Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 20 comments on the Jan 22, 2008, Newsday story titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288302 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
According to God, the Law of Jealousy would reveal the truth regarding guilt or innocence. Are you disputing Him?
Of course I am. I have been disputing that interpretation for two days now and I'm still waiting for you to explain how you can abort a woman who is cheating but not pregnant.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288303 Mar 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, interesting. I get what the bible and you are saying. Thanks for breaking it down STO.
(ps i think some posts of mine from yesterday are missing)
I can check, if you want. Give me the post #s.

I feel like only part of my posts to Ink are showing up, since she keeps ignoring the substance of my posts, as well as the questions.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288304 Mar 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course I am. I have been disputing that interpretation for two days now and I'm still waiting for you to explain how you can abort a woman who is cheating but not pregnant.
Abort a woman?

Like I said, God gave the Law. Not me. Whether you believe the guilty's woman's body response was miscarriage, vomiting, or a headache, God says her body's reaction will reveal the truth.

You are telling me He makes no sense because none of those reactions could prove infidelity.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288305 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Abort a woman?
Like I said, God gave the Law. Not me. Whether you believe the guilty's woman's body response was miscarriage, vomiting, or a headache, God says her body's reaction will reveal the truth.
You are telling me He makes no sense because none of those reactions could prove infidelity.
None of those responses would prove infidelity. Besides none of those reactions are in the Bible anyway.

Do you think the world was ccreated in seven days?
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#288306 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
I can check, if you want. Give me the post #s.
I feel like only part of my posts to Ink are showing up, since she keeps ignoring the substance of my posts, as well as the questions.
#288237

It's to Doc.

Thanks, STO.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288307 Mar 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
None of those responses would prove infidelity. Besides none of those reactions are in the Bible anyway.
Do you think the world was ccreated in seven days?
Even if you took Number's 5 literally (no translation), according to you it could not prove infidelity.

You are claiming God makes no sense.

Stop trying to change the subject.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288308 Mar 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
#288237
It's to Doc.
Thanks, STO.
Nope, not there.

Skips from 36 to 38.

(Ink's intellectual dishonesty knows no bounds. Incredible.)
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288309 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if you took Number's 5 literally (no translation), according to you it could not prove infidelity.
You are claiming God makes no sense.
Stop trying to change the subject.
like Solomon's decision about the baby. Sometimes you don't have to do anything to get the truth, only threaten.

If you take the law as written, the woman has to agree to take the potion which she is told will swell her belly and rot her thighs [or genitals].

What idiot woman would take it if she was guilty. I would say her refusal was probably guilt enough.

God is wise.
sasylicious

Brooklyn, NY

#288310 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
I "have to" explain how God set up the Law so the guilty woman's body would react to the bitter water, while the innocent woman's body would not?
I did. If she is pregnant, she will miscarry.
You are taking a turn into the secular POV. Which, like I said, I'd be happy to discuss with you. Essentially, you are questioning God. Not me. How can any reaction from the woman's body, be it miscarriage or vomiting or a headache, prove infideltiy?
But first thing's first.
Are you taking issue with the evidence I have presented to you regarding Numbers 5 and the translations? If so, what?
You haven't given any reason, so far, which negates the proof.
The man assumes his wife has cheated so according to the law, he will gives this potion to her and if she is guilty, her body will get ill..if not then she wont.

You are saying that she is pregnant and will "miscarry" "if" it is not the husbands child.

I see yoy now added "vomiting and headache" to hrr symptoms ALONG with miscarrage. Where in scripture does it sat thar

Tell me, what are the chances that all accused adulterous woman tested are pregnant in order to prove her infidelity? And if nor pregnant 'then they ASSUME her innocence? Makes no sense.
sasylicious

Brooklyn, NY

#288311 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
It makes sense to God.
Numbers 5
11 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying ,
12 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man's wife go aside , and commit a trespass against him,
(by now, you should have read the entire Law of Jealousies)
Notice where it says, "And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying..."
Are you implying God makes no sense, or are you implying Moses lied and made up the Law, againt God's will?
Nobody is denying the word of God STO.
sasylicious

Brooklyn, NY

#288312 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
All of my siblings are alive and well. Your wishes aside.
I'd love to take up Gtown's question. But you guys are easily distacted. So..one thing at a time.
Btw, thanks for proving yet again you're entire argument is that anyone who disagrees with you is "evil". Same ol' Same ol'.
God created us. Our journey of life began at that moment. He willed us to exist. Your mom paid a Dr to stop the beating heart of her offspring.

No, all of your siblings are not alive. She/he was killed.

Perhaps you had more that were miscarried ( natural death while in the womb) too.

You will see when you meet your maker when all truth is rev ealed.

Do me a favor and stop twisting my words. I don't call you evil for "disagreeing " with me. I do so when you support killing the innocent humans in their eomb.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288313 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> The man assumes his wife has cheated so according to the law, he will gives this potion to her and if she is guilty, her body will get ill..if not then she wont.
You are saying that she is pregnant and will "miscarry" "if" it is not the husbands child.
I see yoy now added "vomiting and headache" to hrr symptoms ALONG with miscarrage. Where in scripture does it sat thar
Tell me, what are the chances that all accused adulterous woman tested are pregnant in order to prove her infidelity? And if nor pregnant 'then they ASSUME her innocence? Makes no sense.
I think just the threat of drinking this poisonous concoction would be enough for her to admit the indiscretion.
Wowowow

Falls City, NE

#288314 Mar 7, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Who said making meth was a sin? Your jesus made wine from water; alcohol is just another drug.
<quoted text>
You can see what kind of pathetic degrading life this guy has. Petey must need a fix if he is posting about it .
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288315 Mar 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
like Solomon's decision about the baby. Sometimes you don't have to do anything to get the truth, only threaten.
If you take the law as written, the woman has to agree to take the potion which she is told will swell her belly and rot her thighs [or genitals].
What idiot woman would take it if she was guilty. I would say her refusal was probably guilt enough.
God is wise.
You are ignoring the Law of Jealousies, which was given by God. Refusal does not play a part in it.

You have stated this Law of God's makes no sense.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288316 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> The man assumes his wife has cheated so according to the law, he will gives this potion to her and if she is guilty, her body will get ill..if not then she wont.
You are saying that she is pregnant and will "miscarry" "if" it is not the husbands child.
I see yoy now added "vomiting and headache" to hrr symptoms ALONG with miscarrage. Where in scripture does it sat thar
Tell me, what are the chances that all accused adulterous woman tested are pregnant in order to prove her infidelity? And if nor pregnant 'then they ASSUME her innocence? Makes no sense.
The husband doesn't give his wife the "bitter water". The priest does.

I did not add "vomiting" and "headache". I was merely using them as examples that could not prove the wife's infidelity, as Ink was claiming miscarriage/abortion could not prove infidelity. What would?

Whether you believe the "bitter water" causes miscarriage or not, it certainly causes the guilty woman's body to respond in such a way that proves her guilt, according to the Law. Ink is stating that her body response cannot prove her guilt and so claims God's Law "makes no sense". She is calling God a liar.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288317 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Nobody is denying the word of God STO.
Ink is.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288318 Mar 7, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> God created us. Our journey of life began at that moment. He willed us to exist. Your mom paid a Dr to stop the beating heart of her offspring.
No, all of your siblings are not alive. She/he was killed.
Perhaps you had more that were miscarried ( natural death while in the womb) too.
You will see when you meet your maker when all truth is rev ealed.
Do me a favor and stop twisting my words. I don't call you evil for "disagreeing " with me. I do so when you support killing the innocent humans in their eomb.
I know you wish my siblings were dead, but they're not. Thank God.

You do say I'm evil when I disagree with you. Just about every time we have an exchange. It's your "thing".
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#288319 Mar 7, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink is.
STO, why is JM claiming your mom had induced abortion rather than spontaneous abortion? What is her problem?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#288320 Mar 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
STO, why is JM claiming your mom had induced abortion rather than spontaneous abortion? What is her problem?
Becasue its Skanky. Lying is what she does. Silly Katie, you're expecting something resembling honesty from that idiot? Or the Inkstain for that matter?

I have to admit, its been fun watching STO make idiots of them both! LOL!
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288321 Mar 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
STO, why is JM claiming your mom had induced abortion rather than spontaneous abortion? What is her problem?
My mom went thru both. Two spontaneous before my oldest sibling was born and an induced abortion much later in her life.

I mentioned it years ago to illustrate there is no difference.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
OBAMA is the BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Nov '10) 9 min Just Saying 18,927
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 15 min -Sprocket- 11,123
Goodbye Waze. Not sharing my contacts. 27 min New York 2
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 31 min New York 52,852
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER 35 min De Oppresso Liber 3,201
News Man arrested in Internet sting with Miss Americ... (May '07) 1 hr Lexxx 398
Seven Dyce musical artist from Arkansas on the ... 1 hr UBANK RECORDS 1
More from around the web

Jackson-Heights People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]