Since: May 12

Location hidden

#41 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
I can ALWAYS count on you for an ignorant reply, just as I can ALWAYS count on you to reply.
But then I guess your busy season ended last week, and life at the office has slowed down to a crawl.
By the way, I'll remove you from my guest list for our next cook out, I had NO idea you held such animosity for me & mine...
In fact I was ShOcKed!
You just can't handle the fact that I would dare point out your false and incredibly ignorant rant stating that Texas is the epicenter of recent gun violence.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#42 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
I can ALWAYS count on you for an ignorant reply, just as I can ALWAYS count on you to reply.
But then I guess your busy season ended last week, and life at the office has slowed down to a crawl.
By the way, I'll remove you from my guest list for our next cook out, I had NO idea you held such animosity for me & mine...
In fact I was ShOcKed!
You have implied several times recently that my profession is tax-related... you must have some poor victim in your sights again that you believe to be me... how many targets is it that you've missed now?... you must be amassing a long list of enemies with all that reckless stabbing in the dark.
ru a retard

United States

#43 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
The he guy in the turban 'is' the FBI's MOST wanted. He's telling his recruits to go to GUN SHOWS and buy guns FROM tables or trunks of cars who ARE not licensed Dealers...
20% of the illegal guns in Chicago are bought in Indiana by 'Straw Purchasers' who then bring them back and sell in the streets. The guy who buys them passes a background ck ok but they wouldn't.
I know guys here in Irvine who wouldn't take the time to go down and pick out a gun at the Gun Store because they wouldn't pass a background ck, SO THAT WORKS!
This bill would have closed Gun Show LOOP HOLES!!! Who in their right mind would be against that? The table that criminals buy from are priced higher than the Gun Stores for a reason so YOU wouldn't buy from that table anyway.
Internet trafficking is a PROBLEM! ANYBODY can buy ANY gun(s) and AMMO and have them sent right to their homes. The bill would have made their purchases go to Gun Stores, so they have a background ck run on the purchaser! It would cost NOTHING!
Texas is advertising right now to "come to Texas we have the MOST RELAXED GUN LAWS & RESTRICTIONS in the US"! Have you noticed all the killings & tragedies coming out of there right now?
ALL STATES are NOT enforcing the National laws!!!
AND I'll lay odds if you told me the truth, you 'ARE' a republican!
I am all for closing abortion loop holes,you know putting undo burdens on someone getting an abortion.I bet you are all for that since it is taking a life, aren't you? If not I bet you are a democrat right?
Lib

London, KY

#44 Apr 23, 2013
Well, I must have struck a nerve!

I'm surprised, hippies ARE ALL pro-choice & yet you call yourself one... they were born in the 50s and sparked the WOmens Rights Movement. Which happened to be responsible for Roe V Wade. No hippie would EVER no not NEVER be against WOmens Rights.

Only a Right Wing Republican would be against the 'exceptions', or giving their medical rights away to men or their bosses, or lately in the senate the republicans voted a big ole 'NO' on the 'equal pay bill for WOmen', something a hippie/liberal would never do.

Hippies are retiring right now at the rate of 1 every 8 seconds like me, unlike flag waving hippie who might be in her early 40s if that.

flag waving hippie wouldn't know Gloria Steinem or Jennifer Hurley if they were standing in front of her claims their doctrine. And I can tell her they would STRONGLY DISapprove of her political beliefs.

http://www.google.com/url... 's%20rights%20&source=web &cd=1&cad=rja&sqi= 2&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=ht tp%3A%2F%2Fwww.hippy.com%2Fart icle-311.html&ei=s6B2Ud2hE afV2QWtv4GYCQ&usg=AFQjCNEe eWxe4DX9gLYPIr86QyD2cm3krA

Maybe just maybe it would help the flag waving hippie not to make such a laughing stock out of herself to just google 'hippie and the women's rights movement'

Clearly the clothes does NOT make the hippie, it is a thought process, and one that she deplores.

hippies are now called liberal democrats, & yes liberals are just one part of the democratic party not the whole.

I do think it's obvious that hippie has been stalking me and I 'was' one of her clients. There have been many times that she has threatened to post my identity.... This is clearly defiant of her disclosure agreement. I want it to stop.
rua retard

United States

#45 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
Well, I must have struck a nerve!
I'm surprised, hippies ARE ALL pro-choice & yet you call yourself one... they were born in the 50s and sparked the WOmens Rights Movement. Which happened to be responsible for Roe V Wade. No hippie would EVER no not NEVER be against WOmens Rights.
Only a Right Wing Republican would be against the 'exceptions', or giving their medical rights away to men or their bosses, or lately in the senate the republicans voted a big ole 'NO' on the 'equal pay bill for WOmen', something a hippie/liberal would never do.
Hippies are retiring right now at the rate of 1 every 8 seconds like me, unlike flag waving hippie who might be in her early 40s if that.
flag waving hippie wouldn't know Gloria Steinem or Jennifer Hurley if they were standing in front of her claims their doctrine. And I can tell her they would STRONGLY DISapprove of her political beliefs.
http://www.google.com/url... 's%20rights%20&source=web &cd=1&cad=rja&sqi= 2&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=ht tp%3A%2F%2Fwww.hippy.com%2Fart icle-311.html&ei=s6B2Ud2hE afV2QWtv4GYCQ&usg=AFQjCNEe eWxe4DX9gLYPIr86QyD2cm3krA
Maybe just maybe it would help the flag waving hippie not to make such a laughing stock out of herself to just google 'hippie and the women's rights movement'
Clearly the clothes does NOT make the hippie, it is a thought process, and one that she deplores.
hippies are now called liberal democrats, & yes liberals are just one part of the democratic party not the whole.
I do think it's obvious that hippie has been stalking me and I 'was' one of her clients. There have been many times that she has threatened to post my identity.... This is clearly defiant of her disclosure agreement. I want it to stop.
I must have struck a nerve!Spouting restrictions and putting undo burdens on "law abiding gun owners" a good thing,messing with abortion and a womens' "right to choose" a bad thing? Which one is plainly mentioned in the Bill Of Rights and does not have to be stripped out of a make believe right.Truly you have the hots for thr 60's a time that I lived through and saw first hand a bunch of self absorbed assholes that run college campuses now.
Lib

London, KY

#46 Apr 23, 2013
no you didn't darling. tell another one before that one gets cold.

What are you an O'Reilly puppet, you mimic everyTHING that pompous idiot says. I watch him every night to see what your next thoughts will be. Your as transparent as glass.

Why don't we talk about the war on Christmas or the war on the Easter Bunny Roll... BoRiNg...

Talking points with hand jesters, word for the day for his fans, billoreilly.com Name Address Name Address billoreilly.com .....killing Kennedy killing Jesus killing killing buy buy make me richerrrererer

What happened I thought you liked the hippie/liberal thinking, you cool mom you!

I have zero problem with the Bill of Rights, just want 'background cks' run on terrorists, rapists, mental health nuts, and criminals. You may have all the muskets you can buy.

You act like I'm trying to tell you what to do with your body!

“I been hangin' on every word.”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#47 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
Well, I must have struck a nerve!
I'm surprised, hippies ARE ALL pro-choice & yet you call yourself one... they were born in the 50s and sparked the WOmens Rights Movement. Which happened to be responsible for Roe V Wade. No hippie would EVER no not NEVER be against WOmens Rights.
No true Scotsman fallacy. Try again.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#48 Apr 23, 2013
Hmmmmm... one must wonder why you (Lib) would address the issues of someone posting as "r u a re****", but you keep using my name (Hippie) as if you were speaking to me.

Most important here... is that I would never post under a name like that... not to mention... I would never have to ask "r u a re****" of you (Lib)... I already know the answer to that burning question (feel free to gallop off into Assumption-ville at your leisure).

My views regarding the sanctity of life... be it born or yet-to-be born... are well-known. I felt no need to repeat them here today... but if I had, I would have done so with much more eloquence (no offense intended, "r u").

How predictable of you (Lib) to imagine that any person with pro-life views MUST be me. I know... we all "look alike" in your grey-lens bigoted world... but to assume we are all the same person is just... well... stupid... idiotic... moronic... imbecilic...dim-witted... I'm sure you "get my drift".

I normally do not address you (Lib) personally... because, quite frankly, I think you're a bit on the whacky side... and not worth my time to bother with. Sort of like a singular fly at a picnic... annoying, buzzing around dirtying up the atmosphere, but not worth spoiling the party by swatting at you.

But accusing me of stalking anyone... especially someone like you (Lib), who I would normally avoid like the plague... is beyond the pale. No, it is YOU who keeps following ME around Topix... trying to guess my identity... while you simultaneously and relentlessly take a word-crap all over every thread you find me posting in.

Here is the best advice I can give you... GET YOUR OWN LIFE and quit trying to suck the joy out of everyone else's... and stop trying to pretend you have even an inkling as to my identity... your weird pseudo-cryptic comments continue to confirm that you do not have a clue.
Lib

London, KY

#49 Apr 23, 2013
Kick Brass wrote:
<quoted text>
No true Scotsman fallacy. Try again.
Now how did I know you'd show up? Did you help her out this year?

I posted the link for the flag waving 'hippie used to wannabe', but nothing keeps YOU from reading it.

If you can't read, not my problem. I know it's hard when your skull's thick, and your brain has all it can process.

BUT my conversation really wasn't with the 'gang' but with her both of the times YOU replied.

Do WE also need to talk? Have you changed YOUR mind? Is this going to be another gang up cyberbully-some man stalking me-look at me session? OR...can I go on and enjoy MY liberties and comment on threads that interest me?

I'm asking for the 3rd time today, real nice like. Hippie makes 3 of me, I am NOT a fighter, YOU do not need to DEfend her, AND 'you' are SmOthERinG me!

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50 Apr 23, 2013
Daggonit... sure wish I knew who it is that she thinks I am today... from the sound if it, it would be mighty entertaining to watch as she confronts the poor unsuspecting target that she (mistakenly) has her sights set on right now... heck, it might even rival a stanza of "Leroy Brown".
Lib

London, KY

#51 Apr 23, 2013
flag waving hippie wrote:
Hmmmmm... one must wonder why you (Lib) would address the issues of someone posting as "r u a re****", but you keep using my name (Hippie) as if you were speaking to me.
Most important here... is that I would never post under a name like that... not to mention... I would never have to ask "r u a re****" of you (Lib)... I already know the answer to that burning question (feel free to gallop off into Assumption-ville at your leisure).
My views regarding the sanctity of life... be it born or yet-to-be born... are well-known. I felt no need to repeat them here today... but if I had, I would have done so with much more eloquence (no offense intended, "r u").
How predictable of you (Lib) to imagine that any person with pro-life views MUST be me. I know... we all "look alike" in your grey-lens bigoted world... but to assume we are all the same person is just... well... stupid... idiotic... moronic... imbecilic...dim-witted... I'm sure you "get my drift".
I normally do not address you (Lib) personally... because, quite frankly, I think you're a bit on the whacky side... and not worth my time to bother with. Sort of like a singular fly at a picnic... annoying, buzzing around dirtying up the atmosphere, but not worth spoiling the party by swatting at you.
But accusing me of stalking anyone... especially someone like you (Lib), who I would normally avoid like the plague... is beyond the pale. No, it is YOU who keeps following ME around Topix... trying to guess my identity... while you simultaneously and relentlessly take a word-crap all over every thread you find me posting in.
Here is the best advice I can give you... GET YOUR OWN LIFE and quit trying to suck the joy out of everyone else's... and stop trying to pretend you have even an inkling as to my identity... your weird pseudo-cryptic comments continue to confirm that you do not have a clue.
Give me a break!'We', that would be you and I have argued our way through more threads than I care to remember... ALL political or of Social content because I rarely post on any other kind.

If you're embarrassed of your political persuasion that's your problem. Your views are the most unforgiving of any party I've seen but certainly closer to the republicans than the democrats. Too bad that causes you distress. BUT don't really care whose side you're on, just who you care for.

You act as if I just lost the last 3 or so years of my life, or rather we all have. It's right here in black & white and if that's not enough there's always the evidence gathered for me with your constant cyberstalking without 'my' replies.

Don't try to play angel on Irvine Topix at this late date. One things for sure you can say whatever you like, BUT you and I know the difference.

I am concerned about 'Client Disclosure' and YOU put yourself in this position. I don't trust you. I haven't decided what means to take to solve that. But it's obvious to gather my information would be like trying to gather feathers once the pillow is shaken, when there's no trust....

I'm very disappointed in you, and have never seen a professional person act and talk as unforgiving and hateful as you do. I am surprised you are not more on side of the middle class and poor given that's your bread and butter!
Lib

London, KY

#52 Apr 23, 2013
flag waving hippie wrote:
Daggonit... sure wish I knew who it is that she thinks I am today... from the sound if it, it would be mighty entertaining to watch as she confronts the poor unsuspecting target that she (mistakenly) has her sights set on right now... heck, it might even rival a stanza of "Leroy Brown".
mayBE you ought to remember just who researched and brought me the information on who you are!

I seriously doubt that kind of PROFESSIONAL person would be wrong.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#53 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
mayBE you ought to remember just who researched and brought me the information on who you are!
I seriously doubt that kind of PROFESSIONAL person would be wrong.
I hate to break it to you (not really, I'll likely enjoy it immensely)... but your "professional" must be a real bumbler... or maybe they're just toying with you for spits and giggles... because nothing about my profession involves "clients"... oh gee! you lose... again... so whatever (or however) you reimbursed your "information provider"... demand a refund...

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#54 Apr 23, 2013
I'm beginning to think someone has been "phelped" again.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#55 Apr 23, 2013
Liberalism is indeed a mental illness.. "Lib" and "Tad" are undeniable proof of this.
mr obvious

United States

#56 Apr 23, 2013
About time someone else noticed the Lib+Tad connection.

“I been hangin' on every word.”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#57 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
<quoted text>
Now how did I know you'd show up? Did you help her out this year?
I posted the link for the flag waving 'hippie used to wannabe', but nothing keeps YOU from reading it.
If you can't read, not my problem. I know it's hard when your skull's thick, and your brain has all it can process.
BUT my conversation really wasn't with the 'gang' but with her both of the times YOU replied.
Do WE also need to talk? Have you changed YOUR mind? Is this going to be another gang up cyberbully-some man stalking me-look at me session? OR...can I go on and enjoy MY liberties and comment on threads that interest me?
I'm asking for the 3rd time today, real nice like. Hippie makes 3 of me, I am NOT a fighter, YOU do not need to DEfend her, AND 'you' are SmOthERinG me!
I was in Wal-mart earlier. A little girl ran up and started hitting her older brother. After a couple minutes he pushed her away. She immediately yelled, "MOM! He pushed me!"

That little girl reminded me of you. You stalk and harass and bully, and if anyone dares to even respond you cry that we are "cyberbullies." Do you really need us to post some of the garbage you have targeted toward us to understand?

And if you want to send a private message to someone, register and send it that way. Otherwise don't cry when someone on a public forum decides to read your public post.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#58 Apr 23, 2013
people like "lib" like "tad" like others who are so cyberly brave to assault the character of others, will never register, will never reveal who they are because they are eternal cowards of humanity. They are the parasitic pre-cancerous growths on the skin of humanity. They live to attempt to cause others pain because they don't like living alone in their misery. They will never possess the courage or the integrity to reveal who they are or face anyone face to face with even one iota of the material that they sling at others on here.

“I been hangin' on every word.”

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#59 Apr 23, 2013
The Virg wrote:
people like "lib" like "tad" like others who are so cyberly brave to assault the character of others, will never register, will never reveal who they are because they are eternal cowards of humanity. They are the parasitic pre-cancerous growths on the skin of humanity. They live to attempt to cause others pain because they don't like living alone in their misery. They will never possess the courage or the integrity to reveal who they are or face anyone face to face with even one iota of the material that they sling at others on here.
I already know who Lib is, although I don't really care who she or Tad happens to be. She seems to go to great lengths to figure out who everyone else is as part of her "kill the opposition" campaign.
rua retard

United States

#60 Apr 23, 2013
Lib wrote:
no you didn't darling. tell another one before that one gets cold.
What are you an O'Reilly puppet, you mimic everyTHING that pompous idiot says. I watch him every night to see what your next thoughts will be. Your as transparent as glass.
Why don't we talk about the war on Christmas or the war on the Easter Bunny Roll... BoRiNg...
Talking points with hand jesters, word for the day for his fans, billoreilly.com Name Address Name Address billoreilly.com .....killing Kennedy killing Jesus killing killing buy buy make me richerrrererer
What happened I thought you liked the hippie/liberal thinking, you cool mom you!
I have zero problem with the Bill of Rights, just want 'background cks' run on terrorists, rapists, mental health nuts, and criminals. You may have all the muskets you can buy.
You act like I'm trying to tell you what to do with your body!
Must be sad laying around worrying about what your neihgbor has "coveting his ass",you can't take it so you will get Big Brother to take it for you, that will show them.Too much money, tax the hell out of the rich bastards,they don't deserve it.Too many guns lets take them no one needs that many guns,just a bunch of rednecks anyway.I couldn't give two shits what you have so don't lose any sleep over what I or anybody else has you pathetic little parasite.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Irvine Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 51 min ChromiuMan 131,393
Dollar General next to Advance Auto 51 min Irvenna 30
drug bust 1 hr get yo rat on 51
Edmund Chaney 1 hr Punk 9
Nick parsons 4 hr Good luck 11
Justin Wolfinbarger 7 hr Who knows 4
Open letter to the Irvine City Council 12 hr sugarsweet 7
Irvine Dating
Find my Match

Irvine Jobs

Irvine People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Irvine News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Irvine

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]