Beg to differ. You keep going off on that tangent rant - a hijacking of sorts - but the rant I was primarily focusing on from the beginning was your jihad against the rabbis. My point is you have never acknowledged meeting in person ANY MEMBER of this population you take issue to. Thus your entire viewpoint is theoretical. Hence my oft repeated comment that you are tilting at windows (Do they read Don Quijote in Jamaica?)<quoted text>
HughBe--- The American born Frijoles believes otherwise. He challenged my point that they were like Jamaicans i.e. religious and not SECULAR.
Frijoles---not even the point I was making
HughBe--- You have a challenge focusing as that was the point that I was making. I was talking about being religious as opposed to being secular. So, I spoke about Jamaicans and then said that Americans were in my opinion like Jamaicans. I went on to talk about Egypt etc as examples of peoples who are religious more than secular.
Finally, I found it interesting that of all the RACES on the earth the least RELIGIOUS in my opinion based on guesswork would be the Jewish people and yet they are the ones who are called ethno-RELIGIOUS.
Memory tells me that approximately 50% of the Jewish people call themselves SECULAR and these are the people which are described as ethno-religious. Is it comedy hour?
What is clear to me is that the Jewish people are UNDENIABLY an ETHNIC group meaning RACE. The emphasis on GENEALOGY speaks for itself to the honest.
But to humor you I may reply to your tangent in my next post.