Vandalism at Seckman High
Imperiallizard

Saint Louis, MO

#61 May 2, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
The students that were arrested for the drugs aren't the ones that did the vandalism, correct? It seems like we have two different things going on here.
That's correct but while reading the thread on vandalism, someone else started talking about the baseball players and the drugs. I didn't see a thread referring to the drug issue, so I just replied to the person that commented on it on this thread. Perhaps I should have started a new one? I'm not used to responding to forums..I couldn't resist on this though.
Imperiallizard

Saint Louis, MO

#62 May 2, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
The students that were arrested for the drugs aren't the ones that did the vandalism, correct? It seems like we have two different things going on here.
And speaking of two different things, when I first started reading about the vandalism issue, I seem to recall that you and another poster got totally off track with some mud-slinging about politics. It was like you two had a history of berating each other on this forum. Just saying.
Gel E Fysh

Fenton, MO

#63 May 2, 2013
The vandalism and baseball drugs were caused by Fox nepotism.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#64 May 2, 2013
Imperiallizard wrote:
<quoted text>
And speaking of two different things, when I first started reading about the vandalism issue, I seem to recall that you and another poster got totally off track with some mud-slinging about politics. It was like you two had a history of berating each other on this forum. Just saying.
You made a very false assumption. I was trying to clarify for my own understanding. I thought maybe they were related somehow. For a first timer you should learn not to make bad assumptions over a simple question.
Please

Imperial, MO

#65 May 2, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
You made a very false assumption. I was trying to clarify for my own understanding. I thought maybe they were related somehow. For a first timer you should learn not to make bad assumptions over a simple question.
Your right imperialiazed, she did with her Doris crap as usual and it was me that called her on it. If you stick around you'll see this is a path of hers. She did post a mighty cute picture of herself though. Only problem was she removed it when someone called her on that.
pizzarat

Fenton, MO

#66 May 2, 2013
Dorbamatism! The root of all evil! Anyhoo, you want diffs between the 2 high schools? Check test scores. Pizza!
pizzarat

Fenton, MO

#67 May 2, 2013
Gel E Fysh, put it all together! Doris... Obama... Nepotism...

Cool handle, BTW.
Gel E Fysh

Fenton, MO

#68 May 2, 2013
Thanks.
I have about the whole thing rapped up, I just can't figure where the Taliban and the federal DNA depository fit into to all this. Gimme time..

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#69 May 3, 2013
Please wrote:
<quoted text>
Your right imperialiazed, she did with her Doris crap as usual and it was me that called her on it. If you stick around you'll see this is a path of hers. She did post a mighty cute picture of herself though. Only problem was she removed it when someone called her on that.
You're obviously obsessed with me. Go get help.

And the other picture is coming. Learn to tell the truth for a change. I know it is hard for you since you have to have a creative imagination to come up with those theories. I removed the picture to replace it only to find I didn't have it and had to get it from a PC. When I can get to the PC you will have the picture. Now quit your obsession with me and go get help.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#70 May 3, 2013
Gel E Fysh wrote:
Thanks.
I have about the whole thing rapped up, I just can't figure where the Taliban and the federal DNA depository fit into to all this. Gimme time..
They need the DNA to make sure the people are related to fuel the nepotism. Now that I figures that one out for you the last one is up to you.
Imperiallizard

Saint Louis, MO

#71 May 3, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
You made a very false assumption. I was trying to clarify for my own understanding. I thought maybe they were related somehow. For a first timer you should learn not to make bad assumptions over a simple question.
First-timer has decided not to post anymore...you all take this way too seriously. Too many angry and critical comments to be any fun. See ya!

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#72 May 3, 2013
Anyway....you wouldn't know that unless you were that person.

So there were drug arrests, but nobody has been arrested or charged with the vandalism? What about the cameras?

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#73 May 3, 2013
Where are the parents of these kids?
Please

Imperial, MO

#74 May 3, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Where are the parents of these kids?
What about them? I hope your children have made it to the teenage years in perfect ways or I wouldn't be judging the parents.
Question

Arnold, MO

#75 May 3, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Where are the parents of these kids?
Where are your parents? I think someone should tell them what you are doing all day as opposed to working. Paying for that education didn't do them much good did it?
Imperiallizard

Saint Louis, MO

#76 May 3, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Anyway....you wouldn't know that unless you were that person.
So there were drug arrests, but nobody has been arrested or charged with the vandalism? What about the cameras?
This is exactly what I am talking about...I AM that person. You referred to me as a "first timer" and you seem to enjoy being critical of others. No wonder you and that other poster are always feuding. This is why I am dropping off. Life's too short.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#77 May 3, 2013
Like we care.

So did they catch the vandals or not?
Clive

Arnold, MO

#78 May 4, 2013
What is taking so long to find the culprits? News reports said they were caught on multiple camera angles and very clear screen shots of them were taken.

The District didn't seem to have this kind of problem identifying the kids who set Fox on fire with the fireworks a few years ago, and they didn't have clear photos of them.
Ssdd

Imperial, MO

#79 May 4, 2013
They aren't going to ever say. It will be covered up!
Steve

United States

#80 May 5, 2013
Clive wrote:
What is taking so long to find the culprits? News reports said they were caught on multiple camera angles and very clear screen shots of them were taken.
The District didn't seem to have this kind of problem identifying the kids who set Fox on fire with the fireworks a few years ago, and they didn't have clear photos of them.
Clear shots on camera but, persons of interest were all wearing hoodies. Fireworks kids got told on by another student...made that easy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Imperial Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Helicopter at heads creek church?? (Jun '13) 20 hr Disgusting People 27
Know Missouri Law Regarding Cameras Before You ... (Sep '14) Tue Lipstick OnA Pig 213
bryan weber (Feb '13) Mon Com man 76
Dumping Trash on Carter Aug 22 Dumping Trash 1
News Lawsuit accuses municipalities of targeting the... Aug 22 VeeBee 6
News Suspects sought in Festus murder (Aug '06) Aug 21 Beyond This 7
Jim Davis owns Davis Excavating Aug 20 No Bobcats 2

Imperial Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Imperial Mortgages