Mitt Romney pisses off the rest of the world?

[the real anonymouse]

Mitt stepped in it multiple times while over in jolly ole England yesterday. He insulted their leaders, citizens, and could not be bothered to remember the smallest details.
So remind us again why this man would be good on foreign policy? He isn't even President, but went over there acting like he was and doing a bad job attempting to represent America. This is an embarrassment to see a man who claims he wants to be out leader go to an long standing and historic ally and just make a fool out of himself.

[TRUTH]

How about Obama bowing to every foreign leader on the planet?

Giving the Queen a Iphone with his speeches on it?

Beginning a speech during the UK national anthem and not stopping!

Wrote the wrong date in the Westminster Abbey guest book.

Sent back the bust of Winston Churchill.

Dumped Netanyahu for private dinner.

Sending Dalai Lama out the back door, by the dumpsters, to keep from making the Chinese mad.

must i go on?

Obama is the biggest embarrassment this country will every know!

[AverageJoe]

You need to look at how Obama has treated our allies. England, Israel, Poland to name a few. Obama has made a fool out of this great country in front of all of the world leaders! I bet Romney wont bow to our enemies! You can't say that about Obama!

[Mitt Romney]

“England is just a small island. Its roads and houses are small. With few exceptions, it doesn’t make things that people in the rest of the world want to buy. And if it hadn’t been separated from the continent by water, it almost certainly would have been lost to Hitler’s ambitions.”---From my book, "No Apologies"

Now I'm off to Switzerland to count my money! Keep thinking you matter! HAHAHAHA

[the real anonymouse]

Slick Willard Romney on abortion, wear your flip flops! http://youtu.be/lNDsyKnQIes

[Nucking Futs]

THEY'RE THE SAME CANDIDATE! The only difference is the slight coloration difference. Obamacare was originally Romneycare, and it's almost no different yet now all the conservatives want to repeal it because it's all somehow Obama's fault. Whoever wins this election, we've already lost. This may as well be a one party election, the same thing we all hated Hussein and countless other dictators for.

[Nucking Futs]

And sorry for the slight redundancy slight error slight there at the beginning near the beginning redundancy

[Mitrack Obamney]

Nucking Futs wrote:

THEY'RE THE SAME CANDIDATE! The only difference is the slight coloration difference. Obamacare was originally Romneycare, and it's almost no different yet now all the conservatives want to repeal it because it's all somehow Obama's fault. Whoever wins this election, we've already lost. This may as well be a one party election, the same thing we all hated Hussein and countless other dictators for.

SHHHH!!!

Don't stir up the peasants! They have to think their votes still matter otherwise there could be trouble!

[From Trigg County]

Romney will bow, scrape, and do the kowtow to the Israelis, the only so-called "ally" that most Americans care a whit about.

[TRUTH]

The American people at least know Israel doesn't want us dead, unlike the world leaders Obama is bowing and sucking up to!

[the real anonymouse]

Republicants like to have it both ways, don't they? Obama is offending the whole world... while also sucking up to them!
It's like you can watch an hour of FOX and the next day it they all start repeating the same lies, even if it contradicts one they told the day before.

[TRUTH]

He has offended every ally we have and sucked up to every communist and islamic dictator in the world.

now are you happy?

i typed r e a l l y s l o w because i know you are an idiot.

[the real anonymouse]

You type slow because you use one finger and look at the keyboard, that is your idiocy, not mine.

[TRUTH]

No, Liberalism, ego, being a Atheist and lack of comprehension is your idiocy.

Loser freak

[Nucking Futs]

How did Murdoch manage to take an innocuous word like "Liberal", which for years meant, "Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." and had synonyms like bountiful, generous, and free, and turn it into a word that caused traditional Christians and conservatives to sneer and clutch their Bibles?

Jesus himself even demonstrated liberal tendencies from time to time, but that's a different story.

Liberals aren't evil or stupid, they're just people with different ideas than you. They want to keep Obama in office, and you want to elect Romney.

I will say this, though. I don't think I'm going to vote for Obama, but I would never vote for Romney. Not because he's a conservative with "traditional family values", but because even before becoming president, he's contradicted almost every single one of his positions.

I figured this out not by watching the news or being subjected to liberal bias, but by researching his views on the internet and on Youtube. Thankfully, instead of linking you to scores of videos, someone managed to compile a lot of these contradictions. I think you should look at it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Vote independent this year. Otherwise we're electing the same guy again, even if we don't.

[TRUTH]

Nucking Futs wrote:

How did Murdoch manage to take an innocuous word like "Liberal", which for years meant, "Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." and had synonyms like bountiful, generous, and free, and turn it into a word that caused traditional Christians and conservatives to sneer and clutch their Bibles?
Jesus himself even demonstrated liberal tendencies from time to time, but that's a different story.
Liberals aren't evil or stupid, they're just people with different ideas than you.

Right - THEY ARE SOCIALIST!

You blame Fox news? Crazy!

Go back in history and find your answer - Norman Thomas - SOCIALIST!

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under
the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist
program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without
knowing how it happened."

You are welcome.

[TRUTH]

The Socialist Party, USA, in 1956, chose to stop running candidates of its own, except on rare occasion. During the 1960's, we began to work in the Democratic Party. This is where our allies in the civil rights and trade union movement worked and continue to work politically. We are proud of what we helped accomplish within the Democratic Party, particularly the civil rights legislation and anti-poverty programs of the the 1960's.

http://www.socialdemocratsusa.org/

[AverageJoe]

I will say this, though. I don't think I'm going to vote for Obama, but I would never vote for Romney. Not because he's a conservative with "traditional family values", but because even before becoming president, he's contradicted almost every single one of his positions.

I figured this out not by watching the news or being subjected to liberal bias, but by researching his views on the internet and on Youtube.

Then you should really research Obama!

BTW, You post earlier on this tread..."THEY'RE THE SAME CANDIDATE! The only difference is the slight coloration difference."

Talk about contradiction, What a loser!

[Nucking Futs]

LOL, are you serious? You're afraid of socialism still? The GOP reached all the way back into the Cold War to pull out that particular fear-mongering tactic, and that's why you hate liberals?

Hang on a second, I'd like you to imagine me pointing at you while I do this:

BAHAHAHAHAHA. AHAHAHAHAHA. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Phew, I need to wipe a tear from my eye. That's good stuff.

I'm not mean enough to call you brainwashed, but I'm still mean enough to call you blind. The US Socialist party hasn't been a serious threat to American politics since WWI. Doesn't mean we haven't adopted socialist ideas, like the public school system that educates all of our children, and many other things. And I can't believe you quoted the lines, "particularly the civil rights legislation and anti-poverty programs" as a BAD thing.

By the way, Norman Thomas has been dead since 1968. His hey-day in politics (if you'll call it that), was well before that. He last ran for serious office (and was soundly defeated) in 1928. You've been so affected by fear mongering you're quoting the words of a man that's been dead for almost the better part of a century, as if his words as a failed politician will somehow come true if you abandon your ridiculous dogma. Independent thinking bro, learn some.

[Nucking Futs]

AverageJoe wrote:

I will say this, though. I don't think I'm going to vote for Obama, but I would never vote for Romney. Not because he's a conservative with "traditional family values", but because even before becoming president, he's contradicted almost every single one of his positions.
I figured this out not by watching the news or being subjected to liberal bias, but by researching his views on the internet and on Youtube.
Then you should really research Obama!
BTW, You post earlier on this tread..."THEY'RE THE SAME CANDIDATE! The only difference is the slight coloration difference."
Talk about contradiction, What a loser!

How is it a contradiction when I said I wasn't going to vote for Obama either? I was addressing a conservative poster over his Mitt Romney affection, why would I also address Obama? Would you like me to? I said they're the same candidate didn't I? Get over yourself.