New Iaeger High Not Consolidated Rive...

New Iaeger High Not Consolidated River View Is For Real War Discussion

Posted in the Iaeger Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
wow truth appears

United States

#1 Oct 13, 2010
Big Creek + Iaeger = Discrimination
I would like to know when THE PARENTS of the children from the Big Creek School District
are going to STAND UP FOR THEIR CHILDREN???!!! IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS BY NOW THAT EVERYTHING BEING DONE AT RIVER VIEW IS THE IAEGER WAY. WHEN SOMEONE POSTED PREVIOUS THAT RIVER VIEW IS A NEW IAEGER HIGH SCHOOL THEY WERE MOST DEFINATELY RIGHT. For starters why all of the sudden ARE there "NEW" rules for cheerleaders as so no Big Creek Girls would be elegible with the rules PUT into place? Do you think that Iagers Cheerleaders are more important OR ARE BETTER AT CHEERING, I don't think so. Why were only 2 Girls on the Homecoming court from the Big Creek Area? I AM SURE ALL OF THE IAEGER GIRLS ARE MORE POPULAR. Why is it that the girl that was associated with trouble with a boy down there has been at the school in her mother's classroom however the boy is alternative school? WHY IS THAT BEING ALLOWED? Volley ball coaching obviously has some issues, look at me wrong and I will bench you. LAST BUT NOT LEAST...You can sit and listen to the fans at the Football games go on and on about the NEW Iaeger Football Team. It was told Long before the consolidation that Big Creek would have a few boys that could fill some spots on the Iaeger team. WOW THAT WAS A GREAT AND OH SO TRUE BROADCAST! It was told BY A MOTHER THAT one former Big Creek student had to beg and beg to run the ball and when he did he had a great game scoring 2 td's. Alot of these boys are being pushed out with no chance to play WHILE THE IAEGER PLAYERS ARE BEING FAVORED. ONE STUDENT NUMBER 10 HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO START AND WAS NOT EVEN AT PRACTICE WITH THE REST OF THE BOYS FOR MONTHS, WHAT IS FAIR ABOUT THAT? GREATNESS I THINK NOT. MAYBE THE COACHING STAFF AT RIVERVIEW ARE AFRAID TO LET THE BIG CREEK STUDENTS PLAY, THEY MIGHT SHOW SOME OF THE IAEGER STUDENTS UP AND THE PUBLIC MIGHT SEE WHAT THEIR DOING.
KNOWING CHILDREN AND BEING USED TO THEIR ABILLITIES IS ONE THING FAVORING THEM IS ANOTHER. This post is not intended to speak ill of any student from Big Creek or Iaeger so don't try to spin that wheel. It is only about Scruples, Values and Egalitarianism.
"FAIR TREATMENT TO ALL STUDENTS"
"THE CONCEPT FOR ALL STUDENTS SHOULD BE FAIR AND EVERYONE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMPETE WITH THE BEST ATHELETES - STUDENTS CHOSEN, PARTICIPATING AND PLAYED NOT BASED ON THE FAVORED ONES WHERE YOU LIVE, OR WHAT SCHOOL YOU ATTENDED PREVIOUSLY".
Any PRINCIPAL OR COACH associated with either school should not have been allowed to BE EMPLOYED at River View. It is very obvious that the Iaeger students are being favored over the Big Creek Students and NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE. EVEN WORSE PARENTS HAVE LAID DOWN LIKE A CARPET TO BE WALK ON. DON'T YOUR CHILDREN MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU?
IS IT THAT PARENTS DON'T SAY ANYTHING IN FEAR THAT IT WILL ONLY BE WORSE FOR THEIR CHILDREN AS THE RUMORS HAVE BEEN GOING AROUND? MAYBE YOU BIG CREEK PEOPLE JUST DON'T HAVE THE BALLS YOU ONCE HAD AND WILL LET ANYONE STOMP RIGHT ON TOP OF YOUR CHILDREN THEN AGAIN MAYBE YOU JUST DON'T CARE.
news flash

Advent, WV

#2 Oct 13, 2010
Who ever you are, you are an unhappy parent of a student who isn't starting at a sport. For your information,#10 on the football team is a freshman who has NEVER started a football game. He played some JV, broke his wrist, and hasn't even worn a uniform since. The player from Bigcreek who wasn't running the ball (#6) I agree, solid athlete, great attitude, etc. So are the other 5 or 6 running backs who were running the ball. Also for your info. Chad Frankling was one of the guys getting more reps in front of him. Last I checked Chad played for Big Creek last year. The quarterback is from Big Creek, our star receiver is from Big Creek, Trey Bailey and Brandon Church start in the backfield and they are from the old Iaeger but who can argue against them playing. They would be starting for just about any team in the state. As for #6, great player, great person, and he is getting the "reps" that he deserves now. Sometimes certain positons have plenty of depth-this year their team has plenty of great skill position players. Ask Jacob Muncy, Cody Jackson, Trey Lockhart, Brandon Thonpsom, if you don't believe me. They hardly ever see the field because of this. If people keep getting hurt, they might have the water boy playing before the years is out. We could make up a sex complaint about the starters to make sure they don't play. Thats original. Oh, no it isn't. Remember John Bailey. Started tailback for River View this year. He is from Big Creek. There is no merit to your complaint
flash for you

United States

#3 Oct 13, 2010
news flash wrote:
Who ever you are, you are an unhappy parent of a student who isn't starting at a sport. For your information,#10 on the football team is a freshman who has NEVER started a football game. He played some JV, broke his wrist, and hasn't even worn a uniform since. The player from Bigcreek who wasn't running the ball (#6) I agree, solid athlete, great attitude, etc. So are the other 5 or 6 running backs who were running the ball. Also for your info. Chad Frankling was one of the guys getting more reps in front of him. Last I checked Chad played for Big Creek last year. The quarterback is from Big Creek, our star receiver is from Big Creek, Trey Bailey and Brandon Church start in the backfield and they are from the old Iaeger but who can argue against them playing. They would be starting for just about any team in the state. As for #6, great player, great person, and he is getting the "reps" that he deserves now. Sometimes certain positons have plenty of depth-this year their team has plenty of great skill position players. Ask Jacob Muncy, Cody Jackson, Trey Lockhart, Brandon Thonpsom, if you don't believe me. They hardly ever see the field because of this. If people keep getting hurt, they might have the water boy playing before the years is out. We could make up a sex complaint about the starters to make sure they don't play. Thats original. Oh, no it isn't. Remember John Bailey. Started tailback for River View this year. He is from Big Creek. There is no merit to your complaint
You're wrong, don't assume anything about me I don't have children. Let's name all of the cheerleaders off and see where they are from. Let's get the listing for the homecoming attendant's and where they are from. Let's play name that player, 22+ positions and what was their previous school. Send a FLASH on this info since you know all about it.
If not mistaken

United States

#4 Oct 13, 2010
isn't cody jackson number ten?
Just heard

Hansford, WV

#5 Oct 13, 2010
From neither school. I asked the question about the cheerleaders and the answer was......Not many Big Creek girls went out for cheerleader. You have to go out before you can be a part of the team.
rvhs

United States

#6 Oct 13, 2010
wow truth appears wrote:
Big Creek + Iaeger = Discrimination
I would like to know when THE PARENTS of the children from the Big Creek School District
are going to STAND UP FOR THEIR CHILDREN???!!! IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS BY NOW THAT EVERYTHING BEING DONE AT RIVER VIEW IS THE IAEGER WAY. WHEN SOMEONE POSTED PREVIOUS THAT RIVER VIEW IS A NEW IAEGER HIGH SCHOOL THEY WERE MOST DEFINATELY RIGHT. For starters why all of the sudden ARE there "NEW" rules for cheerleaders as so no Big Creek Girls would be elegible with the rules PUT into place? Do you think that Iagers Cheerleaders are more important OR ARE BETTER AT CHEERING, I don't think so. Why were only 2 Girls on the Homecoming court from the Big Creek Area? I AM SURE ALL OF THE IAEGER GIRLS ARE MORE POPULAR. Why is it that the girl that was associated with trouble with a boy down there has been at the school in her mother's classroom however the boy is alternative school? WHY IS THAT BEING ALLOWED? Volley ball coaching obviously has some issues, look at me wrong and I will bench you. LAST BUT NOT LEAST...You can sit and listen to the fans at the Football games go on and on about the NEW Iaeger Football Team. It was told Long before the consolidation that Big Creek would have a few boys that could fill some spots on the Iaeger team. WOW THAT WAS A GREAT AND OH SO TRUE BROADCAST! It was told BY A MOTHER THAT one former Big Creek student had to beg and beg to run the ball and when he did he had a great game scoring 2 td's. Alot of these boys are being pushed out with no chance to play WHILE THE IAEGER PLAYERS ARE BEING FAVORED. ONE STUDENT NUMBER 10 HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO START AND WAS NOT EVEN AT PRACTICE WITH THE REST OF THE BOYS FOR MONTHS, WHAT IS FAIR ABOUT THAT? GREATNESS I THINK NOT. MAYBE THE COACHING STAFF AT RIVERVIEW ARE AFRAID TO LET THE BIG CREEK STUDENTS PLAY, THEY MIGHT SHOW SOME OF THE IAEGER STUDENTS UP AND THE PUBLIC MIGHT SEE WHAT THEIR DOING.
KNOWING CHILDREN AND BEING USED TO THEIR ABILLITIES IS ONE THING FAVORING THEM IS ANOTHER. This post is not intended to speak ill of any student from Big Creek or Iaeger so don't try to spin that wheel. It is only about Scruples, Values and Egalitarianism.
"FAIR TREATMENT TO ALL STUDENTS"
"THE CONCEPT FOR ALL STUDENTS SHOULD BE FAIR AND EVERYONE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMPETE WITH THE BEST ATHELETES - STUDENTS CHOSEN, PARTICIPATING AND PLAYED NOT BASED ON THE FAVORED ONES WHERE YOU LIVE, OR WHAT SCHOOL YOU ATTENDED PREVIOUSLY".
Any PRINCIPAL OR COACH associated with either school should not have been allowed to BE EMPLOYED at River View. It is very obvious that the Iaeger students are being favored over the Big Creek Students and NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE. EVEN WORSE PARENTS HAVE LAID DOWN LIKE A CARPET TO BE WALK ON. DON'T YOUR CHILDREN MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU?
IS IT THAT PARENTS DON'T SAY ANYTHING IN FEAR THAT IT WILL ONLY BE WORSE FOR THEIR CHILDREN AS THE RUMORS HAVE BEEN GOING AROUND? MAYBE YOU BIG CREEK PEOPLE JUST DON'T HAVE THE BALLS YOU ONCE HAD AND WILL LET ANYONE STOMP RIGHT ON TOP OF YOUR CHILDREN THEN AGAIN MAYBE YOU JUST DON'T CARE.
Well for your information it isn't only iaeger boys playing on the field. From what I see a lot of them are from big creek and you can't tell me that they aren't because I have been to every game except for one. The last time I checked #'s 6, 9, 33, 65, and 85 seem to be on the field all the time. And in case you didn't notice there is only 17 or 18 boys from big creek on the team and 2 or three of them are out for good because of injuries and other issues and a lot of them are on JV. So what else do you expect? As for #10, he was able to come back and play because he already had enough practices because he was still playing in the state of WV while he was in Princeton. And he isn't always on the field. He may get to play more than some of the other boys on the team but that is because he is a varsity player and he is very good.
also heard

United States

#7 Oct 13, 2010
Just heard wrote:
From neither school. I asked the question about the cheerleaders and the answer was......Not many Big Creek girls went out for cheerleader. You have to go out before you can be a part of the team.
From what I heard Big Creek girls weren't told about the tryouts and when they did find out they had new rules for trying out that made them ineligble. Such as prior gymnastics training of which there is no such a place in the Big Creek area for this and weight limit. Big Creek has always had cheerleaders I can't imagine that all of the sudden no one from Big Creek wanted to be a cheerleader. Said that the new school was going to have a competition team. "Hope that works out for them."
Just heard

Hansford, WV

#8 Oct 13, 2010
I am sorry to hear that. I pray everything will be better in the future for all.
Whats fair about it

United States

#9 Oct 13, 2010
rvhs wrote:
<quoted text>
As for #10, he was able to come back and play because he already had enough practices because he was still playing in the state of WV while he was in Princeton. And he isn't always on the field. He may get to play more than some of the other boys on the team but that is because he is a varsity player and he is very good.
It is not fair that a student comes in late and has not practiced with the team gets to step in front of all the the boys that were there practicing everyday. I don't care where he came from. It's not right. Is he from Iaeger or Big Creek? Haven't seen a great ability there when he has been in the game. Maybe you have seen something the rest of us haven't seen.
Beggar

United States

#10 Oct 13, 2010
news flash wrote:
The player from Bigcreek who wasn't running the ball (#6) I agree, solid athlete, great attitude, etc. So are the other 5 or 6 running backs who were running the ball. Also for your info. As for #6, great player, great person, and he is getting the "reps" that he deserves now.
How is it he just now deserves to play? Is it because he begged and begged and finally got to play and once the public seen his ability the coaches surely couldn't put him back on the bench now could they? Why should any student have to beg to get a chance to play. Your comments are flat out ridulous.
rvhs

United States

#11 Oct 13, 2010
Whats fair about it wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not fair that a student comes in late and has not practiced with the team gets to step in front of all the the boys that were there practicing everyday. I don't care where he came from. It's not right. Is he from Iaeger or Big Creek? Haven't seen a great ability there when he has been in the game. Maybe you have seen something the rest of us haven't seen.
Well he's better than a lot of the boys on that team. He should be playing quarter back.
Whats fair about it

United States

#12 Oct 13, 2010
rvhs wrote:
<quoted text>
Well he's better than a lot of the boys on that team. He should be playing quarter back.
He may be better than some and not as good as some, just haven't seen it on the playing field when he has been in the game. Don't recall him being in the QB position though, still he has not been with the team all season and it is not fair that he goes in front of the rest of the boys that have been working together all season.
haaaa

United States

#13 Oct 13, 2010
rvhs wrote:
<quoted text>
The last time I checked #'s 6, 9, 33, 65, and 85 seem to be on the field all the time.
Sad isn't it out of 22+ positions. Is this all the BC boys you can come up with? 6 just started playing some cause now he getting those reps remember, lol.
LOL

United States

#14 Oct 13, 2010
wow truth appears wrote:
Big Creek + Iaeger = Discrimination
I would like to know when THE PARENTS of the children from the Big Creek School District
are going to STAND UP FOR THEIR CHILDREN???!!! IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS BY NOW THAT EVERYTHING BEING DONE AT RIVER VIEW IS THE IAEGER WAY. WHEN SOMEONE POSTED PREVIOUS THAT RIVER VIEW IS A NEW IAEGER HIGH SCHOOL THEY WERE MOST DEFINATELY RIGHT. For starters why all of the sudden ARE there "NEW" rules for cheerleaders as so no Big Creek Girls would be elegible with the rules PUT into place? Do you think that Iagers Cheerleaders are more important OR ARE BETTER AT CHEERING, I don't think so. Why were only 2 Girls on the Homecoming court from the Big Creek Area? I AM SURE ALL OF THE IAEGER GIRLS ARE MORE POPULAR. Why is it that the girl that was associated with trouble with a boy down there has been at the school in her mother's classroom however the boy is alternative school? WHY IS THAT BEING ALLOWED? Volley ball coaching obviously has some issues, look at me wrong and I will bench you. LAST BUT NOT LEAST...You can sit and listen to the fans at the Football games go on and on about the NEW Iaeger Football Team. It was told Long before the consolidation that Big Creek would have a few boys that could fill some spots on the Iaeger team. WOW THAT WAS A GREAT AND OH SO TRUE BROADCAST! It was told BY A MOTHER THAT one former Big Creek student had to beg and beg to run the ball and when he did he had a great game scoring 2 td's. Alot of these boys are being pushed out with no chance to play WHILE THE IAEGER PLAYERS ARE BEING FAVORED. ONE STUDENT NUMBER 10 HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO START AND WAS NOT EVEN AT PRACTICE WITH THE REST OF THE BOYS FOR MONTHS, WHAT IS FAIR ABOUT THAT? GREATNESS I THINK NOT. MAYBE THE COACHING STAFF AT RIVERVIEW ARE AFRAID TO LET THE BIG CREEK STUDENTS PLAY, THEY MIGHT SHOW SOME OF THE IAEGER STUDENTS UP AND THE PUBLIC MIGHT SEE WHAT THEIR DOING.
KNOWING CHILDREN AND BEING USED TO THEIR ABILLITIES IS ONE THING FAVORING THEM IS ANOTHER. This post is not intended to speak ill of any student from Big Creek or Iaeger so don't try to spin that wheel. It is only about Scruples, Values and Egalitarianism.
"FAIR TREATMENT TO ALL STUDENTS"
"THE CONCEPT FOR ALL STUDENTS SHOULD BE FAIR AND EVERYONE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMPETE WITH THE BEST ATHELETES - STUDENTS CHOSEN, PARTICIPATING AND PLAYED NOT BASED ON THE FAVORED ONES WHERE YOU LIVE, OR WHAT SCHOOL YOU ATTENDED PREVIOUSLY".
Any PRINCIPAL OR COACH associated with either school should not have been allowed to BE EMPLOYED at River View. It is very obvious that the Iaeger students are being favored over the Big Creek Students and NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE. EVEN WORSE PARENTS HAVE LAID DOWN LIKE A CARPET TO BE WALK ON. DON'T YOUR CHILDREN MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU?
IS IT THAT PARENTS DON'T SAY ANYTHING IN FEAR THAT IT WILL ONLY BE WORSE FOR THEIR CHILDREN AS THE RUMORS HAVE BEEN GOING AROUND? MAYBE YOU BIG CREEK PEOPLE JUST DON'T HAVE THE BALLS YOU ONCE HAD AND WILL LET ANYONE STOMP RIGHT ON TOP OF YOUR CHILDREN THEN AGAIN MAYBE YOU JUST DON'T CARE.
YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A TROUBLE MAKER...SEEMS TO ME THEY ALL GET ALONG REAL GOOD! A SCHOOL THAT MCDOWELL COUNTY CAN BE PROUD OF,,, OR MAYBE YOUR FROM A ANOTHER SCHOOL TRYING TO STIR SOMETHING UP BEFORE A GAME... LIKE IT OR NOT "THEY ARE RIVERVEIW RAIDERS"
omg

United States

#15 Oct 13, 2010
Whats fair about it wrote:
<quoted text>
He may be better than some and not as good as some, just haven't seen it on the playing field when he has been in the game. Don't recall him being in the QB position though, still he has not been with the team all season and it is not fair that he goes in front of the rest of the boys that have been working together all season.
He played the quarter back position for Iaeger. I agree that he made a mistake by leaving and then coming back. If he would have stayed he would be getting a lot more playing time right now.

You have to realize that out of the 22 positions of boys from big creek a lot of them are JV. In case you haven't noticed JV players don't get a lot of playing time during Friday night games.

We have a great team this year and I don't see why someone would try to put them down. Honestly, who cares if their from Big Creek or Iaeger. Now they are the River View Raiders and that is all that matters.
Your an idiot

United States

#16 Oct 13, 2010
No one said anything about how anyone of them were getting along. It's fantastic they are getting along moron.

No child should have to feel the need beg or be left out like these children have been at this new school. Adults need to step up and make sure things are fair. The sooner people take a stand the better it will be that all of the students are treated fairly. It's very clear that things are not being done fairly at River View. If you don't see it you must like and have a hand in the dirty work.
Your an idiot

United States

#17 Oct 13, 2010
omg wrote:
<quoted text>
We have a great team this year and I don't see why someone would try to put them down. Honestly, who cares if their from Big Creek or Iaeger. Now they are the River View Raiders and that is all that matters.
No one is putting the children down. It is the Adults in charge that need put in there places. No, they are suppose to be River View Raiders but their not. It's Iaeger Raiders.
There you go

United States

#18 Oct 13, 2010
omg wrote:
<quoted text>
He played the quarter back position for Iaeger. I agree that he made a mistake by leaving and then coming back. If he would have stayed he would be getting a lot more playing time right now.
A former Iaeger player, that does not attend practice with the rest of the boys from the start of the season get to play in front of Iaeger and Big Creek boys who have put their time in. Are you for real? I can't beleive this.
news flash

Logan, WV

#19 Oct 14, 2010
John Bailey was the starting runnning back before being accused of a crime. Joel Thomas starts, Leshon Benton starts,(both ways) Cody Underwood starts, Chad Franklin started before being hurt, Brad Hardy starts, Aaron Barnette has been starting, Justin Kidwell starts (both ways sometimes) there are only 11 spots on offense or defense. What would you have the coaches to do? Force Iaeger area players who have earned a starting spot to set the bench even though they are the best at the position? The players who are from the old Iaeger: Trey Bailey, Brandon Church, Michael Hatfield, Dave Hopkins, John Blankenship, AJ Kennedy, Shane Dobbs, Austin Walker. These guys are either bench pressing the world or are as fast as greased lightening. You simply are trying to make problems for these kids. They are ranked 12th in the entire state this week. Apparently the coaches must know a little about what they are doing, huh? As far as for the cheerleader thing, I personally know that the girls from both schools were made aware of preseason practice, tryouts, etc. if you choose to set at home on you rump during the summer and then cry once school starts-your problem. You can't punish those who are dedicated and came to practice every day. As far as homecoming court-voted on by their peers, the kids. Yeah, popularity contest, yeah, more kids from Iaeger area than Big Creek, what do you do? Segregate them so Sally Sue can get homecoming court? Come on, this is a joke that you are even trying to make an issue here. Get a life! People like you complain about having to pay taxes on winning the lottery
I think

Daniels, WV

#20 Oct 14, 2010
The entire football situation has always been a joke for "Iaeger" we need new coaches...you can't tell me out of 60 something boys they can't come up with 11 offense and 11 different defense players...I'm sure there are alot of good players on the team from Iaeger and Big Creek...WE'LL NEVER KNOW CAUSE THE SAME 11 BOYS PLAY THE ENTIRE GAME! And thats nothing against Iaeger or Big Creek that is just poor coaching. And before anyone starts yes we've won game...thats not the point, the point is you can't great without some "PLAYING TIME"....its all about who you know and who your parents are didn't you know that...oh and how much ass you can kiss!
I will say as far as parents or fans in the stands talking calling it the new Iaeger or whatever...I'm sure Big Creek says the same the new Big Creek...it is just a hard habit to break!
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY GO RIVERVIEW RAIDERS HOPEFULLY YOU ALL GET YOUR CHANCE IN THE SPOTLIGHT...NOT JUST A SELECT FEW!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Iaeger Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BOLD and TRYING (Mar '11) 6 min Laci Ann 7 30,262
cooterdog's hang out (Aug '12) 1 hr Sundog512 41,618
The Welch Hangout (Jan '13) 1 hr Prince 40,370
Voters 2 hr Pray to 14
Stevens Correctional/ McDowell (Jun '17) 2 hr Cop 48
Create your own Forum (Jun '15) 2 hr Really 4,406
4 Word Game (Sep '08) 3 hr SWAMP WITCH 3,029

Iaeger Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Iaeger Mortgages