Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
177,101 - 177,120 of 200,331 Comments Last updated 2 hrs ago
LaVerne

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204378
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

This type of behavior is well known in the Republican, GOP, RNC and Tea Party circles.
Douglas Tessitor and his side kick Gene Murabito are avid followers of this type of bullying behavior too.

Glendora, California city council men..
http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2013/07/22/haz...

The following announcement popped up, but the moderator allows death threats, racist rants etc. to be posted by their favorite political friends.

In fact this Blog moderator has worked hand in hand with these thugs also!

Please refrain from posting profanity or offensive material.
Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204379
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
page after page of pointless bigoted posts..you never once mention anything of love and commitment between two people, the REAL reason that people get married. If procreation is the only thing that matters to you, then marry a turkey baster.
You hit the point right on the head!

My wife means more to me than our ability to have children

My wife means more to me than sex

I would stay with my wife regardless of our ability to have children, or even the ability to have sex.

Our marriage means a whole lot more to us than that.

It makes me sad that some of these people cannot think past the biological function, that their marriages mean no more to them than that alone.

No wonder they think that same sex couples marrying will weaken their marriages, their marriages are so weak to start with.
Huh

Owatonna, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204380
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Time for SCOTUS to do away with UNCONSTITUTIONAL same sex marriage bans and just make it legal nation wide...HATE AND BIGOTRY CANT BE LAW.
Clean Water

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204381
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

The new Silicon Valley Advanced Water Purification Center will open this fall, but due to public perceptions, the water from the plant will be diverted for use in fire hydrants, landscaping and electrical fountains instead of homes.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204382
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Huh wrote:
Time for SCOTUS to do away with UNCONSTITUTIONAL same sex marriage bans and just make it legal nation wide...HATE AND BIGOTRY CANT BE LAW.
well although I agree in general, I understand why they did not.

Roe V Wade

Although I certainly agree with the Roe V Wade decision, its pushing it on every state all in one moment in time, made it a hot button political issue that was a rallying cry for those opposed to women’s right to their own reproductive system.

By allowing the states to come to the right decision on their own, and in their own time on same sex marriage, they are undercutting the politics.

Pressure is mounting on these states to do the right thing, large businesses are re-considering where they will do business, where to locate offices in states that do not recognize the marriages of their employees.

By having the states come to the right decision in their own time, it becomes a more natural state.

It will happen, but it will take some time

Take this recent victory as a win-win, not only is same sex marriage recognized in California, but more importantly, it is recognized on the federal level with the changes to DOMA

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204383
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Load of nonsense. In any event, my relationship isn't required to have a connection to the very roots of human existence. Neither is anyone elses.
<quoted text>
I would disagree, but ultimately it's irrelevant since it isn't required to.
<quoted text>
No fruit is required from marriage. Never has been never will be. And your fruit is rotten, no one wants it.
<quoted text>
Yes. Yes you are.
<quoted text>
You seem to think that I give a shit what you think about my relationship and the relationship of other gays. You would be mistaken. I only care what the state and the federal government say. They say my marriage is the same as yours and that you aren't special. They trump you. They always will.
<quoted text>
Perhaps that made up word, just like all your other made up phrases simply demonstrates how desperate you are. Nothing more.
Have a good day you pathetic c*nt.
A gay in a dress who thinks denial and vulgarity make an argument, and a piece of paper makes a marriage.

So silly honey.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204384
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

guest wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for proving my point. You responded exactly as predicted.
No problem! You're very welcome. Thanks for proving mine.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204385
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

guest wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you here? Please answer that question. I realize it may be difficult to answer HONESTLY, but please do so.
You first, troll. Why are you here posting dopey stuff?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204386
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

guest wrote:
<quoted text>
It appears you are desperately trying to distract from the fact that you have serious issues in your own life. People sometimes do that when they are struggling with who or what they are.
It appears you are desperately trying to distract from the fact that you are a moronic troll with mental health issues.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204387
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

guest wrote:
<quoted text>
People agreeing with your opinions does not make them facts.
You learned that fast! Real proud of you.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204388
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

-SNAFU- wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes indeed my good sir! Bingo,and welcome California the 13th state to pass marriage equality. Isn't it about time this thread came down? I mean the question has been settled once and for all. Finished.Over.Done,forever.... .;)
Aw shuddup Bill you dopey jackass! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204390
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
...You brought up barrenness again, so I will remind you again, that argument was laughed at in the supreme court,
They politely laughed at a bad joke about old people procreating.
SCOTUS is not vengeful like you. They don't laugh at people.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204391
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
A gay in a dress who thinks denial and vulgarity make an argument, and a piece of paper makes a marriage.
So silly honey.
This coming forma person that only thinks of a wife as a sex receptacle and baby producing appliance.

Being called vulgar by you is a complement.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204392
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You lie.
I brought up far more than barrenness.
A bad ruling cannot change the vast and numerous distinctions between marriage and SS couples.
Moreover, not only was there not agreement about procreation, the bare majority flew in the face of previous SCOTUS rulings.
No piece of paper can equate distinct relationships. And that is ALL SS couples have.
What a crybaby!!

I'm still married. The state and the federal government confirm that. They trump you. They always will. Not a damn thing you can do about it!

Smile.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204393
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
They politely laughed at a bad joke about old people procreating.
SCOTUS is not vengeful like you. They don't laugh at people.
I said that laughed, and so did you, thank you for validating my point.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204394
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to think that I give a shit...
"You seem to think that I give a shit..." Jonah1 angrily replied in a 200 word rant.

Priceless.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204395
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The distinction exists only in your head. Because your a moron.
*you're
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204396
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You hit the point right on the head!
My wife means more to me than our ability to have children
My wife means more to me than sex
I would stay with my wife regardless of our ability to have children, or even the ability to have sex.
Our marriage means a whole lot more to us than that.
It makes me sad that some of these people cannot think past the biological function, that their marriages mean no more to them than that alone.
No wonder they think that same sex couples marrying will weaken their marriages, their marriages are so weak to start with.
Oh spare us.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204397
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I said that laughed, and so did you, thank you for validating my point.
My point was that you are a vindictive. And yes I did validate it.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#204398
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
VV, marriage has always defined a distinct relationship among all cultures.
You mean like when marriage defined the wife as property of the husband? Like that "distinct" relationship?! I love when fundies try and rewrite history in order to justify their agendas!!!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Laws limited involvement has historically been directly related to procreation within marriage.
Doubtful, but even if, so what? Historical context is irrelevant. It always will be. You have no argument.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That potential has never needed a 'demand'.
More importantly, that potential has never been a necessity.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That is why marriage needs protection to prevent procreation where ss couples need protection to HAVE sex.
BBBZZZZZTTTTTT. Utter bullshyt alert. If marriage needed protection, then those arguing for your side would be able to demonstrate what it needs protection from. To date they have been completely unable to do that.

Your creepy obsession with gay people's sex needs no comment.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Courts are denying the essence of marriage in the face of a massive denial and herd mentality.
Courts dont' recognize your manufactured and ridiculous "essence of marriage". Courts are only interested in the law. And the courts find no compelling reason to continue to discriminate against gay people. Sucks for you.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
We simply and honestly point out the distinctions between the relationships and the consequences of that denial.
You've pointed out ONE distinction. That gay people won't be capable of producing a child without outside assistance. That distinction is completely irrelevant to the states, since marriage has no procreation requirement.

The fact that you are completely unable to grasp this reality isn't our problem, it's yours child.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are terrified people will wake up.
There is absolutely nothing in your nonsense that terrifies us. You are completely insignificant. Your refusal to acknowledge our marriages means diddly squat, because you are nothing more than a pimple on the face of humanity.

10 years ago there were no states that would recognize our marriages. Today there are 13 states, the Disctrict of Columbia, and 17 foreign countries that recognize our marriages as the same as yours. And those numbers will continue to grow, very quickly. The state bans will very soon be overturned as unconstitutional (watch Pennsylvania very close in the coming months sweetiepie!!!). The only one terrified....is you!!!!

The states, and the federal government will NEVER recognize your made up essences, your imaginary link to humanities existence and future, or your mutual sterility!!!! Ha ha ha ha haha ha!!!! Stupid KiMare!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

14 Users are viewing the Hemet Forum right now

Search the Hemet Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 24 min Acme Pest Control 15,916
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 2 hr Abrahem 7,841
Black Hair salon in hemet 5 hr run 44
Vacationing family loses thousands in bicycle t... Wed Donny B 5
topix needs to remove ads Wed ads 5
Annoying Teachers! (Aug '11) Wed underpaid 72
Illegal immigrants in Menifee Wed thot 13
•••
•••

Hemet News Video

•••
Hemet Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Hemet Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hemet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hemet
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••