Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
I answered your question but I guess you have ADD
4. marriage above all else is a social contract. Inheritances, medical decisions, etc are all part of that contract. With polygamy, the lines of who gets what, who makes what decisions are blurred and lead to legal battles. Does one of the wives who is not the mother of one of the children in the marriage get to make medical decisions for that child is a prime example of why polygamy is illegal.
These are all rational, logical reasons why the slippery slope fallacy is moot. However, judging by your previous posts, intelligent logical debate is not your forte. Debating with a wall has better results.
same sex marriage and polygamy are two separate issues. and comparing them as equal is a fallacy..something you seem to use quite frequently.
as I said marriage is a social contract. Polygamy, besides a host of problems it raises, legal issues is the biggest.

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
We've already been through this. What makes you think I need your permission to discuss the topic or anything else?
You seriously don't think removing the ban on gay marriage will make it easier to remove the ban on polygamy some day?
By what logic do you insist that there will be no effect?

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
are these rhetoric questions, or do you want answers?

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
I answered your question but I guess you have ADD
4. marriage above all else is a social contract. Inheritances, medical decisions, etc are all part of that contract. With polygamy, the lines of who gets what, who makes what decisions are blurred and lead to legal battles. Does one of the wives who is not the mother of one of the children in the marriage get to make medical decisions for that child is a prime example of why polygamy is illegal.
These are all rational, logical reasons why the slippery slope fallacy is moot. However, judging by your previous posts, intelligent logical debate is not your forte. Debating with a wall has better results.
same sex marriage and polygamy are two separate issues. and comparing them as equal is a fallacy..something you seem to use quite frequently.
as I said marriage is a social contract. Polygamy, besides a host of problems it raises, legal issues is the biggest.

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
my bad, rhetorical

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
He has been given answers, he wants a public display of the "slipery slope" argument you so clearly pointed out.
he will not discuss same sex marrage in any way at all, he is 100% focused on poly, and no matter how many times that tactic fails him, he keeps at it.
I think we are looking at a learning disorder

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
again are these rhetorical questions, or are you really interested in answers. Please indicate if your questions are genuine or rhetorical

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
The slippery slope is not a fallacy. It is real. If you were better educated and smarter, you would explain how it is real but inconsequential and not a reason to deny rights. You can change people's opinions for the better much quicker if you don't bullshit them.
I support marriage equality. Do you?

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
The slippery slope is not a fallacy. It is real. If you were better educated and smarter, you would explain how it is real but inconsequential and not a reason to deny rights. You can change people's opinions for the better much quicker if you don't bullshit them.
I support marriage equality. Do you?

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Elmont sucks! Yuck! Too far from the water. Too Queensy. As in the borough.

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
BINGO!!!!!
The slippery slope argument was his entire point.
And of course he will not acknowledge the opposing forces, the decline of the power of religion, and the growing distrust of religious fundamentalists.

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text>
No, the slippery slope argument is a false argument. It is like hypothetical questions; what if.....?
Yes, I support marriage equality.

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text>
No, the slippery slope argument is a false argument. It is like hypothetical questions; what if.....?
Yes, I support marriage equality.

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
ad hominem
and too friggin cold in the winter which is why I moved to SoCal

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
so if it was a rhetoric question, why did you chastise those who you felt didn't answer it????
C'mon Frankie boy, try and get your story straight.
BTW Why are you filled with so much anger?

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I want you to bring your wife on so we can discuss it with her.
of course you are not actually interested yourself, the slippery slope argument is only made by people trying to influence others to their position.

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
again are these rhetorical questions, or are you really interested in answers. Please indicate if your questions are genuine or rhetorical

Dusty Mangina wrote:

I don't want 5 wives; I just want to be able to marry one.