Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201881 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Goo

Honolulu, HI

#231320 Jun 24, 2014
http://reidheadrandom-ness.blogspot.com/
this is more what came to mind from your response.
Goo

Honolulu, HI

#231321 Jun 24, 2014
Pooh bear Mess

Honolulu, HI

#231322 Jun 24, 2014
Third time's a charm
MeSSedUuP

Honolulu, HI

#231323 Jun 24, 2014
all better now
Singe

Northampton, MA

#231324 Jun 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
It is just one of many proofs that homosexuality is a sexual birth defect.
Smile.
Right now Lides is committing buggery on a 16 yo boy. But he'll be back tomorrow to rationalize for gay marriage and parenting.
:o)
Los Angeles

Long Beach, CA

#231325 Jun 24, 2014
Why are so many Mexicans in LA and Orange counties anti-Christ?

Since: May 12

Woodland Hills, CA

#231326 Jun 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS.
Infertility in a hetero couple is rare and often mendable. A ss couple is mutually barren ALWAYS. Hardly 'equally true'.
Moreover, a hetero couple provides a mother and a father. A ss couple ALWAYS deprives a child of a mother or father role. Devastatingly NOT equal!
Ah, gotta love those 'rational atheist' oxymorons...
Smirk.
If you think every child must be raised with both a mother and father, than what about single parents? What about when a man decides to say he's not the father and walks away before the child is even born? Should single mothers who face that reality not be allowed to raise their own children? Should they have their child taken away from them and given to a couple who can provide both a mother and a father? And there are plenty of couples who cannot reproduce. You say because it's rare, that's an excuse for the ones who are to be allowed to marry as opposed to a same sex couple? Also, there are plenty of same sex couples raising happy, healthy children. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it any less true. Plus, no same sex couple will ever get married because of an unwanted pregnancy. No same sex couple will ever have an oops baby. Every child raised by a same sex couple is wanted.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#231327 Jun 25, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS.
Infertility in a hetero couple is rare and often mendable. A ss couple is mutually barren ALWAYS. Hardly 'equally true'.
Moreover, a hetero couple provides a mother and a father. A ss couple ALWAYS deprives a child of a mother or father role. Devastatingly NOT equal!
Ah, gotta love those 'rational atheist' oxymorons...
Smirk.
TrueAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
If you think every child must be raised with both a mother and father, than what about single parents?
Where did I claim any such thing.

The assertion was that ss couples with children are just as valid as sterile hetero couples with children.

I exposed the lie, and you have no rational answer.

Smile.
Rollos

Covina, CA

#231328 Jun 25, 2014
Grow up and go control someone else's life like you own, loser #231327
Clod Hoppers

Covina, CA

#231329 Jun 25, 2014
Stupid Republicans of texas has put gay reparative therapy back on the national stage. The state's wing of the GOP has adopted a platform supporting "conversion therapy" - which is supposed to "heal" homosexuals from their non-heterosexual lifestyle - while Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) has stated that being gay (like being an alcoholic) is a genetic predisposition that can be overcome.

Leave it to people who talk funny - they have been called clod hoppers

Since: May 12

Woodland Hills, CA

#231330 Jun 25, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS.
Infertility in a hetero couple is rare and often mendable. A ss couple is mutually barren ALWAYS. Hardly 'equally true'.
Moreover, a hetero couple provides a mother and a father. A ss couple ALWAYS deprives a child of a mother or father role. Devastatingly NOT equal!
Ah, gotta love those 'rational atheist' oxymorons...
Smirk.
<quoted text>
Where did I claim any such thing.
The assertion was that ss couples with children are just as valid as sterile hetero couples with children.
I exposed the lie, and you have no rational answer.
Smile.
So you admit it. You don't think a hetero sexual couple, who can't produce children, should be able to raise children. Adoption, in-vitro, surrogates, egg donors, sperm banks, none of that should exist for anyone. If you cannot reproduce than you should not be able to get married at all, in your opinion. What about elderly couples, or fertile hetero sexual couples who choose not to get married? After all if marriage is all about reproduction, then why should heterosexual couples be allowed to make the choice not to have kids?
Liberal Transgressive

Northampton, MA

#231331 Jun 25, 2014
Rollos wrote:
Grow up and go control someone else's life like you own, loser #231327
Some might suggest gays are doing just that here in the state of Assachewsetts.
Liberal Transgressive

Northampton, MA

#231332 Jun 25, 2014
TrueAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit it. You don't think a hetero sexual couple, who can't produce children, should be able to raise children. Adoption, in-vitro, surrogates, egg donors, sperm banks, none of that should exist for anyone. If you cannot reproduce than you should not be able to get married at all, in your opinion. What about elderly couples, or fertile hetero sexual couples who choose not to get married? After all if marriage is all about reproduction, then why should heterosexual couples be allowed to make the choice not to have kids?
When the state is involved in "Child placement", a child should never be placed into a home with a pair of "Heterosexual" men as to deny any child the "Basic human rights" to be endowed with a mother in the child's most indelible years of their lives. Only a female mother can provide a child with such compassion, nurturing, bonding, and care. Any other argument to the contrary is irrelevant, off topic, and wrong, but common sense left our governing process long ago. Your post above is all over the road and full of rationalizations, assumptions, and ignorance.
Los Angeles

Long Beach, CA

#231333 Jun 25, 2014
Why are so many Mexicans Anti-Christ? Thy certainly don't act the way Jesus would act. CA prison has over 70% hispanics.
long beach flippers

Covina, CA

#231335 Jun 25, 2014
Why does a idiot from LA keep posting stupid racists comments #213333 - long beach, ca..
Water Wars

Northampton, MA

#231336 Jun 25, 2014
Los Angeles wrote:
Why are so many Mexicans Anti-Christ?.
What about Israel?
L il dog whatsis yaya

San Francisco, CA

#231340 Jun 25, 2014
HOO-EEEEi!
I knowed you was goin to get it right. all kids has got to be kept by the keeper for the priests and reverends to teach them the rapture. now this hurts and sometimes you end up being mean and rreal weirdo drunk all your life after, but that is the truth the way and the light. Join us in the Teaparty4ever! If you get over it, the rapture, you got a shot runnin for election office. Then you can skreeew a whole bunch in reevenge all at once.
Git

Honolulu, HI

#231341 Jun 25, 2014
Los Angeles wrote:
Why are so many Mexicans Anti-Christ? Thy certainly don't act the way Jesus would act. CA prison has over 70% hispanics.
They will falsify belief in God, Jesus Christ and knowledge of enough scripture OR the old 'codex of gentlemanly conduct". This is how they attract their victims. The real 'codex' from Spain is especially beautiful and attractive. It is the basis of the Mexican 'codex'. It is Extremely RARE to meet anyone who truly "serves" with this codex.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#231342 Jun 25, 2014
Los Angeles wrote:
Why are so many Mexicans Anti-Christ? Thy certainly don't act the way Jesus would act. CA prison has over 70% hispanics.
Obama doest want the educated immigrant, that is why he has allowed all those kids in the country, now instead of helping our poor, we have to take care of Central America's poor. Same with the Mexican immigrant, it's all about the votes.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#231343 Jun 25, 2014
TrueAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit it. You don't think a hetero sexual couple, who can't produce children, should be able to raise children. Adoption, in-vitro, surrogates, egg donors, sperm banks, none of that should exist for anyone. If you cannot reproduce than you should not be able to get married at all, in your opinion. What about elderly couples, or fertile hetero sexual couples who choose not to get married? After all if marriage is all about reproduction, then why should heterosexual couples be allowed to make the choice not to have kids?
Dang, you are a perfect example of a 'rational atheist' oxymoron!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Mon Regolith Based Li... 153
News Teens protest legislation (Mar '06) Sun Indo frank 213
Anything to do in Hemet for teenagers? Sep 25 David F Miller 3
Black People in Hemet (Jan '10) Sep 25 Nasty spill 483
Hemet Domestic violence. . bad and getting worst. Sep 24 Vic_Rode 58
Man assaults kids at McDonalds-east florida on ... (Jul '13) Sep 24 Vic_Rode 290
Hemet wife beaters (Jul '14) Sep 24 Dr Kruer MD 37

Hemet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages