Posted in the Huntington Forum
#3 Jul 19, 2013
I missed that one, but it sounds like a story I'd LOVE to hear. lol.
#4 Jul 19, 2013
Disprove carbon dating by carbon dating bones?
Anyways, carbon dating is completely irrelevant to both sides of the argument. I have friend who`s a Jesus freak. I heard it all before. I`m atheist and don`t believe in common descent. It wouldn`t matter to me how many zeros the scientific community keep throwing in or removing in that number.
Good luck with resurrecting the argument.
#10 Jul 19, 2013
I don`t suscribe to either theories or religion. It`s a bit ridiculous to me. I don`t offer a proposal on either a scientific level, or as a religous philosophy. And I`m not peddling an alternative. I just think the religious who make fun of Evolutionists, and Evoulitionists who make fun of the religious have no clue.
My original post wasn`t suggesing one or the other. I just wanted to make sure I understood what zap was saying. That someone wanted to apply carbon dating to disprove carbon dating.
However I will say carbon dating is 100% accurate... If you apply wild assumptions to how much carbon was here before. If you believe there was more then the Earth gets older. If you believe there was less, the Earth gets younger. 100% accurate.
Add your comments below
|school IPads||1 min||Mr_Zerubbabel||3|
|America Held Hostage Day 211||3 min||Mr_Zerubbabel||10|
|Girls what kind of porn do you like ?||4 min||TIM||19|
|Huntington Babe Ruth||14 min||Jimmy H||587|
|KKK is a bunch of NERDS who like to be Heard an...||1 hr||B White||13|
|Create your own Forum (Jun '15)||1 hr||RSM||4,195|
|Remove "Crackers" from Store Shelves||1 hr||black||3|
|Josh Fitzpatrick Fired||9 hr||oh yes||80|
Find what you want!
Search Huntington Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC