Hudson, Wis. / McCain to make appeal to women

[More Truth]

JLT st paul wrote:

<quoted text>
You disrespectful, condescending jerk.

Are you trying to hit on me?

[jen]

Jenny wrote:

Isn't he happy with his own wife? 72 and still can't afford to retire? Or, is it GREED.

He can afford to retire. Do you know how much a president makes? Your post makes no sense.

[More Truth]

jen wrote:

<quoted text>
He can afford to retire. Do you know how much a president makes? Your post makes no sense.

President only makes $400,000/yr. Ex-presidents can make $100 million within five years.

President, like Reagan, can deregulate and enrich friends and 'interests' which can be beneficial for family wealth for generations to come.

[qwerty]

More Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
President only makes $400,000/yr. Ex-presidents can make $100 million within five years.
President, like Reagan, can deregulate and enrich friends and 'interests' which can be beneficial for family wealth for generations to come.

Meanwhile lowlifes like Clinton actually steal crap out of the whitehouse before they leave. Now there was a guy who was squeaky clean...never did anything shady at all. Your hypocracy is astounding.

[More Truth]

qwerty wrote:

<quoted text>
Meanwhile lowlifes like Clinton actually steal crap out of the whitehouse before they leave. Now there was a guy who was squeaky clean...never did anything shady at all. Your hypocracy is astounding.

I'll give you time to verify that before I expose you for being an idiot extraordinarie.

It was the first of many lies we received from the Bush Administration. Let go.

[qwerty]

The Clintons had to give stuff back. THey were "mistaken" when they thought they could have them. Highly publicized. You really need to stop getting all your news from moveon.org . You verify nothing you post all over the place here. Ask not of others that you will not do yourself. "extraordinarie"? Do you mean Extraordinaire? You should probably verify that.

[More Truth]

qwerty wrote:

The Clintons had to give stuff back. THey were "mistaken" when they thought they could have them. Highly publicized. You really need to stop getting all your news from moveon.org . You verify nothing you post all over the place here. Ask not of others that you will not do yourself. "extraordinarie"? Do you mean Extraordinaire? You should probably verify that.

So, you can find a link to emphasize your snarky point but, you can't find one to cite your claims?

There are these things on the internets called the googles. They find what you need.

Simply repeating your bs does not make it true.

[qwerty]

More Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
So, you can find a link to emphasize your snarky point but, you can't find one to cite your claims?
There are these things on the internets called the googles. They find what you need.
Simply repeating your bs does not make it true.

Do you not read your own crap? You could be responding to yourself in all your responses to me. But you in your blindsided infinite wisdom could never see that. The clintons ripping off the White House was hugely publicized even by the liberal media. If you were too busy reading left wing kooky blogs (as your only source of news) to pay attention to what is going on in the real world...there is nothing I can do for you. Go "googles" it yourself.

[More Truth]

qwerty wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you not read your own crap? You could be responding to yourself in all your responses to me. But you in your blindsided infinite wisdom could never see that. The clintons ripping off the White House was hugely publicized even by the liberal media. If you were too busy reading left wing kooky blogs (as your only source of news) to pay attention to what is going on in the real world...there is nothing I can do for you. Go "googles" it yourself.

Widely printed media that I can't find. Where did you see it?

(are you lying to us?)

[qwerty]

More Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
Widely printed media that I can't find. Where did you see it?
(are you lying to us?)

anyone who has ever read a newspaper or watched the news knows of this story. I have no desire to prove such an obvious fact to you. I don't give a rip if you are too lazy to start using reliable news sources or use "the googles" yourself-try "Clinton steals from White House". I guarantee great results. Oh, but thanks so much for giving me time to verify before exposing me. So very big of you. Do you actually think your pathetic attempts at being condescending/threatening work? It's quite humorous actually. I'd love to keep this fascinating back and forth going but I'm going on vacation. I'll miss you "more lies".