Mayoral election
Letusnamenames

United States

#408 Mar 26, 2013
Yeah, right (she says sarcastically). I'm not the one bullying or harassing. That would be you. All I did was post the truth (of which I have screen shots to back up) and put up a link to show someone's true character from a public website. You can deflect blame all you want, but I think that someone disnt like the truth getting out there.
BLT

Germany

#409 Mar 26, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
That would be you.
Not me. But for grins, exactly who is it you think I am??
Letusnamenames

United States

#410 Mar 26, 2013
BLT - Big Lying Turd. LOL. ;)

That was a joke in case you are clueless.
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#411 Mar 26, 2013
Surely Doris couldn't care less how Bill and CC feel about her. Just the good old boys up to their tricks again. The whole truth will come out eventually, just hope it isn't too late. They probably took it off because Bill gave out too much information.
Letusnamenames

United States

#412 Mar 26, 2013
Nope. Matt gave more information about Bill than Bill did about Matt. Matt even gave out lots of information about himself.

Obviously someone (whoever had it removed) cares or the thread would still be here.
BLT

Bucharest, Romania

#413 Mar 26, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
BLT - Big Lying Turd. LOL. ;)
That was a joke in case you are clueless.
Well alrighty then, that was some kind of joke.
Embarrassed Citizen

Netherlands

#414 Mar 26, 2013
This race is truly one of those that we need to look to the lesser of two evils. Ron Counts has shown a complete lack of leadership and treats the city coffers like his personal piggy bank to dole out to friends to make himself look good. Bad use of tax payer money!

Doris, on the other hand, can be rough and abrasive, but we can guarantee there won't be favorites when it comes to following the law and ordinances.

While I believe many of those laws and ordinances are an overreach, consistency is better than who can help me or make me look good like the current mayor works.

Counts and his lackeys are in business for themselves and use city hall as their private business. Covering up all they can in the process. There are those that complain about the legal fees charged the taxpayers because Doris has asked for info, but you need to realize this info belongs to us, the residents! There would be no legal fees involved at all if city hall, under the direction of Mayor Counts, just Did the right thing! Release the records!

The AG got involved last summer and only after a threat of a lawsuit by his office did Arnold release documents that it should have when requested. Just last week Arnold was ordered by a judge to not only release hidden documents in regards to a sexual discrimination case against the mayor appointed city administrator, but he also ordered Arnold to pay a fine for hiding them!

Come on, people. Let's get rid of the current (lack of ) leadership, Counts and cronies, and try a new direction!
Crooked Counts

Saint Louis, MO

#415 Mar 26, 2013
More Going On wrote:
Don't forget the $75,000 grant that was given up because someone dropped the ball. What ever happened to the $250,000 in landscaping for 141/55 promised by Drury?
They gave the money to Ron Counts for his campaign instead!!! Fact: Arnold Drury Inn=$600 and Drury Corporation in Creve Ceour also donated.
Letusnamenames

United States

#416 Mar 26, 2013
Embarrassed Citizen wrote:
This race is truly one of those that we need to look to the lesser of two evils. Ron Counts has shown a complete lack of leadership and treats the city coffers like his personal piggy bank to dole out to friends to make himself look good. Bad use of tax payer money!
Doris, on the other hand, can be rough and abrasive, but we can guarantee there won't be favorites when it comes to following the law and ordinances.
While I believe many of those laws and ordinances are an overreach, consistency is better than who can help me or make me look good like the current mayor works.
Counts and his lackeys are in business for themselves and use city hall as their private business. Covering up all they can in the process. There are those that complain about the legal fees charged the taxpayers because Doris has asked for info, but you need to realize this info belongs to us, the residents! There would be no legal fees involved at all if city hall, under the direction of Mayor Counts, just Did the right thing! Release the records!
The AG got involved last summer and only after a threat of a lawsuit by his office did Arnold release documents that it should have when requested. Just last week Arnold was ordered by a judge to not only release hidden documents in regards to a sexual discrimination case against the mayor appointed city administrator, but he also ordered Arnold to pay a fine for hiding them!
Come on, people. Let's get rid of the current (lack of ) leadership, Counts and cronies, and try a new direction!
Post proof of your allegations against Counts. Post proof of the AG ruling. Post proof of ALL of your allegations.
See No Evil

Arnold, MO

#418 Mar 26, 2013
Hear No Evil

Arnold, MO

#419 Mar 26, 2013
Embarrassed Citizen

London, UK

#420 Mar 27, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
Post proof of your allegations against Counts. Post proof of the AG ruling. Post proof of ALL of your allegations.
It appears the copy of the lawsuit the AG threatened is no longer online. Maybe because Arnold complied and produced the documents demanded by the AG.

Now listen closely to the rest of the proof. You'll actually have to do a bit of leg work, as I can't do this for you. Go to Missouri Casenet. Case umber search. 11JER-CC01055. Docket Entries tab. 03/18/2013. Arnold is fined for not producing documents that the judge had ordered. Documents the mayor's appointee to city administrator says exonerates him of sexual discrimination charges. If so, you'd think he'd be offering them rather than hiding them!
Letusnamenames

United States

#421 Mar 27, 2013
Double check that case number. It says it can't find it.
Letusnamenames

United States

#422 Mar 27, 2013
Geesh! Learn to read.

1. It wasn't fine. They were ordered to pay plaintiff's attorney's fees.

2. They were given ten days from 3/18/2013 to produce the docs. 18+10=28. So they have until tomorrow to produce the information.
Letusnamenames

United States

#423 Mar 27, 2013
Oh, AND you fail to mention their is a DISMISSAL hearing schedules on 4/8/2013. I guess publicizing that doesn't bode well for the fake story you are trying to paint though.

Maybe you should try that research you boast about.
Letusnamenames

United States

#425 Mar 27, 2013
You're basing you assumptions off of employment in Which case you would be correct. However, when something goes to court it becomes a game of strategy and what you said doesn't apply. If the defense can hold onto something until the last moment it gives them an edge in the game. You wouldn't hand the other team your playbook would you?
Ugly Stick

Arnold, MO

#426 Mar 27, 2013
Embarrassed, don't feed the silly, ugly, demented, little troll. You will never be able to satisfy her desire to be right and an accepted member of society. You can present link after link and it will never be good enough. Just ignore her, she won't go away, but it will annoy her.
Embarrassed Citizen

Los Angeles, CA

#427 Mar 27, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
You're basing you assumptions off of employment in Which case you would be correct. However, when something goes to court it becomes a game of strategy and what you said doesn't apply. If the defense can hold onto something until the last moment it gives them an edge in the game. You wouldn't hand the other team your playbook would you?
First, the other team should never have been involved if all was honest and upfront. But, since it is, and they're accusing my team of chop blocking, I'd show them my play book that says to play honest, fair, and absolutely no illegal moves or you're gone. But if I say to do whatever it takes, including illegal blocks below the knees, sure I'd hide it! Court should not be an issue for public records! What are they hiding? If the records showed they dealt with complaints by the book, be forthcoming. But since they've worked so hard to hide these record, they must be damning. And if we had an honest mayor that had any true leadership, he'd be ordering these records turned over immediately.
Letusnamenames

United States

#428 Mar 27, 2013
Ugly Stick wrote:
Embarrassed, don't feed the silly, ugly, demented, little troll. You will never be able to satisfy her desire to be right and an accepted member of society. You can present link after link and it will never be good enough. Just ignore her, she won't go away, but it will annoy her.
Hit a nerve again and made someone look bad. Ruined their little lie I guess.

And it doesn't annoy me (I actually find it interesting). It just shows that I've gotten past your lies to the truth. You're just aggravated that I won't go away just like you bullied, harassed and intimidated everyone else off of here. I guess you've finally met your match.

This is not the Doris promotion board. She has a mayoral Facebook page for that. This is Topix, open to EVERYBODY and ALL OPINIONS.
Shaggadelic

Torrance, CA

#429 Mar 27, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
You're basing you assumptions off of employment in Which case you would be correct. However, when something goes to court it becomes a game of strategy and what you said doesn't apply. If the defense can hold onto something until the last moment it gives them an edge in the game. You wouldn't hand the other team your playbook would you?
Pretty sure being fined in almost $900 in sanctions and being threatened with contempt of court for further obfuscation by the Judge is not a winning play, but hey, run it all day and see what happens.
By the way, a Dismissal Hearing is always held on a motion to dismiss, which may or may not be supported by any facts, evidence, or case law. All it means is that the Defendant(s) filed a motion, for one, some, or all of them to be removed and that the court will hear it. Law School 101 is to always file a motion to dismiss before it goes to trial, even if you are unsuccessful, you preserve the issue for appeal should you need it. Stick to psychology, law just isn't your bag baby.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Imperial Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
If you eat sleep and breath the paranormal... (Nov '10) 21 hr SEMO 1999 5
Spingdale Pool & Bar Sat justin igger 6
Stratford Inn Fenton Sat justin igger 5
More Muslims In Fenton Dec 8 watchin 16
most wanted Terrance Tullock (Nov '15) Dec 6 Clr 4
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) Dec 5 Eileen 1,493
Neighbors Fighting At Bottom of Hill on Carter Dec 4 LawyersLoveIt 36

Imperial Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Imperial Mortgages