Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#205756 Jul 30, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Creep.
I agree 100%. Kimare does sound creepy doesn't he?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#205757 Jul 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Its a piece of paper.
Everyone knows reality smashes paper.
Smirk.
Your "reality" isn't worth the imagined paper it's written on.

You could shack up with a woman for 50 years. You could be totally monogamous, been a perfect partner, an excellent father to your offspring, etc. But if you don't have that "paper"--you know the one that you say "reality smashes"--you don't get to call yourself "married". You don't get the protections and benefits of marriage.

I think you've just defiled yourself again.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205758 Jul 30, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree 100%. Kimare does sound creepy doesn't he?
Tell me honestly if you dare. Who is the creep Kimare, or someone whose sole purpose here including his profile name is to stalk Kimare?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205759 Jul 30, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Your "reality" isn't worth the imagined paper it's written on.
You could shack up with a woman for 50 years. You could be totally monogamous, been a perfect partner, an excellent father to your offspring, etc. But if you don't have that "paper"--you know the one that you say "reality smashes"--you don't get to call yourself "married". You don't get the protections and benefits of marriage.
I think you've just defiled yourself again.
Actually in nine states you do.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#205760 Jul 30, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you've just defiled yourself again.
I thought I could smell something rotten. Of course it would be ole KiMare.
Koch rot

Covina, CA

#205761 Jul 30, 2013
The 2014 midterm election cycle has not even officially started yet and already here's a taste of corporate and special interest election spending according to FEC filings:
•Lockheed Martin:$870,500
•American Bankers Association:$861,000
•Goldman Sachs:$530,500
•Altria (Philip Morris's parent co.):$475,215
•Exxon Mobil:$344,500
•JP Morgan Chase:$268,000
•NRA:$178,000

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#205762 Jul 30, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I could write a book "Obama is hiding under your bed!"
You would buy it :)
Stupid you, people have built and used storm shelters since they first settled in the Midwest. If you had a clue, you might understand. And if you realized where the headquarters of the U.S. Strategic Command was located during the cold war. it might further educate you.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#205763 Jul 30, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I could write a book "Obama is hiding under your bed!"
You would buy it :)
The only book I would buy from you would be "Why do I lie so much?"
Farm Bill 2013

Covina, CA

#205764 Jul 30, 2013
This month released “Farm Vote Follies,” a list of the 46 Republican House members who abandoned the interests of taxpayers by voting against at least nine out of 16 reform amendments to the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, better known as the 2013 Farm Bill.

The legislation, which was defeated by a vote of 195-234 on June 20, failed to provide sufficient reform of the federal government’s labyrinthine, outdated, and wasteful agricultural policies, and several lawmakers offered worthy reform amendments, only to see their efforts shot down.

In many cases, those amendments – which included reforms to the sugar program, which enriches a tiny number of sugar processors at the expense of consumers and sugar-using manufacturers; the Market Access Program, which pays for commodity producers to market their wares overseas and is currently paying for a reality television fashion show in India; and crop insurance, which cost taxpayers a record $14 billion in fiscal year 2012 – were defeated with an assist from Republicans whose putative fiscally conservative values vanished when opportunities to serve special interests arose.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#205765 Jul 30, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>The only book I would buy from you would be "Why do I lie so much?"
I don’t need to lie, I have the luxury of being right

Look around at others that claim people say what they have not said, those are the ones that are admitting defeat by being dishonest.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#205766 Jul 30, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I don’t need to lie, I have the luxury of being right
Look around at others that claim people say what they have not said, those are the ones that are admitting defeat by being dishonest.
LOL..
Farm Bill 2013

Covina, CA

#205767 Jul 30, 2013
Anything's better than what's been posted before this one:

This month released “Farm Vote Follies,” a list of the 46 Republican House members who abandoned the interests of taxpayers by voting against at least nine out of 16 reform amendments to the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, better known as the 2013 Farm Bill.

The legislation, which was defeated by a vote of 195-234 on June 20, failed to provide sufficient reform of the federal government’s labyrinthine, outdated, and wasteful agricultural policies, and several lawmakers offered worthy reform amendments, only to see their efforts shot down.

In many cases, those amendments – which included reforms to the sugar program, which enriches a tiny number of sugar processors at the expense of consumers and sugar-using manufacturers; the Market Access Program, which pays for commodity producers to market their wares overseas and is currently paying for a reality television fashion show in India; and crop insurance, which cost taxpayers a record $14 billion in fiscal year 2012 – were defeated with an assist from Republicans whose putative fiscally conservative values vanished when opportunities to serve special interests arose.
laughing man

Pulaski, TN

#205768 Jul 30, 2013
I've been reading the story about Detroit homes that list for a dollar but aren't sold, and passing through the parts about the decay made me think of Mikey the Stain.

Detroit has its rot, and now Civilization as a whole has too, thanks to SCROTUS and the Common Man.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-23812...
Farm Bill 2013

Covina, CA

#205769 Jul 30, 2013
July 30, 2013

Anything's better than what's been posted before this one:

This month released “Farm Vote Follies,” a list of the 46 Republican House members who abandoned the interests of taxpayers by voting against at least nine out of 16 reform amendments to the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, better known as the 2013 Farm Bill.

The legislation, which was defeated by a vote of 195-234 on June 20, failed to provide sufficient reform of the federal government’s labyrinthine, outdated, and wasteful agricultural policies, and several lawmakers offered worthy reform amendments, only to see their efforts shot down.

In many cases, those amendments – which included reforms to the sugar program, which enriches a tiny number of sugar processors at the expense of consumers and sugar-using manufacturers; the Market Access Program, which pays for commodity producers to market their wares overseas and is currently paying for a reality television fashion show in India; and crop insurance, which cost taxpayers a record $14 billion in fiscal year 2012 – were defeated with an assist from Republicans whose putative fiscally conservative values vanished when opportunities to serve special interests arose.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#205770 Jul 30, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I don’t need to lie, I have the luxury of being right
Look around at others that claim people say what they have not said, those are the ones that are admitting defeat by being dishonest.
LOL

“Building Better Worlds”

Since: May 13

Europa

#205771 Jul 30, 2013
Koch rot wrote:
The 2014 midterm election cycle has not even officially started yet and already here's a taste of corporate and special interest election spending according to FEC filings:
•Lockheed Martin:$870,500
•American Bankers Association:$861,000
•Goldman Sachs:$530,500
•Altria (Philip Morris's parent co.):$475,215
•Exxon Mobil:$344,500
•JP Morgan Chase:$268,000
•NRA:$178,000
so what ? It's called "THE FIRST AMENDMENT". Obviously you're a liberal, since you are implacably opposed to The First Amendment.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205772 Jul 30, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Your "reality" isn't worth the imagined paper it's written on.
You could shack up with a woman for 50 years. You could be totally monogamous, been a perfect partner, an excellent father to your offspring, etc. But if you don't have that "paper"--you know the one that you say "reality smashes"--you don't get to call yourself "married". You don't get the protections and benefits of marriage.
I think you've just defiled yourself again.
Wrong.

Many countries have no legal 'paper'.

Government involvement involves only limited 'benefits and protections'. Most benefits and protections are outside government control.

You make the ridiculous assertion that a piece of paper is the primary element of marriage. How romantic...

The bottom line is this;

A mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage has a piece of paper that claims they are the same as married couples.

LOL
youtubeNews

AOL

#205773 Jul 30, 2013
.

ISRAEL to give POPE "Custody" of Temple Mount --

http://youtu.be/Qt9kEQB4ti8

.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#205776 Jul 30, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
learn to read, I didn't say national recognition liar
I said federal recognition, which they have, every legally preformed same sex marriage is recognized legally on the federal level.
You should learn to be more specific, when you post. Your statement leaves the implication that SSM is legal at all over the country. More propaganda. If you were interested in posting accurate truths, you would have said "at the state level and recognized by the Fed", not a broad, sweeping post like "at the state and federal level". This second one makes it sound like it's a national institution, which it is not. Funny, though, that none of the other posts got a response from you. Just this one......
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#205777 Jul 30, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
No they cant go around the Constitution and cant defy it....THAT IS WHAT THE STATE BANS ARE DOING....WHY SCOTUS NEEDS TO GET RID OF THEM THEY DEFY THE CONSTITUTION.
No, they do not, as the Constitution does not enumerate any mariage rights. It leaves the power to make such laws up to the individual states.
Can't defy what isn't there....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is San Jacinto Dangerous? (Jun '10) May 21 Meg H 35
Whats the deal on the mushroom house in homeland? (Jan '10) May 21 Liz G 20
hookers in Hemet (Sep '11) May 21 Liz G 134
The under ground tunnel , Florida ave. downtown... (Oct '11) May 21 Leesa 93
hans christensen middle school. (Mar '10) May 21 Ladymorgana 32
Rancho LA Vita HOA: Unfair!! (Jun '14) May 21 ceci 3
Hemet Mystery Hunt May 19 Madbro 3

Hemet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages