Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 336650 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Katie

Seattle, WA

#270072 Dec 15, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
no, it's not just his/her problem you small minded fool. it is our problem. all of us. because if you believe that the current overall societal mindset that cheapens and devalues human life -- "all" human life -- does not play a part in the more frequent occurrence of evil, callous and unthinkable slaughter like what happened in connecticut, then you're more naive than one could imagine.
get your silly clueless head out of the sand.
First things first, name-caller. You prove there is a "...current overall societal mindset that cheapens and devalues human life -- "all" human life -- does not play a part in the more frequent occurrence of evil, callous and unthinkable slaughter like what happened in Connecticut..."

Second, prove how this equates to women's civil rights of personal privacy and bodily autonomy; legal rights to determine their own outcomes regardless of what every single nosy parker, gov't official, or clergyman thinks.

I'll wait.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#270074 Dec 15, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, you DO know that for most that dont follow Christianity, he wasn't even a MINOR historical figure, he's completely meaningless.
Second, if he's meaningless to those not of your version of faith, why SHOULD anyone even believe he said ANYTHING about himself, let alone belive it?
<quoted text>
Does Curt Daniel know you plagerized his work unlinked and uncredited? Dont worry, I let him know.
You should let Bitner talk for herself. She is the one trying to put Christ into her paganism in some facet of the diamond.

If I forgot to credit Curt Daniel, my bad.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#270075 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
They don't see that we have taught a new young generation that respect for life, born and unborn isn't important. In fact a lack of respect for anyone. Just see the way kids talk to their parents. All that counts is what the invidual wants and if he wants to take his own life, he takes as many as possible with him. This is frightenly becomming a trend. We are making these angry irrational youngsters
Here's what you guys refuse to see or acknowledge. A lot of you are no different than that selfish gunman shooting elementary-aged kids right before Christmas.

It doesn't matter you think your way is better. It doesn't matter you think you have all the answers. It does matter that you want to override the individual's decision with your form of "Christianity" regardless of what others want or their civil rights to believe in something different. It does matter you try to equate what's legal with what's illegal.

Not one of you has offered sincere condolences for this tragedy. But you have tried to use it to your advantage. And I find that disgusting.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#270076 Dec 15, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
I said:
You claimed your daughter ISN'T being able to raise her kids that way, because she's getting conflicting messages from her athiest husband that interferes.
If they're like you, you're a family of idiots.
<quoted text>
You're a liar, You certainly DID both say AND imply that:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/bethlehem-pa/...
<quoted text>
No actual CATHOLIC should be MARRIED to an athiest. Marrying outside your faith is AGAINST your faith and there's no way in hell any bishop would give a special dispensation to a couple to have even a civil marriage when one is a jackass like you've made your SIL look when it comes to his wife's faith.
Nice try at backtracking Inkstain, but ONCE AGAIN, you said something that was especially stupid, EVEN FOR YOU and its backfired on your ridiculous ass.
Anyone who has been following this conversation knows that you are completely off track and out of line.
So I won't be provoked by your insanity.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#270077 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You should let Bitner talk for herself. She is the one trying to put Christ into her paganism in some facet of the diamond.
If I forgot to credit Curt Daniel, my bad.
I did no such thing. You're just too witless to understand that very simple analogy.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#270078 Dec 15, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's what you guys refuse to see or acknowledge. A lot of you are no different than that selfish gunman shooting elementary-aged kids right before Christmas.
It doesn't matter you think your way is better. It doesn't matter you think you have all the answers. It does matter that you want to override the individual's decision with your form of "Christianity" regardless of what others want or their civil rights to believe in something different. It does matter you try to equate what's legal with what's illegal.
Not one of you has offered sincere condolences for this tragedy. But you have tried to use it to your advantage. And I find that disgusting.
You are wasting your disgust. I went to chapel last night and offered prayers to God, for Him to console and strenthen the moms and dads and all family members. There is no advantage to this horror but maybe we should pay more attention to what our kids are doing and learning. Never before in this country has life been so cheap. I pray that people who are not paying attention will.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#270079 Dec 15, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I did no such thing. You're just too witless to understand that very simple analogy.
Nobody can understand you on any thread.

Your like the guy who had eight bad wives.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#270080 Dec 15, 2012
You're

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270081 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You support & promote the mutilation and execution of children in the first to third trimesters of life.
Now you send "sincerest condolences" for the children executed between the ages of 18 and 33 trimesters of life?
You're being sarcastic, right? You don't value human life.
How vulgar of you to use the Newtown tragedy for your insults. Maybe you should have used the time spent to write this classless post to pray for the families, faux-Christian
Katie

Seattle, WA

#270082 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You should let Bitner talk for herself. She is the one trying to put Christ into her paganism in some facet of the diamond.
If I forgot to credit Curt Daniel, my bad.
"She is the one trying to put Christ into her paganism in some facet of the diamond."

That's what you got out of Bitner's analogy? Not how the different facets were viewed? Really? Or are you just playing dumb to play dumb?
zef

Los Angeles, CA

#270083 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your poop device is artificial. Preborn babies naturally exist where they are supposed to be. Pregnancy is how mankind was created to procreate.
Conversely, no M.D. is going to rip out your intestines at your request because you no longer want to poop. M.D.'s realize pooping is natural & how mankind was created to rid waste.
I must admit, you are full of sh*t. Your poop restriction devices are working well.
So I am being tortured with colon restriction devices because I am nothing more than a useless slave?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270084 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
We aren't talking about rights. He has those.
No, it seems you're upset because you want your catholic daughter to have total control over what the kids get taught, and you want the atheist to shut-up and stay out of it.
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#270085 Dec 15, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone of you has seen this and in the event y'all haven't; can we take a moment of pause on this debate and say a prayer for the kids and adults murdered in Connecticut this morning?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
Thanks!
Some holiday gift the families of the 18 children dead will have!!!
Yes...I agree....let us take a moment of pause from this abortion debate board (where proaborts are fighting for the right to kill innocent little humans located in the womb), and say a prayer for the innocent little humans killed in their classrooms by someone who thought he had the right to kill them.

::::brief pause of silence::::

Now, although WE wouldn't do such a thing, we mustn't judge this man who did. It would be unChristlike to do that.

CD can you please repost the quotes of the bible that you did the other day about not judging......loving/praying for enemies...etc..?

Kthanks.

Do we support his free will choices but not his choices foo and bitler?@@

<<<<<<end sarcasm>>>>

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#270086 Dec 15, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
One can't have an honest conversation with you Inkstain, for many reasons. One is because YOU lie about what you've said and then you lie about what OTHERS say too.
Nobody is making anything up. YOU claimed your son in law was making it "impossible" for your daughter to teach your grandkids her faith. Oh and lets not forget that you also claimed that you havent bothered to get in his face about it because he lives across the country, and likely you dont want to get involved.
Let me tell you sister, if ANYONE had tried to keep my father or mother from educating their grandchild about THEIR faith, they've have faced a righteous wrath, and rightfully so. And similarly, if anyone had tried to keep me from trying to let her keep a connection to HER MOTHERS faith, they'd have gotten it from ME with both barrels.
One can only conclude that either
A) you were lying about the whole thing to begin with ...or...
B) you were exaggerating about the whole thing, and in your usual stumblefooted way - made yourself, your daughter and your son-in-law ALL look like idiots ....or....
C) You're just a moron, you're SIL really IS that big a jackass and now you're trying to backpedal from making him AND you look as bad as you did.
My vote is all three. When her story started to change. I figured that her story was just that.. A pathetic story that was stupid as it was/is absurd.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270087 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Ocean56: I've been watching the coverage of this horrific story since first seeing it early yesterday afternoon, CD. It is every parent's worst nightmare come true, and truly heartbreaking.
I thought having children was a horrific story to you. I thought you said children are burdensome & little inconveniences. You have the same mindset as the perpetrator who killed the 20 children: Kill the little inconveniences. You promote executing small human beings on a daily basis. You damn fool....& hypocrite, to boot.
_______
Ocean56: The residents of this town, especially the families of the children and adults who were murdered yesterday, will never be the same.
Niether will the mothers/fathers/family/communi ties after the 4,000 baby executions taking place in American abortuaries today. These heinous acts have YOUR support.
Again you use the Newtown tragedy to promote your own sick and classless remarks. Truthfully, I see you having more in common with the perpetrator of this heinous crime. You're the sick freak here.
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#270088 Dec 15, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
How vulgar of you to use the Newtown tragedy for your insults. Maybe you should have used the time spent to write this classless post to pray for the families, faux-Christian
Killing innocent life is just that. That man was demonized for justifying killing innocent little humans. Proaborts justify killing too.

How blind ARE you people?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#270089 Dec 15, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody can understand you on any thread.
Your like the guy who had eight bad wives.
TomTroll understood it just fine. So did Stupid Sassy, if I recall correctly. They both denied it's validity, but they STILL understood it. Only you and June seem to be having a problem. Of course, June's insane or senile, or both. That should be a comfort to you, huh?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270090 Dec 15, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's what you guys refuse to see or acknowledge. A lot of you are no different than that selfish gunman shooting elementary-aged kids right before Christmas.
It doesn't matter you think your way is better. It doesn't matter you think you have all the answers. It does matter that you want to override the individual's decision with your form of "Christianity" regardless of what others want or their civil rights to believe in something different. It does matter you try to equate what's legal with what's illegal.
Not one of you has offered sincere condolences for this tragedy. But you have tried to use it to your advantage. And I find that disgusting.
I agree. These so-called Christians are disgusting opportunistic vultures.
zef

Los Angeles, CA

#270091 Dec 15, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
no, it's not just his/her problem you small minded fool. it is our problem. all of us. because if you believe that the current overall societal mindset that cheapens and devalues human life -- "all" human life -- does not play a part in the more frequent occurrence of evil, callous and unthinkable slaughter like what happened in connecticut, then you're more naive than one could imagine.
get your silly clueless head out of the sand.
They say they are torturing me because I can see them. Or because they say I enjoy seeing them. Which is just another lame excuse to torture someone they don't like. If I shouldn't be allowed to see them, or if I am being tortured because I can see them, than perhaps they shouldn't exist.
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#270092 Dec 15, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Last night you pretended to be saddened by the murders of 20 school children.
You said you wished prolifers would've been killed, instead.
Here's the thing, sweetcheeks, YOU spend your days doing all you can to kill children who temporarily reside in utero. Prolifers do all they can to SAVE the lives of innocents.
If you can't see the irony in you faux-sorrow, then drug addiction & living a life of debauchery are the least of your issues.
Foo is an evil person.She supports AND proudly escorts little humans to their death. She leads the killer to the place that will kill her child.

They are satanic.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 2 hr Paul Yanks 343,983
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 4 hr Gutsy n Meth Head 47,159
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... (Nov '16) 4 hr Dudley 7,206
Make Hollywood Great Again (Feb '17) 4 hr WATCHING LIVONIA 16
coumo is un documented 4 hr WATCHING LIVONIA 1
joey d`s pizzeria (Aug '09) Jan '18 Kapowcat1 4
News Fearing Deportation, Food Vendors Are Leaving N... Jan '18 Go trump 1

Jackson-Heights Jobs

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages