Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311625 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266550 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee I dont know Skanky, perhaps becasue its not a hospital's job to let a patient DIE when she COULD BE SAVED??
Gee, what a concept huh??
You fkn IDIOT.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Yet here you are doing EXACTLY that.
The FACT is that its NOT inconclusive that she died when an abortion could have saved her.
You didn't even bother to do ANY reading on this at all did you? You're just talking out your ass again.
The male or female offspring/child of that woman is just as valuable in the eyes of God. The hospitals job is to save BOTH mom and child.

Again,where is the proof that this woman would have lived had the abortion taken place. I'd like to see it.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266551 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
How exactly are your rights being taken away and preventing you from practicing your religion?
Nobody is forcing you to use birth control.
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
*sigh*
You are correct. NOBODY is *forcing* me to go against my beliefs.
But,we are not talking about the EMPLOYEE here. We are talking about EMPLOYERS being FORCED to.
Nobody's FORCING the employer to use birth control either you MORON. Nobody's FORCING them to distribute birth control for that matter either.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266552 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
@@ No what's "sick" are idiots like you still trying to exploit that girl over two years later as a way to "get" to me. And you FAIL at that too.
What's STUPID is expecting that I'd post anything after the way you freaks react to someone trying to help someone else. Some people asked in private, and what was going on was shared in private. After all, its not like you or Lynne gave a shit beyond what you thought you could use it for your own agenda.
Its kind of like your "religion" that way, you only break it out when you want to weild it as a weapon, otherwise, you can't be bothered.
No. YOU bashed the Catholics on this thread. You blamed this womans death on us. You lied and THAT is why you refuse to provide the "real facts" of this womans death. You gave TWO different versions of the womans death.

It is YOU that used this poor woman for YOUR agenda...(your bigotry AND your abortion motives).

Shame on you.

Your posts PROVED that you deliberately exploited Ariel too.

Now you can kick and scream ALL you want,but you only have yourself to blame.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266553 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
What they are providing is health insurance. The employer is not providing birth control. They are simply providing health insurance. What the employee uses the insurance for is not the employer's business.
Dont confuse SKanky with FACTS LNM!
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266554 Nov 27, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I don't support the choices. I support the woman's rights.
Why do you dishonestly ignore the reason I'd have had an abortion?
I don't support the choices. I don't support the womans *legal* rights. I would NEVER abort my child.

You can't say the same.

Doesn't matter why you'd abort. YOU'D ABORT. PERIOD. You not only support a womans right..YOU PERSONALLY would act on that choice.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266555 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
;)
ENTER GOOGLICIOUS (like I said).
LOL
Riiiiight Skanky. Three hours AFTER I left, and an two hours BEFORE I came back on. For ONE post.

Yeah. That's me.@@

You idiot.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266556 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>YOU said you would abort your child if you got pregnant . YOU support abortion rights, even late term abortion.
So what? Your friend Skanky said she'd rather her kid DIE than have a life saving abortion. She supports death over life.

You seem to just support stupidity.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266557 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Oh take a freakin chill pill already. I never made fun of her looks. I was laughing at the post about the pagan princess of trans fat.
"""" I'm sure there are physical features on every one of you that we could trash you about if we saw a picture of you""""
:/
No.
I am beautiful..no matter what they say...words can't bring me down...I am beautiful in every single way....yes words can't bring me down...oh no...so don't you bring me down...TODAY..
Beauty is skin deep, and ugly is to the bone, which is what YOU are Skanky.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266558 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Did I not give you scripture that proved you wrong?
HE WHO HEARS YOU(PETER)HEARS ME.
Who gives a shit about your version of "scripture" that doesn't follow your version of "faith" Skanky?

ESPECIALLY when it comes from a phony like YOU?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266559 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you did not. I wrote that Jesus said nothing about birth control. Where in that scripture does Jesus mention birth control?
It doesn't. Just like it doesn't mention insurance.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266560 Nov 27, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>

Why do you dishonestly ignore the reason I'd have had an abortion?
Because it supports her agenda.

Oh, AND because she's as dishonest as her idiot buddies here are.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266561 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>""" "Than our children? Not really"""" """"
So,if you had a choice to save either your daughter or your cat,you'd perhaps choose to save your cat?
WOW,just WOW.
Which letters of which word in the TWO WORD sentence "NOT REALLY" confused you Skanky.

Now if I had to save my cat or you? Hands down, the cat ANY day. Wouldnt even have to give it a second thought.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266562 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I don't support the choices. I don't support the womans *legal* rights. I would NEVER abort my child.
You can't say the same.
Doesn't matter why you'd abort. YOU'D ABORT. PERIOD. You not only support a womans right..YOU PERSONALLY would act on that choice.
And the fact remains that I don't "support" the choices. I support a woman's legal, and moral, right to make her own choice. Period.

I'm sorry you're too stupid to understand.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266563 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Okay,let's see. You keep saying that the Jewish faith "requires" an abortion if the womans life is in danger. Yet,you also say that it is between the woman,Dr and Rabbi. Sounds like a contradiction. Which is it...REQUIRED or a DECISION made between Doc,Rabbi and woman?
If a woman is dying on the table and 'so called' REQUIRES an abortion,then WHO has time to have mom,Rabbi and Dr "decide".
]

Again for the stupid thing - YOU keep saying "dying on the table" not me or anyone else. Those in the Jewish faith dont need to wait that long if there's indications before hand.
Again, YOU support a woman electively aborting so you are going against your own religious beliefs.
AGAIN you're wrong. Stop lying. I support her right to make her own CHOICE. Period.
""""" "In fact, weirdly, one of the only methods that's frowned upon is in the Orthodoxy, and that's condom use, and that's because its against MAN'S requirement to be fruitful and multiply""" """"" """""
Condom...or any other contraceptive...is forbidden because it prevents man's requirement to be fruitful and multiply. In other words, using the act(sex) that God intended for that purpose(to be fruitful and multiply)while PREVENTING is "frowned upon".
Thank you for proving my point that God forbids artificial contraception.
You're not only a moron, but you're wrong. Again AND as usual.

Try actually READING the links you're given about other faiths Skanky.

"In principle, birth control is permitted, so long as the couple is committed to eventually fulfilling the mitzvah to be fruitful and multiply (which, at a minimum, consists of having two children, one of each gender).

The issue in birth control is not whether it is permitted, but what method is permitted. It is well-established that methods that destroy the seed or block the passage of the seed are not permitted, thus condoms are not permitted for birth control. However, the pill and IUD are acceptable forms of birth control under Jewish law."

Now I realise you ENJOY making yourself look like an ass because you refuse to acknowledge the FACTS about other faiths, AND I'm more than HAPPY to oblige helping you make an even BIGGER idiot of yourself, but damn bitch, you MIGHT just want to actually LEARN something one day.@@

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266564 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up the RCC teachings(Catholic Catechism) on artificial birth control.
It will always give you biblical proof.
What I mentioned about "church teachings" was instituted by God and Christ.
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....

Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.

Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.

In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.

Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266565 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>The male or female offspring/child of that woman is just as valuable in the eyes of God. The hospitals job is to save BOTH mom and child.
Bullshit. The hospital's life is to save the life they CAN save.
Again,where is the proof that this woman would have lived had the abortion taken place. I'd like to see it.
Then perhaps you should actually do some research about it. After all, its not like you're going to "see" what I or anyone else shows you that goes against your agenda. You like to ignore what you dont agree with.

In THIS case, you dont know shit about the case at all, and are just mouthing off in your typical ignorance. LOL!
Husker du

United States

#266566 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you did not. I wrote that Jesus said nothing about birth control. Where in that scripture does Jesus mention birth control?
Sex is a gift from God, He didn't have to make it so enjoyable, but
He did. Using birth control leads to illicit sex,pornography etc not the way God intended sex to be. Sex is intended to be between husband and wife God made sex fun and for pleasure BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.and for procreation. Back in Christ's time ,women were called wh*res for having pre marital sex. The ones who would use birth control were the wh*res. The Culture never had to deal with contraception .

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266568 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> No. YOU bashed the Catholics on this thread. You blamed this womans death on us. You lied and THAT is why you refuse to provide the "real facts" of this womans death. You gave TWO different versions of the womans death.
It is YOU that used this poor woman for YOUR agenda...(your bigotry AND your abortion motives).
Shame on you.
Your posts PROVED that you deliberately exploited Ariel too.
Now you can kick and scream ALL you want,but you only have yourself to blame.
You're an idiot SKanky. I gave ONE version of her death - placental abruption and HER refusal to allow an abortion, and some POSSIBLE reasons it MAY have happened the way it did.

Yes we DO know more now and NO I will not share it with the likes of you that has proven you will exploit whatever you can in the pursuit of YOUR agenda. Suffice to say that she died of a placental abruption and her refusal of treatment because of her faith.

I didn't blame YOU at all. I dont believe you are a catholic to begin with, you're nothing but a mouthy and phony POS.

I DO blame a "faith" that puts such fear into women that they would rather die than have their lives saved when they CAN be saved. I blame a "faith" that creates assholes like you that would rather their CHILDREN die than abort. I blame a faith that demands a hospital allow someone to die WHEN THAT PERSON COULD BE SAVED.

I think that ANY faith that thinks their "g-d" would rather his child die than be saved is SERIOUSLY f'd up.

You people want it both ways. YOu dont want to let people die if medical technology of life support can keep them alive, but you wont allow medical technology to save someone if it means something not even born will die. Its F'd up and its STUPID.

Then again, many of these are the same people that thought it was perfectly okay to allow children to be raped by the leaders of the faith, and to keep moving them around to CONTINUE to molest children.

That's my opinion and guess what Skanky, I dont give to shits if you or anyone else likes it or not.
Husker du

United States

#266569 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....
Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.
Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.
In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.
Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...
Read the whole thing http://www.catholic.com/tracts/birth-control

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266572 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I don't support the choices. I don't support the womans *legal* rights.
We know. Fortunately, other than being a willfully ignorant fool on a messageboard, you're meaningless in real life in the scheme of things.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 1 min Enough 11,935
News Taxpayers spent $127 million on this New York g... 1 hr Vilis 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Earthling-1 61,051
News Rizzoli & Isles' introduction of Maura's husban... 4 hr Ex Fan 1
Google: HPV Related Cancers 4 hr Claire Underwood 1
Moving to NYC...possibly 6 hr tralala 1
Giants talk back (Dec '06) 6 hr jimi-yank 5,091

Jackson-Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages