Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 318354 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#290674 Mar 27, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Rangle's been in congress since 1971, and since 1979 he's introduced and re-introduced the same bill year after year, and it dies on the floor year after year, just like this will.
The way the draft is set up now, ONLY men can register for the selective service. Women are not allowed to, even if they want to.
However that said, women CAN go ahead and JOIN the military, and if they qualify, they can fight just like men do.
There IS NO DRAFT which makes this whole converstaion moot. As we saw after 9/11, volunteerism was at an all time high - and as long as that happens, there WONT be a draft.
Women don't belong on the front lines. ESPECIALLY moms who have young children. I think that it is tragic that moms leave their children to go to war.

LOL I can imagine a woman who is on the front lines getting her period,bleeding like a sieve asking for a moment to change her tampon or dealing with PMS.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#290675 Mar 27, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Don't have an anxiety attack dear. If you can't converse without becoming overly emotional,then I would suggest that you stay away from it. For your health sake.
Of course I've missed most of te conversation about this,and I have no intention of going backing for DAYS to read them when I can ask you simply right out. Didn't know that it would cause you to freak out to have to repeat your answer.
What women in your opinion should be exempt from being drafted? New moms? moms of young kids,etc..?
LOL, nonsense. There was no "anxiety", no "freaking out", no "emotion" other than amusement.

What exceptions? Did I suggest there should be any exceptions?

Since I don't believe the issue will come up, the question is moot.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#290676 Mar 27, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>There are already enlisted men who are forced to serve multiple deployments when they've already done their share.
Did you ALSO not understand my reply? That figures.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#290677 Mar 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't about current events. It was about your thoughts which is a waste of time since you don't have any. You and foo never offer a new thought on any thing happening on the horizon and when someone else does, you both attack from the negative side, usually from no point of refrence whatsoever.
Inkstain, you're a lying sack of shit.

Nobody's "attacking", we're stating facts. What do YOU know about "new thoughts" anyway? Its not like you've offered anything on this forum that's original, let alone insightful. You view anything refuting your petty little nonsense claims as "attacking", and you ignore facts that dont fit into your agenda as if they're poison.

After all, its YOU that has implied repeatedly that men are expendable to war because you're "used to it", but women aren't.

What would be thoughtful or insightful would be if you actually did what Sue has tried to do, and DISCUSS the issue rather than ineffectually attacking Bit or myself or anyone else that you dont like on a personal level.

You're bitterness is showing Inkstain. You might want to tuck that shit back in dear.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#290678 Mar 27, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Her non-answers speak volumes. As do the others who claim to be pro-woman who ONLY fight for a right to kill their unwanted child. It's not about "women",it is about wanting to continue with their selfish agenda's.
Not ONE will fight for equality when it comes to the draft.
This is about being PRO-ABORTION,not PRO-WOMAN.
<<<CUE foo to enter and start with the name calling and attacks to cover up the truth>>>>
The TRUTH is Bit has answered numerous times, and you and your idiot buddy simply ignore what you dont LIKE to see.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#290679 Mar 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
And the reason for that is because everything is subjective.
Exactly; which is why we all perceive god differently. It is unfortunate that most fundies on here are not tolerant to anything that is different than their rigid, religious beliefs. Take Sassy; always thinking she speaks on behalf of God. Quite arrogant to expect the world to conform to your own, subjective beliefs.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#290680 Mar 27, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF are you babbling about Gtown?
Are YOU going to try to claim that its less devistating for a mother to watch her military son go to war, than it would be for her military daughter? That the son's are more expendible than the daughters, because that's what Inkstain is suggesting with her stupid comment.
It's not less "devastating" for a mother to watch her military son go to war than her military daughter. If they are military,then they CHOSE it. Unfortunately,many enlist to escape dysfunctional families,...searching for belonging. That is not for the right reason.

A draft is a totally different story. It's not a choice either way.

Women and men are different. It is more than a penis vs vagina. Women don't belong on the front lines. MOST women anyway,not women like you who have identity issues and act the male.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#290681 Mar 27, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> If a mother wants her offspring then the baby "deserves" compassion and protection but if not,then according to you,"it" doesn't "deserve" compassion. You then proudly march mom in to kill that undeserving offspring.
You think that you're a good person. You're not.You're demented.
It's ALL about what YOU say. You don't have a compassionate bone in your body.
Keep pretending that you do,one of these days,you just MIGHT start to believe it.
Skankdawg, a fetus only "deserves" what the woman who's pregnant decides it deserves.

Its not about the word "deserves", its about the words "medical choice".
STO

Vallejo, CA

#290682 Mar 27, 2013
-Michelle- wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG, old school is right. You just don't mess with grandma's. It don't matter whose grandma it is. I'm friends with a Sicilian guy and his Nonna is a scream. I have learned the hard way that Sicilian grandma's and Mexican grandma's have a lot in common. They know how to throw down in the kitchen and they know how to throw a punch, ROFLMAO!!
My other gramma would just point at you. Follow you with that finger around the room and a very stern face. Not say a word. I don't recall her ever spanking us. She'd do it to the pets, too. They didn't like it, either. lol
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#290683 Mar 27, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Women don't belong on the front lines. ESPECIALLY moms who have young children. I think that it is tragic that moms leave their children to go to war.
LOL I can imagine a woman who is on the front lines getting her period,bleeding like a sieve asking for a moment to change her tampon or dealing with PMS.
Perfect example above; sAss believes whatever she belives about this topic..... and thinks she knows what is best for every woman.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#290684 Mar 27, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>There are already enlisted men who are forced to serve multiple deployments when they've already done their share.
Exactly. bit and foo don't know that.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#290685 Mar 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
The bill drafted by Rangel includes women but I would expect you to be aware of that.
Yes Inkstain, I already knew that. And I already know it will die on the floor, just like the dozens of other bills he's introduced on reinstating the draft you idiot.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#290686 Mar 27, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, nonsense. There was no "anxiety", no "freaking out", no "emotion" other than amusement.
What exceptions? Did I suggest there should be any exceptions?
Since I don't believe the issue will come up, the question is moot.
You,foo,and many other pro-aborts simply cannot handle dialogue. Your posts reek with anger,frustration and contradiction. Calling people names,attacking,because you disagree is very immature. Over emotional reaction to everything said. My guess is guilt.

Anyway,I am asking you if you think that ALL women should be drafted or do you think exemptions should be made(a young mom,a single mom,etc).
STO

Vallejo, CA

#290687 Mar 27, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
We had time outs (though it wasn't called that.) Neither of our parents believed in spanking or physical punishment, but we did get time to think about what we'd done.
<quoted text>
I think that's the way to go. Works just as well. And taking things away. And TALKING to the kid.

I gotta admit, tho, I don't think I ever got a spankin' I didn't deserve. Few and far between. A pop to get your attention, mostly. Got a good one for lying. Made the the perfect impression!
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#290688 Mar 27, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, nonsense. There was no "anxiety", no "freaking out", no "emotion" other than amusement.
What exceptions? Did I suggest there should be any exceptions?
Since I don't believe the issue will come up, the question is moot.
Just because you don't believe something doesn't mean it isn't a potential issue. Last I heard you weren't running things, like the Pentagon

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#290689 Mar 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Who is going to fight in all these wars that our elected official deem neccessary?
All WHAT wars Inkstain? The two that Bush got us in, that Obama is bringing them home from? What other wars are we involved in that would make a draft necessary?

Or do you think the weight should be carried solely by inlisted men who have to serve multible deployments?
Its a VOLUNTEER MILITARY you moron. Nobody's forcing anyone to ENLIST.

When people stop volunteering, the draft will come into effect IF we end up in a war.

So far, that's not happening, so your hystronics are really meaningless Inkstain.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#290690 Mar 27, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Skankdawg, a fetus only "deserves" what the woman who's pregnant decides it deserves.
Its not about the word "deserves", its about the words "medical choice".
Your first sentence included the word "deserves"....so YEAH,it is(according to your words)about the word "deserves".

@@

Change it to "medical choice" all you want. KILLING a humans life is the description. It all changes at the discrepancy of the mother huh? WANTED=BABY...UNWANTED/PROCHOI CE=MEDICAL CHOICE.

I wasn't aware that my pregnancy was a medical choice. For centuries women birthed in their homes alone...no medical. How DID they survive?

lol

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#290691 Mar 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked the same question at she did.
No you did not Inkstain. Stop lying.
You never have any new information.
Really? I didn't see YOU providing any information about what it would take for women to be drafted: an act of Congress. I didn't see YOU providing the information that since 1979 Rangle has introduced the draft bill almost yearly, only to have it die on the floor.

Hell, I dont see you offering ANYTHING regarding new information, simply moronic blanket statements that are completely incorrect.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#290692 Mar 27, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. bit and foo don't know that.
Bullsh*t. You've only proven that you didn't understand what I posted. I'm not surprised, as stupid as you are.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#290693 Mar 27, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well for sure if I was a sto "satans troll online ", then alot more people would like me :)
Like clockwork.

The "don't really wannabe a Christian" goes straight for the Satan card when someone disagrees with him.

LAME, Gtown. It's old and tired, and a complete lie, and you know it. Same ol' same ol'.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 2 min jimi-yank 341,193
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... (Nov '16) 1 hr NEMO 5,443
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 1 hr SweLL GirL 18,811
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 1 hr SweLL GirL 17,683
Hollywood and NFL flopping 2 hr ThomasA 2
Climate change is not real 2 hr Jamiel 1
News More Aug '17 Tina 5

Jackson-Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages