Sex is not merely an act of lust as understood by ordinary people.<quoted text>
If you want us to believe that these anthropomorphic beings, as well as Muhammad had sex with female disciples, daughters, sisters, and the latter with a child, to fix the higher force in the gross physical, then you are a deluded.
Notions of mentally induced morality are skewed.
Spirituality is above morality though it modifies morality according to the need of the hour and as worked out by the higher force to suit its aim.
Sex has its spiritual aspect which is a union in consciousness of the partners via the sexual act.
On the subtle planes, union between 2 consciousnesses is non-physical and the yoga can take place perfectly when 2 converging consciousnesses merge on a certain plane and vibrate as a unified system.
But, for the union to be complete, the union has also to take place on the physical plane via the union of the material consciousnesses of the partners as well as through the sexual act devoid of lust and attachment to the carnal pleasure. This would ensure the complete union from the subtle down to the gross physical. Such a yoga takes place from the overmental down to the gross physical.
However, the supramental yoga does away with sex as it eradicates the sex urge and atrophies the sex organs as part of its dynamism on the physical plane.....
I won't be surprised if Krishna actually had sex via the trance state with dozens of his female disciples since his yoga was to bring down and fix the cosmic overmental into the gross physical.
The successful descent of the overmental engineered by Krishna paved the way for the supramental descent.
At times, the sage may marry but refrain from sex as the union with his wife (a yogini of a high order) is purely on the subtle planes and has not the aim of transformation of matter. With this subtle collaboration in place, the yoga on the subtler planes is easier as it has the force of the partner as prop and dynamis.