Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201881 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198849 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
He said, childishly.
..he said while looking in the mirror at himself.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198850 Jun 29, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>He is not impersonating the actor, he is using the name and being himself fool
Wrong, listen to the link that I gave you. He is in fact impersonating the actor " Frankie Rizzo", right down to fruitloos and fruitcake.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#198851 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
He said, childishly.
She's in tantrum mode this morning. I think the gloat drug has worn off and reality has set in.

Did I say "5 to 4" yet?

*howl*

(I'm not playing about Rose, though. I really think she's had a stroke).
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198853 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote: What works??? Mating behavior sure doesn't. Anal sex is still inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. You still have only the duplicate HALF of marriage. The kids STILL will choose mom and dad. Stamp your feet and repeat all you want, your relationship isn't marriage
<quoted text>
Naw, I'm just going to keep pointing out reality to your bogus legal ruling.
Sure annoys you for something you think is untrue...
What doctor said that anal sex is demeaning? When did having children become a requirement in marriage? Why are you clueless? Are you upset because of the rulings that SCOTUS made? Is that the problem?
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198854 Jun 29, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
She's in tantrum mode this morning. I think the gloat drug has worn off and reality has set in.
Did I say "5 to 4" yet?
*howl*
(I'm not playing about Rose, though. I really think she's had a stroke).
You obviously have lost your mind, giggle boi. Please try harder if you must post. You are making a fool of yourself. And do I look foolish? If so, you have proven my point. I was imitating that squawking trollie, Franklyn. Next.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198855 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. Try again though. You'll pop that blood vessel yet.
Frank are you still upset because Polygamy is STILL illegal? I don't know how many times we tried to explain it to you. Next time shut your pie hole and try to listen.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198856 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Nice comeback. Hows the playground?
Thanks. I know. I dunno about the playground but you're there now, why do you ask me, I'm not.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198857 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. You failed again. Squawk!
Danth's Law.
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198858 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>What doctor said that anal sex is demeaning? When did having children become a requirement in marriage? Why are you clueless? Are you upset because of the rulings that SCOTUS made? Is that the problem?
That is exactly his problem. His opinion has been over-ruled by the Supreme Court and he continues to cling desperately to his opinions, trying to fabricate some "fact". And, being the fool he is, he doesn't even realize that not all gay people even engage in anal sex! So he has failed once again to make a valid point.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198859 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong, listen to the link that I gave you. He is in fact impersonating the actor " Frankie Rizzo", right down to fruitloos and fruitcake.
So what? Makes you mad eh sizzlechest? That's what I intended it to do. Works like a charm on morons every time. So get used to it fruitcake.

P.S. Your nic is "Zorro". Spelled incorrectly of course, a nice touch.

YUK!YUK!YUK! Whoop!~Whoop! Jizzy! What a moron.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#198860 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks. I know. I dunno about the playground but you're there now, why do you ask me, I'm not.
Not what? Acting like a 3rd grader because Polygamy is still illegal? Now post back and call me fruitloops, fruitcake or spiceboy. Thats your normal responce.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198861 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Frank are you still upset because Polygamy is STILL illegal? I don't know how many times we tried to explain it to you. Next time shut your pie hole and try to listen.
Yes. Many times you morons have tried to explain to me why "marriage is a (one) man and a (one) woman only" doesn't ban polygamy but you have failed. Because prop 8 did ban polygamy. And you can't spin away that fact.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198862 Jun 29, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankie, congratulations. Way to hold up your standard of never being on topic or making a valid point.
The reality remains that existing same sex marriage bans are unconstitutional, the US Supreme Court has handed those in support of equality a powerful tool in moving forward with legal challenges, and you still don't have the ability to articulate a compelling state interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law that would render such a restriction constitutional and begin to indicate that you are not an imbecile.
If they're "unconstitutional" why didn't SCOTUS", declare them null and void?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198863 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No discord 'ma'am', just pointing out reality.
No reality in your statement KiMare. Facts don't start with "Maybe". So now not only are you intentionaly sowing discord, but you are lying as well. Your god despises your behavior. Enjoy hell. Smirk.

http://www.topix.com/forum/san-diego/TH6FC2NT...
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You lied. You are not married.
The state of Connecticut, and now the federal government, says I'm married. They have more say in the matter then you do. To say I'm not married is a lie. Your god hates people that lie.

Smile, and enjoy your trip to hell!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198864 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Could you supply the link that states.
"Anal sex is still inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning"...
Gets you hot eh, Jiz? YUK!YUK!YUK! Find your own porn perv. Google it.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#198865 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text> And do I look foolish?
Do you really want an answer to that, little girl?
racine

Los Angeles, CA

#198866 Jun 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
No... It's not an idiotic response. It's a perfectly reasonable observation.
If you believe that current marriage laws should be dictated by history, then maybe you think that other institutions and behaviors should also be supported by their almost constant presence in history.
You just don't agree with them because you realize how absurd it would be for you to try to support slavery, war, genocide, gender inequality, racial and ethnic inequality, etc.
But marriage inequality, you're willing to support that based on the history of marriage--even though you KNOW that marriage has never been the same in all cultures throughout history. Arranged marriage, plural marriage, same-gender marriage, interracial marriage, "ghost marriage", etc. are just a few of the many faces of marriage over the history of mankind.
It doesn't matter. Our Supreme Court Justices, having had all the facts argued before them by the best attorneys and legal teams in the country, came to the conclusion that it is unconstitutional to deny federal rights and protections to a married couple who happen to be comprised of same-gender individuals. They found it unconstitutional to deny benefits and protections to married, same-gender couples who have children.
And there you have it... The law is clearly on our side here. It's probably getting close to closing time around here on this particular thread.
The decision has been made. Your team lost. We were triumphant. The definition of marriage (of which there are many) now includes same-gender couples.
Poor ol' long-winded queer. Running your trap but no one to blow. Try going to Chuckee-Cheese Pizza Time Theater.., lots of gay men there you can do.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198867 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Not what? Acting like a 3rd grader because Polygamy is still illegal? Now post back and call me fruitloops, fruitcake or spiceboy. Thats your normal responce.
My normal responses trump your abnormal responses.

Anyone (you) who tries to argue that prop 8 didn't discriminate against polygamy too is a moron.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#198868 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong, listen to the link that I gave you. He is in fact impersonating the actor " Frankie Rizzo", right down to fruitloos and fruitcake.
"listen to the link" What a doofus.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198869 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You noted, as I do, that ss couples are a duplicated gendered half of marriage.
Marriage is defined as a union and an institution. The gender of the participants don't alter that. The union has still taken place. There is no half union dear. You really should learn how the English language works.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Interracial marriage has been prevalent across human history with brief points of conflict.
Wow, there's a pointless statement. Historical prevalence is not an argument. If it were, women would still be property. It's 2013 plebe, do try and keep up.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Ss couples being called married has never been accepted across the history of a single culture.
Completely irrelevant. You seem to be hung up on acceptance. Your acceptance and the acceptance of other bitches like you is irrelevant!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Moreover, race differences don't affect the essence of mating behavior. SS couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
More lies from KiMare. Your god despises your behavior. The "essence of mating behavior" is irrelevant. There are no mating prerequisites as related to the institution of marriage. And gays can mate just fine. That's already been proven. Your not accepting the true definitions of mating is irrelevant.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I admitted no such thing. I simply quoted the SCOTUS assertion, and mocked it.
Hmmmm. What's another term for using mockery? Oh, I know....sowing discord.

Enjoy hell! It's where all the other hypocritical fundamentalists Christians will be plebe!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Sep 26 Regolith Based Li... 153
News Teens protest legislation (Mar '06) Sep 25 Indo frank 213
Anything to do in Hemet for teenagers? Sep 25 David F Miller 3
Black People in Hemet (Jan '10) Sep 25 Nasty spill 483
Hemet Domestic violence. . bad and getting worst. Sep 24 Vic_Rode 58
Man assaults kids at McDonalds-east florida on ... (Jul '13) Sep 24 Vic_Rode 290
Hemet wife beaters (Jul '14) Sep 24 Dr Kruer MD 37

Hemet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages