Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
172,581 - 172,600 of 200,552 Comments Last updated 5 hrs ago

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198353
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not angry?
Nope, not at all. I've just exposed your intentional deceitfulness on two posts. I'm happy as can be.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You might want to do some checking of your own, you are looking pretttty stupid right now...
Nope, the only one looking stupid right now is the one who stated that there are "procreation constraints" to marriage and who stated that there are studies being currently conducted that are looking for "cures" to homosexuality.

That would be you stupid. Repeatedly asked to support you ridiculous claims, you have ducked and weaved and fundie-twirled around the issues because you can't support your statements. Instead, you just issue character assaults, an act that your Sky Santa has stated he despises.

Carry on plebe!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If that is not a dress, it must be a slip you are wearing...
And you want to call other people stupid? LOL. Let us know when you are capable of supporting your claims KiMare. Until then, we can only assume that you will continue ranting on about animated characters because you got nothing else. Stupid cow.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198354
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is what hasn't changed;
Ss couples are only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not the same.
Do you want a sympathy card?
Smile.
When you buy a dictionary, the first word you should look up is "clearly". It's evident from your posts that you clearly don't have a clue as to how to properly employ it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198355
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sugarlips, pointing out that you have ASSumed things you don't have any clue about (like my feelings and opinions on matters that I've never uttered a word) isn't expressing anger, it's simply demonstrating your complete lack of integrity. So sorry you dislike that, but, tough shyt.
In which post were you discussing marriage equality and not trying to represent multiple marriages as being the same as a singular marriage. Please provide the post number.
Many of my best on topic posts have been censored away (look at all the missing post numbers) but here's a few that weren't deleted: 197823 197827 197818 197835 197824 197903 197925 197919 197852 197854
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198356
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of several states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198357
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you want a sympathy card?
Smile.
Sowing discord. Jesus hates you bitch!

Smile.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198358
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sugarlips, pointing out that you have ASSumed things you don't have any clue about (like my feelings and opinions on matters that I've never uttered a word) isn't expressing anger, it's simply demonstrating your complete lack of integrity. So sorry you dislike that, but, tough shyt.
Spice boy, you're angry. And about 4 posters have told you so. When one person tells you something about yourself, you can shine it on, when two people tell you, you should start listening, When three or more people tell you, you better start believing.

You are angry.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198359
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
When you buy a dictionary, the first word you should look up is "clearly". It's evident from your posts that you clearly don't have a clue as to how to properly employ it.
Off topic ad hominem nonsense.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198360
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, not at all. I've just exposed your intentional deceitfulness on two posts. I'm happy as can be.
<quoted text>
Nope, the only one looking stupid right now is the one who stated that there are "procreation constraints" to marriage and who stated that there are studies being currently conducted that are looking for "cures" to homosexuality.
That would be you stupid. Repeatedly asked to support you ridiculous claims, you have ducked and weaved and fundie-twirled around the issues because you can't support your statements. Instead, you just issue character assaults, an act that your Sky Santa has stated he despises.
Carry on plebe!
<quoted text>
And you want to call other people stupid? LOL. Let us know when you are capable of supporting your claims KiMare. Until then, we can only assume that you will continue ranting on about animated characters because you got nothing else. Stupid cow.
Angry off topic drivel.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198361
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no such thing as ss couples being married.
The state and the federal government say otherwise. Since rights are extended by them, and not KiMare, I'll take their word over yours. Whether you think ss couples can be married is COMPLETELY IRRELAVENT! You are nothing.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a fake relationship trying to masquerade as the most unique human relationship in existence.
Yawn!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198362
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Folks, for those of you who are interested, this is a clear example of what "denial" looks like.
A person is presented with undeniable facts and he believes the opposite is true.
It's sad when your world comes crashing down around you and all you can turn to is delusional thinking.
It's called the fundie-twirl! It's a requirement for people that think that everything written in that ridiculous Christian bible is actual truth!!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198363
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sugarlips, pointing out that you have ASSumed things you don't have any clue about (like my feelings and opinions on matters that I've never uttered a word) isn't expressing anger, it's simply demonstrating your complete lack of integrity. So sorry you dislike that, but, tough shyt.
In which post were you discussing marriage equality and not trying to represent multiple marriages as being the same as a singular marriage. Please provide the post number.
Poly marriage is marriage too. It is not off topic in a discussion of marriage. Duh. Your anger at it's mere mention speaks volumes.

Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage.
Anonymous

Vallejo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198364
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

2016: Chris Christie blasts gay-marriage ruling
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/chris-c...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198365
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sowing discord. Jesus hates you bitch!
Smile.
And you say you're not angry. And you complain of my posts being off topic when I attempt to discuss marriage equality without your fear, anger, ridicule and attempts at censorship.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198366
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you take joy in good people not being allowed to marry? Isn't that what you have been fighting for?
Oh hell, I know why. It's because you are a hypocrite.
The ONLY joy I take is repeatedly pointing out to you that this had NOTHING to do with polygamy, you flaming dumbass. Now go take another pain pill and OD.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198367
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I buy it. It's not crap. Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as SSM.
Then find a forum where others are interested in it. This one isn't it. Oh, and please Sally, before you start your tired routine, a lack of interest does not imply disapproval or approval. Play your routine somewhere else.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198368
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

What harm would a loving marriage of three men cause Jonah1 or anyone else?
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198369
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Poly marriage is marriage too.
Not in the USA it isn't. Are you stuck on stupid?
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198370
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
And you say you're not angry. And you complain of my posts being off topic when I attempt to discuss marriage equality without your fear, anger, ridicule and attempts at censorship.
aw.......... here's a tissue.
If you don't wish to be ridiculed, stick to the topic.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198371
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamy deserves the same respect that same sex marriage does. Spin that, troll.
Next.
We aren't required to spin it pussy. It's been made very clear to you that it isn't an issue of interest. That does not imply or convey approval or disapproval of any type. The majority of people in this sting have made it quite clear to you. We aren't interested in a discussion about polygamy.

But, because you're a complete asshat, you continue to pretend that our lack of interest means more than it does. Because you got nothing else, and quite frankly, because it appears that stirring the kettle in Topix appears to be your only source of interaction with other human beings.

You have stated your point. You believe polygamy deserves respect. Great for you. We have stated our point - we aren't here to discuss polygamy. If we wanted to discuss polygamy, we would find a string and other Topix members that were intentionally seeking to discuss this issue. What we wouldn't do is hijack an existing string about one thing (same-sex marriage) in order to steer it to be about something else (polygamy). That would be rude.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198372
Jun 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Then find a forum where others are interested in it. This one isn't it. Oh, and please Sally, before you start your tired routine, a lack of interest does not imply disapproval or approval. Play your routine somewhere else.
No. This is a perfectly good marriage equality forum. You are the problem, not I. All we've seen from you is angry irrelevant ad hominem.

As far as a lack of interest, that's not true. Witness you, vv, rose Feratu and Big D et al interest in my posts. Not only interest but PASSION!

Hope that helps junior.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Hemet Discussions

Search the Hemet Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 4 hr Dragonflyer 15,928
McDonalds 7 hr tye 1 4
EBT Cards 19 hr TellThem 3
HEMET: Confusion over write-in votes cleared up (Nov '12) 21 hr Teabag Sanchez 10
Home Wrecker Mon mad mom 6
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Mon Mudflys to 7,901
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Mon Green Soilent 4,975
•••
•••

Hemet News Video

•••
•••

Hemet Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hemet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hemet
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••