Who do you support for U.S. Senate in New York in 2010?

Bigfoot wrote:

<quoted text>I am Bigfoot - Let's meet a the Clinton and battle this out!

What a shame to clame the fame of my name

voter

Ok, folks, the topic is "Who do you support for U.S. Senate in New York in 2010?" Do any of you know that it is 2013. Now lets consider the fact that Topix is so up to date that they still post that question. Does that tell you that maybe Topix really is not up to date and the person responsible does not have the ability to keep it current.

They all lie so they don't have my support at all.

Tax payer wrote:

They all lie so they don't have my support at all.

Then this is as a good as a reason I can think of not to get involved, do not enter that voting booth, do not try to make a difference, just sit back and complain on blogs like these. PS a job well done.

Gillibrand is a puppet for Schumer and backs any vote he supports.
NY is number one in taxes and number 50 for bad for business friendly. The Liberal Dems have ruined another state.

No

Obama rules

These officials are not for the people they are for themselves. They lust for power, money and self grandeur. They are clueless on purpose to the needs of the people they were elected to serve. These and all elected officials are puppets for the rich and Corporate America.

allknowing wrote:

These officials are not for the people they are for themselves. They lust for power, money and self grandeur. They are clueless on purpose to the needs of the people they were elected to serve. These and all elected officials are puppets for the rich and Corporate America.

And it will remain so, until the uninformed begin to take an interest in the process and select servants to the public good, rather than empty cult figures like obama. Term limits would eliminate professional politicians and political dynasties. No former senator or congressman should be allowed to work as a lobbyist to congress after serving their term. It really is simple, save the fact that Fox runs the chicken house.

the fox

uouy wrote:

Obama rules

I bow to no king, serf.

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

<quoted text>
I bow to no king, serf.

Says the guy who does nothing but repeat right-wing talking points. You bow. You bow and you pull your cheeks apart.

De Odumbo Conser wrote:

<quoted text>
Says the guy who does nothing but repeat right-wing talking points. You bow. You bow and you pull your cheeks apart.

You should stop drinking obamas' urine and sober up.

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

<quoted text>
You should stop drinking obamas' urine and sober up.

Aw look, an ad hominem from the big boy. How cute.

De Odumbo Conser wrote:

<quoted text>
Aw look, an ad hominem from the big boy. How cute.

"ad hominem"? really, does that mean you reallly do imbibe the prophets urine?

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

<quoted text>
"ad hominem"? really, does that mean you reallly do imbibe the prophets urine?

I'm sorry, I should've realized using advanced terminology (not to mention proper grammar and spelling) would only cause confusion. Look it up, big boy. Google is made for people like you.

De Odumbo Conser wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sorry, I should've realized using advanced terminology (not to mention proper grammar and spelling) would only cause confusion. Look it up, big boy. Google is made for people like you.

"advanced terminology" ? You seem like a Wiki kind of guy :

Ad hominem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of ...

Obviously, I wasn't attacking you, merely giving you some sound advice, consider sobriety, allow some cogent thoughts to flow, discover the true obama, obama urine was a figure of speech, I hope you're really not drinking it, it's bad for you, like obamacare.

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

<quoted text>
"advanced terminology" ? You seem like a Wiki kind of guy :
Ad hominem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of ...
Obviously, I wasn't attacking you, merely giving you some sound advice, consider sobriety, allow some cogent thoughts to flow, discover the true obama, obama urine was a figure of speech, I hope you're really not drinking it, it's bad for you, like obamacare.

Glad to see you looked it up. See? You learned something today.

De Odumbo Conser wrote:

<quoted text>
Glad to see you looked it up. See? You learned something today.

Whenever the facts fail a liberal like you, the backup plan is to lie and distort, the only person you fool is yourself, the only thing you could teach anyone is that you are a liar, even when confronted with the facts, just lie about it. "It depends what is, is", "I never had sex with that woman"; "If you like your health care plan, you get to keep it" "Every family will se a reduction of 2500 dollars in their premiums under this bill" "I first heard about it on Friday in the media, like most of you"{ I'm just the President, I get my briefings from the New York Times}

Keep lying, there are plenty of fools, that don't know the difference.