Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310475 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Gtown71

United States

#274852 Jan 7, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
And those that care for you would care. Those that dont, would care too, until the money ran out.
<quoted text>
To YOU.
To those who dont share or WANT to share your version of faith, what you have is worthless. And no matter how much you harangue people, the MOST you're likely to do, is what others here like No Relevance and Skanky have done: turn people OFF of your faith.
<quoted text>
I have all that too, and didn't need your Jesus to have it. I found that within my OWN faith. Now the question becomes: can you respect that even if you dont agree with it?
<quoted text>
Since I personally have no doubt that I am NOT wrong, and that G-d is just fine with exactly how I worship Him in the Jewish faith, I dont have to waste my time with asking such foolish questions.
You say you are of the Jewish faith?

All examples I used, is from the 10 commandments.
There shall have no other gods, before the one true God is one of them.
So there goes the theory that people may serve any or difderent gods.
Any who are justified by the law, is a debtor to do the whole law.

Jesus came, not to do away with the law, but to fulfill the law.
He is the only one to ever live who kept the whole law.
Those "in christ ",have "imputed rightousness ".
No Relativism

Huntington, IN

#274853 Jan 7, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>Even when I wasn't impotent, Age (Junket) is the only one here to get a rise out of me.
grumpy: "Even when I wasn't impotent, Age (Junket) is the only one here to get a rise out of me."

I guess back in your day, corpulent women were considered attractive.

Nowadays, a picture of Age/Junket is considered a treatment for erections lasting longer than 4 hours.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#274854 Jan 7, 2013
Because the bible is the cudgel used by most christians to attack gays and their rights. It's the rulebook most believers follow, especially tose who say everyone else should follow it.

Of course, it's antiquated and meaningless--ALL of it. You think it's good that a rape victim had to live with her rapist by law? BTW--there were no castles in david's time. David also had a male lover, jonathan--the only real love story in the book.
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do people who say they don't believe in the bible, use the same bible to try an justify their actions?
Plus customs thousands of years ago, are different.
Plus the customs you speak of were writtens to jews.
Plus the man was obligated to care for the woman forever.
Even King David put out a wife, but he put her in another castle, and still took care of her needs.
The reason many harp on gays, is becouse not as many commit the sin, yet that is not what seperates us from God.
People who try to reach Heaven anothr way, bypassing the cross.
The cross God set up.
The place, where He made a way, for all to escape hell, and go to heaven.
Let God be God, and all men a liar

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#274855 Jan 7, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You told Doc that a baby who require's medical support is not "viable".
Then your comments morphed into viable if can survive on medical support.
You contradicted yourself.
Why run from that fact?
Everyone saw your switcheroo. You're making an ass out of yourself.
Again
Now he'll scroll by yours. It's a fascinating dynamic. When he's wrong he simply ignores....tries to act as if it never happened.
Anytime he's sees one of my posts I picture him tucking himself into a fetal position sucking his thumb... while his other thumb is planted firmly up his ass.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#274856 Jan 7, 2013
If you can't tell the difference between NO function and REDUCED function, you're too stupid to discuss the issue.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You told Doc that a baby who require's medical support is not "viable".
Then your comments morphed into viable if can survive on medical support.
You contradicted yourself.
Why run from that fact?
Everyone saw your switcheroo. You're making an ass out of yourself.
Again
No Relativism

Huntington, IN

#274857 Jan 7, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
If you can't tell the difference between NO function and REDUCED function, you're too stupid to discuss the issue.
<quoted text>
You are presenting a definition of "viablility" that is not related to the point at hand.

Your switcheroo happened here:

1) Your original definition of "viability": If fetus requires medical support after born, he/she is not considered viable.

2) Much, much later you changed your definition. You said a fetus is considered viable if he/she is able to live WITH medical support upon birth.

Everyone (inluding your prochoice buds) can see that you are introducing the new concept - "NO function vrs REDUCED function - as a pink flamingo. Your head fake is duly noted, but it doesn't explain or coverup your change in perspective re viability & medical support.

Why not admit that upon further review, you find fetuses who are able to live WITH medical support upon birth are considered viable?

What's so hard about that?

Admitting that you gleaned a knew perspective shouldn't cause such anxiety & insecurity in you.

Come on..........
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#274858 Jan 7, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Ihave a constitutional right to point out that there are no god-given rights.
<quoted text>
What kind of rights were there before the Constitution?

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#274859 Jan 7, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What kind of rights were there before the Constitution?
The same ones that are in the constitution Inky. Or is it that you think the Constitution grants any rights?

Read carefully: The Constitution limits government. It does not grant rights; it recognizes the rights we already have. If the rights you thin are rights are not expressly stated in the constitution, then you'll look at the 9th Amendment, and at case law to determine whether what you think is a right, is a right.

The right to have an abortion is a right, and it's protected by the constitution.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#274860 Jan 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Being "Happy " has very little to do with peace and joy.
Many confuse the two, just like love and sex.
It grieves me to here how many don't believe in the one true God, and you are right about how people worsgip different gods, but they cannot all be right.
Few be that find the truth.
Crissy Moran (a former porn star) found the truth.
Lead guitar player from a band called (korn) found the truth.
Gtown 71 (John) found the truth.
Any who look may find the truth.
You're just another arrogant Christian who goes around telling people that what you believe is the "truth". Yeah, we get it by now...what you Christians believe is the "truth" and everyone else is wrong yada yada.

“Never look back unless”

Since: Sep 09

you're in a rough neighborhood

#274861 Jan 7, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>Even when I wasn't impotent, Age (Junket) is the only one here to get a rise out of me.
Sweet talker! Ladies Home Journal, right?

“Never look back unless”

Since: Sep 09

you're in a rough neighborhood

#274862 Jan 7, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
grumpy: "Even when I wasn't impotent, Age (Junket) is the only one here to get a rise out of me."
I guess back in your day, corpulent women were considered attractive.
Nowadays, a picture of Age/Junket is considered a treatment for erections lasting longer than 4 hours.
Puddles! Celibacy does not seem to agree with you - perhaps you should consider entering the priesthood.
;-p
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#274863 Jan 7, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Because the bible is the cudgel used by most christians to attack gays and their rights. It's the rulebook most believers follow, especially tose who say everyone else should follow it.
Of course, it's antiquated and meaningless--ALL of it. You think it's good that a rape victim had to live with her rapist by law? BTW--there were no castles in david's time. David also had a male lover, jonathan--the only real love story in the book.
<quoted text>
That would not be the interpertation of the relationship between David and Jonathon by Jewish and Christian scholars.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#274864 Jan 7, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
The same ones that are in the constitution Inky. Or is it that you think the Constitution grants any rights?
Read carefully: The Constitution limits government. It does not grant rights; it recognizes the rights we already have. If the rights you thin are rights are not expressly stated in the constitution, then you'll look at the 9th Amendment, and at case law to determine whether what you think is a right, is a right.
The right to have an abortion is a right, and it's protected by the constitution.
Why are you telling me this? I have no problem knowing where my rights come from.

Give the lecture to Petey. He said:

Ihave a constitutional right to point out that there are no god-given rights.
Gtown71

United States

#274865 Jan 7, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Because the bible is the cudgel used by most christians to attack gays and their rights. It's the rulebook most believers follow, especially tose who say everyone else should follow it.
Of course, it's antiquated and meaningless--ALL of it. You think it's good that a rape victim had to live with her rapist by law? BTW--there were no castles in david's time. David also had a male lover, jonathan--the only real love story in the book.
<quoted text>
Again, it is funny how you say the bible "all of it, as you say ",is nothing but meaningless mumble jumble, yet you turn around and say that Daivd and Jonathon was lovers.

You are not the first gay person to tell me that.
I geuss when you are gay, then you believe everyone is, and most "choose " to be straight.

Either way, Jonathon and David were not lovers, only best friends.

I think I can prove that, without a shadow of doubt.
King David didn't have the sword to never leave his home, becouse he lusted after a man, it was becouse he lusted after a woman. Plus all of the other women he had.

The story between david and Jonathon was also another of many example of how God is with us.

We lie -God does not.
We may break a contract, yet God does not.

Most kings, after taking over a kingdom, would normaly kill all that was of the house of the former king.
After david became king "a nurse took a baby (Jonathons baby), and ran with it to try and hid the child, becouse she feared david would have the chold killed. She feel as she ran, crushing the baby boys legs. He grew up in a bad place, thankful of a family who took care of him, being the time it was, there was mo welfare, and him being crippled, he could not do much work.

Years later King David began to wonder if there were any left from the house of saul.
A servant came and told david about this boy (who was now a man), and how he was Jonathons son.
David and jonathon had made a covenant, that which ever one of them outlived the other, that they would take care of the others family...

Jonathons son did not know this -all he knew was to fear david, or hate david.
All he knew was he had a bad life, and that life was nor fair.
He was didderent then others.
King david sent after this man "miphibashaft " was his name (bad spelling true story).
I cannot imagine how miphib felt, as these kings chariots came rolling up, in his small town of nothing. He feared what was about to happen.
When he is put before king david, he fell on his face, and begged david to have mercy. David told him to stand up. He told him, I don't know you, but your father and I made a deal! He then told poor ole miphib, that he now owned all the land of his fathers, and all the servants of his father, he also told him that he would eat at the kings table everynight as one of the kings son!

God is the same way. He made a covenant with His son Jesus -all wjho accept Jesus as lord and savior, they will be as the children of God.
God doesn't break His covenants.

It is not anything we deserve, it is what God says that matters.
His will, will be done!
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#274866 Jan 7, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Talk about a vivid example of your Jeebus' teachings on humility!
You're too much of a stupid fetus worshiper to even be a good idolater, I mean, a "good christian."
Take a look at one of my favorite photos..
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thum...
Enjoy.
Why is that one of your favorite photos?
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#274867 Jan 7, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Have you ever heard the saying," Ain't nothin worse than a reformed whore?" Think about it while looking in the mirror. In the meantime, I know that I am who I want and need to be, for others and for myself. I don't need a god to validate me. Thanks for your input, though:-)
" I don't need a god to validate me."

What does that mean? What would God's validation encompass?
feces for jesus

East Meadow, NY

#274868 Jan 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well first, I don't wish Hell on anyone, and neither does God.
As far as you being glad you don't believe in the same God as I, becouse He seems so bad, what is bad about my God?
He did not wish for any to go to Hell, and even allowed His only begotton son Jesus Christ to leave Heaven, be born and live a sinnless life, in this sinfilled world. He was beaten, spit on, and torchered, before dying on the cross, where He took your Sin and mine, and made a way for all to escape Hell, and go to Heaven.
As far as me posting here verses wal mart?
Many many many people read these post, even though they never comment.
I simply want to tell them my story, about how I went from darkness to light.
As far as God being ok with people believing in diffrent gods? Would you be ok (being human), if your kids (that you created) called others their parents?
God is a jelous God, and Since He created all things, can He not just be God?
Must He explain to His creation all things?
Sometimes us "sinful " parents, don't tell our kids all things, and many times kids don't understand why we do certain things, but if we are halfway good, we do those things, out of love for them.
If all the christians and or pro lifers left, how long would this post go on?
How much high fives could the pro choicers give each other?
The world doesn't revolve around you.
There are many more watching, some are looking for hope, that this nasty life, is not all there is.
There is a God,we will all meet Him, either as our Father, or as our judge.
Keep those ROFL posts coming.
feces for jesus

East Meadow, NY

#274869 Jan 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You say you are of the Jewish faith?
All examples I used, is from the 10 commandments.
There shall have no other gods, before the one true God is one of them.
So there goes the theory that people may serve any or difderent gods.
Any who are justified by the law, is a debtor to do the whole law.
Jesus came, not to do away with the law, but to fulfill the law.
He is the only one to ever live who kept the whole law.
Those "in christ ",have "imputed rightousness ".
"There shall have no other gods, before the one true God is one of them."

What bible do you have???

John's super special bible, handwriten by you when you were 7? Spare us your lunacy.
Gtown71

United States

#274870 Jan 7, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
"There shall have no other gods, before the one true God is one of them."
What bible do you have???
John's super special bible, handwriten by you when you were 7? Spare us your lunacy.
I waa paraphrasing, but thinks for being on point at that one thing at least, but since you are the only one who says hell is not in the bible,I'm not sure what you call the bible?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#274871 Jan 7, 2013
It's not MY definition, nor is there a contradiction. The non-viable fetus will die regardlss of ow much air you pump into the little fu**er; the viable one will. The second case allows for the possibility of life without support; the former does not.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You are presenting a definition of "viablility" that is not related to the point at hand.
Your switcheroo happened here:
1) Your original definition of "viability": If fetus requires medical support after born, he/she is not considered viable.
2) Much, much later you changed your definition. You said a fetus is considered viable if he/she is able to live WITH medical support upon birth.
Everyone (inluding your prochoice buds) can see that you are introducing the new concept - "NO function vrs REDUCED function - as a pink flamingo. Your head fake is duly noted, but it doesn't explain or coverup your change in perspective re viability & medical support.
Why not admit that upon further review, you find fetuses who are able to live WITH medical support upon birth are considered viable?
What's so hard about that?
Admitting that you gleaned a knew perspective shouldn't cause such anxiety & insecurity in you.
Come on..........

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Add a word, Drop a word (Dec '09) 12 min Forrest 12,334
Drop a Word, Add a Word (Jan '10) 21 min _FLATLINE-------- 10,807
News Republicans are going to hate what Donald Trump... 54 min OccupyThis 12
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Trey LaTrache 54,497
Poll Who is the heaviest person of all time 2 hr Paul Yanks 11
The Book of the century is finally here.-NY Yan... 2 hr Paul Priore 1
My Support for Donald Trump Presidential Bid: 2 hr Paul Priore 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages