Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 9,313)

Showing posts 186,241 - 186,260 of199,073
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#214998
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
All I see from you are unsupported claims and one sided biased opinions.
That's the one fact about you we HAVE established.
That's all we see from you.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#214999
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Jbird666 wrote:
<quoted text>Sup dummy? Still trying to find your azz, try using both hands.
No. Never was. How are you doing with it? Find it yet? Here's a hint. Just take off your hat.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215000
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
"Ten to 15 percent of couples in the United States are infertile."
Source;
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/infertility/...
---OK idiot. How does your shoe taste???
So 85 to 90% are fertile. Compared to 100% ss couples who are mutually sterile.

You were saying.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215001
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
'Social scientists'...LOL!!!
Marriages exist without kids in many cases you dolt.
You're more f-ed up than someone thinking he's going to enter his German shepherd as an entry to win the Boston Marathon.
Get your facts straight and bring proof to your baseless claims next time idiot.
Already posted them. Look back idiot.
Mikey

Chatsworth, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215011
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Maggot Maggie is a hating c(_)nt, you just revealed your true colors bub...rot with Kimare.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215012
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Err...
...same sexed couples are made up of individuals whom represent the whole and are fertile genius.
http://www.census.gov/hhes/fertility/
That's why I said 'mutually sterile' idiot.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215014
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
DOH!
You missed on that dart throw idiot - I'm not gay but think what you want.
P.S.....gay couples can often adopt those children cast out by their own parents because their biological mommy and daddy units wanted to eradicate themselves of their offspring.
I swear....you could wear 2 sets of Depends, have a cork shoved no less than 3" up your ass and grease your butt, legs and feet with a mix of Crisco and Pam cooking spray and you'd still manage to shit on yourself with these DUMBASS comments you make.
ROFL!!!!!!!!
You are clearly gay.

Nothing you said explains requiring children.

Every kid I know prefers their mother and father. Both, not a duplicated fake.

Idiot.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215015
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Natural families?
Families consist of gay and straight couples, including those with kids moron.
Unfortunately for you your efforts at inventing a new terminology based on your messed up system of thought doesn't exist.
Disagree???
Find just one reference to a "default family" you f-ing IDIOT.
Just one.
-Tick tock...the clock is running.
Stay with the game you started.

Can't?

You lose.

Idiot.
The match continues

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215016
Sep 7, 2013
 
September 07, 2013.

Attended the Judy Chu event in Claremont, California (5) speakers ate up time allotted by Judy Chu.

That left only 20 minutes to be used by attendee's asking questions.

September 07, 2013.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215018
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Err...
...there are no like studies given "default families" DON'T EXIST SHITFORBRAINS.
LOL!!!
Good GOD you're dumber than a porcupine thinking it's going to mate with a balloon animal.
Look it up.
EVERYONE else knows what they are.
Idiot.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215023
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Well....if you're to say couples of gays are 'mutually sterile' you're stating that both members in a gay couple cannot have kids.
Riiight???
So what happens? When Tony hooks up with Bob do his testicles fall off?? Do Bob's sperm shrivel up and die about the same time Tony's nuts turn into SunMaid raisins?
How about when Susan and Ann get married. Does Ann's ovaries shoot out of her body like cannon balls? Do Susan's fallopian tubes tie themselves into an internal pretzel???
Listen IDIOT. Gays are just as fertile as the rest of the population. If Tony wants a biological kiddy to carry on the family name he better find a surrogate mother given Bob ain't gonna deliver but Tony is just as fertile. Ann can get pregnant through artificial insemination or other means.
BLOWS YOUR MIND doesn't it.
So your statement of gays are infertile because they ARE gays is about as bright as claiming the Sun God burned your TV dinner after you left your Swanson turkey and stuffing Hungry Man feast on high in the microwave for 3 hours and 2 minutes.
PULL YOUR HEAD OUTTA YOUR ASS sunshine. PLEASE.
I was wrong.

You're not gay.

You are a blonde lesbian.

Then they are not mutual anymore, are they.

Idiot.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215026
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
The objection is that five individuals, in eccense over turned not only the votes, twice, of millions of Californians, but created a new definition of a significant social institution.
Pietro...

If millions of Californians voted to ban all gun sales in the state, would you agree that the Supreme Court should let their decision stand?

Of course not. There is a Constitutional Amendment that allows for gun ownership.

There is also a Constitutional Amendment that doesn't allow for parts of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Just because millions of people express an opinion at the polls does not mean that they can overturn the Constitution.

The only way to change the Constitution is by way of amendment. There is no amendment barring same-sex marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215027
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey sister....it's your words; 'mutually sterile'.
So now I'm a blonde lesbian.
Right on.
Wait around long enough and you'll claim I'm a bi-sexual llama wearing a pair of crotchless lace trimmed panties.
Now you've gone and shocked me.

LOL

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215028
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
On what basis would society in the end end because anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning? Another poster proved that wrong already. At the most society would waddle, not come to the end.
You are like a worm on hot cement. You twist and turn and twirl, trying to slim out of the corners your denial puts you. I'm not here to support your lies. I'm here to protect marriage and children.
You are getting your ass kicked from every side VV.
Kimare,

Let me try to put this in a manner that you understand. Let's look at history.

Throughout the history of mankind, anal sex has been practiced among straight and gay individuals. It has been going on since the onset of this country. In fact it was probably even more prevalent in history since it was a common means of birth control. There were no condoms. There were no birth control pills. People had to figure out a way early on to have sexual intercourse without always getting knocked up. Now how do you think they did it?

If anal sex were so unhealthy and demeaning, we wouldn't have come this far. Mankind would have ended long ago.

The facts do not support your idea.

Now, let's talk about the contemporary world we live in. In our society anal sex between consenting adults is legal. And none of your bluster and scare tactics will end that.

Finally, please take your attention off my ass. I've seen your photo. You are short. I don't care for short men. And I particularly don't care for short men who are morons. I have standards--none of which you meet.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215029
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

8

8

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Games?
Like making up terms and asking the other party to 'prove' their non-existent claims are not real???
Ohhh brother.
LOL!!!!
One of Kim's favorite games is to create facts when reality stands in his way. It's where his contrived one-liners come from. They're like canned laughter on an old sitcom.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215032
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>they turned over the votes that were unconstitutional, as is their job.
no, that definition was already there, they just stopped all those californians from breaking their own constitution...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Propo... (2000)

Prior to 1977, marriage was defined in Section 4100 of the California Civil Code. This stated that marriage is "a personal relation arising out of a civil contract, to which consent of the parties making that contract is necessary".[6] While related sections of the law made references to sex, a State Assembly committee that was debating adding sex-specific terms to this section in 1977 noted: "Under existing law it is not clear whether partners of the same sex can get married".[7] That year, the legislature amended the legal definition of marriage to remove any ambiguity. In 1992 the legal definition of marriage was moved from the Civil Code to Section 300 of the Family Code.
When Proposition 22 came before voters, marriage was defined in the Family Code as "a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary" [italics added].[8]
Even though the definition governing who may marry explicitly precluded contracting a same-sex marriage in California, a separate provision, Section 308, governed recognition of marriages contracted elsewhere. This stated that a "marriage contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted is valid in this state".[9] Advocates of Proposition 22 described Section 308 as a "loophole", apparently forcing California to recognize a same-sex marriage validly contracted in some other state.[10]
To address this, Proposition 22 did not reword the existing provisions of the Family Code, but added to them the declaration that "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California".[11] The official citation of Proposition 22, the "California Defense of Marriage Act", is almost the same as that of a federal law, the Defense of Marriage Act, which was enacted by Congress in 1996. This federal law had a similar purpose, and was intended to prevent any state from being obligated to recognize a same-sex marriage contracted in another state.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215033
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Pietro...
If millions of Californians voted to ban all gun sales in the state, would you agree that the Supreme Court should let their decision stand?
Of course not. There is a Constitutional Amendment that allows for gun ownership.
There is also a Constitutional Amendment that doesn't allow for parts of the Defense of Marriage Act.
Just because millions of people express an opinion at the polls does not mean that they can overturn the Constitution.
The only way to change the Constitution is by way of amendment. There is no amendment barring same-sex marriage.
The problem with that analogy is you chose a specific constitutional right. Marriage isn't me tinned in the constitutional at all. Californians went to the polls to maintain a definition of a legally recognized relationship which had existed since the birth of the State, even earlier than that. The voters did amend the state constitution, per established procedure. If the vote had gone the other way, would any SSM advocate object to the process?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215034
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Natural families?
Families consist of gay and straight couples, including those with kids moron.
Unfortunately for you your efforts at inventing a new terminology based on your messed up system of thought doesn't exist.
Disagree???
Find just one reference to a "default family" you f-ing IDIOT.
Just one.
-Tick tock...the clock is running.
".....inventing new terminology"? Like "homosexual", "heterosexual" , "gay" to refer to "homosexual"? Not exactly terms that are centuries old.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215035
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>oh wow1 totally biased report for a totally biased foundation...
so not even one social scientist to cite from? not even one?
Gee why not quote HRC, not any bias there......oh Madone! So it only "bias" when it eminates from sources you dislike, but not "bias" when you like the source? Got it, IMAPP bad, HRC good. Thanks Woody for the intellectual honesty.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215037
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Jbird666 wrote:
<quoted text>What wrong sugarnipples, Still confused about what sex you are?
No. You?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 186,241 - 186,260 of199,073
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

16 Users are viewing the Hemet Forum right now

Search the Hemet Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 8 min Activity 15,657
Why is hemet racist ?!? 1 hr Farout 7
sad sad sad:/ 1 hr Sofia 9
Front Yard Junk 5 hr Peevin 7
LA FITNESS Membership Sales People (Feb '12) 12 hr MuffenTop 38
Edy's Placed Closed by Health Department 12 hr Hugo 2
el toro markets busted! (Jul '13) 12 hr End of YOUR World 47
•••
•••

Hemet News Video

•••
Hemet Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Hemet Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••