Posted in the Huntington Forum
#1 Dec 18, 2012
How can people be so stupid to think if gun are.harder to get for the good people. That is going to magically stop people from getting shot and killed!!! 95% of all gun related deaths is done with a gun that was illegally got in some way!! I am all for background checks and looking into my past as deep as they can before i am sold a.gun. but it comes.down to the gun dont have legs to walk into a room and kill.someone!! Guns dont kill people.do!!
#2 Dec 18, 2012
I AGREE I have never heard of anyone getting killed at a gun show have you??...LOL amytime someting like this happens the "gun "grabbers" get on this same old shit...but in the end they would love to have one protecting all the fancy nice shit they have and thier life!....
#3 Dec 18, 2012
this is so true
#6 Dec 18, 2012
no its not guns that kill people it is stupid phsycopaths with guns that kll people
#7 Dec 18, 2012
Or if you look at other countries that don't have the nauseating glut of guns like our country does and has a minuscule fraction of gun related deaths like we do you could have a different opinion. You people act like the biggest dumbest babies in the works crying about your automatic weapons and 30 round clips. The single purpose for those things are to kill more people faster.
Get over having small penises. You aren't Rambo.
#9 Dec 18, 2012
Sure is easier with a gun. I don't see lots of multiple smothering a in the news.
#11 Dec 18, 2012
How trite and useless could a paragraph be?
#12 Dec 18, 2012
I don't understand why people are so upset about the idea of stricter gun laws.
If you're an honest, law abiding, mentally stable person, you have nothing to worry about.
Will it solve the problem? No. But it will keep guns out of the hands of the people who we don't want to have them.
And do you really need semi-automatic weapons and assault rifles? For what?
#13 Dec 18, 2012
They're not automatics and they're not clips
#14 Dec 18, 2012
Do you know how many guns are 'semi-automatic'?
I have a .22 rifle made back in the 1940's that was passed down from my Father. It would be illegal if all 'semi-automatics' banned.
Also, every handgun but revolvers would be banned.
I think people need to be educated on this before they comment.
Some people don't even know what a semi-automatic is.
They hear 'semi-automatic' and see a vision of some character from Call of Duty shooting a fully automatic machine gun.
That is not what it is...
#15 Dec 18, 2012
Do you really need the sh!t you have?
Murder is illegal, what law do you think would have changed anything?
How about strict or controls on meds
How about banning violent video games
How about banning violence in movies and tv
How about banning violent lyrics in music
1,200,000 unborn children killed every year in the US, do you shed a tear for those precious lives?
#16 Dec 18, 2012
Should any limit be placed on arms? RPGs, tanks, nukes? If so, why?
#17 Dec 18, 2012
The gubmint used tanks at Waco...just saying..
I don't think anyone is asking for nukes or tanks.....
Remember, 3 people killed in charleston by a 22 rifle...
#18 Dec 18, 2012
None of my "sh!t" can kill people. If someone breaks into my home, they might be able to steal a butcher knife, but I'm positive that they wouldn't be able to go on a mass killing spree with that.
We do own one gun, but its in a hidden lock box and the only people who are even aware of its existence are me and my husband.
I'm not against guns, they just need to be harder to get.
And yes, to all the things you mentioned.
There should absolutely be stricter laws on meds.
I would absolutely support a ban on violent video games. My children don't play them at all, violent or otherwise.
Violent movies and television shows should not be seen by children, ever.
And I don't support violent lyrics in music either.
The problem does not lie in the possession of firearms - it is the people who possess them. Is the well being of your children a family not worth an extra day or two wait time? Is it really necessary to own a stockpile of weapons designed to kill quicker?
#19 Dec 18, 2012
Harder to get? I have to show ID, fill out a form and undergo a background check to buy a firearm, my constitutional right.
Do you go through that to vote? Do you go through that for religion? Do you go through that for free speech?
Harder to get would not have changed the horrible thing that happened last week.
Why does the gubmint have armed guards at the corp of engineers, the VA, the social security office but cancel funding for schools?
What happened last week shows how badly our society has deteriorated, not because of guns but because of dozens of other things
#21 Dec 18, 2012
I have never known voting, free speech, or religion to ever have killed anyone, let alone multiple people at once.
No one is proposing taking away your second amendment rights. If you aren't planning on using your weapons for anything other than hunting or target practice (or the unlikely event of self defense), then what are you worried about?
I'm pretty sure that when the right to bear arms was put into the constitution, it was to protect your right to hoarse a small arsenal of deadly weapons, easily accessible to anyone willing to jump through your "man cave" window.
However, I don't disagree that guns are the cause of violence. Too many parents are letting TV and videogames babysit their kids. They don't pay enough.attention to who their children are friends with. But the fact still remains that if those people had a more difficult time accessing a gun, tragedies like Sandy Hook could be avoided.
I don't know what the answer is, truth be told, but I'm certainly willing to try, without complaint, to regulate access to guns.
#22 Dec 18, 2012
only the strong survive. its that simple. im an ex soldier in special forces. believe me when i say: Get Your Guns Ready People. it is sooner than you may think
Since: Oct 11
#23 Dec 18, 2012
Gun safety rule #1: Carry one.
#24 Dec 18, 2012
Never known religion to kill anyone? What about 9/11 when the terrorist thought by killing Americans they would given passage into their heaven?
Or the Crusades? In the first crusade, Christians killed tens of thousands of people they called "infidels". The Children's Crusade (1212) caused the deaths of nearly 50,000 children.
There were the the Salem witch trials (1692) in America, when all those women were burned at the stake.
Joan of Arc being murdered because she heard the voice of God and people thought she was a witch.
Preachers sentenced to death and executed thousands during the Inquisition (1233-1834) for heresy and witchcraft.
The 17th Century Thirty Years War (Catholics v. protestants) wiped out tens of millions in Europe.
In the Taiping Rebellion in China in the 1850's a Christian cult started a war that resulted in the slaughter of twenty million people.
The Holocaust even had a religious argument of the Jews Killed Jesus and six million Jews were murdered.
Muslims and Christians in Bosnia reached a death toll of over 250,000.
Tell me again how people never used religion to kill hundreds of people?
#25 Dec 19, 2012
and what country would you be talking about?
Add your comments below
|Lisa Hernandez||11 min||lisa||7|
|Toi wilson||15 min||Toi Keira||6|
|britt davis||16 min||lmao||36|
|Urgent Message||21 min||Wow||9|
|Herald Dispatch is Marshall University Used Tampon||39 min||nohalgerg||6|
|Mary Simpkins eats the a for packs||44 min||cat||5|
|Prayer request for the Facebook drama queen||56 min||Ooh Child||1|
|Martin/Lemaster - Shame on the police and prose...||4 hr||Get a clue||109|
|Martin on Drugs||8 hr||LOL||210|
|Should I ever show up naked beating on your doo...||10 hr||J4J always||44|
|martin shoot||11 hr||explain||111|
|Holderby Shooting||14 hr||timeout||68|
Find what you want!
Search Huntington Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC