Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311360 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

STO

Vallejo, CA

#288328 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> STO, you are totally misunderstanding ink. Hou are putting words in her mouth as well.
You need to address her questions. You're not paying attention. I repeated the same question to you and you even ignored me. You avoid questions from people. It's dishonest of you.
Now kindly go back and reread our posts. You're acting all defensive for no reason. If you are secure in your beliefs then you wouldn't start attacking people. Youre being challenged and it frustrates you. Since when does bible discussions provoke people to anger? It shouldnt.
Oh, and why not read my post that this post of yours ^^^^ was in reply to. It answers her question and yours. Here it is again:

STO wrote:
<quoted text>
The husband doesn't give his wife the "bitter water". The priest does.
I did not add "vomiting" and "headache". I was merely using them as examples that could not prove the wife's infidelity, as Ink was claiming miscarriage/abortion could not prove infidelity. What would?
Whether you believe the "bitter water" causes miscarriage or not, it certainly causes the guilty woman's body to respond in such a way that proves her guilt, according to the Law. Ink is stating that her body response cannot prove her guilt and so claims God's Law "makes no sense". She is calling God a liar.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288329 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>No she isn't. She is trying to discuss the law with hou but you refuse to answer direct questions.
You guys are ignoring my answers. I can't help you, there.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288330 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Here you go atacking me by lying. I never wished ANYONE dead. You arenacting like a spoiled brat.
I linked scripture to show you what God has to say about HIM creating all of us in his image and likeness and how he finds kiling of the innocence to be a heinous crime. Now if God created us in the womb like HE says and knew uz before that(we were always in the mind of God) then your mom ENDED your siblings life.
You're dishonest about me AND about telling others that THEY are denying the word of God. IT IS YOU who is.
That is scripture that Im quoting...the word of God and here you are lying that Gods creation wasn't in your moms womb(who had their life killed).
Now...go bad mouth me to cover it up.
Have a good night!
Settle down, sunshine.

Just beause you misapply scripture doesn't mean I have to sign on.

You have a good night, as well.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#288331 Mar 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well would you agree, "if there is a God ",that He would be God and us just His creation?
God only deals with sin one way, He kills it.
Yes He has had children killed, but He is God, and it stopped the blood line of that particular sec.
All babies go to Heaven, but God is God, we are not, but have no problem playing it.
What you wrote almost sounds like God created us so he can abort/destroy us.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#288332 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
My mom went thru both. Two spontaneous before my oldest sibling was born and an induced abortion much later in her life.
I mentioned it years ago to illustrate there is no difference.
I remembered you'd mentioned it, but why is JM bringing it up as if it's any of her nosy-parker business? I mean really? The girl has no class.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#288333 Mar 7, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Becasue its Skanky. Lying is what she does. Silly Katie, you're expecting something resembling honesty from that idiot? Or the Inkstain for that matter?
I have to admit, its been fun watching STO make idiots of them both! LOL!
It has been interesting. And entertaining!
Hope you're having a nice evening over there, Foo :)

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#288334 Mar 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
God's punishment of evil and corruption can be fierce.
If you believe that then you have to believe that God punishes the non-evil as well. How many times has a good and decent person died a horrible death or had so many bad things happen to them that people ask why, why them? And decent people are often left to wonder why so many "evil" people prosper.

It's too easy to make God's actions out to be anything you want them to be.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#288335 Mar 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
STO, why is JM claiming your mom had induced abortion rather than spontaneous abortion? What is her problem?
I don't have a problem.

Kthanks.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#288336 Mar 7, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Becasue its Skanky. Lying is what she does. Silly Katie, you're expecting something resembling honesty from that idiot? Or the Inkstain for that matter?
I have to admit, its been fun watching STO make idiots of them both! LOL!
No, you are lying. Typical proabort coming in to defend a.proabort just for being proabort and having NO clue what your talking about.
STO isnt making an idiot out of anyone. He is saying what he believes and is shutting his ears to debate. Numerous debate questions have gone ignored. Speaks volumes.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#288337 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
My mom went thru both. Two spontaneous before my oldest sibling was born and an induced abortion much later in her life.
I mentioned it years ago to illustrate there is no difference.
Again you show us that you ignore the word of God. I linked you scripture and the ironic part is that you said earlier in reply to it that you weren't iigoring it.

^^^^^^this above proves you not only didn't read it, but that you are ignoring Gods sord where he tells us that CREATES US in the womb ...and that the bible refers to a CHILD in the womb....and the UNBORN CHRIST in the womb....and children in the womb referring to Rebekkehs twins....and that God calls the kiliing of innocents a heinous crime..,etc...

I guess you think God didnt create your sibling that was aborted?

How sad that you don't see a difference between natural death via miscarriage and mom paying a Dr to kill her unwanted child?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#288338 Mar 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
I remembered you'd mentioned it, but why is JM bringing it up as if it's any of her nosy-parker business? I mean really? The girl has no class.
Oh NOW you remember he "mentioned" it but a few posts ago you were calling me a liar?

Dishonest katie.

STO brought up his moms abortion to prove a point. It failed. He also showed us WHY he is ignoring what God has to say. His loyalty is with his mom. I feel bad but he needs to pray for his mother before its too late. I pray he does because he is gravely sinning by supporting killing whom God has creatednin HIS image and likeness....and for abusing scripture to support his prodeath agenda and misleading proaborts who then think Gods okay with killing his innocent creations.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#288339 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Gimme a break. I'm not putting words in her mouth.
She said the Law makes no sense. More than once. I've answered all questions regarding Numbers 5.
You're full of it.
Kindly go back and read my answers.
The way you are applying it is what she is referring to when she said "it makes no sense"......hence the debate questions she asked you. You know wthe very same ones that I asked.....and you have STILL ignored.

I could understand missing ONE question but she has repeated them for days and so have I. You are ignoring them as you did gtowns question.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#288340 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and why not read my post that this post of yours ^^^^ was in reply to. It answers her question and yours. Here it is again:
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
The husband doesn't give his wife the "bitter water". The priest does.
I did not add "vomiting" and "headache". I was merely using them as examples that could not prove the wife's infidelity, as Ink was claiming miscarriage/abortion could not prove infidelity. What would?
Whether you believe the "bitter water" causes miscarriage or not, it certainly causes the guilty woman's body to respond in such a way that proves her guilt, according to the Law. Ink is stating that her body response cannot prove her guilt and so claims God's Law "makes no sense". She is calling God a liar.
Honey, pay attention now. This ^^^ Is not explaining what was asked.

Who says the accused adulterous is pregnant? You keep harping on ABORTION. If shes not pregnant then whats the bitter water going to do as to prove her guilty or not? Understand?

It says nothing about her being pregnant or for the bitter water aborting. It is about the priest givinv her the bitter water and either it affects her body or not...depending on her guilt.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#288341 Mar 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
It has been interesting. And entertaining!
Hope you're having a nice evening over there, Foo :)
You are learning a few thing about what God has to say. Either you chose him or you dont.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#288342 Mar 7, 2013
Did he warn the chinese, the central american and ausralian native peoples, etc?
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes He did, and never even warned them did He? Let's see, just in noahs case the people had over 120 years of warning.
The reason He spared lot, is the same reason He will spare me.
The same reason He saved noah was the same reason He saved me.
Noah was in the ark "a type of Christ ",and God shut the door, if you noticed.
Those that are "in Christ " shall be saved.
You will probably not have 120 years, and you've been warned many many times, to turn to God, but just like those in noahs day -you say where is this God?
lol -where is the promise of the comming of God unto man?
Those outside of Christ will be destroyed quickly.
I had a choice to make one night, and had I continued to say No -I'll do it my way, then He would have backed off and I would have went to Hell "where I deserve to be ",instead I'm going to Heaven "where I do not deserve to be ",but becouse I've accepted the wonderful "gift " of God, then I'm going.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#288343 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> You are learning a few thing about what God has to say. Either you chose him or you dont.
Psssssssst.....Stupid Skanky - YOU dont speak for G-d, and you certainly dont know how to interpret what he had to say. ROFLMAO You dumb thing.

You dont even know what it means when you keep babbling about how we're "made in His image". You dont have a damn clue.
Forum

Lovington, NM

#288344 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I don't have a problem.
Kthanks.
Leave the babies alone.
Gtown71

United States

#288345 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Heya Foo. Sjm isn't lying THIS TIME ( I know, I know. hard to believe). She doesn't know the circumstances, either. But she'll go on claiming my siblings are dead. She's kinda sick like that.
Yes, if his interpretation was correct, I would agree, BUT it is not. He's the only one looking foolish, by trying to even say that there is a pregnant woman in numbers 5, let alone an abortion taking place.

He and all who agree with him on this matter.
Forum

Lovington, NM

#288346 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Settle down, sunshine.
Just beause you misapply scripture doesn't mean I have to sign on.
You have a good night, as well.
It is too late for scripture. Rapture.
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#288347 Mar 7, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, maybe I can't reconcile it, according to you, but still you did not address my point about elevating the rights of the z/e/f above the rights of the woman. The z/e/f is not born, but the woman is. And I don't have the legal expertise of a Supreme Court Justice ya know?
Every time you ejac-late (topix doesn't like that word) millions of live sperms will die...sperm that had the *potential* to become a person. Would you want your sperm's rights elevated above your own? I realize it's not the best analogy, but I think you get the point.
What we need is BC that is 100% effective and then 100% compliance with using it and then we could be arguing something else.
I've got to get to work. Have a good one.
It is a terrible analogy. However, most of you proabortion pagans make terrible analogies in order to make your pointless points of view. All you care about are yourselves. The unborn child is just a casulty of your wanton sexual behavior.

An unborn child starts life at conception. Sperm is alive and so is a female egg but an unborn child is just that, an unborn human being developing to the point of full independent life. That is something nothing but the unborn child can accomploish.

It is a basic fact of life that you pagans cannot or I should say willnot grasp becasue it would shatter your self-centered universe.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Time to go? (Jun '15) 5 min State of Florida 12,018
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 23 min Into The Night 60,169
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 1 hr Hooplah 329,815
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 1 hr NEMO the RINO 11,024
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 2 hr GEORGIA 14,691
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 2 hr Princess Hey 15,478
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 3 hr jimi-yank 40,270

Jackson-Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages