Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201481 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

pico pico

Covina, CA

#204724 Jul 25, 2013
No it was red rooster.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204725 Jul 25, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Because the government doesn't have an interest in "conjugality" within a marriage unless one of the people in the marriage brings the issue before a court. Polygamy and incest have both been addressed by the government. They have specifically created laws against polygamy and incest.
If you have a problem with that, then take it up with the courts.
Conjugality as in "husband and wife", its not simply a reference to coitus.

We both know polygamy is following the blazing trail left by ssm, so why deny it? Its all one big happy marriage equally tent.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204726 Jul 25, 2013
well wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit! You are here primarily because you have a fear and hatred of gay men...you don't seem to have a problem with lesbians. You have spent a few years lying about why you are here. Why not try to be honest for a change?
So it's 'hate' hiding behind reality.

Kind of convenient for one of us, don't you think?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204727 Jul 25, 2013
POOF wrote:
<quoted text>ROFLMAO, He's all about Jebus
Oh, it's Jesus now, and not hate?

Anything else besides reality?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204728 Jul 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Having children is a primary purpose of marriage.”– Heup v. Heup (Was. 1969) 172 N.W.2d 334, 336
“[M]arriage exists as a protected legal institution primarily because of societal values associated with the propagation of the human race.”– Singer v. Hara (Wash. App. 1974) 522 P.2d 1187, 1195.
<quoted text>
Just one man, and one woman, in thirty plus states.
<quoted text>
As long as they entered into a legally recognized u ion of husband and wife, valid in all fifty states, they are married.
<quoted text>
But treated, and acknowledged as different. A veggie patty is now a "burger". A man can be a lesbian too.
then explain to me why we allow injured veterans to obtain marriage licenses when it is a medical fact that they cannot procreate or consummate?

I know the reason already of course, there is no legal requirement

But with your wrong interpretation of the law, how do you explain it?

they are acknowledged, by both state and federal law, and a majority of voters as well. Not that they need anyone else’s approval other than the law
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204729 Jul 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So it's 'hate' hiding behind reality.
Kind of convenient for one of us, don't you think?
Oh no, your hate hides behind your religion
Red Rooster

Covina, CA

#204730 Jul 25, 2013
Made a cock and bal mess out of it's competition.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204731 Jul 25, 2013
POOF wrote:
<quoted text>ROFLMAO, He's all about Jebus
"Jebus". I read this often from you commie pinko kumbaya dream team Christian hating fruitloops. What is the significance? "Jebus"? I don't get it.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204732 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no, your hate hides behind your religion
Calm down Miss Drama.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204733 Jul 25, 2013
"This thread is now moot" -Loudmouthed Big D two weeks ago.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204734 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
then explain to me why we allow injured veterans to obtain marriage licenses when it is a medical fact that they cannot procreate or consummate?
I know the reason already of course, there is no legal requirement.
As I already stated, husband and wife, and accepting each other as such.
But with your wrong interpretation of the law, how do you explain it?
Which law have I wrongly interpreted?
they are acknowledged, by both state and federal law, and a majority of voters as well. Not that they need anyone else’s approval other than the law
Some states have chosen to lower the bar, drop conjugality, grade on a curve, call an apple an orange, etc.
POOF

Rock Island, IL

#204735 Jul 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, it's Jesus now, and not hate?
Anything else besides reality?
Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204736 Jul 25, 2013
POOF wrote:
<quoted text> Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus,Jebus, Jebus, Jebus
What a dopey jerk.
POOF

Rock Island, IL

#204737 Jul 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What a dopey jerk.
What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk WhWhat a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerkat a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk WhWhat a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerkat a dopey jerk
POOF

Rock Island, IL

#204738 Jul 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
As I already stated, husband and wife, and accepting each other as such.
<quoted text>
Which law have I wrongly interpreted?
<quoted text>
Some states have chosen to lower the bar, drop conjugality, grade on a curve, call an apple an orange, etc.
Why?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204739 Jul 25, 2013
POOF wrote:
<quoted text>What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk WhWhat a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerkat a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk WhWhat a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerk What a dopey jerkat a dopey jerk
http://www.hark.com/clips/bsvmvxgykk-cuckoo-c...

Judged:

10

10

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204740 Jul 25, 2013
POOF wrote:
<quoted text>Why?
GET A JOB!

Judged:

10

10

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204741 Jul 25, 2013
POOF wrote:
<quoted text>Why?
Exactly Poofy, why did they reject conjugality? It just doesn't make sense.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204742 Jul 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
As I already stated, husband and wife, and accepting each other as such.
<quoted text>
Which law have I wrongly interpreted?
<quoted text>
Some states have chosen to lower the bar, drop conjugality, grade on a curve, call an apple an orange, etc.
I am not saying there will not be people like you

Folks that call black folks N.....
Folks that refer to Asians as Gooks

etc

There will always be people like you, but you will never define them in the eyes of Americans
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204743 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not saying there will not be people like you
Folks that call black folks N.....
Folks that refer to Asians as Gooks
etc
There will always be people like you, but you will never define them in the eyes of Americans
Oy vey.

Judged:

10

10

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Im curious about an area of Hemet (Nov '08) Wed tellinitlikeitis 92
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Feb 20 Regolith Based Li... 161
unlicened gardners Feb 17 tellinitlikeitis 2
Is it just me, or are people from Hemet really ... (Feb '08) Feb 17 rajaincajain 84
Homeless People Everywhere Feb 16 jasond 1
News Husband & wife accused of beating man in Calime... (Mar '16) Feb 10 tellinitlikeitis 3
The under ground tunnel , Florida ave. downtown... (Oct '11) Feb 10 tellinitlikeitis 101

Hemet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages