Oh, and why not read my post that this post of yours ^^^^ was in reply to. It answers her question and yours. Here it is again:<quoted text> STO, you are totally misunderstanding ink. Hou are putting words in her mouth as well.
You need to address her questions. You're not paying attention. I repeated the same question to you and you even ignored me. You avoid questions from people. It's dishonest of you.
Now kindly go back and reread our posts. You're acting all defensive for no reason. If you are secure in your beliefs then you wouldn't start attacking people. Youre being challenged and it frustrates you. Since when does bible discussions provoke people to anger? It shouldnt.
The husband doesn't give his wife the "bitter water". The priest does.
I did not add "vomiting" and "headache". I was merely using them as examples that could not prove the wife's infidelity, as Ink was claiming miscarriage/abortion could not prove infidelity. What would?
Whether you believe the "bitter water" causes miscarriage or not, it certainly causes the guilty woman's body to respond in such a way that proves her guilt, according to the Law. Ink is stating that her body response cannot prove her guilt and so claims God's Law "makes no sense". She is calling God a liar.