Casual Observer

Syracuse, NY

#25 Mar 10, 2012
Facts are facts wrote:
It took the Topix admin a day or two to take it down and with their cooperation, a police report filed for identity theft.
roflmao
FISHY FISHY joke is on U

New York, NY

#26 Mar 10, 2012
The 50 % off applies to a SINGLE piece of sushi. One PIECE per visit is 50% off of $1.98 piece. So much for cheap sushi....lol tHIS DOES not apply to any entree.
Flamebird

New York, NY

#28 Mar 12, 2012
So I decided to finally try the place out, and yeah, it's actually really good. And a good-sized entree's pretty cheap for a sushi place (not 50% off cheap, but still). Everything was fresh, the presentation was nice. Good place.

And seriously, FISHY, most sushi places sell sushi and sashimi by the piece, although they all have meals with multiple pieces as options. If you want to simplify things, get an entree meal or a sushi roll.
yum yum

Tully, NY

#29 Mar 13, 2012
I've been there for dinner. The fish was fresh and flavorful, presentation was superb, the hot tea refills were plentiful, and the service was attentive. There were 2-3 sushi makers working at the sushi bar. The cost of the sushi and rolls are comparable to any of the Utica Japanese restaurants. I hope they keep up the good work.
Law

United States

#30 Mar 13, 2012
There is an actual law of false advertising out there. If it states that it is 50% off then it should all be 50% off unless stated on their sign. Investigation now is being done on this.
Truth is

New York, NY

#31 Mar 13, 2012
doubtful any investigation is going on about a 50% off sushi sign. I don't suppose anybody has ever taken you seriously a day in your life?
Nope

United States

#32 Mar 13, 2012
Investigators were thought to be out there early morning snapping shops of the sign the other day unless it was Chinese Tourists.
Truth is

New York, NY

#34 Mar 13, 2012
There is nothing to investigate when it is clearly spelled out for the customer before they even order a thing what is 50% off and what is not. There is no deception when full disclosure occurs.

Again, nobody is investigating anything.
Barney

United States

#35 Mar 13, 2012
its like advertising gas for a buck..you need to write the small print somewhere on the outside sign.

its called bait and switch.

Customer assumes that anything associated with sushi is %50 off before going in. Once you are in then you get the small print. Against the LAW!
Truth is

New York, NY

#36 Mar 13, 2012
Not against the law as long as the terms are disclosed before the customer buys anything.

Again, there is nothing here to investigate.
Chcukie

Cicero, NY

#37 Mar 14, 2012
Truth is you used to post as First Amendment!!!!!!!!!
Truth is wrote:
Not against the law as long as the terms are disclosed before the customer buys anything.
Again, there is nothing here to investigate.
Truth is

New York, NY

#38 Mar 14, 2012
Chcukie wrote:
Truth is you used to post as First Amendment!!!!!!!!!
<quoted text>
That would be a negative there, ghost writer. How you came to that conclusion is a mystery.

Not only that, but there are two distinctly different posters using that name. One who still posts on the local newspapers. The other is a loser stalker troll using that name here merely to harass and stalk the one from the newspapers. I am neither, but I suspect you are the stalker one found here on Topix. Otherwise, why else would you even make reference to the name?
Chcukie

Cicero, NY

#39 Mar 14, 2012
No, it is quite obvious you are the First Amendment that posts here and on the OD.
You're "know it all" attitude is a dead give away. Especially when you think you know every law and how to interpet them.
Truth is wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be a negative there, ghost writer. How you came to that conclusion is a mystery.
Not only that, but there are two distinctly different posters using that name. One who still posts on the local newspapers. The other is a loser stalker troll using that name here merely to harass and stalk the one from the newspapers. I am neither, but I suspect you are the stalker one found here on Topix. Otherwise, why else would you even make reference to the name?
shammy

Utica, NY

#40 Mar 14, 2012
ditto, he is the loser lib troll who harrasses young girls.
his above everybody attitude is the give away. he needs a slap and ill give it to him. did u know its just that attitude that killed his mother n law,upurs prick..
Truth is

New York, NY

#41 Mar 14, 2012
Chcukie wrote:
No, it is quite obvious you are the First Amendment that posts here and on the OD.
You're "know it all" attitude is a dead give away. Especially when you think you know every law and how to interpet them.
<quoted text>
In your own mind perhaps. There are many people posting on here so how is it you can possibly keep track of who is who?

Not sure where you get this "know it all" attitude about me but I only post on select topics, not just anything and everything. See, unlike the typical troll (ie you), I only post on topics I have some interest or insight into.

the only dead give away is you have no idea what you are talking about nor who you are talking to. Obviously, if it wasn't for either of the "first amendment" posters, you'd have no life to live since it is your ultimate goal to stalk them, just as you are doing now.

Good day.
Truth is

New York, NY

#42 Mar 14, 2012
shammy wrote:
ditto, he is the loser lib troll who harrasses young girls.
his above everybody attitude is the give away. he needs a slap and ill give it to him. did u know its just that attitude that killed his mother n law,upurs prick..
Speaking of the topix "first amendment" stalker troll, he must have just gotten into his menial job this morning. Good morning, stalker.
Truth is

New York, NY

#43 Mar 14, 2012
Chcukie wrote:
No, it is quite obvious you are the First Amendment that posts here and on the OD.
You're "know it all" attitude is a dead give away. Especially when you think you know every law and how to interpet them.
<quoted text>
BTW, that would be "your" not "you're" which is a form of "you are". There should be no period after "give away" because the rest becomes an incomplete sentence. It should be a comma not a period. Also, it is spelled "interpret".
Chcukie

Cicero, NY

#44 Mar 14, 2012
First Amendment, I see you had to change your posting name, people have been and continue to be sick of your know it all attitude. Select topics? LOL!! Even your knowledge about the two First Amendments proves you are the person who thinks he know it all. You sit there in your not for profit job posting on various sites all day long while feeding off the taxpayers.
Truth is wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, that would be "your" not "you're" which is a form of "you are". There should be no period after "give away" because the rest becomes an incomplete sentence. It should be a comma not a period. Also, it is spelled "interpret".
Truth is

New York, NY

#45 Mar 14, 2012
Chcukie wrote:
First Amendment, I see you had to change your posting name, people have been and continue to be sick of your know it all attitude. Select topics? LOL!! Even your knowledge about the two First Amendments proves you are the person who thinks he know it all. You sit there in your not for profit job posting on various sites all day long while feeding off the taxpayers.
<quoted text>
Well, I see it has been awhile since your meds have been adjusted. Your conspiracy theories are brilliant, but mythical. Since clearly you have no other purpose in life than to stalk someone, best of luck getting your life in order. I have more intelligent things to do than to hash out reality from make believe.

Oh, do be careful of the low flying pink elephants!
troubled youth

New York, NY

#46 Mar 14, 2012
Truth is wrote:
<quoted text>
In your own mind perhaps. There are many people posting on here so how is it you can possibly keep track of who is who?
Not sure where you get this "know it all" attitude about me but I only post on select topics, not just anything and everything. See, unlike the typical troll (ie you), I only post on topics I have some interest or insight into.
the only dead give away is you have no idea what you are talking about nor who you are talking to. Obviously, if it wasn't for either of the "first amendment" posters, you'd have no life to live since it is your ultimate goal to stalk them, just as you are doing now.
Good day.
Your second "who" should be "whom."

Poor phrasing to say "I have some interest ... into."

"ie" should have periods -> "i.e."

"Give away" as a noun is one word.

"...nor who you are talking to" is grammatically incorrect; better would be "nor to whom you are talking."

Always hilarious when some would-be grammar and spelling cop tries correcting someone else ... when his own posts are riddled with errors! LOL.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Herkimer Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Need a man. 6 hr mtgcdjfl 6
Herkimer to be annexed in 3 years? 9 hr catch up 93
What did Ex-Ilion investigator PAUL ROSE reciev... 15 hr The Truth 8
Interesting facts about the Merger vote (Oct '12) 19 hr Resident 57
Does Legal Incense show up on a drug test? (Aug '11) Tue mr cat 298
Larry Dack comes out of the closet!!!! Dec 22 Ho Ho Ho Merry Xmas 5
It's Been 6 Months and What has the Fatty Mayor... Dec 22 Plan X 3
Herkimer Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Herkimer People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Herkimer News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Herkimer

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:43 am PST