Obama promises more than 600,000 stim...

Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs

There are 109504 comments on the Newsday story from Jun 8, 2009, titled Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs. In it, Newsday reports that:

President Barack Obama promised Monday to deliver more than 600,000 jobs through his $787 billion stimulus plan this summer, with federal agencies pumping billions into public works projects, schools and summer youth programs.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

nac

Massapequa, NY

#118926 May 13, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Your shallow thinking is why the Republican party is coming unhinged. You are the type they target. Someone so un-educated, so dense that you can't do anything but repeat the foxnews line that Bush and Cheney are irrelevant to today's mess in the mid-east. That you can't or refuse to see the hypocrisy in such statements. That you don't or can't see how the Republican majority in the House spends ALL it's time trying to decimate and destroy our American government by any means at hand.
Your ignorance of the Accountability Review Board's report is only compounded by you and your party's despicable escalation of attacks and suspicion of every person who doesn't agree with you.
In the real world two views of an incident would not be grounds to accuse the other party of lying. The Republican's and you by inference are going batshlt, accusing EVERYBODY of lying, now even including the CIA and our military leadership. Your desperation is becoming visibly psychotic and, if you and your traitorous "leaders" continue to attack our (the majority of the American people's) government for the obviously political damage you hope to inflict, you wreck all chances of fixing the problems we need to fix merely for the benefit of a pure power grab by a Republican leadership that doesn't know any other way to get power.
And don't even have any suspicion of a party that declares that sees government as the enemy unless their running it.
You and them care nothing about the people of this country only yourself and the destruction of Barack Obama. That's it, that's all you brown shirt thugs post on this forum.
So now, Mr Objective, go back and remind us all how Bush lying to get us into war in Iraq, killing hundreds of thousands of people isn't relevant.
Remind us again, please, how Bush ignoring warnings of an impending Al Qaeda attack in our country causing 3,000 deaths isn't relevant.
Remind us again how Al Qaeda had no presence in Iraq before the 2003 U.S. invasion. But a new organization, known as Al Qaeda in Iraq, has since formed and has attacked U.S. and Iraqi forces, and wages regular attacks on Iraqi civilians. Additionally, by 2013, AQI has spread offshoots and technical know-how to Syria, Jordan, and Libya. And that this isn't relevant.
Remind us again how Iraq became a "front" in the war on terrorism, a front that George Bush created and that that isn't relevant.
Remind us again how George Bush and the Republican Party said they weren't interested in catching and killing the leader of Al Qaeda that isn't relevant.
You are a mindless twit just like all the rest of the right wing storm troopers. Dedicating your energies to destroying Barack Obama instead of leading the way to solutions to our many challenges.
Every issue you've brought to this forum is a foxnews talking point attack on Barack Obama. Every one. Minion.
Bush lied about the WMD's in Iraq. Obama lied about Benghazi.

I don't think lies about either are acceptable. You think Bush's lies are bad and Obama's lies are acceptable....and I'm the shallow thinker. Duly noted. We're done here.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118927 May 13, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Whine and deflect, little Alinskyite, whine.
The facts remain on the public record in sworn testimony before Congress.
And as for your favorite mindless reactionary "FOX!! spew? Long past its discrd-by date. Why lookee here:
"For a long time, it seemed like the idea of a coverup was just a Republican obsession. But now there is something to it."
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdes...
Oh, lookee there. Oh, dear. Oh, my. Not Fox at all, is it. Nothing you could remotely label as 'reichwing' at all, in fact.
THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE. Paragon of eastern progressive intellectual thought.
Yes, there is something to it. There always was. So suck on that.
As usual, nothing of reason or substance in your partisan spew requiring any further response.
The reality is the world is a messy place and only right wing geriatrics like you would be unable to realize that. The hypocrisy coming from you guys is phenomenal. I've tried to point out the errors of your hive thinking but I'm beginning to think you're just to far gone.

The glee in your writing is so self-incriminating I'd have thought you'd want to have toned it down a bit, just to appear more rational.

Just another bankrupt Republican fishing for something to attack Obama with. It wouldn't even be so bad if your whipped little party could do something else at the same time.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118928 May 13, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush lied about the WMD's in Iraq. Obama lied about Benghazi.
I don't think lies about either are acceptable. You think Bush's lies are bad and Obama's lies are acceptable....and I'm the shallow thinker. Duly noted. We're done here.
Whoa, not so fast there, Mr. Objective. You really are a piece of cake. You kinda left out some things didn't you?

I mean beside the part about Bush lying to get us into a war killing hundreds of thousands of people.

No comment from you on how Bush ignored the warnings of an impending Al Qaeda attack in our country causing 3,000 deaths?

Or how Al Qaeda had no presence in Iraq before the 2003 U.S. invasion and has spread offshoots and technical know-how to Syria, Jordan, and LIBYA.

And no comment from you on how George Bush and the Republican Party said they weren't interested in catching and killing the leader of Al Qaeda?

And I guess you're fine with the US consulate in Pakistan bombing, killing ten people?

And the 2004 attack on the US embassy in Uzbekistan, killing people.

And in 2008, the US embassy in Yemen bombing, another ten people killed.

Over 60 embassy attacks under Bush. And your okay with that? How many investigations did you call for then?

And your disgusting answer::"Bush lied about the WMD's in Iraq. Obama lied about Benghazi."

Yeah, those would be equivalent in the mind of a right wing hack like you.

and yeah, you are a shallow thinker. Duly noted. We are done here.

joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118929 May 13, 2013
Right-Wing Benghazi Witch Hunt Sets Sights On Pickering, Mullen

Continued Investigation Used To Help GOP Fundraise

Like I said, with Republicans everyone's a liar except them.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118930 May 13, 2013
Bush and His Aides Made 935 False Statements about Iraq In the 2 Years After 9/11

In 2008, two non partisan groups released a study that determined that President Bush and his top aides made 935 false statements about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following September 11, 2001.

Former Bush White House press secretary Scott McClellan wrote,“top Bush aides had outlined a strategy for carefully orchestrating the coming campaign to aggressively sell the war… In the permanent campaign era, it was all about manipulating sources of public opinion to the president’s advantage.”(What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception)

“President George W. Bush and seven of his administration’s top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq…

Just a little reminder.
nac

Massapequa, NY

#118931 May 13, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Whoa, not so fast there, Mr. Objective. You really are a piece of cake. You kinda left out some things didn't you?
I mean beside the part about Bush lying to get us into a war killing hundreds of thousands of people.
No comment from you on how Bush ignored the warnings of an impending Al Qaeda attack in our country causing 3,000 deaths?
Or how Al Qaeda had no presence in Iraq before the 2003 U.S. invasion and has spread offshoots and technical know-how to Syria, Jordan, and LIBYA.
And no comment from you on how George Bush and the Republican Party said they weren't interested in catching and killing the leader of Al Qaeda?
And I guess you're fine with the US consulate in Pakistan bombing, killing ten people?
And the 2004 attack on the US embassy in Uzbekistan, killing people.
And in 2008, the US embassy in Yemen bombing, another ten people killed.
Over 60 embassy attacks under Bush. And your okay with that? How many investigations did you call for then?
And your disgusting answer::"Bush lied about the WMD's in Iraq. Obama lied about Benghazi."
Yeah, those would be equivalent in the mind of a right wing hack like you.
and yeah, you are a shallow thinker. Duly noted. We are done here.
So I can't comment on current events without first addressing EVERYTHING else that's happened in US history? I don't have that kind of time, joe. Maybe you do, but I don't.

Keep cheerleading an administration that thinks so little of you that it constantly tells preposterous lies to you. Good day.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118932 May 13, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
So I can't comment on current events without first addressing EVERYTHING else that's happened in US history? I don't have that kind of time, joe. Maybe you do, but I don't.
Keep cheerleading an administration that thinks so little of you that it constantly tells preposterous lies to you. Good day.
Yep, just as we continue to see, another right wing tard who's more than happy to attack the "current" administration but doesn't have time to discuss anything that undermines their hypocritical mindset.

Oh, and by the way, I'll repeat the fact that only you azwipes keep seeing me as supporting the Obama administration when I've ONLY been criticizing the Republicans (and the wing-nut tea party, of course).
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118933 May 13, 2013
Moving on...

IT’S NO SURPRISE that Senate Republicans grouse about Obama administration policies on enforcing civil rights laws or limiting greenhouse-gas emissions. They are entitled to their policy views.

It’s a different matter for Republican leaders to manifest their views by blocking confirmation to Cabinet positions of the officials in charge of those policies. By doing so, on absurdly flimsy pretexts, Republicans not only impede the president’s nominations for labor secretary and chief of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), but also undermine the normal flow of government, upon which presidents of both parties have depended. They help to subvert whatever is left of Americans’ faith in government. And they may give frustrated Democrats an excuse to rewrite Senate rules in a way that both parties will have cause to regret.

...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-go...
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118934 May 13, 2013
Contrary to popular belief, President Obama doesn't have a magic wand

GOP opposition to everything Obama supports is the most important story of the last four years of American politics

When Congress is controlled by the other party, you have greater opportunity for obstructionism (see: Congress 2011-present). Of course when that opposition party is the modern GOP, then you have the opportunity for historic, mindless, wanton and heartless obstructionism that strikes at the very heart of representative democracy.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/...
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118935 May 13, 2013
Michelle Bachman, another great Republican leader

It’s no secret our nation may very well be experiencing the hand of judgment … Our nation has seen judgment not once but twice on September 11.

But if Bachmann has identified the problem, fear not, because she also has the solution.

That’s why we’re going to have “9-1-1 Pray” on that day. To protect America from further attacks, the former Republican front-runner for the U.S. presidency then proposed a comprehensive national security plan:

What is the answer? The answer is … humbling ourselves before an almighty God, crying out to an almighty God, saying not of ourselves but you, would you save us oh God? We repent of our sins, we turn away from them, we seek you, we seek your ways.

I think Issa's Benghazi committee is going after the wrong guy. He should be hauling God in for interrogation.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118936 May 13, 2013
LOL Of The Week: Destroying Hillary Clinton Is The GOP’s Only Hope For 2016

Just days after C-SPAN began its Road to White House 2016, front runners for the GOP presidential nomination Rand Paul (R-KY) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) have begun blasting the woman they fear they may have to face in less than four years – Hillary Clinton.

While House Republicans are intent on using the tragedy in Benghazi to engage in their ritual witch-hunt of any Democratic president who wins a second term, Paul and Rubio — along with Karl Rove and Dick Cheney – are intent on destroying the reputation of America’s most popular politician, likely in hopes of dissuading her from running.

Desperate, uncontainable fear of a Hillary candidacy is one of the few Republican policies that makes sense.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118937 May 13, 2013
BTW....

It is being reported that Republican, deep cover operatives placed in the IRS by Karl Rove under the Bush administration are responsible for targeting tea party groups, leaking the information to bring attacks on the Obama administration.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118938 May 13, 2013
Bush Secretary of Defense Robert Gates Calls Out Conservatives on Benghazi

" I think the one place where I might be able to say something useful has to do with some of the talk of the military response. And I listened to the testimony of both Secretary Panetta and General Dempsey, and frankly had I been in the job at the time, I think that my decisions would have been just as theirs were.

We don’t have a ready force standing by in the Middle East, despite all the turmoil that’s going on with planes on strip alert, troops ready to deploy at a moment’s notice. And so getting someone there in a timely way would have been very difficult if not impossible.

And frankly I’ve heard, well, why didn’t you just fly a fighter jet over there to scare ‘em with the noise or something. Given the number of surface to air missiles that have disappeared from Qaddafi’s arsenals I would not have approved sending an aircraft, a single aircraft, over Benghazi under those circumstances.

And with respect to sending in Special Forces or a small group of people to try and provide help, based on everything I’ve read people really didn’t know what was going on in Benghazi contemporaneously, and to send some small number of Special Forces or other troops in without knowing what the environment is, without knowing what the threat is, without having any intelligence in terms of what is actually going on on the ground, I think would have been very dangerous and personally I would not have approved that because we just don’t — it’s sort of a cartoonish impression of military capabilities and military forces. The one thing our forces are noted for is planning and preparation before we send people in harm’s way, and there just wasn’t time.
nac

Massapequa, NY

#118939 May 13, 2013
joe wrote:
Moving on...
IT’S NO SURPRISE that Senate Republicans grouse about Obama administration policies on enforcing civil rights laws or limiting greenhouse-gas emissions. They are entitled to their policy views.
It’s a different matter for Republican leaders to manifest their views by blocking confirmation to Cabinet positions of the officials in charge of those policies. By doing so, on absurdly flimsy pretexts, Republicans not only impede the president’s nominations for labor secretary and chief of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), but also undermine the normal flow of government, upon which presidents of both parties have depended. They help to subvert whatever is left of Americans’ faith in government. And they may give frustrated Democrats an excuse to rewrite Senate rules in a way that both parties will have cause to regret.
...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-go...
The IRS should audit those Republicans!
nac

Massapequa, NY

#118940 May 13, 2013
joe wrote:
LOL Of The Week: Destroying Hillary Clinton Is The GOP’s Only Hope For 2016
Just days after C-SPAN began its Road to White House 2016, front runners for the GOP presidential nomination Rand Paul (R-KY) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) have begun blasting the woman they fear they may have to face in less than four years – Hillary Clinton.
While House Republicans are intent on using the tragedy in Benghazi to engage in their ritual witch-hunt of any Democratic president who wins a second term, Paul and Rubio — along with Karl Rove and Dick Cheney – are intent on destroying the reputation of America’s most popular politician, likely in hopes of dissuading her from running.
Desperate, uncontainable fear of a Hillary candidacy is one of the few Republican policies that makes sense.
It's either that... or they don't appreciate being lied to about Benghazi.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118941 May 13, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
It's either that... or they don't appreciate being lied to about Benghazi.
You sure use the word LIE alot, don't you. As I've said before, the only people using that word (besides you and little teddy) are the Republicans and they haven't actually proved anybody has lied, you know. This country requires proof and a trial to determine that. Til now all we have are right wing storm troopers ACCUSING people of lying. You don't seem to know the difference, right.

Why not just send us your little link leading to the PROOF that someone is lying.'Cause until that happens the one here lying is you and Republican buddies.

Hey, I thought you were done with all this. Yeah, right.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118942 May 13, 2013
PPP’s newest national poll finds that Republicans aren’t getting much traction with their focus on Benghazi over the last week.

Voters trust Hillary Clinton over Congressional Republicans on the issue of Benghazi by a 49/39 margin and Clinton’s +8 net favorability rating at 52/44 is identical to what it was on our last national poll in late March.

Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans remain very unpopular with a 36/57 favorability rating.

Yeah, she’s smiling.

She is the scandal whisperer.

http://crooksandliars.com/
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118943 May 13, 2013
More from the anti-American storm-trooper tea party:

Four months ago, Tea Party candidates took over the state government of South Carolina – both chambers of the General Assembly, as well as the governorship. Together, the newly elected office holders have been hellbent on eviscerating every social program they can get their hands on in the name of doing “the people’s business.”

Among the proposals that have been introduced are a $200 million cut to state universities, shortening early voting, totally eliminating both Sunday voting and same-day voters’ registration, easing environmental restrictions on fracking, cutting benefits to the unemployed (already signed into law), refusing federal dollars for Medicaid expansion for the poor, and–oh, yeah–establishing an official state religion.

Whew, should thrill you righties. Especially that part about establishing an official state religion.
nac

Merrick, NY

#118944 May 13, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
You sure use the word LIE alot, don't you. As I've said before, the only people using that word (besides you and little teddy) are the Republicans and they haven't actually proved anybody has lied, you know. This country requires proof and a trial to determine that. Til now all we have are right wing storm troopers ACCUSING people of lying. You don't seem to know the difference, right.
Why not just send us your little link leading to the PROOF that someone is lying.'Cause until that happens the one here lying is you and Republican buddies.
Hey, I thought you were done with all this. Yeah, right.
Jay Carney said,“The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two, of these two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility’ because ‘consulate’ was inaccurate.”

But

ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/...

Jay Carney attempted to mislead America... ya know, lie.

I'm sure that since he's not a Republican, you won't consider it a lie, and I look forward to hearing what you call an intentional attempt to mislead Americans.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118945 May 13, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
Jay Carney said,“The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two, of these two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility’ because ‘consulate’ was inaccurate.”
But
ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/...
Jay Carney attempted to mislead America... ya know, lie.
I'm sure that since he's not a Republican, you won't consider it a lie, and I look forward to hearing what you call an intentional attempt to mislead Americans.
You are pitiful.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jackson-Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
jets talk back (Dec '07) 5 min jimi-yank 13,324
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 19 min Susanm 312,821
Giants talk back (Dec '06) 56 min jimi-yank 5,732
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 1 hr jimi-yank 334,397
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... 1 hr Nemo 60
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Into The Night 62,340
HILLARY will be THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER (Dec '14) 4 hr DILLIGAF 13,882

Jackson-Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Jackson-Heights Mortgages