Trooper sentenced to 8-10 years for rape

Apr 18, 2007 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Boston Globe

“The victim in this case went through a deeply traumatic experience, and she deserves great credit for bravely coming forward and recounting this incident to the jurors.”

A suspended state trooper was sentenced yesterday to at least eight years in jail for raping a 26-year-old woman and threatening to plant drugs on her if she did not comply with his advances last year, ... via The Boston Globe

Comments
1 - 4 of 4 Comments Last updated May 7, 2007
ROH

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Apr 21, 2007
 
What was the evidince in this case?
BmW

Mendon, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
May 2, 2007
 
ROH wrote:
What was the evidince in this case?
Thank you. There was no Forensic evidence. What evidence at all was provided? It was her story against his. I think she was a talented story teller and that's what swayed the jury. I think she made it up for her own personal reasons.(probably a possible monetary gain or some kind of revenge) I wouldn't be surprised if she recants her story or the "guy" that was supposedly offered money changes their stories and this trooper is vindicated. I just can't beleive with a record like his, and 17 years of service that all of a sudden he would do something "stupid" like this.
Chuck

Canaan, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
May 2, 2007
 
Why do you assume this is the first time? Perhaps it happened before and was not reported. Aren't most rapes unreported?

There's bad apples in any bunch of people, even police officers.

Personally I know neither the officer in question nor the plaintiff, and I have not heard the testimony. But I think it is a reasonable assumption that the jury heard the testimony and deliberated on it.

I'm curious as to why the officer in question did not testify.
Sue

Weston, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 7, 2007
 
In any criminal case the defendant does not have to tesify on his/her own behalf. These cases are always difficult becasue of the way the meida sensationilizes the story. More often than not the defendant is guilty in the public eye before they even go to trial. Our system is suppose to be innoncent till proven guilty and due to the media coverage I think many are swayed before they are even selected to sit on the jury.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Holbrook Discussions

Search the Holbrook Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Seeking Owner of Lost Class Ring (Jan '06) 6 hr anjel1441 522
NAACP Partners With Dunkin' Donuts 10 hr Annoyance Incorporated 2
What do you like about Shades?? (Apr '13) Thu Kundrot dionkie 339
dionkie blows (Aug '13) Thu Truth 321
Woods Hole Film Festival Gears Up for 23rd Year Thu Cheryl D 1
MA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Massachus... (Oct '10) Thu jimmietsen 4,698
MA Who do you support for Governor in Massachusett... (Oct '10) Thu Dale Craven 1,152
•••
•••

Holbrook News Video

•••
•••

Holbrook Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Holbrook People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Holbrook News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Holbrook
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••