The Prediction for Nov 2012

[JJK]

Mitt gets the majority of the votes......the electorial vote is split.....the supreme court appoints Obama President!...All hell breaks loose!

[Hot Dog]

If Obama is re-elected the chances of a financial crash increase by 100%!!!!!!!!

If Romney is elected there will be an immediate improvement in economic data!!!!!!!!!

[Deer Hunter]

I cannot see any Conservative voting for Obama. The man stands in complete opposition to everything Conservatives stand for.

Romney in November!
God Bless America!

[Bingo Granny]

The mainstream media is brainwashing Americans by anointing Barack Obama as the Messiah. In 2008, they launched an all-out attack on McCain/ Palin. Their message: if you don't support Obama, you're a racist. It has become obvious that the media distorts and lies to help Obama succeed. We must stop this propaganda!!!

[DemsRule12]

Maybe all the Bingo Grannies could get together and try to get Sarah Palin nominated for VP, since she was robbed the first time. Chances of Mittens choosing Sarah Palin: zero. Why? Uh, because the lamestream media just can't see how great she is. Stick to Bingo, Granny. By the way, John McCain says all this muslim/communist bullsh*t about the president "defames the spirit of our nation, and we all grow poorer because of it". John McCain probably never dreamed there'd be a day when he simply wasn't crazy enough for republicans.

[Jack]

Deer Hunter wrote:

I cannot see any Conservative voting for Obama. The man stands in complete opposition to everything Conservatives stand for.
Romney in November!
God Bless America!

Who would have thought Chief Justice Roberts.......who by the way......was appointed by G.Bush, would have went along with Obama Care? BAM!......Nobody saw that one come'n. We may see some cazy things come to pass yet! Time will tell. "DECISION 2012"

[Twister]

Jack wrote:

<quoted text>
Who would have thought Chief Justice Roberts.......who by the way......was appointed by G.Bush, would have went along with Obama Care? BAM!......Nobody saw that one come'n. We may see some cazy things come to pass yet! Time will tell. "DECISION 2012"

Roberts didn't "vote for Obamacare", he merely stated that the individual mandate was Constitutional because it is a tax. A tax, I might add, that only the lower income brackets are going to have to pay.

Once the working class people in this country figure this out, they are going to vote Romney and more Republicans into office. Then Obamacare can simply be voted out of existence.

This decision will not turn out well for Obama and the Democrats.

[Elmer]

Did Roberts make his ruling just to make it easier to repeal Obamacare as a tax?
Now it takes only a simple majority in the Senate, and it's a done deal.

All that it takes is the Republicans to gain 4 seats in the Senate. Then through
Reconciliation they could go 51 votes and be the majority opinion. Killing Obama
care FOR GOOD.

That's why they call him CHIEF Justice John Roberts.

He da MAN!!!

Pure genius....

[Paul]

He is giving the We the People of America...an opportunity to finally be a part of the process.

[Haha]

Elmer wrote:

Did Roberts make his ruling just to make it easier to repeal Obamacare as a tax?
Now it takes only a simple majority in the Senate, and it's a done deal.
All that it takes is the Republicans to gain 4 seats in the Senate. Then through
Reconciliation they could go 51 votes and be the majority opinion. Killing Obama
care FOR GOOD.
That's why they call him CHIEF Justice John Roberts.
He da MAN!!!
Pure genius....

The bad thing is that republicans will not get 4 seats in the senate........
YES....
OBAMACARE rules!!

[DemsRule12]

Pure genius..
----------

You're an idiot. John Roberts turned out to be a jurist, not so much a right-wing nutbag as Thomas and Scalia. And Haha is right; the senate has grownups in it, unlike the House, which is full of teabagger freshmen who think Michelle Bachmann is a genius. That is to say that it will stay Democratic, of course. And over time, repeal will get harder as the benefits of the Affordable Care Act kick in. It's nearly impossible to convince people to give good things up once they have them. Unless they're retardican loons, voting to give up social security and medicare with their vote for a retardican candidate.

[ron]

We need healthcare reform. Like start at the big pharmaceutical companies that charge outrageous prices for meds.but that wont happen toooo many lobbyists and campaign money involved.

[DemsRule12]

It's hilarious that the same Americans who spend millions buying prescription medicine from Canada on the internet also think universal health care is a dangerous socialist plot. Retardicans are weird. And unbelievably poorly informed.

[ron]

Do you feel lonely? Its ok,it will all be over soon.

[Jack]

Twister wrote:

<quoted text>
Roberts didn't "vote for Obamacare", he merely stated that the individual mandate was Constitutional because it is a tax. A tax, I might add, that only the lower income brackets are going to have to pay.
Once the working class people in this country figure this out, they are going to vote Romney and more Republicans into office. Then Obamacare can simply be voted out of existence.
This decision will not turn out well for Obama and the Democrats.

He rewrote the damn law. Gave it the meaning he thought it needed.........Duh!

[Lost In Space]

Jack wrote:

<quoted text>
He rewrote the damn law. Gave it the meaning he thought it needed.........Duh!

He did it so that Mitt Romney would win. He's a genius!!!!

[God Bless Texas]

This is about Justice John Roberts leaving the Republican side and siding with Obama and the democrats. In other words, people feel that the Chief Justice was playing politics, rather than going by the law itself. Usually, a Republican Chief Justice would side with his own side, in this case Republicans. Had he voted against Obama's Health Reform plan, some think that this would have led to the Democrats trying to bring in limits on how long a Supreme Court Justice could serve. By siding with the Democrats, he made it look like the decision was based upon the legality of paying for it with taxes, rather than looking at it being legal under the commerce clause. As a result, this issue is right back in front of the voters again.

[lisa]

And vote we will.

[Grapevine]

Roberts held that the Obamacare law was unconstitutional utilizing the commerce clause--which was an important if unnoticed victory for strict constructionists. He found that it was constitutional under the enumerated power of congress to tax. I think in this he was correct. He correctly noted it wasn't his job to fix the mistakes of the voters but simply to rule on whether it was constitutional or not. We can undo this mistake by voting out president downgrade and cronies this fall.

[Day Dreamer]

I for one am happy that CJ Roberts called Obamacare out for what it really is...a HUGE NEW TAX on the middle class and small business.

I want to see Obama and the Dems try to defend this one.