Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Read more: www.cnn.com 201,838

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196619 Jun 18, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh he is very used to having his ass handed to him, happens here a lot
He must really enjoy it. Damn if I embarrassed myself as much as he does, I would sell my PC, and become a hermit. Brian _ G even learned his lesson.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#196620 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D says he has nothing to hide so he doesn't care that Obama snoops on him. It's OK with him.
Big D does have x-ray vision ya know.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196621 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Jizzy, if you're a "bottom hog" and male, you're gay. So yes, you did call me gay as an insult don't try to worm out of it now.
Lets see, Fruitloops, nope sorry, you are wrong.

http://www.google.com/url...
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196622 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Re-post one post where you handed my ass to me. Or you are a proven liar, like Big D.
Do I go all the way back crap, there are over 196,600 posts. Oh hell, just go back to Monday.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196626 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/union-city-ca...
com wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankie whats the biggest cock you've taken in the butt??
Frankie is a bottom hog
You are a liar Jizzy. You didn't mean dogs chasing hogs, you meant gay.
Nope, you're a bottom hog, How about a bone? What happened to the Fruitloops stuff? Why u mad bro?
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196627 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do it liar.
Look back to Monday Flunkie, I handed it to you atleast three times. Why u mad bro?
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196628 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You called me a bottom hog implying I was gay and worthy of ridicule. And you've just been caught in another lie.
Sending me a link to the rodeo won't save your dopey ass. You're a bigot and a liar.
Wow Frunkie why u mad bro? Can't sit down? Do you have a rash? Oh wait your agent orange kicked in, never mind. Relax fruitloops, its all in fun. YUK YUK YUK

http://www.google.com/imgres...
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196632 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No you didn't, liar.
Oh Frankly, Denial is not a river in Egypt. But do have a great day.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#196633 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D says he has nothing to hide so he doesn't care that Obama snoops on him. It's OK with him.
I bet he has curtains on his windows. But the fact is, privacy matters, even if you say you have nothing to hide.

If you really "have nothing to hide," then you should take the curtains out of your bedroom, and put in a camera that goes straight to a HAL 9000 computer for the world to see.

As Daniel Day Soloff wrote in the Chronicle of Higher Education, "I don't have anything to hide, but I also don't have anything I feel like showing you."

It's about things not being anyone else's damn business.

Soloff added that Joseph Stalin would've loved to have the power Obama has over the citizenry.

The question is where will Obama go with this power?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#196634 Jun 18, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the irony, they want to deny others freedom, while demanding their own freedoms, all in the name of their religion.
Hippocrates to the core
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>So do you think Frankie,KiMare and the rest will see that?
No FLUKING way said da Pope
Dumb and dumber.

I rarely address the religious basis for marriage.

I kind of enjoy the hissy fit when I point out the social science basis;

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.

No violation of freedom, no religion. Just a clear distinction between the two relationships.

Now, watch the pink brigade show up.

Smile.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#196638 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I tried to tell Big D whether or not you have something to hide is not the point. He had no response, just pulled his disappearing act like he always does when stressed.
Who knows what kind of stress he is going through living in Methdesto.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#196639 Jun 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Dumb and dumber.
Yes, you are.
KiMare wrote:
I rarely address the religious basis for marriage.
I kind of enjoy the hissy fit when I point out the social science basis;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
No violation of freedom, no religion. Just a clear distinction between the two relationships.
Now, watch the pink brigade show up.
Smile.
It's not hard to disprove your assertions because it is so amazingly infantile.

Does the state allow infertile heterosexual couples to legally marry?

Is procreation possible outside the legal protections of marriage?

If so your entire argument is down the drain.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#196642 Jun 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
I rarely address the religious basis for marriage.
I kind of enjoy the hissy fit when I point out the social science basis;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
No violation of freedom, no religion. Just a clear distinction between the two relationships.
Now, watch the pink brigade show up.
Smile.
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you are.
<quoted text>
It's not hard to disprove your assertions because it is so amazingly infantile.
Does the state allow infertile heterosexual couples to legally marry?
Is procreation possible outside the legal protections of marriage?
If so your entire argument is down the drain.
'I' made no assertions. I simply stated the scientific basis for the social constraint of marriage.

You noted a minor exception the law allows for numerous reasons.

You then note a mating behavior consequence with detrimental results that the constraint of marriage is meant to protect from.

Care to try again?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#196643 Jun 18, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you are.
<quoted text>
It's not hard to disprove your assertions because it is so amazingly infantile.
Does the state allow infertile heterosexual couples to legally marry?
Is procreation possible outside the legal protections of marriage?
If so your entire argument is down the drain.
Hey lides,

Noticed you ignored the main point of the post with a ad homoan attack.

You okay with your buddies falsely portraying our position?
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196644 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You sound like you have visited that dusty little sh!thole. I have had that unfortunate experience myself.
Had a g.f. there her brother was a meth cook named "Rock". Sketchy as they come. It all ended badly as you might expect. Oy. The little head was doing all the thinking in those days...
Let me guess you met her in the rice paddies in Nam right

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#196645 Jun 18, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you are.
<quoted text>
It's not hard to disprove your assertions because it is so amazingly infantile.
Exactly, infants.....you're catching on.
Does the state allow infertile heterosexual couples to legally marry?
As long as the couple, OPPOSITE SEX regardless of self identified sexual orientation, is willing to accept each other as HUSBAND AND WIFE, the state will allow them to marry.
Is procreation possible outside the legal protections of marriage?
So is love, sex, and cohabitation. Your point is? Society benefits when sex, and procreation take place within the marital relationship between husband and wife.
If so your entire argument is down the drain.
Crazy, I know but marriage is a union of both sexes. The state can declare a veggie patty burger, but that doesn't make it a hamburger.
Perp Walk

Monrovia, CA

#196646 Jun 18, 2013
Of course Judge Luis A. Lavin said the public interest would not suffer if the plant were to operate in the meantime?

Has this judge lost all the brain cells in his head?

This of course is America and we are still talking about California?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196648 Jun 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the irony, they want to deny others freedom, while demanding their own freedoms, all in the name of their religion.
Hippocrates to the core
<quoted text>
Dumb and dumber.
I rarely address the religious basis for marriage.
I kind of enjoy the hissy fit when I point out the social science basis;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
No violation of freedom, no religion. Just a clear distinction between the two relationships.
Now, watch the pink brigade show up.
Smile.
It doesn’t matter if you address it or not, we all know where your opinion comes from, we all know where the money comes from

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#196650 Jun 18, 2013
KiMare'a wrote;

Dumb and dumber.
I rarely address the religious basis for marriage.
I kind of enjoy the hissy fit when I point out the social science basis;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
No violation of freedom, no religion. Just a clear distinction between the two relationships.
Now, watch the pink brigade show up.
Smile.
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn’t matter if you address it or not, we all know where your opinion comes from, we all know where the money comes from
So you deduced I got my evolutionary proof from the Bible?

AND, there is money there? Damn, I'll split it with you if you help me find it!

What other conspiracy theories do you follow???
sheesh

Washington, DC

#196653 Jun 18, 2013
Okay you two, you're slipping a bit...
sheesh wrote:
<quoted text>
With D*ck Cheney's approval.
Yup, D*ck won't get through the sweary filter in here.
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Right! Anything illegal or immoral or underhanded that Obama does is Bush or Cheney's fault.
Disclaimer: Obama is really wonderful, just kidding ha ha. Michelle is too!
Where exactly did I assign blame to the Bush or Cheney? I simply said Cheney approved of the monitoring. I'd think that would make those who supported the last administration like Obama.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>If Dick Cheney was doing half what the great Obama is doing, you liberals would be protesting nude in the streets. But Obama snooping is good snooping...LOL
And where exactly did I voice approval of "Obama snooping?"

A little reading and comprehension wouldn't be out of line in here some time would it?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Come on already! 5 hr Big 9Nailer 2
Brittany CROUCH Mar 30 tellinitlikeitis 2
Review: Cindy's Pawn Mar 29 phoenix 4
kevin duffy (Aug '09) Mar 27 tellinitlikeitis 8
Lou Pittam's Store (Apr '10) Mar 26 Chris 3
Black teens loitering outside E. Hemet stores (Jul '11) Mar 23 ignorancekillsus 40
bradley rd. Mar 23 DMJBF 3
More from around the web

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]