Second Harassment Claim
First Prev
of 6
Next Last
Haha

Imperial, MO

#104 Feb 20, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Now who's arguing/questioning themself(ves).
No, they don't all get put on paid administrative leave. It depends on what it is. This most likely wouldn't.
You are soooo wrong. If an officer is put on leave it is without pay. It happens all the time. Ask Ott. She is one of many. It is a wrong practice. I can't believe the city has gone on like this. Some officers don't have the money to fight and fight getting attorneys involved for months all while not drawing a paycheck. Doris is correct when she says the officer gives up and moves on. Not because they are guilty but because they have families to feed and house. They can not afford to go on. Sir/mama you need to pull your head up from your bootstraps and do some research.

I don't care what an officer does if they are put on leave, they should be paid until they get a hearing and it is decided if they are terminated. End of subject. If this means emergency hearings by the police board then get it done. None of this months dragging stuff out.

I challenge you to prove me wrong.
Haha

Imperial, MO

#105 Feb 20, 2013
Answer the overriding question. If you knew about this lawsuit when it was files since you were on the council, why did t you bring it to the citizen's attention then? Why did you wait until now?[/
I'm speaking for myself but why is it your business when she told it? Maybe she is doing it not because they are trying to throw her under the bus every chance they get and as of yet still have not. Does it matter if she would have told you a year ago or now? According to you it was in the paper so it's old news.. Right??? Or was it???
Letusnamenames

United States

#106 Feb 20, 2013
We're officers put on leave in the Hartzell case and if so, were all the officers that suffered demotion put on leave?
Hey

Imperial, MO

#107 Feb 20, 2013
I'm pretty sure most but the chief took the fall and were terminated. That was before the time I started paying attention to city doings. Not sure if back then this went on but it sure does now. Take a survey now and see.
remember when

United States

#108 Feb 20, 2013
I want to know why that fat shady btard is sitting up there rallying boondoggles false claim when he has a legit one against himself ????
Why was HE allowed to sit as city administrator with a harassment lawsuit filed ?
I want to know exactly what his lawsuit is claiming ???
Does he feel he is not responsible for answering question pertaining to his duties? Didn't he tell ken's lawyer to go F himself ?
He needs to be removed immediately.
This is beyond ridamdiclous .
Anonymous

United States

#109 Feb 20, 2013
remember when wrote:
I want to know exactly what his lawsuit is claiming ???
http://www.scribd.com/doc/125664712/Ott-Lawsu...
remember when

United States

#110 Feb 20, 2013
Thank you !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Imperial Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Social Security Office ( Cruel and Unjust ) (May '17) Sat Guest 25
Bear Creek Estates (Jan '13) Sat bernhe 7
Who is Johann Martinez she drives a grey dodge ... (Oct '13) Sat Room12 2
Carlos Ramirez needs to Shower (Sep '16) Sat Zest 2
Delta Queen Port of Call Sat Justatrucker 3
Entertainment Fri Mike Wallace 1
Neighbors Fighting At Bottom of Hill on Carter (Oct '16) Dec 8 Yep Its Perverted 94

Imperial Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Imperial Mortgages