Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

[Katie]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't find it a "waste of time" to demonstrate in real-time what deceitful, lying scum you proaborts are.
When you lose credibility, your opinion is meaningless.
Hope that helps.

So how's med school going?

[Kathwynn]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't find it a "waste of time" to demonstrate in real-time what deceitful, lying scum you proaborts are.
When you lose credibility, your opinion is meaningless.
Hope that helps.

The only ones that are meaningless on these forums are you bigoted fool that cal themselves prolife.

You are meaningless in to a woman making a decision concerning her pregnancy.

Meaningless to any one with any common sense.

As for credibility. Your first posts were all it took to tag many you fools as not having any. if not to long after that to really understand what true creeps you were to every one.

[AyakaNeo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't find it a "waste of time" to demonstrate in real-time what deceitful, lying scum you proaborts are.
When you lose credibility, your opinion is meaningless.
Hope that helps.

Really? How many precious lives were murdered today while you and other self proclaimed pro life advocates post on an abortion forum discussing a subject from 2 years ago that has nothing to do with reproduction or Roe vs. Wade?

Speaking of deceitful, credibility, and subjects off topic do you believe that Lil Lily always tells the truth?
When you lose credibility, your opinion is meaningless.
Hope that helps with your answer, a simple yes or no will do.

[AyakaNeo]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
So how's med school going?

Med School?

[Bitner]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
Bitner: The full statement would be that the slaves were considered 3/5ths of a person in the census, for the purpose of taxation and representation in gov't.
__________
How does the "purpose" for considering blacks 3/5 persons mitigate that they were considered 3/5 persons.
What other legal purposes of considering blacks 3/5 persons make it offensive?
You & Johnny excuse designating blacks 3/5 persons because it was 'only' for purposes of the census.
I find that offensive.
You don't.
Racists.

Because it had nothing to do with whether or not individuals were people. It was only for a census. A fact that YOU keep ignoring.

No, Liar, the decision did so. Johnny and I are only educating you about history, since apparently the school you attended failed to do so.

Racist? What, by correcting you on your incorrect reading of history? LOL, nonsense. Not only a liar, but a Drama Queen as well. I'm not surprised.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text> Where does he get all the sour grapes he's sucking, anyway?

Currently from Lynne's behind apparently.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
Foo: Depending on the context, no they're not "interchangable". "human" being used as a noun is NOT interchangable as "human" being used as an ajective ya dummy.
______
If you actually looked at the context, you'd see Bitner was using "human" as a noun. Ergo, it IS interchangeable w/ human being.
You tried to use a "context" argument, when the context was right in front of you poking you between your closely-set, beady eyes.
^^^ Bonefide Bonehead ^^^

Wrong again son. Bit was talking about a "human fetus", FETUS being the noun you dolt.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
Bringing up a poster's lack of credibility has relevance & merit in ANY Topix Forum. Wouldn't you agree? Yes or no?

Coming from the walking, talking hemorrhoid who hasn't had any credibility here in YEARS, this is amusing as hell! LOL!!

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
(Bitner likes butter & bacon sandwiches)

And you think YOU have credibility No Relevance?@@ You're a bitter little peon, nothing more, nothing less.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
HUSKER: And Bitner has to have it on white dollar store brand bread.
LMAO!

And the sad thing is, you two idiots think you're christian.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

HUSKER wrote:

<quoted text> Foo IS googleisious

Uh no Knutbar, I'm not. But hey, dont let FACTS get in the way of your stupidity.@@

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
HUSKER: Foo IS googleisious.
-----
Makes sense. She's made a jackass out of herself as Foo. She's too a'skeert to come in as foo.

"a'skeert"? Of what? Knutbar, the white trash idiot, or you, the ball-less wonder? ROFLMAO!

No Relevance, you couldn't scare a fly, and you certainly dont scare me. You never have, and you never will. You're a basement dweller at best who couldn't intimidate anyone.

You idiot.@@

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
Bitner: The full statement would be that the slaves were considered 3/5ths of a person in the census, for the purpose of taxation and representation in gov't.
__________
How does the "purpose" for considering blacks 3/5 persons mitigate that they were considered 3/5 persons.
What other legal purposes of considering blacks 3/5 persons make it offensive?
You & Johnny excuse designating blacks 3/5 persons because it was 'only' for purposes of the census.
I find that offensive.
You don't.
Racists.

Yes folks, No Relevance really IS this stupid. Poor lil fella....

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

AyakaNeo wrote:

<quoted text>Med School?

Oh some years back the idiot claimed to be in med school. Of course he was as full of shit then as he is now.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

Kathwynn wrote:

<quoted text>
yes he was a devout catholic, but he even stated his stories are not allegories.. DERR!!
Look, knutter, by your logic any one that writes a story that religious devout and the book hits the big. It must be allegory.
By your logic Anne Rices vampire series is an allegory as she is a devout catholic. McCaffery was a devout catholic. So her Pern stories must be allegories..
The one thing all three writers have in common. All have stated their stories are just a good yarn, an a adventure yarn. Escapist fiction. Not meant to be any deeper than that.
Tolkien even wrote in his foreword that his stories were not an allegory.. How much more plain does that have to be for you to get it.
You are reading a book of fantasy. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Dont bother to try to teach the Knut anything factual, she will ignore everything, INCLUDING WHAT THE MAN HIMSELF SAID over what her bullshit version of "faith" says.

Just sit back and enjoy the new Bevis and Butthead show staring NR and Knutter. Its amusing as hell really!

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
When you lose credibility, your opinion is meaningless.

You only believe that while you delude yourself that it doesn't apply to you and to Lynne, when in the REAL world, you and that cowardly idiot haven't had any credibility here in YEARS.

[Carbon-12]

No Relativism wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's the yes/no question for you to answer again.
Were blacks considered 3/5 persons?
Yes or no?
(Mr. Rogers would be disappointed in your OCD exhibition)

No, they were considered slaves. You are arguing this wrongly. The racist Southern view was that slaves should be counted as a full person to increase the political power of a slave owning class/region. It had noting to do with the personhood of the slaves, whose humanity was not even being considered by the players in this political maneuver. In no context that I consider important were black people considered 3/5ths of a person.

[No Relativism]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
You only believe that while you delude yourself that it doesn't apply to you and to Lynne, when in the REAL world, you and that cowardly idiot haven't had any credibility here in YEARS.

You are so wee-weed up that you spittle out run on sentences.

Pull yourself together, sister.

[No Relativism]

Carbon-12 wrote:

<quoted text>
No, they were considered slaves. You are arguing this wrongly. The racist Southern view was that slaves should be counted as a full person to increase the political power of a slave owning class/region. It had noting to do with the personhood of the slaves, whose humanity was not even being considered by the players in this political maneuver. In no context that I consider important were black people considered 3/5ths of a person.

Johnny Carbon: "In no context that I consider important were black people considered 3/5ths of a person."

Tell that to black people.

[Katie]

AyakaNeo wrote:

<quoted text>Med School?

He talks about Foo's credibility as if he's forgotten his own ruse of being in med school. If he can go back a couple years to dig up dirt, so can anyone.
<shrug>

(it's just a stupid game being perpetuated by the "wronged in her own mind" Triple L and her "defenders")