Channel 4 Report Big Pay Day

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#145 Jun 19, 2013
Heather wrote:
<quoted text>And yet, you were in this topix quickly pointing fingers of blame at who you thought was the messenger. And when told you were wrong, you didn't apologize, merely changed the point of your constant harangue against Doris.

Hello! The subject is the big payout of $450,000 and how Arnold is stuck yet again, with another big payout -- and one of those directly involved, was promoted rather than punished.

I am beginning to think you're paid to show up on every topix about Arnold and disrupt the thread, misdirect it, attack Doris, and so forth.

You could not be doing it for nothing.
Show proof of your accusation against me of being paid to be on every thread. Oh wait, you can't because it is libel. More libel from the people that lost the election.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#146 Jun 19, 2013
The truth is Officer Ott filed a SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION complaint with the Arnold Police department and she and her lawyers have walked away with $450,000! The officer involved in the complaint is still working with the APD as an arms instructor and his superior officer the Chief is still collecting $140,000+ per year to run not only the police department, but even more employees! This is unacceptable.
Fed Up Taxpayer

Anonymous Proxy

#147 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
The truth is Officer Ott filed a SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION complaint with the Arnold Police department and she and her lawyers have walked away with $450,000! The officer involved in the complaint is still working with the APD as an arms instructor and his superior officer the Chief is still collecting $140,000+ per year to run not only the police department, but even more employees! This is unacceptable.
Absolutely!

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#148 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
The truth is Officer Ott filed a SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION complaint with the Arnold Police department and she and her lawyers have walked away with $450,000! The officer involved in the complaint is still working with the APD as an arms instructor and his superior officer the Chief is still collecting $140,000+ per year to run not only the police department, but even more employees! This is unacceptable.
I see you have gotten rid of the accusations that they did something wrong. Afraid of libel suits from the city?

It's sad that you still feel you have to defame our city by repeating the same information hundreds of times. Too bad nobody is listening anymore. That's what happens when you cry wolf one too many times.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#149 Jun 20, 2013
No one has gotten rid of anything, that is the problem. The Chief needs to go, the officer involved, needs to go. The Mayor who knew about it and promoted the Chief anyway, needs to go. The city attorney, who obviously did not advise them not to do it, needs to go. There was liability on the part of the City, that means their actions or inaction was a responsibility they did not uphold, therefore they chose to payout $450,000. Yes, THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#150 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
No one has gotten rid of anything, that is the problem. The Chief needs to go, the officer involved, needs to go. The Mayor who knew about it and promoted the Chief anyway, needs to go. The city attorney, who obviously did not advise them not to do it, needs to go. There was liability on the part of the City, that means their actions or inaction was a responsibility they did not uphold, therefore they chose to payout $450,000. Yes, THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!
Again, you just convicted them without a court proceeding. You're just as guilty as they are for what Moss accuses them of doing.

It never went to court so no guilt was determined so you cannot say they did something wrong.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#151 Jun 20, 2013
Bless her little heart, she just can't seem to stay on point, but little reminders help....
No one has gotten rid of anything, that is the problem. The Chief needs to go, the officer involved, needs to go. The Mayor who knew about it and promoted the Chief anyway, needs to go. The city attorney, who obviously did not advise them not to do it, needs to go. There was liability on the part of the City, that means their actions or inaction was a responsibility they did not uphold, therefore they chose to payout $450,000. Yes, THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#153 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Bless her little heart, she just can't seem to stay on point, but little reminders help....
No one has gotten rid of anything, that is the problem. The Chief needs to go, the officer involved, needs to go. The Mayor who knew about it and promoted the Chief anyway, needs to go. The city attorney, who obviously did not advise them not to do it, needs to go. There was liability on the part of the City, that means their actions or inaction was a responsibility they did not uphold, therefore they chose to payout $450,000. Yes, THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!
You only stay on topic when it makes you look good. I was on topic. You have just committed libel against the city. You need to prove the guilt. The case never went to trial and no guilt was determined. You have just done to the city what Moss has accused the city of doing to him. I hope Moss wins the. Sweeney will have a precedent to sue you and it will be all your own doing. Hypocrites.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#154 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Bless her little heart, she just can't seem to stay on point, but little reminders help....
No one has gotten rid of anything, that is the problem. The Chief needs to go, the officer involved, needs to go. The Mayor who knew about it and promoted the Chief anyway, needs to go. The city attorney, who obviously did not advise them not to do it, needs to go. There was liability on the part of the City, that means their actions or inaction was a responsibility they did not uphold, therefore they chose to payout $450,000. Yes, THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!
Hypocrites, the whole lot of you.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#155 Jun 20, 2013
Bless her little heart, she just can't seem to stay on point, but little reminders help....
No one has gotten rid of anything, that is the problem. The Chief needs to go, the officer involved, needs to go. The Mayor who knew about it and promoted the Chief anyway, needs to go. The city attorney, who obviously did not advise them not to do it, needs to go. There was liability on the part of the City, that means their actions or inaction was a responsibility they did not uphold, therefore they chose to payout $450,000. Yes, THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#156 Jun 21, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Bless her little heart, she just can't seem to stay on point, but little reminders help....
No one has gotten rid of anything, that is the problem. The Chief needs to go, the officer involved, needs to go. The Mayor who knew about it and promoted the Chief anyway, needs to go. The city attorney, who obviously did not advise them not to do it, needs to go. There was liability on the part of the City, that means their actions or inaction was a responsibility they did not uphold, therefore they chose to payout $450,000. Yes, THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!
Bless her heart, all she has the intelligence to do is copy and paste. Wonder if there is an original thought up there in that little head.

People get tired of broken records and have started tuning you out.

And you have officially convicted them on a public forum on a case that never went to court. You are such a hypocrite. You're doing to them EXACTLY what Moss is accusing them of doing to him making you no better than them, and maybe even worse.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#157 Jun 21, 2013
You are correct. You ARE a broken record, with a big fat scratch on it! The subject of this thread is the deservedly big payday to Officer Ott! Who suffered at the hands of Chief Shockey, Owen Conarow and the City of Arnold and now has been vindicated by receiving a $450,000 settlement.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#159 Jun 21, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
You are correct. You ARE a broken record, with a big fat scratch on it! The subject of this thread is the deservedly big payday to Officer Ott! Who suffered at the hands of Chief Shockey, Owen Conarow and the City of Arnold and now has been vindicated by receiving a $450,000 settlement.
Prove she suffered because of them. You can't because the case never went to court and no guilt was ever determined.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#160 Jun 21, 2013
Hey Everyone!!!! Pay attention here! According to Letusnamenames, you can go to Arnold and make false claims and the City's insurance company will pay you $450,000!!! No one has to do anything to you that is in the least bit discriminatory or criminal, and no one is guilty!!!! Isn't that great? What a city. I think I will just get right in line for that. If you ask the Mayor, he will tell you that money isn't being paid by the taxpayers, the INSURANCE company is paying it, so in his mind, that makes it OK. I would venture to say the person behind Letusnamenames and the Mayor are of the same mindset, do you really want someone like that overseeing your taxpayer dollars????

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#162 Jun 21, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Hey Everyone!!!! Pay attention here! According to Letusnamenames, you can go to Arnold and make false claims and the City's insurance company will pay you $450,000!!! No one has to do anything to you that is in the least bit discriminatory or criminal, and no one is guilty!!!! Isn't that great? What a city. I think I will just get right in line for that. If you ask the Mayor, he will tell you that money isn't being paid by the taxpayers, the INSURANCE company is paying it, so in his mind, that makes it OK. I would venture to say the person behind Letusnamenames and the Mayor are of the same mindset, do you really want someone like that overseeing your taxpayer dollars????
Libel. I never said that and I hope you can find the post where I said that WORD FOR WORD. You like libeling, don't you? Too bad you can't tell the truth and you just proved it. Your behavior on here indicates to me that your conspiracy theories are most likely lies, too. You just don't know how to shut up to save face, do you?
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#163 Jun 21, 2013
Ha, ha, ha, ha. Libel, libel, libel. You are like Chicken Little, the sky is falling. I'll pray for you, just like the song says, maybe a flowerpot falling off a window ledge will knock some sense into you. You are so effin funny. NOT! Look up the definition of sarcasm. Then just go away.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#164 Jun 21, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Ha, ha, ha, ha. Libel, libel, libel. You are like Chicken Little, the sky is falling. I'll pray for you, just like the song says, maybe a flowerpot falling off a window ledge will knock some sense into you. You are so effin funny. NOT! Look up the definition of sarcasm. Then just go away.
As your buddy says all of the time, I won't back down. See how stupid that sounds? Sell any real estate lately?

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#166 Jun 25, 2013
remember when wrote:
A huge payout is a win in my book! In other words how much to shut her up and get her to move along.
Not necessarily, but you need people to believe you so keep spewing.
Topic Is

Arnold, MO

#168 Jun 25, 2013
Alicia Ott, former police officer with the Arnold Police Department, filed a sexual discrimination suit against Chief Robert Shockey, P.O. Owen Conarow and the City of Arnold and was able to walk away with a $450,000 cash settlement. The City of Arnold pays a half million in premiums to MIRMA, so don't say the taxpayers didn't pay anything, they did, and plenty.
maryk

Saint Louis, MO

#169 Jun 25, 2013
Doris Borgelt wrote:
To set the record straight.....I was at the start of a funeral procession at the time I received a call from Channel 4. So, no, I did not call them.
This is not about the Mayor's race, it is about another big payout,$450,000 being paid because of the failure of leadership to act accordingly at the Arnold Police Department and City Hall. If the city had a case, they would have presented it confidently. If they were in the right they wouldn't be hiding the depositions and keeping it all under a gag order. Release it all, see what the public who is paying for this all thinks!
Who pays the premiums for the insurance, uh, that would be the taxpayers.
LUNN, your misguided opinion means absolutely nothing to me. I just want to make sure the public has access to the truth instead of your inane ramblings.
Aparently the inmates are running the asylum.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Imperial Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
If you eat sleep and breath the paranormal... (Nov '10) 2 hr SEMO 1999 5
Spingdale Pool & Bar 5 hr justin igger 6
Stratford Inn Fenton 5 hr justin igger 5
More Muslims In Fenton Thu watchin 16
most wanted Terrance Tullock (Nov '15) Dec 6 Clr 4
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) Dec 5 Eileen 1,493
Neighbors Fighting At Bottom of Hill on Carter Dec 4 LawyersLoveIt 36

Imperial Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Imperial Mortgages