Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196416 Jun 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He wants to talk about poly and incest, he doesnít want to talk about same sex marriage, the religious and bigotry involved in the case or anything else that actually is related to Prop 8. He certainly does not want to talk about the overturn of Prop 8 itself.
Poly and incest are his only interests, he will censor anyone trying to talk about any aspect of Prop 8 that is not about poly or incest ( which of course have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Prop 8 )
Someone created a poly thread for him, but he doesnít post there, as his obsession is to derail same sex marriage topics.
He will attempt to censor anyone discussing the religious influence against same sex marriage or any other aspect that does not have to do with either Poly on Incest
His censorship speaks volumes about his motives.
Your off topic problem is religion.

I don't think poly MARRIAGE is off topic in a discussion of MARRIAGE. You want to censor it away and it makes you angry because you don't like polygamy but you realize you can't say that without revealing your hypocrisy. Same with that troll Jizzy, or whatever his sock of the day is called.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196417 Jun 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He wants to talk about poly and incest, he doesnít want to talk about same sex marriage, the religious and bigotry involved in the case or anything else that actually is related to Prop 8. He certainly does not want to talk about the overturn of Prop 8 itself.
Poly and incest are his only interests, he will censor anyone trying to talk about any aspect of Prop 8 that is not about poly or incest ( which of course have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Prop 8 )
Someone created a poly thread for him, but he doesnít post there, as his obsession is to derail same sex marriage topics.
He will attempt to censor anyone discussing the religious influence against same sex marriage or any other aspect that does not have to do with either Poly on Incest
His censorship speaks volumes about his motives.
I have never attempted censorship. You are a liar.

Sure I have complained about your obsession with religion but only in retaliation to your constant whining about poly being off topic.
I have not screamed for censorship like you or created derogatory troll threads like Jizzy and VV and others of your ilk.("ilk" stole that from you clowns!)

Why so angry about the mere mention of other forms of marriage in a discussion of marriage equality? The only reason I see is hypocrisy. That's on you. Don't get angry at me for it.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196418 Jun 17, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your off topic problem is religion.
I don't think poly MARRIAGE is off topic in a discussion of MARRIAGE. You want to censor it away and it makes you angry because you don't like polygamy but you realize you can't say that without revealing your hypocrisy. Same with that troll Jizzy, or whatever his sock of the day is called.
Post away, talk about Poly, go for it, have at it, let it fly, don't let us hold ya back. Stand on your soap box and let it rip. Do it, just don't say that you will, now do it.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196419 Jun 17, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>

I don't think ....
You are under the wrong assumption that anyone cares what you think. I was making a comment to someone else, not you
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196420 Jun 17, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said, ridicule.
Hey if you wan't to marry your sisters, OK by me. Have at it, let it in, go with it, do it sunshine.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#196421 Jun 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He wants to talk about poly and incest, he doesnít want to talk about same sex marriage, the religious and bigotry involved in the case or anything else that actually is related to Prop 8. He certainly does not want to talk about the overturn of Prop 8 itself.
Poly and incest are his only interests, he will censor anyone trying to talk about any aspect of Prop 8 that is not about poly or incest ( which of course have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Prop 8 )
Someone created a poly thread for him, but he doesnít post there, as his obsession is to derail same sex marriage topics.
He will attempt to censor anyone discussing the religious influence against same sex marriage or any other aspect that does not have to do with either Poly on Incest
His censorship speaks volumes about his motives.
I know, hey let him post. we don't have to answer
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196422 Jun 17, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never attempted censorship. You are a liar.
Sure I have complained about your obsession with religion but only in retaliation to your constant whining about poly being off topic.
I have not screamed for censorship like you or created derogatory troll threads like Jizzy and VV and others of your ilk.("ilk" stole that from you clowns!)
Why so angry about the mere mention of other forms of marriage in a discussion of marriage equality? The only reason I see is hypocrisy. That's on you. Don't get angry at me for it.
Iím not angry at anyone, wanted to see if you would lie and you didnít disappoint

so you are saying you have never said "off Topic" when someone was talking about religion and their influence opposed to same sex marriage?

I donít need to look it up, everyone here knows you are lying, I donít care if you do or not.:D

You are like a puppet, pull this string and you dance.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196423 Jun 17, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>I know, hey let him post. we don't have to answer
Yeah he gets really mentally constipated when you donít answer too :)

The Supreme Court did the AZ voting law decision today, I think they are clearing the books and will wait until the end to do DOMA and I suspect Prop 8 last, not sure if it will be this week or next.

Although to me, I think DOMA is really the more important one in the long term, Federal recognition is on the table with that one.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196425 Jun 17, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Post away, talk about Poly, go for it, have at it, let it fly, don't let us hold ya back. Stand on your soap box and let it rip. Do it, just don't say that you will, now do it.
Glad you finally realize what an ass you've been.

I'll trust you to keep your juvenile crap on the troll threads you made against me and stop butting in here with your inanity when I try to discuss marriage equality.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196426 Jun 17, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Hey if you wan't to marry your sisters, OK by me. Have at it, let it in, go with it, do it sunshine.
Like I said. Ridicule. It's like me saying hey if you wanna marry your boyfriend it's OK by me.

Why if I said that it would be hateful bigotry but when you say it it's not? Because you are a hypocrite.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196427 Jun 17, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>I know, hey let him post. we don't have to answer
It's not that you don't have to answer, it's that you can't.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196428 Jun 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Iím not angry at anyone, wanted to see if you would lie and you didnít disappoint
so you are saying you have never said "off Topic" when someone was talking about religion and their influence opposed to same sex marriage?
I donít need to look it up, everyone here knows you are lying, I donít care if you do or not.:D
You are like a puppet, pull this string and you dance.
I'm not going to entertain your liar straw man. Either give me good reasons poly and incest marriage shouldn't be allowed or stop lying. Preferably both.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196429 Jun 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are under the wrong assumption that anyone cares what you think. I was making a comment to someone else, not you
For someone who says they don't care about what I think, you sure care about what I think! And my posts elicit spirited, albeit dumb and angry responses from you. Funny that.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#196430 Jun 17, 2013
Damn Rizzo Whizzo still flapping about anything but the TOPIC...go figure. Samesh!t different day. Later.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196431 Jun 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah he gets really mentally constipated when you donít answer too :)
The Supreme Court did the AZ voting law decision today, I think they are clearing the books and will wait until the end to do DOMA and I suspect Prop 8 last, not sure if it will be this week or next.
Although to me, I think DOMA is really the more important one in the long term, Federal recognition is on the table with that one.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/w...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196432 Jun 17, 2013
Imprtnrd wrote:
Damn Rizzo Whizzo still flapping about anything but the TOPIC...go figure. Samesh!t different day. Later.
You're off topic. I understand that you have no argument, but better to remain silent until you get one rather than just post dumb nonsense like that and prove you have no argument.

Tell me your argument for being against marriage equality. Don't just troll.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#196433 Jun 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He wants to talk about poly and incest, he doesnít want to talk about same sex marriage, the religious and bigotry involved in the case or anything else that actually is related to Prop 8. He certainly does not want to talk about the overturn of Prop 8 itself.
Poly and incest are his only interests, he will censor anyone trying to talk about any aspect of Prop 8 that is not about poly or incest ( which of course have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Prop 8 )
Someone created a poly thread for him, but he doesnít post there, as his obsession is to derail same sex marriage topics.
He will attempt to censor anyone discussing the religious influence against same sex marriage or any other aspect that does not have to do with either Poly on Incest
His censorship speaks volumes about his motives.
http://m.sltrib.com/sltrib/mobile3/56282277-2...

While the Supreme Court ponders the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, activists along the political spectrum are voicing their opinions on monogamy's core institution and whom it should include. Most miss the following point: DOMA doesn't just prohibit gay marriage by defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It also prohibits plural marriage by limiting it to one and one.

The plural marriage movement is real. An estimated 50,000 to 150,000 polygamous families already live in America, from the well-publicized Muslims and Mormons to the African and Vietnamese immigrants keeping up their cultural ways. From modern feminists looking for a better work/life balance, to family traditionalists, who maintain that any marriage is better than none in the fight against the rising tide of single parents, cohabitation, and divorce.

Over 500,000 others identify as polyamorous, and engage in "ethical non-monogamy" ó loving, committed, concurrent, consensual relationships with multiple partners.

The push for non-monogamous marriage reveals some unexpected bedfellows: Everyone from former presidents to the remarried elderly couple next door. Experts say that 30 to 60 percent of married people in the U.S. will commit adultery over the course of their 'exclusive, dyadic relationships,' producing a form of de facto polygamy. Thousands of others will actually marry a second, sometimes even a third person, albeit after a legal divorce from their original spouse.

The rise of no-fault divorce has made "polygamy on the installment plan" more and more common for adults of all ages. Whether it's de facto polygamy in the form of adultery, or serial polygamy with no-fault divorce, we as Americans have already broken the sanctity of the "couple."
Big D

Modesto, CA

#196434 Jun 17, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're off topic. I understand that you have no argument, but better to remain silent until you get one rather than just post dumb nonsense like that and prove you have no argument.
Tell me your argument for being against marriage equality. Don't just troll.
There it is, he will try to censor anything that is not what he wants to talk about.:)

Best bet.. Ignore the loser
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196435 Jun 17, 2013
Most miss the following point: DOMA doesn't just prohibit gay marriage by defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It also prohibits plural marriage by limiting it to one and one.

Excerpt from Pietro's link for all the clowns that scream at me when I mention this simple fact. Big D especially.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#196437 Jun 17, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
http://m.sltrib.com/sltrib/mobile3/56282277-2...
While the Supreme Court ponders the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, activists along the political spectrum are voicing their opinions on monogamy's core institution and whom it should include. Most miss the following point: DOMA doesn't just prohibit gay marriage by defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It also prohibits plural marriage by limiting it to one and one.
The plural marriage movement is real. An estimated 50,000 to 150,000 polygamous families already live in America, from the well-publicized Muslims and Mormons to the African and Vietnamese immigrants keeping up their cultural ways. From modern feminists looking for a better work/life balance, to family traditionalists, who maintain that any marriage is better than none in the fight against the rising tide of single parents, cohabitation, and divorce.
Over 500,000 others identify as polyamorous, and engage in "ethical non-monogamy" ó loving, committed, concurrent, consensual relationships with multiple partners.
The push for non-monogamous marriage reveals some unexpected bedfellows: Everyone from former presidents to the remarried elderly couple next door. Experts say that 30 to 60 percent of married people in the U.S. will commit adultery over the course of their 'exclusive, dyadic relationships,' producing a form of de facto polygamy. Thousands of others will actually marry a second, sometimes even a third person, albeit after a legal divorce from their original spouse.
The rise of no-fault divorce has made "polygamy on the installment plan" more and more common for adults of all ages. Whether it's de facto polygamy in the form of adultery, or serial polygamy with no-fault divorce, we as Americans have already broken the sanctity of the "couple."
Bravo!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
HELP STOP UNJUST PERSECUTIONS of TAXPAYERS over... 9 hr Un agenda 21 and ... 22
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) May 21 Facepalmnative 104
FUBU Clothing Company is Racist (Oct '12) May 18 left them in the ... 48
hemet is heaven (Mar '10) May 17 uknowwho 20
Earthquake? Did anyone feel that? May 15 kuntakinte 8
stolen!!! 1983 sportscoach motorhome May 12 sas98029 4
News Theater Complex, Bowling Alley Coming to Menife... (May '14) May 12 Lady Morgana 15
More from around the web

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]