Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#196521 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No Jizzy. Pointing out someone's ad hominem is not ad hominem you big silly galoot! But do try again.
I see when you say this "Only dumb-ass posters like yourself. " Its not ad hominem.

An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of against their argument.[2] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as an informal fallacy,[3][4][5] more precisely an irrelevance

Lets see you called him/her a dumbass. Thats a personal attack. Unless you are Frankie, then its his choice.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#196522 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
The moron Jizzy or Zoro or whatever his sock of the hour is thinks we should not give marriage equalitiy to polygamists because some of them are fundamentalists. And you agree it seems.
Frankie, can you show me any group of Polygamists that do not base polygamy on religion or religious faith or religious doctrine?

If we as a Nation start changing or adding laws based on religion which religion shall we use?
laughing man

Luton, UK

#196523 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
YUK!YUK!YUK! Funny.
Anybody else making such a tirade would be met with hypocritical screaming of "hater!"

When all of a sudden did the tweens start running the world?
laughing man

Luton, UK

#196524 Jun 18, 2013
Zero wrote:
<quoted text>I see when you say this "Only dumb-ass posters like yourself. " Its not ad hominem.
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of against their argument.[2] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as an informal fallacy,[3][4][5] more precisely an irrelevance
Lets see you called him/her a dumbass. Thats a personal attack. Unless you are Frankie, then its his choice.
When are you going to give proper credit for your copy and pastes, Zero?

Your fellow zeros never call you on that, another example of your kind never taking out the trash.

Get outta my neighborhood, plagiarist.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#196525 Jun 18, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
When are you going to give proper credit for your copy and pastes, Zero?
Your fellow zeros never call you on that, another example of your kind never taking out the trash.
Get outta my neighborhood, plagiarist.
Do you know how to use google? Look it up ?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196526 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Frankie, can you show me any group of Polygamists that do not base polygamy on religion or religious faith or religious doctrine?
If we as a Nation start changing or adding laws based on religion which religion shall we use?
FSM!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196527 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>I see when you say this "Only dumb-ass posters like yourself. " Its not ad hominem.
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of against their argument.[2] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as an informal fallacy,[3][4][5] more precisely an irrelevance
Lets see you called him/her a dumbass. Thats a personal attack. Unless you are Frankie, then its his choice.
WOW! Very good Jizzy! We're real proud of you! You cut and pasted the definition of ad hominem after you looked it up. Bet you feel all smart and sh!t.
leaking

Covina, CA

#196528 Jun 18, 2013
For all the unfortunate residents who live near the City of Vernon, California.

That have been told that some "Crack Head Judge" has allowed the battery recycling plant "Exide Batteries" to reopen after it was shut down for contaminating the area with Arsenic, Lead and Acids.

Hundreds of health issues and deaths are attributed to the battery recycling plant in Vernon, California.

The Judge who signed the back to work order for this plant doesn't live anywhere near the dangerous toxic emission either.

The City Manager and Fire Chief of Vernon California lives in Glendora, California where is his morality and religion?

Since a large population of Latin's live in the surrounding cities etc. just goes to prove the City of Vernon and the L.A. City Council doesn't either don't really care about them at all.

Another emergency order can be had to over ride and shut down the Exide Battery plant down, politician's get off your brain you sit on all day.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196529 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Frankie, can you show me any group of Polygamists that do not base polygamy on religion or religious faith or religious doctrine?
If we as a Nation start changing or adding laws based on religion which religion shall we use?
According to the best estimates there are half a million of them, I can't show them to you because they are busy going to work and sh!t and don't have time to come here just to satisfy your moronic self.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196530 Jun 18, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
When are you going to give proper credit for your copy and pastes, Zero?
Your fellow zeros never call you on that, another example of your kind never taking out the trash.
Get outta my neighborhood, plagiarist.
Jizzy cannot even cut and paste properly he has no idea you should give someone credit for their words. Or back up his bullsh!t. The lad is a dope.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196531 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Do you know how to use google? Look it up ?
That's not how it works dummy. You make a bullsh!t claim YOU back it up, you don't expect your reader to do prove your point for you, the burden is on you. Not them. Duh.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196532 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Frankie, can you show me any group of Polygamists that do not base polygamy on religion or religious faith or religious doctrine?
If we as a Nation start changing or adding laws based on religion which religion shall we use?
http://www.polygamyday.com/questions/
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#196533 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the best estimates there are half a million of them, I can't show them to you because they are busy going to work and sh!t and don't have time to come here just to satisfy your moronic self.
So you pulled the half a million out your butt. You say that you are all for Polygamy, but can't back up your posts. WOW Frankie, you are lame.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196534 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Frankie, can you show me any group of Polygamists that do not base polygamy on religion or religious faith or religious doctrine?
If we as a Nation start changing or adding laws based on religion which religion shall we use?
Jizzy, think about it. You are saying that polygamy shouldn't be allowed because some polygamists are religious.

Why don't you say same sex marriage should not be allowed because some people in a same sex marriage are religious?

Hope that helps you understand your bigotry, but I doubt it. You are not very bright.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#196535 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Isn't Polygamy simply a Mormon thing?
Not at all. Of course, Mormon polygamists believe in polygamy, but naturally, they do not define meaning of polygamy in general. A number of different religions accept the morality of polygamy, from Muslims to even including non-Mormon, Bible-believing Christians. Indeed, the modern polygamy movement got its national impetus and success from the new movement called, Christian Polygamy. See ChristianPolygamy.INFO for more about this new phenomenon. Be sure to also read the History of the Christian Polygamy Movement there. Even non-religious secular polygamy gets its political strength from the fact that now evangelical Christians are advocating polygamy too.

http://www.polygamyday.com/questions/
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#196536 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not how it works dummy. You make a bullsh!t claim YOU back it up, you don't expect your reader to do prove your point for you, the burden is on you. Not them. Duh.
Posting the definition for you, was my way of showing you that you did not understand the definition. Glad I could help.
Zoro

Rock Island, IL

#196537 Jun 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Jizzy, think about it. You are saying that polygamy shouldn't be allowed because some polygamists are religious.
Why don't you say same sex marriage should not be allowed because some people in a same sex marriage are religious?
Hope that helps you understand your bigotry, but I doubt it. You are not very bright.
You are asking to change a law based on religion. There is no law that says you have to be religious to be married. One more time, what religion shall we then base our laws on?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196538 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>So you pulled the half a million out your butt. You say that you are all for Polygamy, but can't back up your posts. WOW Frankie, you are lame.
98.3% of statistics are made up on the spot 94.7% of the time
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196539 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>You are asking to change a law based on religion. There is no law that says you have to be religious to be married. One more time, what religion shall we then base our laws on?
We could go with Volcano worship, toss the occasional virgin into the fire.

But I still think FSM is the best bet. You have been touched by his noodley appendage.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#196540 Jun 18, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't Polygamy simply a Mormon thing?
Not at all. Of course, Mormon polygamists believe in polygamy, but naturally, they do not define meaning of polygamy in general. A number of different religions accept the morality of polygamy, from Muslims to even including non-Mormon, Bible-believing Christians. Indeed, the modern polygamy movement got its national impetus and success from the new movement called, Christian Polygamy. See ChristianPolygamy.INFO for more about this new phenomenon. Be sure to also read the History of the Christian Polygamy Movement there. Even non-religious secular polygamy gets its political strength from the fact that now evangelical Christians are advocating polygamy too.
http://www.polygamyday.com/questions/
Jizzy, you continue to base who should be allowed to marry on religion. A clear violation of the First Amendment.

How bigoted is it for you to decide polygamy shouldn't be allowed because some polygamists are religious? That's ignorant. Stop it dummy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gay priest from Redlands discusses sexuality, r... (Feb '15) Nov 29 Mike 11
Are black people afraid of if crosswalks? (Jan '12) Nov 28 Regolith Based Li... 22
young gay guys in hemet (Oct '14) Nov 28 tellinitlikeitis 17
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Nov 26 Realest 154
Menifee- will it take a turn for the worst? (Aug '09) Nov 23 Pantiks 92
Doctors in area Nov 20 Shelly92 1
morning sky school in mountain center ca (Mar '13) Nov 16 ATTENTION 47

Hemet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages