Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 8,459)

Showing posts 169,161 - 169,180 of200,319
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193861
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
Here is the disappointing reality of all this gay twirl.
A ss couple will only ever be only a duplicated HALF of marriage.
Nothing can change that.
You can't force people to deny that reality.
A law or a piece of paper cannot change it.
The result can ONLY be another fruitless gay encounter.
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha! You're a riot.
You don't get to decide "reality."
I am married. We are both husbands. Nothing you can say can ever matter to those facts.
But I kind of enjoy that it bothers you so much.
I see no difference between what you said and I said.

Care to clarify?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193862
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you distinguish pedophiles who molest only boys from those who molest only girls?
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
Clearly you need to do your research on pedophilia. We all know these answers already.
Come back when you are better prepared for a debate.
Honey, why don't you simply educate me?

I'd really love to hear it from you.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193863
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
If you read my post it would be clear. There are only pedophiles. There is no distinction between those pedophiles who molest only boys and those who molest only girls. Legally, there is no difference and medically/psychologically there is no difference.
There is to the boys and the girls.

And they are distinct pedophiles.

Surely it would be wise to label the gender danger a pedophile represents?

Or are you suggesting we leave a child at risk to be politically correct?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193865
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No that's not what I am implying. You are wrong, where did you get that idea?
I am stating that prop 8 prohibits polygamy as much as it does SSM.
You disagree?
How can it prohibit something that was already against the law? That's like saying Californians passed a proposition to outlaw murder.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193866
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is to the boys and the girls.
And they are distinct pedophiles.
Surely it would be wise to label the gender danger a pedophile represents?
Or are you suggesting we leave a child at risk to be politically correct?
Then should we distinguish between Catholic pedophiles and non-Catholic pedophiles? Should we distinguish football coach pedophiles and non-football coach pedophiles?

There is nothing politically correct about the current laws and medical diagnoses.

What you're suggesting is ridiculous. You know it; I know it; everybody reading your posts knows it.

Give up, hater. Go back to "church school".

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193867
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
MLK you ain't! He fought for freedom for all races, not just his favorite one.
So you are saying marriage equality should not be for polyamorists too? Is that equality? No of course it's not.
So, the bottom line is you don't really support marriage equality. You just want more of the same. Rights only for marriages you approve of.
Maybe this will help you to understand... I support marriage equality for same-gender couples and opposite-gender couples. I do not support polygamy.

Your continuous and contrived astonishment of my position on this issue does not sway me.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193868
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
How can it prohibit something that was already against the law? That's like saying Californians passed a proposition to outlaw murder.
Many states defense of marriage acts prohibit same sex marriage which was already prohibited.

I'm sorry if you feel polyamorists are horning in on your suffering, but they are suffering exactly the same as you. And they deserve the same relief that you demand.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193869
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Then should we distinguish between Catholic pedophiles and non-Catholic pedophiles? Should we distinguish football coach pedophiles and non-football coach pedophiles?
There is nothing politically correct about the current laws and medical diagnoses.
What you're suggesting is ridiculous. You know it; I know it; everybody reading your posts knows it.
Give up, hater. Go back to "church school".
I think that you insisting that pedophiles who molest only boys and never girls are not gay is ridiculous. But PC is ridiculous so that's that.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193870
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you distinguish pedophiles who molest only boys from those who molest only girls?
<quoted text>
Honey, why don't you simply educate me?
I'd really love to hear it from you.
All pedophiles are straight according to the PC handbook. It would be homophobic to say one was gay! But it's fine to call them all straight.

PC makes no sense, but that's the nature of it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193872
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is to the boys and the girls.
And they are distinct pedophiles.
Surely it would be wise to label the gender danger a pedophile represents?
Or are you suggesting we leave a child at risk to be politically correct?
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Then should we distinguish between Catholic pedophiles and non-Catholic pedophiles? Should we distinguish football coach pedophiles and non-football coach pedophiles?
There is nothing politically correct about the current laws and medical diagnoses.
What you're suggesting is ridiculous. You know it; I know it; everybody reading your posts knows it.
Give up, hater. Go back to "church school".
If those designations would protect the child, yes.

But you know they don't.

You also know what I suggest does protect them, and the only reason it is not used is political correctness. To the detriment of the child.

However, more than gay pedophiles jumping for joy, the Scouts are careful about opposite gender leaders in camping situations with Scouts. A responsible recognition to the power of mating behavior. Homosexuals are exempt from that temptation and discretion?

All this is just another example of homosexuals throwing common sense and children under the bus to fulfill their fantasy and denial.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193873
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe this will help you to understand... I support marriage equality for same-gender couples and opposite-gender couples. I do not support polygamy.
Your continuous and contrived astonishment of my position on this issue does not sway me.
I'm just exposing your hypocrisy, I'm not trying to sway you.

Any astonishment is with your audacity in casually believing that polygamy doesn't deserve the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193874
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
All pedophiles are straight according to the PC handbook. It would be homophobic to say one was gay! But it's fine to call them all straight.
PC makes no sense, but that's the nature of it.
I'm embarrassed as a human for them trying to defend such nonsense.

I'm outraged that they are willing to put children at risk to maintain their denial.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193875
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe this will help you to understand... I support marriage equality for same-gender couples and opposite-gender couples. I do not support polygamy.
Your continuous and contrived astonishment of my position on this issue does not sway me.
Ironic isn't it, the very form of legal marriage you support other than monogamous, conjugal, husband and wife, is same sex, has opened the door to the form of marriage, polygamy, you don't support. Every victory for SSM is also a victory for the eventual legalization of plural marriage.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor brought it up while questioning former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson, a Republican who argued that gay marriage is an individual right and should be protected by the Constitution.

"If you say that marriage is a fundamental right, what state restrictions could ever exist?" Sotomayor asked before referencing polygamy and incest among adults.

How can one prohibit polygamy between consenting adults, if marriage is a fundamental right? What state restrictions, as long as the parties are consenting adults, could ever exist?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193876
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Ironic isn't it, the very form of legal marriage you support other than monogamous, conjugal, husband and wife, is same sex, has opened the door to the form of marriage, polygamy, you don't support. Every victory for SSM is also a victory for the eventual legalization of plural marriage.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor brought it up while questioning former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson, a Republican who argued that gay marriage is an individual right and should be protected by the Constitution.
"If you say that marriage is a fundamental right, what state restrictions could ever exist?" Sotomayor asked before referencing polygamy and incest among adults.
How can one prohibit polygamy between consenting adults, if marriage is a fundamental right? What state restrictions, as long as the parties are consenting adults, could ever exist?
That is an excellent point that cannot be stressed enough to these dumb haters, every victory for same sex marriage is a victory for polygamy.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193877
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
How can it prohibit something that was already against the law? That's like saying Californians passed a proposition to outlaw murder.
They did, they outlawed assault rifles which made murder even "MORE ILLEGAL" ( chuckle ) It used to just be illegal to murder someone with an assault rifle, but now it is even "more illegal".

( I hope you realize you are arguing with someone that has no conception of what he is talking about )
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193878
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
They did, they outlawed assault rifles which made murder even "MORE ILLEGAL" ( chuckle ) It used to just be illegal to murder someone with an assault rifle, but now it is even "more illegal".
( I hope you realize you are arguing with someone that has no conception of what he is talking about )
Is that why you choose not to address me directly? Or perhaps you have no argument? Is that why you are so hostile whenever I mention poly?(chuckle)
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193879
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
They did, they outlawed assault rifles which made murder even "MORE ILLEGAL" ( chuckle ) It used to just be illegal to murder someone with an assault rifle, but now it is even "more illegal".
( I hope you realize you are arguing with someone that has no conception of what he is talking about )
Your jokes are stupid. But any diversion to avoid addressing the fact that I am correct, eh Big D?

I am correct. Prop 8 discriminates against polygamy as much as it does against SSM.(chuckle)

But that's your straw man argument. To avoid the real argument we were having which is that true marriage equality won't happen until polygamy is also allowed. I am also correct on that. And it makes you angry and frustrated. Deal with it.

Hope that helps!

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193880
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that you insisting that pedophiles who molest only boys and never girls are not gay is ridiculous. But PC is ridiculous so that's that.
How about this... You go out and change all of the laws regarding pedophilia--make them determine what kind of pedophile they're dealing with. But be ready for all of the different types. There are Catholic, Baptists, Atheists, teachers, coaches, troop leaders, politicians, etc.

When it comes right down to it, would you want a man who has a history of molesting little girls working with little boys?

IMHO, if you are a pedophile, you are a pedophile. And the laws, as well as the scientists, seem to agree on that.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193881
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is to the boys and the girls.
And they are distinct pedophiles.
Surely it would be wise to label the gender danger a pedophile represents?
Or are you suggesting we leave a child at risk to be politically correct?
<quoted text>
If those designations would protect the child, yes.
But you know they don't.
You also know what I suggest does protect them, and the only reason it is not used is political correctness. To the detriment of the child.
However, more than gay pedophiles jumping for joy, the Scouts are careful about opposite gender leaders in camping situations with Scouts. A responsible recognition to the power of mating behavior. Homosexuals are exempt from that temptation and discretion?
All this is just another example of homosexuals throwing common sense and children under the bus to fulfill their fantasy and denial.
Here's what I know... You seem to know an awful lot about gays and pedophiles. Why, exactly, is that?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193882
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
How about this... You go out and change all of the laws regarding pedophilia--make them determine what kind of pedophile they're dealing with. But be ready for all of the different types. There are Catholic, Baptists, Atheists, teachers, coaches, troop leaders, politicians, etc.
When it comes right down to it, would you want a man who has a history of molesting little girls working with little boys?
IMHO, if you are a pedophile, you are a pedophile. And the laws, as well as the scientists, seem to agree on that.
Sure. But men who molest only boys are gay.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 169,161 - 169,180 of200,319
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Hughson Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Hughson People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hughson News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hughson
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••