAL...BUT I THINK THE LAW SHOULD CHANGE AND THEN WHOMEVER KILLS/ABORTS SHOULD GO TO JAIL.
Shall I repeat it?
Did Jesus tell us not to have a justice system? No He did not. So, if you call me a hypocrite for not disagreeing with Jesus, then I suppose you're accusing Him of being a hypocrite, too.

Why don't you want the hypothetical penalty (25 years to life) for abortion to be retroactive? You equate it with murder, so I would guess you'd want all those "murderers" to be charged with murder. No?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292474 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
No there's not. A theraputic abortion and an elective one is the same thing. The ONLY difference is the reasoning behind it, and that makes ZERO difference to the end result.
An ABORTION.
Twist that all you like Lynniekins - but its a FACT.
<quoted text>
What part of what STO said that he was repeating what he was told did you not grasp?? He didn't LIE you jackwit, and YOU dont have a damn clue what went on in that room with that woman.
What I proved, is that it certainly COULD happen, and definetly has. My BIL's sister is dead proof of it.
STO said that this girl had an abortion at 8 months pregnant because of preeclampsia.

He lied. They would have done an emergency csection if her life was in IMMEDIATE danger....not kill the baby in order to remove it.
worships reality

United States

#292475 Apr 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Well, it was stupid, but it's early...I have every confidence they'll come up with something even more moronic.
<quoted text>
look no further than yourself, stupid. any one of your dumbass posts on "deadly force" is in a stupidity class all it's own.
Katie

Kent, WA

#292476 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Prison is your solution. Its acceptable to you. You just said it.
Me? Yes...a woman or man who kills or pays to have someone killed ESPECIALLY a premeditated killing should be punished.
Once upon a time(days of my own two grandmas) they didnt have prenatal care. They knew they were pregnant and took extra care of themselves. Prenatal care is not mandatory for childbirth. Since the beginning of time women birthed children alone with no Dr giving crappy prescribed vitamins. I didnt take them. I got whole food real vitamnins andtook ggod care of myself.
"Since the beginning of time women birthed children alone with no Dr giving crappy prescribed vitamins. I didnt take them. I got whole food real vitamnins andtook ggod care of myself."

Huh. You would be a hypocrite, though, and determine women carrying unwanted/unhealthy pregnancies be mandated to remain pregnant and under doctor's care or face prison/death?
<SMH>
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292477 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Why would I? You make no sense. Fact is she CONCEIVED her child. She WAS the biological mother of that deceased child.
If she is grying to have another child to "mother" then thats her right. I would hope she could. Why would i remind her of her deceased child if she eagerly wants to mother a new child?
"Why would i remind her of her deceased child if she eagerly wants to mother a new child?"

How could you remind her of her deceased child when she has told you she has never had children, miscarried, and is trying to have children?

Are you telling me you would not correct her when she tells you she has never had children, and she that has no dead children?

Are you telling me you would not say to her something along the lines of, "No, you did have a child. It died. No matter what you think, you're child is dead."

No corrections from you? You'd just go on letting her believe she was never a mother, when you vehemently disagree?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292478 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Did Jesus tell us not to have a justice system? No He did not. So, if you call me a hypocrite for not disagreeing with Jesus, then I suppose you're accusing Him of being a hypocrite, too.
Why don't you want the hypothetical penalty (25 years to life) for abortion to be retroactive? You equate it with murder, so I would guess you'd want all those "murderers" to be charged with murder. No?
Sorry STO but dont attempt to twist this. YOU and otbers say that we have no right to call out baby killer(those who kill living, developing humans that God has created) becajse we are fake Xtians and self-righteous judgemental people.

You can justify OTHER people and their sins but hour not judgemenfal or self righteous"??? HOW CONVENIENT!!!!

What happened to "Gods the judge not you" crap that you people hand us?

Hypocrite.If you think a wkman who kills her born children should be in jail then your mom belongs there too.
Katie

Kent, WA

#292479 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Oh I do?
No, you'd rather your daughter (and her fetus) die than abort an unhealthy pregnancy. Not sure how STO forgot...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 19 min TMAN_Mets 47,548
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... (Nov '16) 45 min Bloody Bill Anderson 7,515
jets talk back (Dec '07) 46 min jimi-yank 16,243
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 2 hr Paul Yanks 344,685
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 3 hr Halle Berry Sister 18,531
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 3 hr Halle Berry Sister 19,709
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr judy 64,692

Jackson-Heights Jobs

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages