Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#9931 May 8, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>There is no Benghazi thingy looming for Obama. I'll give you this. I do think it severely hurt Clinton, but that's it. End of story.
Well, possibly. There are questions concerning Obama's whereabouts and lack of response. He won't walk away unscathed. We'll see.
Hillary is probably going down big time.
danger zone

Snellville, GA

#9932 May 8, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
If you call posting vulgarity shutting someone down then I'll give you that one.
I'm not old. Don't know why you think that.
Aggie is brilliant.
I can stand my ground as well.
We think alike. LOL. Don't give them anything.
Aggie trumps everyone on this forum with grace & manners. And yes, brilliant... I think we conservatives stand our ground by not stooping to conquer.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#9934 May 8, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
The judges have ruled.
"Bored" has been destroyed, decimated, and demolished.
Someday he'll learn not to take on his "Betters", as Right Wing Wackos just don't have the mental horsepower to compete with normal Americans.
After all, if RWWs were that smart, they wouldn't be REWs.
YOU are a normal American???? Maybe compared to Jack the Ripper you are normal. Maybe in your alternate universe you are normal. Wow! You are just full of ........surprises.
danger zone

Snellville, GA

#9935 May 8, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting that you think showing respect for the mentally challenged makes you "a stick in the mud". I read the book from which that quote in #9614 was taken while I was in college and thought it was a beautiful affirmation of the value of all life - even those lives that some would look upon as a burden. And the ONLY reason I used that quotation is that that post was directed towards you and you claim to be a believer, though your actions on here certainly do nothing to present evidence of that fact -(with the exception of your posts concerning the sanctity of life of the unborn - you have been quick to champion their right to live and, for that alone, I still harbor some small respect for you.)
However, there is still no excuse for the profane vulgarity you spew in most of your posts - which I feel confident will be your response to this, should you choose to respond. But, I no longer care, you have proven yourself unworthy of any time spent either reading or responding to your posts. So that was the last of your posts I will read and this is my last post to you, don't worry, I am well aware you couldn't care less. I hope you find your way out of your anger and bitterness.
Goooo Aggie!!!

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#9937 May 8, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Umm.. yeah... I was trying to find a nice way of giving your a trophy for "effort" when I got to the good stuff...LOL!
lol I posted that for your benefit. I knew you would like it.

Nighty night. Sleep tight. Don't let the right wing wackos bite. lol
danger zone

Snellville, GA

#9938 May 8, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, possibly. There are questions concerning Obama's whereabouts and lack of response. He won't walk away unscathed. We'll see.
Hillary is probably going down big time.
Hillary is toast, yesterday's leftovers.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#9940 May 8, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you say that ?
You mean women don't excrete secret super sperm killers when raped that prevent pregnancy ?
You mean the Earth is not actually 6,000 years old ?
You mean Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld were lying when they said we had to invade Iraq or nuclear missiles would explode in Sheboygan, Wisconsin the following week ?
You mean the glaciers are melting and sea level rising because if global climate ?
You mean that voter fraud is so uncommon that voter ID laws, and reducing polling places and shortening voting times are actually intended to keep the working class from voting ?
You mean Bush actually left us with a $1.4 Trillion Dollar Debt, 3 wars, and a recession ?
You mean that there's no logical reason income received from investments should be taxed at 1/2 the rate of income received from working for a living ?
Say it ain't so !
1. So we have an idiot on our side of the fence, do you really want us to start listing the list of brain trusts YOU have.? Hank Johnson, who thinks Guam could "tip over and capsize" if we sent too many troops to the island,
Sheila Jackson Lee who asked NASA personnel if the Mars rover could go over to the site where the astronauts planted the flag. Claire McCaskill who thinks that "the good news is emissions are way down thanks to the recession" . And that true queen of smarts Nancy "we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it." Pelosi. And then of course we have our president who thinks there are 57 or 58 states and who thinks you pronounce the "p" in"corpsman".
2. So who on here has claimed the Earth is 6,000 years old, and I will also refer you back to #1.
3. Please find that quote, I'd love to see it.
4. Oh, didn't you know the Earth has gone through climate changes before, ever heard of the Ice Ages, the Medieval Warm Period, the Little Ice Age? All of which occurred without those evil carbon emissions.
5. Why is it that Democrats are so worried if someone who has to show an ID to cash a check or buy alcohol also has to show one to protect the integrity of our electoral process- kind of makes you wonder.
6. Bush was not the fiscal conservative I would have preferred, but he was a hell of a lot better than what's in there now.
7. That's right, there is no logical reason that money that was already taxed once and then risked in ventures that will stimulate the economy if successful or could be lost completely if the venture fails, should be taxed at the same rate as earned income where there is no risk of loss.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#9942 May 8, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Now now,- settle yourself down.
No need for you Right Wing Wackos to get all upset.
You RWWs can stay on the guv'ment dole just like you have your whole lives.
RWWs can keep collecting those guv'ment checks and benefits that we taxpayers provide for 'em.
Relax, nobody is trying to pry those RWW lips from that guv'ment teat.
After all you all been sucking on that taxpayer teat for so long it wouldn't be fair to demand you all take care of yourselves or your young 'ens.
So settle down and take your Thorazine, we'll all watch over you tonight and keep you all snugly wugly in your own little comfy taxpayer provided homes.
Oh, goody, more projection.
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#9943 May 8, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>Hey! Just shut 'em down. Cut and paste your usual response. That'll do it.
Glad to accommodate your request.

Here's another one:

"I think on a national level your Department of Law there in the White House would look at some of the things that we've been charged with and automatically throw them out."

Sarah Palin opining on "The Department of Law"(Which of course does not exist).

Is it even conceivable to be so intellectually vacuous that you would support this poor woman's quest to be Vice - President of the United States.

I know McCain picked her cause she does look good, nut hell, my Wife put a "referee" shirt on her dog for Halloween, but that didn't convince me the dog should be hired to ref the NCAA Championship.

But then again, Palin makes my Wife's dog look as smart as a brain surgeon.
danger zone

Snellville, GA

#9944 May 8, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>Oh my God. You again. Is that you Chuck? I thought your a$$ was gone. Fat boy. I've had about enough of you boy. I wasn't talking to you. You are not part of this thread you're to stupid. Get a f*cking clue.
I will never acknowledge your presence again. You are below us..... I'm a part of this thread, I'm not going anywhere!!!!!!!!!
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#9945 May 8, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>DON'T EVEN TRY wussy-boy. You turned tail and ran like a coward.

Now you're trying to act all tough again? You've proven what you're worth. Go run along now.

If you want to have a grown-up discussion, try discussing things like a grown-up. You can do this on your own at any time. But I'll bet you continue to act live a useless little ankle-biter. We'll see.

Until then enjoy coloring with your crayons.

You've had your cowardly butt handed to you. Now stop your yammering.
Please stop slapping "Bored" around in such an obvious manner.

He'll figure out he does the RIght Wing Wacko more damage than he does good, and we'll lose him as a foil.

Ah, wait... He's a RWW.... He'll never figure it out..... Never mind.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#9946 May 8, 2013
And thank you, Syn and danger zone, you are very kind and I appreciate your support.
danger zone

Snellville, GA

#9947 May 8, 2013
Leave OMTE alone. Let him play in the gutter forever, I DO NOT care. Intelligent people AVOID this demon.
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#9948 May 8, 2013
Bored wrote:
I'm outta here, Butt is confused about debating and I aint gonna wait for no sorry liberace.
Wait .... Don't go.

First, I am still curious.

What is denigrating about being called "Liberace" ?

Why is that a bad thing.

Was Liberace imprisoned for some major federal felony ?

Was he convicted of some heinous crime?

Did he defraud creditors using bankruptcy ?

Did he fail to perform at his scheduled Las Vegas show ?

Did he refuse a "Special Request" you made to him ?

Why attack Liberace ?

Inquiring minds want to know ?

danger zone

Snellville, GA

#9949 May 8, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
And thank you, Syn and danger zone, you are very kind and I appreciate your support.
You are most welcome.
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#9952 May 8, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>Shut us down????
Are you kidding????
You wish!! If you think using extremely vulgar language and insults is shutting us down, I have no words. You are one really confused poster. You need to stick to the argument without loose lips, that spit out anything. Some thoughts should be, just that, thoughts. You don't have a filter.
No, no.

The judges have ruled.

You were thoroughly spanked and sent to bed - without dessert.

If this were a prison setting, you'd be wearing a mop as a wig, along with your best negligee made from pajamas stolen from the infirmary, the guys in the next cell would be quietly humming the song "Every Breath You Take", and you'd be calling 'Ol Chicken "Darlin".

Give it up - you've been owned.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#9953 May 8, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
The "problem" has ALWAYS been the deliberate lie the administration tried to feed the American public that al Qaeda was on the run
So you're contending that al Qaeda hasn't been effectively chased like rabbits into the holes of Pakistan for the most part, and then continued to be chased and killed by US drones?

I'd like to confirm that's your argument before I decimate it.
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
The "problem" has ALWAYS been the deliberate lie.......that the attack was the result of an impromptu protest over a stupid video virtually no one saw. They knew it wasn't true then, they knew it wasn't true when they sent Susan Rice to lie on ALL the Sunday shows - and boy was Bob Scheiffer mad about that this week- they knew it was a lie when they kept saying it for the next two weeks.
You're missing some important details in your assertions here Aggie. Can you confirm that there was no intel coming in through the hundreds of thousands of sources if intel that needs to be sorted through daily about protests regarding that film? Egypt protested over that film that nobody saw. Yemen protested over that film that nobody saw, Iran protested over the film that nobody saw.

http://www.aljazeera.com/video/middleeast/201...

In hindsight it wasn't a protest at Benghazi, but are you sure that things couldn't have been confused AT THAT MOMENT with various intel coming in? It's a big world and there's a lot going on, a lot of information flowing in quickly, not all intel is reliable.

Who is "They"? And why do you give them so much credit for assuming they have perfect intel and analysis of all that intel instantaneously? What backup do you have of that? Why do you assume that the thousands of people and computers sorting all that intel have perfect and instantaneous communication amongst each other?

What makes you think that a LOT of that intel isn't still classified and that you're working with all the information?
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
And don't even try with the "republicans cut the funding" - besides the fact that it doesn't explain why security personnel already stationed there were removed AFTER the consulate requested additional security. Nor can it explain why the team in Tripoli was delayed from responding, nor does it explain why support a few hours away in Italy was told to stand down. I just LOVE the current excuse - "they couldn't get there in time".
Yeah? People get reassigned all the time due to budgetary needs and operational priorities.

Perhaps an intelligence or tactical decision was made that this could be a diversionary tactic and they needed that force for a more critical deployment, based on intel analysis. You're insane if you think our intelligence procedures and information are being cracked wide-open on C-span for the world to see.

Couldn't get there in time? Who knows what the issue was. Fuel trucks late, pilot still in Germany, who knows? If you think our military runs like a swiss watch - lol - I could tell you some stories - and I'm sure some other service-men could as well.

The truth is, Hillary requesting additonal funding. Not only did she not get it, but her funding was cut. This IS something we know was directly the result of Republicans. I bet Exxon-Mobil didn't have to wait for their subsidies though.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#9955 May 8, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>

And yes, the "wording" is very important when you see they were trying to spin the narrative.
That's what governments do. Not only governments, but people in general. They spin things. How often do you see somebody raise their hand and say "Everything turned to crap in a way to massive to ever repair and it's because I made a wrong decision!"???

Nice of you to think you have all the answers, Monday-Morning Quarterbacking what was probably 10,000 people dealing with hundreds of thousands of intel snippets, instantaneously. Sure we didn't get the result we wanted. Sure everybody wish's things went better.

That doesn't justify a witch hunt. You should be ashamed of yourself to think you have enough information to make those judgements. This is the real world, not 30-second Fox soundbites we're talking about.
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>

And I am not thinking about "blood in the water". I am thinking about blood on the streets of Benghazi and on the hands of WHOEVER told those Response Teams to stand down. That is what I want to know.


Nice hyperbole here, Ms. Hysterical. Why do you have a RIGHT to know exactly what happened in the inner-workings of our intelligence machine?

What you need to know, and be concerned with is that America was attacked in some armpit of the world 8,000 miles away. Not the name of some Staff Sargent or lieutenant that made a bad call while trying to sort out a difficult situation with global and immediate consequences. That's just arrogant to think you deserve that.
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
And by the way Hillary, it makes a hell of a lot of difference.
You AND the Republicans owe Hillary an apology. It's just that simple.

Try to get a grip on just how complicated the real world is, and perhaps have some gratitude for the 100'000's of thousands of people on duty at this very moment doing very critical and instantaneous work trying to keep your judgmental witch-hunting butt safe.

And that's what this is. It's partisan politics of the very worst kind, initially led by John McCain who was being an opportunist because he needed a committee to sit on.
danger zone

Snellville, GA

#9956 May 8, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
No, no.
The judges have ruled.
You were thoroughly spanked and sent to bed - without dessert.
If this were a prison setting, you'd be wearing a mop as a wig, along with your best negligee made from pajamas stolen from the infirmary, the guys in the next cell would be quietly humming the song "Every Breath You Take", and you'd be calling 'Ol Chicken "Darlin".
Give it up - you've been owned.
Not hardly. Not hardly. By encouraging him, you're no better. I realize my posts have rattled nerves. I just DO NOT care. So there.:))
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#9958 May 8, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I realize my posts have rattled nerves.:))
You're giving yourself WAY too much credit there, buckaroo.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hinesville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
I want a honest single soldier Aug 24 Harsh Dose of Rea... 2
The Billy Crowder Case (Mar '12) Aug 22 Wendy 103
Can a police officer get fired for sleeping wit... (Jul '11) Aug 12 Reality Check 33
Looking for Herbs Aug 12 doesitmatter 2
News Soldier granted bond on murder charge Jul '15 ssgmilanlarry 3
Count finds 37 possible homeless people (Feb '15) Jul '15 anpoeplearecrazy 2
Tivoli or Jerico Kayaking Jul '15 RHW 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hinesville Mortgages