Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 8,459)

Showing posts 169,161 - 169,180 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193849
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Laws against polygamy predate laws against same-sex marriage by a century. What you're implying is that if Prop. 8 had not passed and if DOMA hadn't been legislated, then polygamy would be legal. And that isn't the case.
No that's not what I am implying. You are wrong, where did you get that idea?

I am stating that prop 8 prohibits polygamy as much as it does SSM.
You disagree?
sheesh

Union Bridge, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193850
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

laughing man wrote:
As we all know, the homosexists claim that "everybody" supports them, when in reality all that backs them are crooked politicians and the Common Man.
But don't take my word for it. Here's the lowest common denominator in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
With people like that on their side, who needs enemies?
Mash those smilies until Death, dimwits.
Here are some bright sparks for you. You wanna rub elbows with them?
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193851
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
By George, I think you've finally gotten it! Polygamy isn't my issue. I don't support it.
MLK you ain't! He fought for freedom for all races, not just his favorite one.

So you are saying marriage equality should not be for polyamorists too? Is that equality? No of course it's not.

So, the bottom line is you don't really support marriage equality. You just want more of the same. Rights only for marriages you approve of.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193852
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

sheesh wrote:
<quoted text>
Here are some bright sparks for you. You wanna rub elbows with them?
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://toddkinsey.com/blog/2011/10/10/tea-par...
laughing man

Tempe, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193853
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

sheesh wrote:
<quoted text>
Here are some bright sparks for you. You wanna rub elbows with them?
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
I struck a nerve, as always.

I'm laughing at you, Brainiac.
laughing man

Tempe, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193854
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
No, not the Occutards!!!!

*snicker*
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193855
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

It is CHILD ABUSE when Government licensed organizations DISCRIMINATE against LITTLE CHILDREN who believe membership in the Boy Scouts should be limited to boys who are morally straight. Please write your Congressman! DEMAND the tax exempt status of the Boy Scouts of America be ENDED NOW.

Ronald

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Feb 13

Is A Reality

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193858
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you distinguish pedophiles who molest only boys from those who molest only girls?
There's no need to make that distinction, given that it is a sex crime, not a consensual act.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193859
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
So you make an unsubstantiated claim and then quit. Brilliant.
Dismissed.
Sorry honey, you were already dismissed for ignorant, outrageous statements about children and family.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193860
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
So you don't accept adoption as society accepts adoption. Adoptive parents are not parents in your world. They are less than. Be sure to tell that to Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.
I accept adoptive parents exactly as society and social science does.

As I stated, they are one of several default options, specified as so by the word 'adoptive' preceding the word parent.

According to numerous broad and long term studies they fail to measure up to parents on the average.

You are the one denying the distinctions and the broad based disadvantages to the child because "children are adaptive".

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193861
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
Here is the disappointing reality of all this gay twirl.
A ss couple will only ever be only a duplicated HALF of marriage.
Nothing can change that.
You can't force people to deny that reality.
A law or a piece of paper cannot change it.
The result can ONLY be another fruitless gay encounter.
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha! You're a riot.
You don't get to decide "reality."
I am married. We are both husbands. Nothing you can say can ever matter to those facts.
But I kind of enjoy that it bothers you so much.
I see no difference between what you said and I said.

Care to clarify?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193862
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you distinguish pedophiles who molest only boys from those who molest only girls?
Tony C wrote:
<quoted text>
Clearly you need to do your research on pedophilia. We all know these answers already.
Come back when you are better prepared for a debate.
Honey, why don't you simply educate me?

I'd really love to hear it from you.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193863
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
If you read my post it would be clear. There are only pedophiles. There is no distinction between those pedophiles who molest only boys and those who molest only girls. Legally, there is no difference and medically/psychologically there is no difference.
There is to the boys and the girls.

And they are distinct pedophiles.

Surely it would be wise to label the gender danger a pedophile represents?

Or are you suggesting we leave a child at risk to be politically correct?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193865
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No that's not what I am implying. You are wrong, where did you get that idea?
I am stating that prop 8 prohibits polygamy as much as it does SSM.
You disagree?
How can it prohibit something that was already against the law? That's like saying Californians passed a proposition to outlaw murder.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193866
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is to the boys and the girls.
And they are distinct pedophiles.
Surely it would be wise to label the gender danger a pedophile represents?
Or are you suggesting we leave a child at risk to be politically correct?
Then should we distinguish between Catholic pedophiles and non-Catholic pedophiles? Should we distinguish football coach pedophiles and non-football coach pedophiles?

There is nothing politically correct about the current laws and medical diagnoses.

What you're suggesting is ridiculous. You know it; I know it; everybody reading your posts knows it.

Give up, hater. Go back to "church school".

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193867
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
MLK you ain't! He fought for freedom for all races, not just his favorite one.
So you are saying marriage equality should not be for polyamorists too? Is that equality? No of course it's not.
So, the bottom line is you don't really support marriage equality. You just want more of the same. Rights only for marriages you approve of.
Maybe this will help you to understand... I support marriage equality for same-gender couples and opposite-gender couples. I do not support polygamy.

Your continuous and contrived astonishment of my position on this issue does not sway me.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193868
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
How can it prohibit something that was already against the law? That's like saying Californians passed a proposition to outlaw murder.
Many states defense of marriage acts prohibit same sex marriage which was already prohibited.

I'm sorry if you feel polyamorists are horning in on your suffering, but they are suffering exactly the same as you. And they deserve the same relief that you demand.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193869
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Then should we distinguish between Catholic pedophiles and non-Catholic pedophiles? Should we distinguish football coach pedophiles and non-football coach pedophiles?
There is nothing politically correct about the current laws and medical diagnoses.
What you're suggesting is ridiculous. You know it; I know it; everybody reading your posts knows it.
Give up, hater. Go back to "church school".
I think that you insisting that pedophiles who molest only boys and never girls are not gay is ridiculous. But PC is ridiculous so that's that.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193870
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you distinguish pedophiles who molest only boys from those who molest only girls?
<quoted text>
Honey, why don't you simply educate me?
I'd really love to hear it from you.
All pedophiles are straight according to the PC handbook. It would be homophobic to say one was gay! But it's fine to call them all straight.

PC makes no sense, but that's the nature of it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193872
May 30, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is to the boys and the girls.
And they are distinct pedophiles.
Surely it would be wise to label the gender danger a pedophile represents?
Or are you suggesting we leave a child at risk to be politically correct?
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Then should we distinguish between Catholic pedophiles and non-Catholic pedophiles? Should we distinguish football coach pedophiles and non-football coach pedophiles?
There is nothing politically correct about the current laws and medical diagnoses.
What you're suggesting is ridiculous. You know it; I know it; everybody reading your posts knows it.
Give up, hater. Go back to "church school".
If those designations would protect the child, yes.

But you know they don't.

You also know what I suggest does protect them, and the only reason it is not used is political correctness. To the detriment of the child.

However, more than gay pedophiles jumping for joy, the Scouts are careful about opposite gender leaders in camping situations with Scouts. A responsible recognition to the power of mating behavior. Homosexuals are exempt from that temptation and discretion?

All this is just another example of homosexuals throwing common sense and children under the bus to fulfill their fantasy and denial.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 169,161 - 169,180 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

13 Users are viewing the Hemet Forum right now

Search the Hemet Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Section 8 people 4 hr The_Squall 6
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 4 hr Brian_G 7,303
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 5 hr Foes 15,669
Why is hemet racist ?!? 12 hr dave 10
Single men in Hemet 17 hr TRUTH IN COLO 11
Temecula: Three men arrested in connection with... 19 hr baby boomer 5
Front Yard Junk 21 hr Pretty_Poison 8
•••
•••

Hemet News Video

•••
•••

Hemet Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••