Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8287 Apr 30, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess cut and paste ain't so bad after all.
As I've posted before, it's the only thing you are good at. Your personal posts wordings show a complete lack of clarity, information, and knowledge.

Stick to copy and paste and hide your ignorance.


Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8288 Apr 30, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, those "global warming activists" had a lot more to say in that article, mainly that it's a complex issue, but for some reason you're hungup on CO2, strawman perhaps.
Simple Question, Simple Answer… Not
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives...
...Physics is rich in phenomena that are simple in appearance but cannot be calculated in simple terms. Global warming is like that. People may yearn for a short, clear way to predict how much warming we are likely to face. Alas, no such simple calculation exists. The actual temperature rise is an emergent property resulting from interactions among hundreds of factors. People who refuse to acknowledge that complexity should not be surprised when their demands for an easy calculation go unanswered.

You are the one hung up on "global warming." My posts deal with climate change. Sorry you dont know the difference like Chicken little.
OMTE

United States

#8289 Apr 30, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
See, it easy to not cut and paste and show your ignorance. Show us more of yourself without cut and paste.
I wish you'd go back to just insulting IO, because you're a dummy.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8290 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
Bored,
Every bit of your information came from this webpage:
http://www.cfact.org/issues/climate-change/cl...
Yet another privately undisclosed funded groups paid to "create a controversy". Just who do you think is paying it millions of dollars to keep putting out this stuff?
Don't be a plagiarist. Attribute your sources.

Actually it sounds more a libtard website to me.

"Statement of Purpose
Prospering Lives. Promoting Progress. Protecting the Earth.

In 1985, the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) was founded to promote a positive voice on environment and development issues. Its co-founders, David Rothbard and Craig Rucker, believed very strongly that the power of the market combined with the applications of safe technologies could offer humanity practical solutions to many of the world’s pressing concerns. A number of leading scientists, academics, and policy leaders would also agree with them and soon joined their effort, along with thousands of citizens from around the country.

Today, this Washington DC-based group is a highly respected organization and its voice can be heard relentlessly infusing the environmental debate with a balanced perspective on environmental stewardship. With an influential and impressive scientific advisory board, aggressive collegiate program, CFACT Europe, United Nations representation, Adopt-A-Village project, Global Social Responsibility program, and “Just the Facts” national radio commentary, CFACT has and continues to offer genuine positive solutions to today’s global challenges.

The organization has been termed “invaluable” by the Arizona Republic, it has been lauded for its “effort to bring sound science to the environmental debate” by a former president of the National Academy of Sciences, and has been praised by a respected Boston Globe columnist for “a record of supplying absolutely solid information.”

At the heart of CFACT, our goal is to enhance the fruitfulness of the earth and all of its inhabitants. CFACT accomplishes this through four main strategies:

Prospering Lives. CFACT works to help people find better ways to provide for food, water, energy and other essential human services.
Promoting Progress. CFACT advocates the use of safe, affordable technologies and the pursuit of economic policies that reduce pollution and waste, and maximize the use of resources.
Protecting the Earth. CFACT helps protect the earth through wise stewardship of the land and its wildlife.
Providing Education. CFACT educates various sectors of the public about important facts and practical solutions regarding environmental concerns."
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8291 Apr 30, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I wish you'd go back to just insulting IO, because you're a dummy.

Dont like to look the fool huh? Sorry, NOT!


Informed Opinion

La Fayette, GA

#8292 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>That's not really accurate. One side is supported by almost every honest scientist in the world. The other side is supported by scientists who are PAID to support a predetermined stance paid for by big-oil and coal interests who stand to gain substantially by getting people to believe their propaganda.

That's quite the difference.

Synergy wrote, "<quoted text>
I don't even WANT to try to change your mind. I had rather you just find out I'm right.:)"

LOL - I know you do. I understand. But you're ultimately going to be disappointed. You're not right, you just hate Obama with a passion for reasons that go beyond logic and reality.
Hey, Right Wingers claim the Earth is flat; it's less than 6,000 years old; and women, when raped, create secret sperm killers in their bloodstream that prevents pregnancy.

vs.

Normal Earth inhabitants say the Earth is spherical; it's about 4 Billion years old; and women, when raped, can become pregnant.

If only their was an impartial, objective methodology to determine the truth.

But, I guess there isn't - so we have to say both sides are equally legitimate viewpoints.

Damn - maybe someday science and rational analysis will be invented on Right Wing Planet.
Cartersville Resident

Pine Lake, GA

#8293 Apr 30, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you just LOVE how the liberal socialist commies "think" their sources are correct and anyone's sources that don't support their agenda are wrong? It's a complete waste of time. They have been completely liberal programmed and live in an alternate universe.
OMG...that is describing you to a T!
columbus native

Edmond, OK

#8294 Apr 30, 2013
Why are there those who won't accept Global Warming? Mostly republicans who feel their Giant Corporation gods are not responsible for puking all kinds of chemicals in our air that we all breathe. Also they have little regard for protecting our water that we drink. You see their gods will have to spend time and money putting filters on giant smoke stacks and clean up our waterways. Now those sane balanced folks out there believe that business and the enviroment can work together but big business will have to be monitored to see that they don't pull shortcuts and jeporadize all of our health satisfying their Bottom Line( PROFIT). How stupid republicans are!
columbus native

Edmond, OK

#8295 Apr 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, Right Wingers claim the Earth is flat; it's less than 6,000 years old; and women, when raped, create secret sperm killers in their bloodstream that prevents pregnancy.
vs.
Normal Earth inhabitants say the Earth is spherical; it's about 4 Billion years old; and women, when raped, can become pregnant.
If only their was an impartial, objective methodology to determine the truth.
But, I guess there isn't - so we have to say both sides are equally legitimate viewpoints.
Damn - maybe someday science and rational analysis will be invented on Right Wing Planet.
As time goes by people are lining up far right are far left, but then there are still those like me who believe that the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#8296 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
You just keep saying nothing, over and over again. Give up trying to alphabetize your M&M's and realize that some people are just smarter than others, bless your heart...
The irony of this post, from this poster...

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8297 Apr 30, 2013
OMTE wrote:
I like you Dave, but CB is wiping the floor with your a$$. Bill Gates is brilliant man and you proved it with your link. I'm very impressed Chickn.
Well I guess I was wrong about you. You are not a self thinker and you are not very smart either. I always gave to the benefit of doubt. No more chances for you. I now look at you just as I now look at all the other socialist suckers.
You will reap what you sow.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#8298 Apr 30, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I wish you'd go back to just insulting IO, because you're a dummy.
And the irony of this post, from this poster.

Oh yeah, the one that determines who is above and below others...

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8299 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
So essentially you're saying all science is a fraud?
Is that your position now? It would explain a lot.
You continue to put your words in my mouth. I never said any such thing. I did say that you usually try to tell your boss what he wants to hear. I know that there are some people that make results turn out the way people want them too. Not all but some.
When you play golf with the boss you should be smart enough to let him win.
To deny fraud is fraudulent. We are dealing with peole that have certain political causes and people that just want to keep getting government grants. Not too hard to figure out.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8300 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, let's let the source go for a moment. Read what it's talking about. Not ONCE did Bill Gates advocate eliminating mankind. He talked about population control through the use of contraceptives, and he only spoke about that in the context of an equation that showed ONE of several possible numbers had to go down to solve a problem.
No matter. It doesn't come anything close to what you're claiming he said.
However, it shouldn't be difficult to find a transcript of a Bill Gates speech. I couldn't find much mention of it except at your link. Odd, don't you think?
What a pathetic distortion.
Now you say people don't mean what they say. I wouldn't waste my time looking up anything for you. You look it up .I have wasted about all the time that I am going to.
Informed Opinion

Cape Coral, FL

#8301 Apr 30, 2013
Nope- there's no climate change going on. Those glaciers are intentionally melting cause they are "Libtards".

National Geographic News
March 2, 2009
It's an oft-repeated statistic that the glaciers at Montana's Glacier National Park will disappear by the year 2030.

But Daniel Fagre, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist who works at Glacier, says the park's namesakes will be gone about ten years ahead of schedule.

How do you have a Glacier National Park where all the glaciers have done melted ?

The 2030 date, he said, was based on a 2003 USGS study, along with 1992 temperature predictions by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

"Temperature rise in our area was twice as great as what we put into the [1992] model," Fagre said. "What we've been saying now is 2020."

The 2020 estimate is based on aerial surveys and photography Fagre and his team have been conducting at Glacier since the early 1980s.

A more standardized measure of what's happening to a glacier comes from arduous documentation of its mass, which requires—among other techniques—multiple core samples.

Fagre said the 2020 estimate could be slightly revised after his team conducts the mass measurements—hopefully this year—and their computer models are retooled with current temperatures.

Nonpolar ice is disappearing all over the globe, Fagre said. Major glaciers have entirely disappeared from the Andes, and the Himalaya have lost a third of their snow.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8302 Apr 30, 2013
OMTE wrote:
Dave I hope you feel better dude.
Well thanks and I know I have been very grumpy and not as sharp as I would like to be. I tire easily. But I will be well in no time.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8303 Apr 30, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
I second that. Get feeling better Dave.
Thanks man. I am pages behind and I can't catch up. Wow you guys have a lot of time to type.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#8304 Apr 30, 2013
Bored wrote:
"
No. In fact, big tornadoes have seen a drop in frequency since the 1950s.“There has been a downward trend in strong (F3) to violent (F5) tornadoes in U.S. since 1950s.” In fact,“warming causes fewer strong tornadoes, not more,” climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer explained.
Other prominent scientists also reject global warming links to tornadoes. There is “no scientific consensus or connection between global warming and tornadic activity,” emphasized Greg Carbin, tornado warning coordination meteorologist at NOAA’s Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Oklahoma.“NOAA statistics show that the last 60 years have seen a dramatic increase in the reporting of weak tornadoes, but no change in the number of severe to violent ones,” Corbin commented."
++1 Post! You must be commended on all the effort that you put forth on that lengthy post but it will not matter as our liberal posters will just say it really isn't up to snuff. That all your facts are just made up or paid for by the Koch brothers. Only their speaking points are correct. Some have been brainwashed since kids with the lies and that is a hard cycle to break.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8305 Apr 30, 2013
columbus native wrote:
Why are there those who won't accept Global Warming? Mostly republicans who feel their Giant Corporation gods are not responsible for puking all kinds of chemicals in our air that we all breathe. Also they have little regard for protecting our water that we drink. You see their gods will have to spend time and money putting filters on giant smoke stacks and clean up our waterways. Now those sane balanced folks out there believe that business and the enviroment can work together but big business will have to be monitored to see that they don't pull shortcuts and jeporadize all of our health satisfying their Bottom Line( PROFIT). How stupid republicans are!
Normally I dont reply to idiots, but in your case will make an exception.
If you read the above posts you will see I "quoted" (notwithstanding ChickButt's claim of plagiarism) a libtard website about climate change. If you wanna harp on global warming, educate yourself.
Bored

Dahlonega, GA

#8306 Apr 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, Right Wingers claim the Earth is flat; it's less than 6,000 years old; and women, when raped, create secret sperm killers in their bloodstream that prevents pregnancy.
vs.
Normal Earth inhabitants say the Earth is spherical; it's about 4 Billion years old; and women, when raped, can become pregnant.
If only their was an impartial, objective methodology to determine the truth.
But, I guess there isn't - so we have to say both sides are equally legitimate viewpoints.
Damn - maybe someday science and rational analysis will be invented on Right Wing Planet.
If you read the posts I made from a libtard website and come away uninformed, you are an idiot. I've always had my suspicion about you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hinesville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ludowici woman denied bond again (Aug '07) Sep 20 kansas 88
News Army, Georgia Power build 250-acre solar energy... (Dec '16) Sep 17 Jamesmatheson 3
Men Wearing Thongs (Sep '08) Sep 16 Texasguy 267
Looking for Herbs (Aug '15) Aug 29 Ryuk7 4
News Will Monday's total eclipse change your life? Aug '17 howdydoo 5
I want a Bbw 😍 Aug '17 All687 2
Long Counties finest Aug '17 Disgusted 1

Hinesville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hinesville Mortgages