I have appreciated your posts on this, thanks. The agenda behind the man made global warming - oops, sorry - now it's "man made global climate change" push is so obvious, but no matter the evidence to the contrary, its devotees will not waver.<quoted text>
I used to work in a university and I bet you don't realize how much money in grants these professors and scientist get from Uncle Sam for certain studies and projects. Don't you think that these scientist want to keep getting their grant money? I could say all the studies in various university's are rigged and the results are all phoney to please the government so that these people can keep their jobs from year to year. That has been done before. I could say all studies are done this way just as you point to my articles and information. Think about that. Your MIT information might very well be false so a person or persons can keep getting their grants renewed. No results no money.
And regarding your absolutely spot on comments about the willingness of the less ethical to fraudulently skew data or even make it up for the purposes of notoriety or grants, the following is a link to an article about a Dutch psychologist who admitted last year to completely making up the data for which he received both renown, but more importantly grant money. He denies that his intent was selfish,(right) but it is probable that like many of the man made climate change adherents, his conclusion was the important thing - if data had to be skewed (or outright created) so be it, the greater good must be upheld.