Judged:
2
2
1
“On the contrary, anyone with knowledge of 17-year-old boys would assume that most would accept the offer with alacrity and those who, from fear or embarrassment, refused the offer would soon and for the rest of their lives regret not having taken advantage of it,” Breen wrote in the petition.
The petition suggests the arbitrator should have gotten some expert opinion regarding any psychological harm to the boy “arising from a woman whose sole apparent purpose was to give him pleasure.”
Perhaps this young man's parents taught him respect in his upbringing and therefore that is why he refused the invitation. KUDOS to him and his parents. She is a sexual preditor. She should not be teaching children. She should not be around children. And to top it off, she has been getting paid since 2007...on paid leave. Your tax money is paying a sexual preditor. OUTRAGEOUS.







